Debian bug report logs - #1634
revision should be package_revision

Package: gsfonts; Reported by: Erick Branderhorst <branderhorst@fgg.eur.nl>; Done: Ian Jackson <iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk>.

Message received at debian-bugs-done:


From cus.cam.ac.uk!iwj10 Tue Oct 10 12:23:08 1995
Return-Path: <iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk>
Received: from pixar.com by mongo.pixar.com with smtp
	(Smail3.1.28.1 #15) id m0t2kGa-000I1pC; Tue, 10 Oct 95 12:23 PDT
Received: from bootes.cus.cam.ac.uk by pixar.com with SMTP id AA06968
  (5.67b/IDA-1.5 for debian-bugs-done-pipe@mongo.pixar.com); Tue, 10 Oct 1995 12:22:45 -0700
Received: by bootes.cus.cam.ac.uk 
	(Smail-3.1.29.0 #36) id m0t2kG3-000C0XC; Tue, 10 Oct 95 20:22 BST
Received: by chiark
	id <m0t2kEn-0002ZbZ@chiark.al.cl.cam.ac.uk>
	(Debian /\oo/\ Smail3.1.29.1 #29.33); Tue, 10 Oct 95 20:21 BST
Message-Id: <m0t2kEn-0002ZbZ@chiark.al.cl.cam.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 95 20:21 BST
From: Ian Jackson <iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk>
To: debian-bugs-done@pixar.com
Subject: Re: Bug#1634: revision should be package_revision

No, Revision is now a permitted name for the Package_Revision field,
and has been for a while.  This was announced on debian-devel.
Unfortunately the guidelines document is hopelessly out of date at the
moment.

Ian.

Notification sent to Erick Branderhorst <branderhorst@fgg.eur.nl>:
Bug acknowledged by developer. Full text available.
Reply sent to Ian Jackson <iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk>:
You have taken responsibility. Full text available.

Message received at debian-bugs:


From fgg.eur.nl!branderhorst Tue Oct 10 01:39:31 1995
Return-Path: <branderhorst@fgg.eur.nl>
Received: from pixar.com by mongo.pixar.com with smtp
	(Smail3.1.28.1 #15) id m0t2aDi-000BG5C; Tue, 10 Oct 95 01:39 PDT
Received: from mailgate.eur.nl by pixar.com with SMTP id AA17753
  (5.67b/IDA-1.5 for debian-bugs-pipe@mongo.pixar.com); Tue, 10 Oct 1995 01:39:02 -0700
Received: from hp750.fgg.eur.nl by mailgate.eur.nl (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA04582; Tue, 10 Oct 95 09:39:19 +0100
Message-Id: <9510100839.AA04582@mailgate.eur.nl>
Received: by hp750.fgg.eur.nl
	(1.38.193.4/16.2) id AA20018; Tue, 10 Oct 1995 09:42:55 +0100
From: Erick Branderhorst <branderhorst@fgg.eur.nl>
Subject: revision should be package_revision
To: debian-bugs@pixar.com
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 95 9:42:55 MET
Mailer: Elm [revision: 70.85]


Package: gsfonts
Version: 2.6.1-
Libc: libc.so.4.6.27

Kernel etc: Linux morris 1.2.10 #1 Tue Jun 13 18:37:28 EST 1995 i486
Reporter: repair 0.1
Subject: Package_Revision field is missing
 
$ dpkg --info gsfonts-2.6.1-2.deb
 old debian package, version 0.939000.
 size 1703146 bytes: control archive= 267, main archive= 1702866.
     150 bytes,     5 lines      control              
 PACKAGE: gsfonts
 VERSION: 2.6.1
 REVISION: 2
 MAINTAINER: Ted Hajek <tedhajek@boombox.micro.umn.edu>
 DESCRIPTION: Fonts for the ghostscript interpreter

REVISION should be Package_Revision according to Debian Guidelines

--
Erick Branderhorst@heel.fgg.eur.nl 00++10-46351542
Deparment of General Surgery (Intensive Care) University Hospital Rotterdam NL

Acknowledgement sent to Erick Branderhorst <branderhorst@fgg.eur.nl>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Full text available.
Report forwarded to debian-devel@pixar.com:
Bug#1634; Package gsfonts. Full text available.
Ian Jackson / iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk, with the debian-bugs tracking mechanism
This page last modified 07:43:01 GMT Wed 01 Nov