Debian bug report logs - #1729
Naming of commands

Package: lrzsz; Reported by: Juho A Vuori <javuori@cc.helsinki.fi>; Done: Michael Alan Dorman <mdorman@lot49.med.miami.edu>.

Message received at debian-bugs-done:


From lot49.med.miami.edu!mdorman Sun Oct 22 07:38:16 1995
Return-Path: <mdorman@lot49.med.miami.edu>
Received: from pixar.com by mongo.pixar.com with smtp
	(Smail3.1.28.1 #15) id m0t71XU-0006F1C; Sun, 22 Oct 95 07:38 PDT
Received: from lot49.med.miami.edu by pixar.com with SMTP id AA20323
  (5.67b/IDA-1.5 for debian-bugs-done-pipe@mongo.pixar.com); Sun, 22 Oct 1995 07:37:50 -0700
Received: (from mdorman@localhost) by lot49.med.miami.edu (8.6.12/8.6.12) id KAA11435; Sun, 22 Oct 1995 10:32:57 -0400
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 1995 10:32:57 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Alan Dorman <mdorman@lot49.med.miami.edu>
To: Juho A Vuori <javuori@cc.helsinki.fi>, debian-bugs-done@Pixar.com
Subject: Re: Bug#1729: Naming of commands
In-Reply-To: <199510212234.AAA27322@kruuna.helsinki.fi>
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.3.91.951022103144.11346C-100000@lot49.med.miami.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

On Sun, 22 Oct 1995, Juho A Vuori wrote:
> Oops, after sending my last mail, I noticed another thing. The man pages
> of lrz and lsz speak about commands called rz, sz, rb, ..., but the
> actual binaries are named lsz, ... In my opinion, it would be better if
> the commands were also called traditionally rz, sz, ..., but if not,
> then, please modify the man-pages. Or keep the original commands, but
> make symlinks to the traditional commands (and man-pages).

I have also done this in the updated lrzsz package --- the binaries are 
now accessible under their traditional names, as they were in the 
minicom-1.71 and as they weren't in lrzsz-0.11.

Cheers,

Mike.
--
"I'm a dinosaur.  Somebody's digging my bones."



Notification sent to Juho A Vuori <javuori@cc.helsinki.fi>:
Bug acknowledged by developer. Full text available.
Reply sent to Michael Alan Dorman <mdorman@lot49.med.miami.edu>:
You have taken responsibility. Full text available.

Message received at debian-bugs:


From cc.helsinki.fi!javuori Sat Oct 21 15:34:53 1995
Return-Path: <javuori@cc.helsinki.fi>
Received: from pixar.com by mongo.pixar.com with smtp
	(Smail3.1.28.1 #15) id m0t6mVB-0006F3C; Sat, 21 Oct 95 15:34 PDT
Received: from kruuna.helsinki.fi (kruuna-fddi.Helsinki.FI) by pixar.com with SMTP id AA05096
  (5.67b/IDA-1.5 for debian-bugs-pipe@mongo.pixar.com); Sat, 21 Oct 1995 15:33:48 -0700
Received: (javuori@localhost) by kruuna.helsinki.fi (8.6.12+Emil1.1/8.6.5) id AAA27322 for debian-bugs@pixar.com; Sun, 22 Oct 1995 00:34:10 +0200
From: Juho A Vuori <javuori@cc.helsinki.fi>
Message-Id: <199510212234.AAA27322@kruuna.helsinki.fi>
Subject: Naming of commands
To: debian-bugs@pixar.com
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 1995 00:34:09 +0200 (EET)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Length: 443       

Package: lrzsz
Version: 0.11

Oops, after sending my last mail, I noticed another thing. The man pages
of lrz and lsz speak about commands called rz, sz, rb, ..., but the
actual binaries are named lsz, ... In my opinion, it would be better if
the commands were also called traditionally rz, sz, ..., but if not,
then, please modify the man-pages. Or keep the original commands, but
make symlinks to the traditional commands (and man-pages). 



Acknowledgement sent to Juho A Vuori <javuori@cc.helsinki.fi>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Full text available.
Report forwarded to debian-devel@pixar.com:
Bug#1729; Package lrzsz. Full text available.
Ian Jackson / iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk, with the debian-bugs tracking mechanism
This page last modified 07:43:01 GMT Wed 01 Nov