Debian bug report logs - #1745
/bin/perl

Package: base?, perl?; Reported by: Raul Miller <rdm@tad.micro.umn.edu>; 8 days old.
Bug assigned to package `base?, perl?'. Request was from Raul Miller <rdm@tad.micro.umn.edu> to debian-bugs-request@pixar.com. Full text available.

Message received at debian-bugs:


From tad.micro.umn.edu!rdm Mon Oct 23 15:52:08 1995
Return-Path: <rdm@tad.micro.umn.edu>
Received: from pixar.com by mongo.pixar.com with smtp
	(Smail3.1.28.1 #15) id m0t7Viy-000Bd8C; Mon, 23 Oct 95 15:52 PDT
Received: from rdm.legislate.com ([192.77.155.13]) by pixar.com with SMTP id AA25064
  (5.67b/IDA-1.5 for debian-bugs-pipe@mongo.pixar.com); Mon, 23 Oct 1995 15:51:41 -0700
Received: by rdm.legislate.com
	id <m0t7VjP-0006k6C@rdm.legislate.com>
	(Debian /\oo/\ Smail3.1.29.1 #29.33); Mon, 23 Oct 95 18:52 EDT
Message-Id: <m0t7VjP-0006k6C@rdm.legislate.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 95 18:52 EDT
From: Raul Miller <rdm@tad.micro.umn.edu>
To: debian-bugs@pixar.com
Subject: /bin/perl

I'm trying to puzzle out /bin/perl

On a new system today, I tried to run perl and ran into problems
because /usr/lib/libdb.so.1 wasn't available.  Can anyone tell me if
I'm doing something wrong or if it's the system that's wrong?

Thanks,

-- 
Raul

Acknowledgement sent to Raul Miller <rdm@tad.micro.umn.edu>:
New bug report received and forwarded.

Your message didn't have a Package: line at the start (in the pseudo-header following the real mail header), or didn't have a psuedo-header at all.

This makes it much harder for us to categorise and deal with your problem report; please ensure that you say which package(s) and version(s) the problem is with next time. Some time in the future the problem reports system may start rejecting such messages.

Full text available.


Report forwarded to debian-devel@pixar.com:
Bug#1745. Full text available.
Ian Jackson / iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk, with the debian-bugs tracking mechanism
This page last modified 07:43:01 GMT Wed 01 Nov