Debian bug report logs - #960, boring messages

Subject: Bug#960: base?
Reply-To: jimr@simons-rock.edu, debian-bugs@pixar.com
Resent-To: debian-devel@pixar.com
Resent-From: "James A. Robinson" <jimr@simons-rock.edu>
Resent-Sender: iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk
Resent-Date: Thu, 08 Jun 1995 12:03:01 GMT
Resent-Message-ID: <debian-bugs-handler.960.060812024715288@pixar.com>
X-Debian-PR-Package: base?
X-Debian-PR-Keywords: 
Received: via spool for debian-bugs; Thu, 08 Jun 1995 12:03:01 GMT
Received: with rfc822 via encapsulated-mail id 060812024715288;
          Thu, 08 Jun 1995 12:02:47 GMT
Received: from pixar.com by mongo.pixar.com with smtp
	(Smail3.1.28.1 #15) id m0sJgGN-0005OZC; Thu, 8 Jun 95 05:00 PDT
Received: from plato.simons-rock.edu by pixar.com with SMTP id AA19012
  (5.67b/IDA-1.5 for debian-bugs-pipe@mongo.pixar.com); Thu, 8 Jun 1995 04:58:55 -0700
Received: from simons-rock.edu by plato.simons-rock.edu with smtp
	(Smail3.1.29.1 #3) id m0sJgFn-00000zC; Thu, 8 Jun 95 08:00 EDT
Message-Id: <m0sJgFn-00000zC@plato.simons-rock.edu>
X-Mailer: MH 6.8.3
To: Debian Bugs <debian-bugs@pixar.com>
Cc: Ian Murdock <imurdock@gnu.ai.mit.edu>, mbaily@simons-rock.edu
Dcc:
Date: Thu, 08 Jun 1995 08:00:03 -0400
From: "James A. Robinson" <jimr@simons-rock.edu>


package: base?
version: .935-current

I'm not sure where it came from, but there was an "available" file in
/var/lib/dpkg/, and it was completely messed up.  It looks like
perhaps pdpkg had a fit when it generated the list, with random
garbage and swapped key-value entries.

On the same note, there is a Packages file in debian.cps.cmich.edu
under /pub/debian/binary, and it is also completely messed up.

Jim

From: iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson)
To: jimr@simons-rock.edu
Subject: Bug#960: Acknowledgement (was: base?)
In-Reply-To: <m0sJgFn-00000zC@plato.simons-rock.edu>
References: <m0sJgFn-00000zC@plato.simons-rock.edu>

Thank you for the problem report you have sent regarding Debian GNU/Linux.
This is an automatically generated reply, to let you know your message has
been received.  It is being forwarded to the developers' mailing list for
their attention; they will reply in due course.

If you wish to submit further information on your problem, please send
it to debian-bugs@pixar.com, but please ensure that the Subject
line of your message starts with "Bug#960" or "Re: Bug#960" so that
we can identify it as relating to the same problem.

Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message,
unless you wish to report a problem with the bug-tracking system.

Ian Jackson
(maintainer, debian-bugs)

From: iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson)
To: imurdock@debian.org (Ian Murdock)
In-Reply-To: <m0t36vD-0001eEC@imagine.imaginit.com>
References: <m0t36vD-0001eEC@imagine.imaginit.com> <m0sJgFn-00000zC@plato.simons-rock.edu>
Subject: Bug#960: marked as done (was: base?)

Your message dated Wed, 11 Oct 95 14:34 EST
with message-id <m0t36vD-0001eEC@imagine.imaginit.com>
and subject line Bug#960:
has caused the attached bug report to be marked as done.

It is your now responsibility to ensure that the bug report is dealt
with.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I'm
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Ian Jackson
(maintainer, debian-bugs)

Received: with rfc822 via encapsulated-mail id 060812024715288;
          Thu, 08 Jun 1995 12:02:47 GMT
From simons-rock.edu!jimr Thu Jun  8 05:00:40 1995
Return-Path: <jimr@simons-rock.edu>
Received: from pixar.com by mongo.pixar.com with smtp
	(Smail3.1.28.1 #15) id m0sJgGN-0005OZC; Thu, 8 Jun 95 05:00 PDT
Received: from plato.simons-rock.edu by pixar.com with SMTP id AA19012
  (5.67b/IDA-1.5 for debian-bugs-pipe@mongo.pixar.com); Thu, 8 Jun 1995 04:58:55 -0700
Received: from simons-rock.edu by plato.simons-rock.edu with smtp
	(Smail3.1.29.1 #3) id m0sJgFn-00000zC; Thu, 8 Jun 95 08:00 EDT
Message-Id: <m0sJgFn-00000zC@plato.simons-rock.edu>
Reply-To: jimr@simons-rock.edu
X-Mailer: MH 6.8.3
To: Debian Bugs <debian-bugs@pixar.com>
Cc: Ian Murdock <imurdock@gnu.ai.mit.edu>, mbaily@simons-rock.edu
Dcc:
Subject: base?
Date: Thu, 08 Jun 1995 08:00:03 -0400
From: "James A. Robinson" <jimr@simons-rock.edu>


package: base?
version: .935-current

I'm not sure where it came from, but there was an "available" file in
/var/lib/dpkg/, and it was completely messed up.  It looks like
perhaps pdpkg had a fit when it generated the list, with random
garbage and swapped key-value entries.

On the same note, there is a Packages file in debian.cps.cmich.edu
under /pub/debian/binary, and it is also completely messed up.

Jim

From: iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson)
To: jimr@simons-rock.edu
Subject: Bug#960 acknowledged by developer (was: base?)
References: <m0t36vD-0001eEC@imagine.imaginit.com> <m0sJgFn-00000zC@plato.simons-rock.edu>
In-Reply-To: <m0sJgFn-00000zC@plato.simons-rock.edu>

This is an automatic notification regarding your bug report.

Responsibility for it has been taken by one of the developers, namely
imurdock@debian.org (Ian Murdock).

You should be hearing from them with a substantive response shortly, if
you have not already done so.  If not, please contact them directly,
or email debian-bugs@pixar.com or myself.

Ian Jackson
(maintainer, debian-bugs)