Debian bug report logs - #670, boring messages


Message sent to debian-devel@pixar.com:


Subject: Bug#670: gs_both (Recommended) -depends-> xbaseR6 (optional)
Reply-To: iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson), debian-bugs@pixar.com
Resent-To: debian-devel@pixar.com
Resent-From: iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson)
Resent-Sender: iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk
Resent-Date: Thu, 30 Mar 1995 21:48:11 GMT
Resent-Message-ID: <debian-bugs-handler.670.0330213814282@pixar.com>
X-Debian-PR-Package: Package classification
X-Debian-PR-Keywords: 
Received: via spool for debian-bugs; Thu, 30 Mar 1995 21:48:11 GMT
Received: with rfc822 via encapsulated-mail id 0330213814282;
          Thu, 30 Mar 1995 21:38:14 GMT
Received: from pixar.com by mongo.pixar.com with smtp
	(Smail3.1.28.1 #15) id m0ruRtE-0007G5A; Thu, 30 Mar 95 13:36 PST
Received: from bootes.cus.cam.ac.uk by pixar.com with SMTP id AA17408
  (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for <debian-bugs@pixar.com>); Thu, 30 Mar 1995 13:36:07 -0800
Received: by bootes.cus.cam.ac.uk
	(Smail-3.1.29.0 #30) id m0ruRqj-000BzUA; Thu, 30 Mar 95 22:33 BST
Received: by chiark (Smail3.1.28.1 #3)
	id m0ruRV2-0002gOA; Thu, 30 Mar 95 22:11 BST
Message-Id: <m0ruRV2-0002gOA.ijackson@nyx.cs.du.edu>
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 95 22:11 BST
From: iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson)
To: Debian bugs submission address <debian-bugs@pixar.com>
Precedence: air-mail

Package: Package classification
Version: Debian 0.93R5

The gs_both package quite properly mentions a dependency on xbaseR6.

However, gs_both is Recommended and xbaseR6 is only optional.

Either xbaseR6 should be made at least Recommended or gs_both should
be made Optional.

Ian.


Message sent:


From: iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson)
To: iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson)
Subject: Bug#670: Acknowledgement (was: gs_both (Recommended) -depends-> xbaseR6 (optional))
In-Reply-To: <m0ruRV2-0002gOA.ijackson@nyx.cs.du.edu>
References: <m0ruRV2-0002gOA.ijackson@nyx.cs.du.edu>

Thank you for the problem report you have sent regarding Debian GNU/Linux.
This is an automatically generated reply, to let you know your message has
been received.  It is being forwarded to the developers' mailing list for
their attention; they will reply in due course.

If you wish to submit further information on your problem, please send
it to debian-bugs@pixar.com, but please ensure that the Subject
line of your message starts with "Bug#670" or "Re: Bug#670" so that
we can identify it as relating to the same problem.

Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message,
unless you wish to report a problem with the bug-tracking system.

Ian Jackson
(maintainer, debian-bugs)


Message sent:


From: iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson)
To: imurdock@debian.org (Ian Murdock)
In-Reply-To: <m0t3DBY-0001cHC@imagine.imaginit.com>
References: <m0t3DBY-0001cHC@imagine.imaginit.com> <m0ruRV2-0002gOA.ijackson@nyx.cs.du.edu>
Subject: Bug#670: marked as done (was: gs_both (Recommended) -depends-> xbaseR6 (optional))

Your message dated Wed, 11 Oct 95 21:15 EST
with message-id <m0t3DBY-0001cHC@imagine.imaginit.com>
and subject line Bug#670:
has caused the attached bug report to be marked as done.

It is your now responsibility to ensure that the bug report is dealt
with.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I'm
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Ian Jackson
(maintainer, debian-bugs)

Received: with rfc822 via encapsulated-mail id 0330213814282;
          Thu, 30 Mar 1995 21:38:14 GMT
From cus.cam.ac.uk!iwj10 Thu Mar 30 13:36:28 1995
Return-Path: <iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk>
Received: from pixar.com by mongo.pixar.com with smtp
	(Smail3.1.28.1 #15) id m0ruRtE-0007G5A; Thu, 30 Mar 95 13:36 PST
Received: from bootes.cus.cam.ac.uk by pixar.com with SMTP id AA17408
  (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for <debian-bugs@pixar.com>); Thu, 30 Mar 1995 13:36:07 -0800
Received: by bootes.cus.cam.ac.uk
	(Smail-3.1.29.0 #30) id m0ruRqj-000BzUA; Thu, 30 Mar 95 22:33 BST
Received: by chiark (Smail3.1.28.1 #3)
	id m0ruRV2-0002gOA; Thu, 30 Mar 95 22:11 BST
Message-Id: <m0ruRV2-0002gOA.ijackson@nyx.cs.du.edu>
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 95 22:11 BST
From: iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson)
To: Debian bugs submission address <debian-bugs@pixar.com>
Subject: gs_both (Recommended) -depends-> xbaseR6 (optional)
Precedence: air-mail

Package: Package classification
Version: Debian 0.93R5

The gs_both package quite properly mentions a dependency on xbaseR6.

However, gs_both is Recommended and xbaseR6 is only optional.

Either xbaseR6 should be made at least Recommended or gs_both should
be made Optional.

Ian.


Message sent:


From: iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson)
To: iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson)
Subject: Bug#670 acknowledged by developer (was: gs_both (Recommended) -depends-> xbaseR6 (optional))
References: <m0t3DBY-0001cHC@imagine.imaginit.com> <m0ruRV2-0002gOA.ijackson@nyx.cs.du.edu>
In-Reply-To: <m0ruRV2-0002gOA.ijackson@nyx.cs.du.edu>

This is an automatic notification regarding your bug report.

Responsibility for it has been taken by one of the developers, namely
imurdock@debian.org (Ian Murdock).

You should be hearing from them with a substantive response shortly, if
you have not already done so.  If not, please contact them directly,
or email debian-bugs@pixar.com or myself.

Ian Jackson
(maintainer, debian-bugs)


Ian Jackson / iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk, with the debian-bugs tracking mechanism
This page last modified 07:43:01 GMT Wed 01 Nov