Debian bug report logs - #1676, boring messages

Subject: Bug#1676: w3-el-2.2.16-1.tar.gz doesn't build
Reply-To: Raul Miller <moth@magenta.com>, debian-bugs@pixar.com
Resent-From: Raul Miller <moth@magenta.com>
Resent-To: debian-devel@pixar.com
Resent-Date: Sat, 14 Oct 1995 17:18:02 GMT
Resent-Message-ID: <debian-bugs-handler.1676.B10141716140@pixar.com>
Resent-Sender: iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk
X-Debian-PR-Package: 
X-Debian-PR-Keywords: 
Received: via spool for debian-bugs; Sat, 14 Oct 1995 17:18:02 GMT
Received: with rfc822 via encapsulated-mail; Sat, 14 Oct 1995 17:16:12 GMT
Received: from pixar.com by mongo.pixar.com with smtp
	(Smail3.1.28.1 #15) id m0t4AAv-000B17C; Sat, 14 Oct 95 10:15 PDT
Received: from magenta.com by pixar.com with SMTP id AA03446
  (5.67b/IDA-1.5 for debian-bugs-pipe@mongo.pixar.com); Sat, 14 Oct 1995 10:14:46 -0700
Received: (moth@localhost) by magenta.com (8.6.12/8.6.4) id NAA10523; Sat, 14 Oct 1995 13:10:17 -0400
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 1995 13:10:17 -0400
Message-Id: <199510141710.NAA10523@magenta.com>
From: Raul Miller <moth@magenta.com>
To: debian-bugs@pixar.com
Cc: Karl Eichwalder <ke@ke.Central.DE>

Hmm...

I just looked again at what I'm doing with w3 on install.

Basically, I'm doing two things:

(a) putting the w3 directory in emac's load path.

(b) setting up autoloads for the typically useful entry points to w3.

I don't think this is a bad thing.  If you do, could you explain?

--
Raul

From: iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson)
To: Raul Miller <moth@magenta.com>
Subject: Bug#1676: Acknowledgement (was: w3-el-2.2.16-1.tar.gz doesn't build)
In-Reply-To: <199510141710.NAA10523@magenta.com>
References: <199510141710.NAA10523@magenta.com>

Thank you for the problem report you have sent regarding Debian GNU/Linux.
This is an automatically generated reply, to let you know your message has
been received.  It is being forwarded to the developers' mailing list for
their attention; they will reply in due course.

If you wish to submit further information on your problem, please send
it to debian-bugs@pixar.com, but please ensure that the Subject
line of your message starts with "Bug#1676" or "Re: Bug#1676" so that
we can identify it as relating to the same problem.

Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message,
unless you wish to report a problem with the bug-tracking system.

Your message didn't have a Package: line at the start (in the
pseudo-header following the real mail header), or didn't have a
psuedo-header at all.

This makes it much harder for us to categorise and deal with your
problem report; please ensure that you say which package(s) and
version(s) the problem is with next time.  Some time in the future the
problem reports system may start rejecting such messages.

Ian Jackson
(maintainer, debian-bugs)

From tad.micro.umn.edu!rdm Tue Oct 24 13:27:27 1995
Return-Path: <rdm@tad.micro.umn.edu>
Received: from pixar.com by mongo.pixar.com with smtp
	(Smail3.1.28.1 #15) id m0t7pwV-0005h5C; Tue, 24 Oct 95 13:27 PDT
Received: from rdm.legislate.com ([192.77.155.13]) by pixar.com with SMTP id AA24314
  (5.67b/IDA-1.5 for debian-bugs-request-pipe@mongo.pixar.com); Tue, 24 Oct 1995 13:27:01 -0700
Received: by rdm.legislate.com
	id <m0t7pz0-0006iYC@rdm.legislate.com>
	(Debian /\oo/\ Smail3.1.29.1 #29.33); Tue, 24 Oct 95 16:30 EDT
Message-Id: <m0t7pz0-0006iYC@rdm.legislate.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 95 16:30 EDT
From: Raul Miller <rdm@tad.micro.umn.edu>
To: debian-bugs-request@pixar.com
Subject: 

reassign 1744 dpkg
reassign 1676 w3-el
reassign 1675 w3-el
reassign 1745 base?, perl?