Debian bug report logs - #1530, boring messages

Subject: Bug#1530: Source doesn't seem to depend on bin86
Reply-To: Michael Alan Dorman <mdorman@lot49.med.miami.edu>, debian-bugs@pixar.com
Resent-From: Michael Alan Dorman <mdorman@lot49.med.miami.edu>
Resent-To: debian-devel@pixar.com
Resent-Date: Tue, 03 Oct 1995 00:33:02 GMT
Resent-Message-ID: <debian-bugs-handler.1530.B10030022180@pixar.com>
Resent-Sender: iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk
X-Debian-PR-Package: 
X-Debian-PR-Keywords: 
Received: via spool for debian-bugs; Tue, 03 Oct 1995 00:33:02 GMT
Received: with rfc822 via encapsulated-mail; Tue, 03 Oct 1995 00:22:16 GMT
Received: from pixar.com by mongo.pixar.com with smtp
	(Smail3.1.28.1 #15) id m0szv6e-000EWYC; Mon, 2 Oct 95 17:21 PDT
Received: from lot49.med.miami.edu by pixar.com with SMTP id AA18760
  (5.67b/IDA-1.5 for debian-bugs-pipe@mongo.pixar.com); Mon, 2 Oct 1995 17:20:52 -0700
Received: (from mdorman@localhost) by lot49.med.miami.edu (8.6.12/8.6.12) id UAA01389; Mon, 2 Oct 1995 20:16:29 -0400
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 1995 20:16:28 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Alan Dorman <mdorman@lot49.med.miami.edu>
To: debian-bugs@pixar.com
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.3.91.951002201528.1383A-100000@lot49.med.miami.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


I can think of a couple of reasons that bin86 might not be in the
true-blue depends for the source package, but I'd think it'd at least be
"recommended" since you can't compile a new kernel without it.

Mike.
--
"And I swear that I don't have a gun."

From: iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson)
To: Michael Alan Dorman <mdorman@lot49.med.miami.edu>
Subject: Bug#1530: Acknowledgement (was: Source doesn't seem to depend on bin86)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.91.951002201528.1383A-100000@lot49.med.miami.edu>
References: <Pine.LNX.3.91.951002201528.1383A-100000@lot49.med.miami.edu>

Thank you for the problem report you have sent regarding Debian GNU/Linux.
This is an automatically generated reply, to let you know your message has
been received.  It is being forwarded to the developers' mailing list for
their attention; they will reply in due course.

If you wish to submit further information on your problem, please send
it to debian-bugs@pixar.com, but please ensure that the Subject
line of your message starts with "Bug#1530" or "Re: Bug#1530" so that
we can identify it as relating to the same problem.

Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message,
unless you wish to report a problem with the bug-tracking system.

Your message didn't have a Package: line at the start (in the
pseudo-header following the real mail header), or didn't have a
psuedo-header at all.

This makes it much harder for us to categorise and deal with your
problem report; please ensure that you say which package(s) and
version(s) the problem is with next time.  Some time in the future the
problem reports system may start rejecting such messages.

Ian Jackson
(maintainer, debian-bugs)

From debian.org!imurdock Wed Oct 11 15:55:09 1995
Return-Path: <imurdock@debian.org>
Received: from pixar.com by mongo.pixar.com with smtp
	(Smail3.1.28.1 #15) id m0t3A3I-000GxjC; Wed, 11 Oct 95 15:55 PDT
Received: from imagine.imaginit.com by pixar.com with SMTP id AA11941
  (5.67b/IDA-1.5 for debian-bugs-request-pipe@mongo.pixar.com); Wed, 11 Oct 1995 15:54:45 -0700
Received: by imagine.imaginit.com
	id <m0t3A73-0001cHC@imagine.imaginit.com>
	(Debian /\oo/\ Smail3.1.29.1 #29.33); Wed, 11 Oct 95 17:59 EST
Message-Id: <m0t3A73-0001cHC@imagine.imaginit.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 95 17:59 EST
From: imurdock@debian.org (Ian Murdock)
To: debian-bugs-request@pixar.com

reassign 1530 source