Debian bug report logs - #1712, boring messages


Message sent to debian-devel@pixar.com:


Subject: Bug#1712: Tex has no version number texbin does
Reply-To: Erick Branderhorst <branderhorst@fgg.eur.nl>, debian-bugs@pixar.com
Resent-From: Erick Branderhorst <branderhorst@fgg.eur.nl>
Resent-To: debian-devel@pixar.com
Resent-Date: Fri, 20 Oct 1995 14:48:02 GMT
Resent-Message-ID: <debian-bugs-handler.1712.B10201435280@pixar.com>
Resent-Sender: iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk
X-Debian-PR-Package: tex
X-Debian-PR-Keywords: 
Received: via spool for debian-bugs; Fri, 20 Oct 1995 14:48:02 GMT
Received: with rfc822 via encapsulated-mail; Fri, 20 Oct 1995 14:35:26 GMT
Received: from pixar.com by mongo.pixar.com with smtp
	(Smail3.1.28.1 #15) id m0t6IUn-0006CRC; Fri, 20 Oct 95 07:32 PDT
Received: from mailgate.eur.nl by pixar.com with SMTP id AA21205
  (5.67b/IDA-1.5 for debian-bugs-pipe@mongo.pixar.com); Fri, 20 Oct 1995 07:31:58 -0700
Received: from hp750.fgg.eur.nl by mailgate.eur.nl (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA16199; Fri, 20 Oct 95 15:32:13 +0100
Message-Id: <9510201432.AA16199@mailgate.eur.nl>
Received: by hp750.fgg.eur.nl
	(1.38.193.4/16.2) id AA09399; Fri, 20 Oct 1995 15:36:41 +0100
From: Erick Branderhorst <branderhorst@fgg.eur.nl>
To: debian-bugs@pixar.com
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 95 15:36:41 MET
Mailer: Elm [revision: 70.85]


Package: tex
Version: unknown

Because of the changes in the TeX directory structure since a few
releases of TeX (related) packages, I thought adding a (general)
depends line in the xypic package would be smart. I thought it would
even be better if I add a version number with it:

Depends: tex (>3.1415-4)

However, during installation an error message comes up indicating that
TeX is not installed. This is probably because of the version number
which is checked and which is not reported by the package tex. The tex
package (without a version number) is a package provided by texbin
(with a version number).

It might be usefull to let the provides packages have the same version
number as the providing package, or if a specific version number is
given in the provides line providing that version number.

