Debian bug report logs - #1632
Revision should be package_revision

Package: npasswd; Reported by: Erick Branderhorst <branderhorst@fgg.eur.nl>; Done: Ian Jackson <iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk>.

Message received at debian-bugs-done:


From cus.cam.ac.uk!iwj10 Tue Oct 10 12:22:55 1995
Return-Path: <iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk>
Received: from pixar.com by mongo.pixar.com with smtp
	(Smail3.1.28.1 #15) id m0t2kGN-000IExC; Tue, 10 Oct 95 12:22 PDT
Received: from bootes.cus.cam.ac.uk by pixar.com with SMTP id AA06954
  (5.67b/IDA-1.5 for debian-bugs-done-pipe@mongo.pixar.com); Tue, 10 Oct 1995 12:22:30 -0700
Received: by bootes.cus.cam.ac.uk 
	(Smail-3.1.29.0 #36) id m0t2kG2-000C0HC; Tue, 10 Oct 95 20:22 BST
Received: by chiark
	id <m0t2kEa-0002ZbZ@chiark.al.cl.cam.ac.uk>
	(Debian /\oo/\ Smail3.1.29.1 #29.33); Tue, 10 Oct 95 20:21 BST
Message-Id: <m0t2kEa-0002ZbZ@chiark.al.cl.cam.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 95 20:21 BST
From: Ian Jackson <iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk>
To: debian-bugs-done@pixar.com
Subject: Re: Bug#1632: Revision should be package_revision

No, Revision is now a permitted name for the Package_Revision field,
and has been for a while.  This was announced on debian-devel.
Unfortunately the guidelines document is hopelessly out of date at the
moment.

Ian.

Notification sent to Erick Branderhorst <branderhorst@fgg.eur.nl>:
Bug acknowledged by developer. Full text available.
Reply sent to Ian Jackson <iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk>:
You have taken responsibility. Full text available.

Message received at debian-bugs:


From mdd.comm.mot.com!mitchell Tue Oct 10 13:17:10 1995
Return-Path: <mitchell@mdd.comm.mot.com>
Received: from pixar.com by mongo.pixar.com with smtp
	(Smail3.1.28.1 #15) id m0t2l6s-000BYAC; Tue, 10 Oct 95 13:17 PDT
Received: from motgate.mot.com by pixar.com with SMTP id AA09236
  (5.67b/IDA-1.5 for debian-bugs-pipe@mongo.pixar.com); Tue, 10 Oct 1995 13:16:43 -0700
Received: from pobox.mot.com (pobox.mot.com [129.188.137.100]) by motgate.mot.com (8.6.11/8.6.10/MOT-3.8) with ESMTP id PAA13132; Tue, 10 Oct 1995 15:16:57 -0500
Received: from mdd.comm.mot.com (mdisea.mdd.comm.mot.com [138.242.64.201]) by pobox.mot.com (8.6.11/8.6.10/MOT-3.8) with SMTP id PAA09538; Tue, 10 Oct 1995 15:16:56 -0500
Received: from bb29c.mdd.comm.mot.com by mdd.comm.mot.com (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA29482; Tue, 10 Oct 95 13:16:55 PDT
Received: by bb29c.mdd.comm.mot.com (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA29038; Tue, 10 Oct 95 13:16:40 PDT
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 95 13:16:40 PDT
From: mitchell@mdd.comm.mot.com (Bill Mitchell)
Message-Id: <9510102016.AA29038@bb29c.mdd.comm.mot.com>
To: debian-bugs@pixar.com, branderhorst@fgg.eur.nl
Subject: Re: Bug#1632: Revision should be package_revision

Erick Branderhorst <branderhorst@fgg.eur.nl> said:

> Package_Revision field missing

Npasswd is one of the first -- perhams _the_ first package I
put together.  I've not supported it fully for some time now
(as the lack of a PACKAGE_REVISION field indicates).

If anyone is using this, I'll update the package to the extent
of uploading an update with the missing field added.  Otherwise,
I'd like to withdraw it or declare it orphan.

If you're using it, speak up.

Acknowledgement sent to mitchell@mdd.comm.mot.com (Bill Mitchell):
Extra info received and forwarded. Full text available.
Information forwarded to debian-devel@pixar.com:
Bug#1632; Package npasswd. Full text available.

Message received at debian-bugs:


From fgg.eur.nl!branderhorst Tue Oct 10 01:38:31 1995
Return-Path: <branderhorst@fgg.eur.nl>
Received: from pixar.com by mongo.pixar.com with smtp
	(Smail3.1.28.1 #15) id m0t2aCk-00064oC; Tue, 10 Oct 95 01:38 PDT
Received: from mailgate.eur.nl by pixar.com with SMTP id AA17610
  (5.67b/IDA-1.5 for debian-bugs-pipe@mongo.pixar.com); Tue, 10 Oct 1995 01:38:02 -0700
Received: from hp750.fgg.eur.nl by mailgate.eur.nl (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA04567; Tue, 10 Oct 95 09:38:20 +0100
Message-Id: <9510100838.AA04567@mailgate.eur.nl>
Received: by hp750.fgg.eur.nl
	(1.38.193.4/16.2) id AA19597; Tue, 10 Oct 1995 09:41:56 +0100
From: Erick Branderhorst <branderhorst@fgg.eur.nl>
Subject: Revision should be package_revision
To: debian-bugs@pixar.com
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 95 9:41:56 MET
Mailer: Elm [revision: 70.85]


Package: npasswd
Version: 2.1-
Libc: libc.so.4.6.27

Kernel etc: Linux morris 1.2.10 #1 Tue Jun 13 18:37:28 EST 1995 i486
Reporter: repair 0.1
Subject: Package_Revision field missing

$ dpkg --info npasswd-1.2-8-.deb
 old debian package, version 0.936000.
 size 9431 bytes: control archive= 661, main archive= 8757.
      45 bytes,     3 lines      conffiles            
     159 bytes,     5 lines      control              
     280 bytes,    13 lines   *  postinst             #!/bin/sh
     258 bytes,    11 lines   *  postrm               #!/bin/sh
     395 bytes,    12 lines   *  preinst              
 PACKAGE: npasswd
 VERSION: 1.2-8
 MAINTAINER: mitchell@mdd.comm.mot.com (Bill Mitchell)
 DESCRIPTION: npasswd provides a passwd(1) utility for non-networked use

Version should be 1.2
Package_Revision should be 8
--
Erick Branderhorst@heel.fgg.eur.nl 00++10-46351542
Deparment of General Surgery (Intensive Care) University Hospital Rotterdam NL

Acknowledgement sent to Erick Branderhorst <branderhorst@fgg.eur.nl>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Full text available.
Report forwarded to debian-devel@pixar.com:
Bug#1632; Package npasswd. Full text available.
Ian Jackson / iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk, with the debian-bugs tracking mechanism
This page last modified 07:43:01 GMT Wed 01 Nov