Debian bug report logs - #1768, boring messages

Subject: Bug#1768: retraction
Reply-To: bhogan@rahul.net, debian-bugs@pixar.com
Resent-From: Bill Hogan <bhogan@rahul.net>
Resent-To: debian-devel@pixar.com
Resent-Date: Thu, 26 Oct 1995 06:33:02 GMT
Resent-Message-ID: <debian-bugs-handler.1768.B10260624150@pixar.com>
Resent-Sender: iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk
X-Debian-PR-Package: 
X-Debian-PR-Keywords: 
Received: via spool for debian-bugs; Thu, 26 Oct 1995 06:33:02 GMT
Received: with rfc822 via encapsulated-mail; Thu, 26 Oct 1995 06:24:13 GMT
Received: from pixar.com by mongo.pixar.com with smtp
	(Smail3.1.28.1 #15) id m0t8LiY-0006CRC; Wed, 25 Oct 95 23:23 PDT
Received: from tango.rahul.net by pixar.com with SMTP id AA00490
  (5.67b/IDA-1.5 for debian-bugs-pipe@mongo.pixar.com); Wed, 25 Oct 1995 23:22:45 -0700
Received: from bolero.rahul.net by tango.rahul.net with SMTP id AA26028
  (5.67b8/IDA-1.5 for <debian-bugs@Pixar.com>); Wed, 25 Oct 1995 23:23:07 -0700
Received: from bedlam.rahul.net by bolero.rahul.net with SMTP id AA14909
  (5.67b8/IDA-1.5 for <debian-bugs@Pixar.com>); Wed, 25 Oct 1995 23:23:04 -0700
Received: by bedlam.rahul.net
	id m0t8JXo-0003isC
	(Debian /\oo/\ Smail3.1.29.1 #29.33); Wed, 25 Oct 95 21:03 PDT
Message-Id: <m0t8JXo-0003isC@bedlam.rahul.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 95 21:03 PDT
From: Bill Hogan <bhogan@rahul.net>
To: debian-bugs@Pixar.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII


   Package: cern-httpd

   PLease ignore my previous message.

   I missed the bit about addduser > 1.93.

   Saying "requires adduser >= 1.94" might be better.

   Bill

From: iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson)
To: bhogan@rahul.net
Subject: Bug#1768: Acknowledgement (was: retraction)
In-Reply-To: <m0t8JXo-0003isC@bedlam.rahul.net>
References: <m0t8JXo-0003isC@bedlam.rahul.net>

Thank you for the problem report you have sent regarding Debian GNU/Linux.
This is an automatically generated reply, to let you know your message has
been received.  It is being forwarded to the developers' mailing list for
their attention; they will reply in due course.

If you wish to submit further information on your problem, please send
it to debian-bugs@pixar.com, but please ensure that the Subject
line of your message starts with "Bug#1768" or "Re: Bug#1768" so that
we can identify it as relating to the same problem.

Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message,
unless you wish to report a problem with the bug-tracking system.

Your message didn't have a Package: line at the start (in the
pseudo-header following the real mail header), or didn't have a
psuedo-header at all.

This makes it much harder for us to categorise and deal with your
problem report; please ensure that you say which package(s) and
version(s) the problem is with next time.  Some time in the future the
problem reports system may start rejecting such messages.

Ian Jackson
(maintainer, debian-bugs)

From: iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson)
To: Ian Jackson <ian@chiark.chu.cam.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <m0t9C6m-0002bkC@chiark.chu.cam.ac.uk>
References: <m0t9C6m-0002bkC@chiark.chu.cam.ac.uk> <m0t8JXo-0003isC@bedlam.rahul.net>
Subject: Bug#1768: marked as done (was: retraction)

Your message dated Sat, 28 Oct 95 14:19 GMT
with message-id <m0t9C6m-0002bkC@chiark.chu.cam.ac.uk>
and subject line Bug#1768: retraction
has caused the attached bug report to be marked as done.

It is your now responsibility to ensure that the bug report is dealt
with.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I'm
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Ian Jackson
(maintainer, debian-bugs)

Received: with rfc822 via encapsulated-mail; Thu, 26 Oct 1995 06:24:13 GMT
From rahul.net!bhogan Wed Oct 25 23:23:10 1995
Return-Path: <bhogan@rahul.net>
Received: from pixar.com by mongo.pixar.com with smtp
	(Smail3.1.28.1 #15) id m0t8LiY-0006CRC; Wed, 25 Oct 95 23:23 PDT
Received: from tango.rahul.net by pixar.com with SMTP id AA00490
  (5.67b/IDA-1.5 for debian-bugs-pipe@mongo.pixar.com); Wed, 25 Oct 1995 23:22:45 -0700
Received: from bolero.rahul.net by tango.rahul.net with SMTP id AA26028
  (5.67b8/IDA-1.5 for <debian-bugs@Pixar.com>); Wed, 25 Oct 1995 23:23:07 -0700
Received: from bedlam.rahul.net by bolero.rahul.net with SMTP id AA14909
  (5.67b8/IDA-1.5 for <debian-bugs@Pixar.com>); Wed, 25 Oct 1995 23:23:04 -0700
Received: by bedlam.rahul.net
	id m0t8JXo-0003isC
	(Debian /\oo/\ Smail3.1.29.1 #29.33); Wed, 25 Oct 95 21:03 PDT
Message-Id: <m0t8JXo-0003isC@bedlam.rahul.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 95 21:03 PDT
From: Bill Hogan <bhogan@rahul.net>
Reply-To: bhogan@rahul.net
To: debian-bugs@Pixar.com
Subject: retraction
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII


   Package: cern-httpd

   PLease ignore my previous message.

   I missed the bit about addduser > 1.93.

   Saying "requires adduser >= 1.94" might be better.

   Bill

From: iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson)
To: bhogan@rahul.net
Subject: Bug#1768 acknowledged by developer (was: retraction)
References: <m0t9C6m-0002bkC@chiark.chu.cam.ac.uk> <m0t8JXo-0003isC@bedlam.rahul.net>
In-Reply-To: <m0t8JXo-0003isC@bedlam.rahul.net>

This is an automatic notification regarding your bug report.

Responsibility for it has been taken by one of the developers, namely
Ian Jackson <ian@chiark.chu.cam.ac.uk>.

You should be hearing from them with a substantive response shortly, if
you have not already done so.  If not, please contact them directly,
or email debian-bugs@pixar.com or myself.

Ian Jackson
(maintainer, debian-bugs)