Debian bug report logs - #1634, boring messages

Subject: Bug#1634: revision should be package_revision
Reply-To: Erick Branderhorst <branderhorst@fgg.eur.nl>, debian-bugs@pixar.com
Resent-From: Erick Branderhorst <branderhorst@fgg.eur.nl>
Resent-To: debian-devel@pixar.com
Resent-Date: Tue, 10 Oct 1995 17:18:08 GMT
Resent-Message-ID: <debian-bugs-handler.1634.B10101715230@pixar.com>
Resent-Sender: iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk
X-Debian-PR-Package: gsfonts
X-Debian-PR-Keywords: 
Received: via spool for debian-bugs; Tue, 10 Oct 1995 17:18:08 GMT
Received: with rfc822 via encapsulated-mail; Tue, 10 Oct 1995 17:15:21 GMT
Received: from pixar.com by mongo.pixar.com with smtp
	(Smail3.1.28.1 #15) id m0t2aDi-000BG5C; Tue, 10 Oct 95 01:39 PDT
Received: from mailgate.eur.nl by pixar.com with SMTP id AA17753
  (5.67b/IDA-1.5 for debian-bugs-pipe@mongo.pixar.com); Tue, 10 Oct 1995 01:39:02 -0700
Received: from hp750.fgg.eur.nl by mailgate.eur.nl (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA04582; Tue, 10 Oct 95 09:39:19 +0100
Message-Id: <9510100839.AA04582@mailgate.eur.nl>
Received: by hp750.fgg.eur.nl
	(1.38.193.4/16.2) id AA20018; Tue, 10 Oct 1995 09:42:55 +0100
From: Erick Branderhorst <branderhorst@fgg.eur.nl>
To: debian-bugs@pixar.com
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 95 9:42:55 MET
Mailer: Elm [revision: 70.85]


Package: gsfonts
Version: 2.6.1-
Libc: libc.so.4.6.27

Kernel etc: Linux morris 1.2.10 #1 Tue Jun 13 18:37:28 EST 1995 i486
Reporter: repair 0.1
Subject: Package_Revision field is missing

$ dpkg --info gsfonts-2.6.1-2.deb
 old debian package, version 0.939000.
 size 1703146 bytes: control archive= 267, main archive= 1702866.
     150 bytes,     5 lines      control
 PACKAGE: gsfonts
 VERSION: 2.6.1
 REVISION: 2
 MAINTAINER: Ted Hajek <tedhajek@boombox.micro.umn.edu>
 DESCRIPTION: Fonts for the ghostscript interpreter

REVISION should be Package_Revision according to Debian Guidelines

--
Erick Branderhorst@heel.fgg.eur.nl 00++10-46351542
Deparment of General Surgery (Intensive Care) University Hospital Rotterdam NL

From: iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson)
To: Erick Branderhorst <branderhorst@fgg.eur.nl>
Subject: Bug#1634: Acknowledgement (was: revision should be package_revision)
In-Reply-To: <9510100839.AA04582@mailgate.eur.nl>
References: <9510100839.AA04582@mailgate.eur.nl>

Thank you for the problem report you have sent regarding Debian GNU/Linux.
This is an automatically generated reply, to let you know your message has
been received.  It is being forwarded to the developers' mailing list for
their attention; they will reply in due course.

If you wish to submit further information on your problem, please send
it to debian-bugs@pixar.com, but please ensure that the Subject
line of your message starts with "Bug#1634" or "Re: Bug#1634" so that
we can identify it as relating to the same problem.

Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message,
unless you wish to report a problem with the bug-tracking system.

Ian Jackson
(maintainer, debian-bugs)

From: iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson)
To: Ian Jackson <iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <m0t2kEn-0002ZbZ@chiark.al.cl.cam.ac.uk>
References: <m0t2kEn-0002ZbZ@chiark.al.cl.cam.ac.uk> <9510100839.AA04582@mailgate.eur.nl>
Subject: Bug#1634: marked as done (was: revision should be package_revision)

Your message dated Tue, 10 Oct 95 20:21 BST
with message-id <m0t2kEn-0002ZbZ@chiark.al.cl.cam.ac.uk>
and subject line Bug#1634: revision should be package_revision
has caused the attached bug report to be marked as done.

It is your now responsibility to ensure that the bug report is dealt
with.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I'm
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Ian Jackson
(maintainer, debian-bugs)

Received: with rfc822 via encapsulated-mail; Tue, 10 Oct 1995 17:15:21 GMT
From fgg.eur.nl!branderhorst Tue Oct 10 01:39:31 1995
Return-Path: <branderhorst@fgg.eur.nl>
Received: from pixar.com by mongo.pixar.com with smtp
	(Smail3.1.28.1 #15) id m0t2aDi-000BG5C; Tue, 10 Oct 95 01:39 PDT
Received: from mailgate.eur.nl by pixar.com with SMTP id AA17753
  (5.67b/IDA-1.5 for debian-bugs-pipe@mongo.pixar.com); Tue, 10 Oct 1995 01:39:02 -0700
Received: from hp750.fgg.eur.nl by mailgate.eur.nl (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA04582; Tue, 10 Oct 95 09:39:19 +0100
Message-Id: <9510100839.AA04582@mailgate.eur.nl>
Received: by hp750.fgg.eur.nl
	(1.38.193.4/16.2) id AA20018; Tue, 10 Oct 1995 09:42:55 +0100
From: Erick Branderhorst <branderhorst@fgg.eur.nl>
Subject: revision should be package_revision
To: debian-bugs@pixar.com
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 95 9:42:55 MET
Mailer: Elm [revision: 70.85]


Package: gsfonts
Version: 2.6.1-
Libc: libc.so.4.6.27

Kernel etc: Linux morris 1.2.10 #1 Tue Jun 13 18:37:28 EST 1995 i486
Reporter: repair 0.1
Subject: Package_Revision field is missing

$ dpkg --info gsfonts-2.6.1-2.deb
 old debian package, version 0.939000.
 size 1703146 bytes: control archive= 267, main archive= 1702866.
     150 bytes,     5 lines      control
 PACKAGE: gsfonts
 VERSION: 2.6.1
 REVISION: 2
 MAINTAINER: Ted Hajek <tedhajek@boombox.micro.umn.edu>
 DESCRIPTION: Fonts for the ghostscript interpreter

REVISION should be Package_Revision according to Debian Guidelines

--
Erick Branderhorst@heel.fgg.eur.nl 00++10-46351542
Deparment of General Surgery (Intensive Care) University Hospital Rotterdam NL

From: iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson)
To: Erick Branderhorst <branderhorst@fgg.eur.nl>
Subject: Bug#1634 acknowledged by developer (was: revision should be package_revision)
References: <m0t2kEn-0002ZbZ@chiark.al.cl.cam.ac.uk> <9510100839.AA04582@mailgate.eur.nl>
In-Reply-To: <9510100839.AA04582@mailgate.eur.nl>

This is an automatic notification regarding your bug report.

Responsibility for it has been taken by one of the developers, namely
Ian Jackson <iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk>.

You should be hearing from them with a substantive response shortly, if
you have not already done so.  If not, please contact them directly,
or email debian-bugs@pixar.com or myself.

Ian Jackson
(maintainer, debian-bugs)