# dpkg -s tex
Package: tex
Status: purge ok not-installed
Priority: optional
Section: tex

# dpkg -s tebin
Package: texbin
Status: install ok installed
Priority: standard
Section: tex
Maintainer: Nils Rennebarth <nils@nus.pan-net.de>
Version: 3.1415
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Revision: 4
~~~~~~~~~~~
Provides: tex
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Depends: texlib (>1.0-3), metafont, kpathsea
[deleted]

Erick
--
Erick Branderhorst@heel.fgg.eur.nl +31-10-4635142
Department of General Surgery (Intensive Care) University Hospital Rotterdam NL


Message sent:


From: iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson)
To: Erick Branderhorst <branderhorst@fgg.eur.nl>
Subject: Bug#1712: Acknowledgement (was: Tex has no version number texbin does)
In-Reply-To: <9510201432.AA16199@mailgate.eur.nl>
References: <9510201432.AA16199@mailgate.eur.nl>

Thank you for the problem report you have sent regarding Debian GNU/Linux.
This is an automatically generated reply, to let you know your message has
been received.  It is being forwarded to the developers' mailing list for
their attention; they will reply in due course.

If you wish to submit further information on your problem, please send
it to debian-bugs@pixar.com, but please ensure that the Subject
line of your message starts with "Bug#1712" or "Re: Bug#1712" so that
we can identify it as relating to the same problem.

Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message,
unless you wish to report a problem with the bug-tracking system.

Ian Jackson
(maintainer, debian-bugs)


Message sent:


From: iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson)
To: Ian Jackson <ian@chiark.chu.cam.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <m0t6Spj-0002aWC@chiark.chu.cam.ac.uk>
References: <m0t6Spj-0002aWC@chiark.chu.cam.ac.uk> <9510201432.AA16199@mailgate.eur.nl>
Subject: Bug#1712: marked as done (was: Tex has no version number texbin does)

Your message dated Sat, 21 Oct 95 02:34 BST
with message-id <m0t6Spj-0002aWC@chiark.chu.cam.ac.uk>
and subject line Bug#1712: Tex has no version number texbin does
has caused the attached bug report to be marked as done.

It is your now responsibility to ensure that the bug report is dealt
with.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I'm
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Ian Jackson
(maintainer, debian-bugs)

Received: with rfc822 via encapsulated-mail; Fri, 20 Oct 1995 14:35:26 GMT
From fgg.eur.nl!branderhorst Fri Oct 20 07:32:33 1995
Return-Path: <branderhorst@fgg.eur.nl>
Received: from pixar.com by mongo.pixar.com with smtp
	(Smail3.1.28.1 #15) id m0t6IUn-0006CRC; Fri, 20 Oct 95 07:32 PDT
Received: from mailgate.eur.nl by pixar.com with SMTP id AA21205
  (5.67b/IDA-1.5 for debian-bugs-pipe@mongo.pixar.com); Fri, 20 Oct 1995 07:31:58 -0700
Received: from hp750.fgg.eur.nl by mailgate.eur.nl (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA16199; Fri, 20 Oct 95 15:32:13 +0100
Message-Id: <9510201432.AA16199@mailgate.eur.nl>
Received: by hp750.fgg.eur.nl
	(1.38.193.4/16.2) id AA09399; Fri, 20 Oct 1995 15:36:41 +0100
From: Erick Branderhorst <branderhorst@fgg.eur.nl>
Subject: Tex has no version number texbin does
To: debian-bugs@pixar.com
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 95 15:36:41 MET
Mailer: Elm [revision: 70.85]


Package: tex
Version: unknown

Because of the changes in the TeX directory structure since a few
releases of TeX (related) packages, I thought adding a (general)
depends line in the xypic package would be smart. I thought it would
even be better if I add a version number with it:

Depends: tex (>3.1415-4)

However, during installation an error message comes up indicating that
TeX is not installed. This is probably because of the version number
which is checked and which is not reported by the package tex. The tex
package (without a version number) is a package provided by texbin
(with a version number).

It might be usefull to let the provides packages have the same version
number as the providing package, or if a specific version number is
given in the provides line providing that version number.

# dpkg -s tex
Package: tex
Status: purge ok not-installed
Priority: optional
Section: tex

# dpkg -s tebin
Package: texbin
Status: install ok installed
Priority: standard
Section: tex
Maintainer: Nils Rennebarth <nils@nus.pan-net.de>
Version: 3.1415
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Revision: 4
~~~~~~~~~~~
Provides: tex
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Depends: texlib (>1.0-3), metafont, kpathsea
[deleted]

Erick
--
Erick Branderhorst@heel.fgg.eur.nl +31-10-4635142
Department of General Surgery (Intensive Care) University Hospital Rotterdam NL


Message sent:


From: iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson)
To: Erick Branderhorst <branderhorst@fgg.eur.nl>
Subject: Bug#1712 acknowledged by developer (was: Tex has no version number texbin does)
References: <m0t6Spj-0002aWC@chiark.chu.cam.ac.uk> <9510201432.AA16199@mailgate.eur.nl>
In-Reply-To: <9510201432.AA16199@mailgate.eur.nl>

This is an automatic notification regarding your bug report.

Responsibility for it has been taken by one of the developers, namely
Ian Jackson <ian@chiark.chu.cam.ac.uk>.

You should be hearing from them with a substantive response shortly, if
you have not already done so.  If not, please contact them directly,
or email debian-bugs@pixar.com or myself.

Ian Jackson
(maintainer, debian-bugs)


Ian Jackson / iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk, with the debian-bugs tracking mechanism
This page last modified 07:43:01 GMT Wed 01 Nov