Debian bug report logs - #1530
Source doesn't seem to depend on bin86

Message received at debian-bugs:

From lot49.med.miami.edu!mdorman Mon Oct  2 17:21:12 1995
Return-Path: <mdorman@lot49.med.miami.edu>
Received: from pixar.com by mongo.pixar.com with smtp
	(Smail3.1.28.1 #15) id m0szv6e-000EWYC; Mon, 2 Oct 95 17:21 PDT
Received: from lot49.med.miami.edu by pixar.com with SMTP id AA18760
  (5.67b/IDA-1.5 for debian-bugs-pipe@mongo.pixar.com); Mon, 2 Oct 1995 17:20:52 -0700
Received: (from mdorman@localhost) by lot49.med.miami.edu (8.6.12/8.6.12) id UAA01389; Mon, 2 Oct 1995 20:16:29 -0400
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 1995 20:16:28 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Alan Dorman <mdorman@lot49.med.miami.edu>
To: debian-bugs@pixar.com
Subject: Source doesn't seem to depend on bin86
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.3.91.951002201528.1383A-100000@lot49.med.miami.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


I can think of a couple of reasons that bin86 might not be in the 
true-blue depends for the source package, but I'd think it'd at least be 
"recommended" since you can't compile a new kernel without it.

Mike.
--
"And I swear that I don't have a gun."

Your message didn't have a Package: line at the start (in the pseudo-header following the real mail header), or didn't have a psuedo-header at all.

This makes it much harder for us to categorise and deal with your problem report; please ensure that you say which package(s) and version(s) the problem is with next time. Some time in the future the problem reports system may start rejecting such messages.

Full text available.