Debian bug report logs - #1538, boring messages

Message sent to debian-devel@pixar.com:

Subject: Bug#1538: (no subject)
Reply-To: mitchell@mdd.comm.mot.com (Bill Mitchell), debian-bugs@pixar.com
Resent-From: mitchell@mdd.comm.mot.com (Bill Mitchell)
Resent-To: debian-devel@pixar.com
Resent-Date: Tue, 03 Oct 1995 15:48:12 GMT
Resent-Message-ID: <debian-bugs-handler.1538.B10031547390@pixar.com>
Resent-Sender: iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 95 08:44:17 PDT
From: mitchell@mdd.comm.mot.com (Bill Mitchell)
Message-Id: <9510031544.AA21565@bb29c.mdd.comm.mot.com>
To: debian-bugs@pixar.com
Cc: Re:, Bug#1187.@mdd.comm.mot.com, Various@mdd.comm.mot.com,
        `vi'@mdd.comm.mot.com, versions@mdd.comm.mot.com,
        trample@mdd.comm.mot.com


This bug is assigned to "nvi, elvis".  Since elvis and nvi now use
update-alternatives, I've requested that this be reassigned to vim.

Message sent:

From: iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson)
To: mitchell@mdd.comm.mot.com (Bill Mitchell)
Subject: Bug#1538: Acknowledgement (was: (no subject))
In-Reply-To: <9510031544.AA21565@bb29c.mdd.comm.mot.com>
References: <9510031544.AA21565@bb29c.mdd.comm.mot.com>

Thank you for the problem report you have sent regarding Debian GNU/Linux.
This is an automatically generated reply, to let you know your message has
been received.  It is being forwarded to the developers' mailing list for
their attention; they will reply in due course.

If you wish to submit further information on your problem, please send
it to debian-bugs@pixar.com, but please ensure that the Subject
line of your message starts with "Bug#1538" or "Re: Bug#1538" so that
we can identify it as relating to the same problem.

Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message,
unless you wish to report a problem with the bug-tracking system.

Your message did not contain a Subject field.  This is broken, I'm
afraid - the Subject: line is a Required Header according to RFC822.
Please remember to include a Subject field in your messages in future.
If you did so the fact that it got lost probably indicates a poorly
configured mail system at your site or an intervening one.

Your message didn't have a Package: line at the start (in the
pseudo-header following the real mail header), or didn't have a
psuedo-header at all.

This makes it much harder for us to categorise and deal with your
problem report; please ensure that you say which package(s) and
version(s) the problem is with next time.  Some time in the future the
problem reports system may start rejecting such messages.

Ian Jackson
(maintainer, debian-bugs)

Message sent:

From: iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson)
To: imurdock@debian.org (Ian Murdock)
In-Reply-To: <m0t3DAz-0001eEC@imagine.imaginit.com>
References: <m0t3DAz-0001eEC@imagine.imaginit.com> <9510031544.AA21565@bb29c.mdd.comm.mot.com>
Subject: Bug#1538: marked as done (was: (no subject))

Your message dated Wed, 11 Oct 95 21:15 EST
with message-id <m0t3DAz-0001eEC@imagine.imaginit.com>
and subject line Bug#1538:
has caused the attached bug report to be marked as done.

It is your now responsibility to ensure that the bug report is dealt
with.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I'm
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Ian Jackson
(maintainer, debian-bugs)

Received: with rfc822 via encapsulated-mail; Tue, 03 Oct 1995 15:47:37 GMT
From mdd.comm.mot.com!mitchell Tue Oct  3 08:44:42 1995
Return-Path: <mitchell@mdd.comm.mot.com>
Received: from pixar.com by mongo.pixar.com with smtp
	(Smail3.1.28.1 #15) id m0t09WL-000GzpC; Tue, 3 Oct 95 08:44 PDT
Received: from motgate.mot.com by pixar.com with SMTP id AA25664
  (5.67b/IDA-1.5 for debian-bugs-pipe@mongo.pixar.com); Tue, 3 Oct 1995 08:44:21 -0700
Received: from pobox.mot.com (pobox.mot.com [129.188.137.100]) by motgate.mot.com (8.6.11/8.6.10/MOT-3.8) with ESMTP id KAA12230 for <debian-bugs@pixar.com>; Tue, 3 Oct 1995 10:44:38 -0500
Received: from mdd.comm.mot.com (mdisea.mdd.comm.mot.com [138.242.64.201]) by pobox.mot.com (8.6.11/8.6.10/MOT-3.8) with SMTP id KAA20051 for <debian-bugs@pixar.com>; Tue, 3 Oct 1995 10:44:35 -0500
Received: from bb29c.mdd.comm.mot.com by mdd.comm.mot.com (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA28173; Tue, 3 Oct 95 08:44:33 PDT
Received: by bb29c.mdd.comm.mot.com (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA21565; Tue, 3 Oct 95 08:44:17 PDT
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 95 08:44:17 PDT
From: mitchell@mdd.comm.mot.com (Bill Mitchell)
Message-Id: <9510031544.AA21565@bb29c.mdd.comm.mot.com>
To: debian-bugs@pixar.com
Cc: Re:, Bug#1187.@mdd.comm.mot.com, Various@mdd.comm.mot.com,
        `vi'@mdd.comm.mot.com, versions@mdd.comm.mot.com,
        trample@mdd.comm.mot.com


This bug is assigned to "nvi, elvis".  Since elvis and nvi now use
update-alternatives, I've requested that this be reassigned to vim.

Message sent:

From: iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson)
To: mitchell@mdd.comm.mot.com (Bill Mitchell)
Subject: Bug#1538 acknowledged by developer (was: (no subject))
References: <m0t3DAz-0001eEC@imagine.imaginit.com> <9510031544.AA21565@bb29c.mdd.comm.mot.com>
In-Reply-To: <9510031544.AA21565@bb29c.mdd.comm.mot.com>

This is an automatic notification regarding your bug report.

Responsibility for it has been taken by one of the developers, namely
imurdock@debian.org (Ian Murdock).

You should be hearing from them with a substantive response shortly, if
you have not already done so.  If not, please contact them directly,
or email debian-bugs@pixar.com or myself.

Ian Jackson
(maintainer, debian-bugs)

Ian Jackson / iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk, with the debian-bugs tracking mechanism

This page last modified 07:43:01 GMT Wed 01 Nov