Debian bug report logs -
#933, boring messages
Message sent to debian-devel@pixar.com:
Subject: Bug#933: Pine wants to post my email reply, and other problems
Reply-To: iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson), debian-bugs@pixar.com
Resent-To: debian-devel@pixar.com
Resent-From: iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson)
Resent-Sender: iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk
Resent-Date: Thu, 01 Jun 1995 11:18:17 GMT
Resent-Message-ID: <debian-bugs-handler.933.060111164921465@pixar.com>
X-Debian-PR-Package: pine
X-Debian-PR-Keywords:
Received: via spool for debian-bugs; Thu, 01 Jun 1995 11:18:17 GMT
Received: with rfc822 via encapsulated-mail id 060111164921465;
Thu, 01 Jun 1995 11:16:56 GMT
Received: from pixar.com by mongo.pixar.com with smtp
(Smail3.1.28.1 #15) id m0sH89I-0007m0C; Thu, 1 Jun 95 04:10 PDT
Received: from bootes.cus.cam.ac.uk by pixar.com with SMTP id AA18832
(5.67b/IDA-1.5 for debian-bugs-pipe@mongo.pixar.com); Thu, 1 Jun 1995 04:07:47 -0700
Received: by bootes.cus.cam.ac.uk
(Smail-3.1.29.0 #36) id m0sH7pF-000C0EC; Thu, 1 Jun 95 11:50 BST
Received: by chiark
id <m0sGunG-0000XQZ@chiark.al.cl.cam.ac.uk>
(Debian /\oo/\ Smail3.1.29.1 #29.31); Wed, 31 May 95 21:55 BST
Message-Id: <m0sGunG-0000XQZ@chiark.al.cl.cam.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 31 May 95 21:55 BST
From: iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson)
To: Debian bugs submission address <debian-bugs@pixar.com>
Package: pine
Version: 3.91-2
I just sent `guest@chiark' (a test account on my system) the message:
Return-Path: <ian>
Received: by chiark
id <m0sGuKK-0000XQZ@chiark.al.cl.cam.ac.uk>
(Debian /\oo/\ Smail3.1.29.1 #29.31); Wed, 31 May 95 21:25 BST
Message-Id: <m0sGuKK-0000XQZ@chiark.al.cl.cam.ac.uk>
Newsgroups: chiark.test
From: ian (Ian Jackson)
To: guest,
ian
Subject: A test mail message
Date: Wed, 31 May 95 21:25 BST
Let's see.
When I (guest, that is) hit `r' for Reply while viewing the message,
Pine gives me the prompt:
Post follow-up message to news group(s)?
If I answer `y' it decides I want to do a posted `followup' instead
of a reply.
Presumably it does this because the message I'm replying to has a
Newsgroups line.
This is completely ridiculous behaviour, and probably stems from an
inability on the part of the author to understand conventions used on
the net.
The presence of a Newsgroups line in a mail message you have received
does NOT indicate that it has been posted to those newsgroups. It
usually indicates that the message relates to a discussion which is
taking place in those newsgroups, and is provided as a helpful hint
for reference purposes by newsreaders like `trn' (the de-facto
standard USENET newsreader).
Furthermore, posting a followup which would probably contain quoted
text would be a bad violation of netiquette (if not illegal in some
way), as it is conventional (if not obligatory) to obtain someone's
consent before publishing personal correspondance they have sent you.
This feature should be removed from Pine.
If the authors disagree with you please:
(a) Refer them to me and to news.admin.*
(b) Fix the problem in Debian's version of Pine anyway.
I note that the news posting facilities in Pine do not work in my
Debian configuration. I do not consider it a great loss. The
tendency of every program in existence to jump on the news posting
bandwagon is pernicious and should be resisted.
Incidentally, if I ask to post a message by using the `^T' key in the
compose screen I get a message saying that I can't post to newsgroups
because the NNTP server is not defined. This message is accompanied
by a beep and is immediately erased - I could only read it by holding
down the `^T' key, which made it half-visible.
I went and configured my INN installation as my NNTP server and the
only thing that was obviously suspicious was the Path: line, which
contained
chiark.my.domain!chiark!guest
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^ presumably entered by Pine
|
^ put in by INN
Pine has no business putting a Path line in postings it makes via the
NNTP POST command. It should leave that to the NNTP server.
For comparison, a message posted directly via NNTP says:
chiark.my.domain|news
which come from nnrpd and innd.
At least Pine did ask:
Posted message may go to thousands of readers. Really post?
Ian.
Message sent:
From: iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson)
To: iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson)
Subject: Bug#933: Acknowledgement (was: Pine wants to post my email reply, and other problems)
In-Reply-To: <m0sGunG-0000XQZ@chiark.al.cl.cam.ac.uk>
References: <m0sGunG-0000XQZ@chiark.al.cl.cam.ac.uk>
Thank you for the problem report you have sent regarding Debian GNU/Linux.
This is an automatically generated reply, to let you know your message has
been received. It is being forwarded to the developers' mailing list for
their attention; they will reply in due course.
If you wish to submit further information on your problem, please send
it to debian-bugs@pixar.com, but please ensure that the Subject
line of your message starts with "Bug#933" or "Re: Bug#933" so that
we can identify it as relating to the same problem.
Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message,
unless you wish to report a problem with the bug-tracking system.
Ian Jackson
(maintainer, debian-bugs)
Ian Jackson /
iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk,
with the debian-bugs tracking mechanism