Debian bug report logs -
#1405, boring messages
Message sent to debian-devel@pixar.com:
Subject: Bug#1405: vim doesn't use update-alternatives
Reply-To: Ian Jackson <iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk>, debian-bugs@pixar.com
Resent-From: Ian Jackson <iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk>
Resent-To: debian-devel@pixar.com
Resent-Date: Wed, 20 Sep 1995 23:49:14 GMT
Resent-Message-ID: <debian-bugs-handler.1405.B09202349000@pixar.com>
Resent-Sender: iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk
X-Debian-PR-Package: vim
X-Debian-PR-Keywords:
Received: via spool for debian-bugs; Wed, 20 Sep 1995 23:49:14 GMT
Received: with rfc822 via encapsulated-mail; Wed, 20 Sep 1995 23:48:58 GMT
Received: from pixar.com by mongo.pixar.com with smtp
(Smail3.1.28.1 #15) id m0svYrI-000G8NA; Wed, 20 Sep 95 16:47 PDT
Received: from bootes.cus.cam.ac.uk by pixar.com with SMTP id AA03268
(5.67b/IDA-1.5 for debian-bugs-pipe@mongo.pixar.com); Wed, 20 Sep 1995 16:47:00 -0700
Received: by bootes.cus.cam.ac.uk
(Smail-3.1.29.0 #36) id m0svYps-000C13A; Thu, 21 Sep 95 00:45 BST
Received: by chiark
id <m0svYL6-0002YOA@chiark.al.cl.cam.ac.uk>
(Debian /\oo/\ Smail3.1.29.1 #29.33); Thu, 21 Sep 95 00:14 BST
Message-Id: <m0svYL6-0002YOA@chiark.al.cl.cam.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 95 00:14 BST
From: Ian Jackson <iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk>
To: Debian bugs submission address <debian-bugs@pixar.com>
Precedence: air-mail
Package: vim
Version: 3.0-3
Setting up vim ...
A link to /usr/bin/vi already exists, so a link will not be made
A link to /usr/man/man1/vi.1 already exists, so a link will not be made
Not linking vim to vi in /usr/bin or /usr/man/man1
vim should use update-alternatives instead. Taking a leaf out of
nvi's postinst:
update-alternatives --install /usr/bin/vi vi /usr/bin/vim 20 \
--slave /usr/man/man1/vi.1 vi.1 /usr/man/man1/vim.1
would seem appropriate, with a corresponding
if [ $1 != "upgrade" ]
then
update-alternatives --remove vi /usr/bin/vim
fi
in the prerm.
Ian.
Message sent:
From: iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson)
To: Ian Jackson <iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk>
Subject: Bug#1405: Acknowledgement (was: vim doesn't use update-alternatives)
In-Reply-To: <m0svYL6-0002YOA@chiark.al.cl.cam.ac.uk>
References: <m0svYL6-0002YOA@chiark.al.cl.cam.ac.uk>
Thank you for the problem report you have sent regarding Debian GNU/Linux.
This is an automatically generated reply, to let you know your message has
been received. It is being forwarded to the developers' mailing list for
their attention; they will reply in due course.
If you wish to submit further information on your problem, please send
it to debian-bugs@pixar.com, but please ensure that the Subject
line of your message starts with "Bug#1405" or "Re: Bug#1405" so that
we can identify it as relating to the same problem.
Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message,
unless you wish to report a problem with the bug-tracking system.
Ian Jackson
(maintainer, debian-bugs)
Message sent to debian-devel@pixar.com:
Subject: Bug#1405: vim doesn't use update-alternatives
Reply-To: "D.J. Gregor" <dgregor@gregor.com>, debian-bugs@pixar.com
Resent-From: "D.J. Gregor" <dgregor@gregor.com>
Resent-To: debian-devel@pixar.com
Resent-Date: Thu, 21 Sep 1995 01:33:02 GMT
Resent-Message-ID: <debian-bugs-handler.1405.B09210118470@pixar.com>
Resent-Sender: iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk
X-Debian-PR-Package: vim
X-Debian-PR-Keywords:
Received: via spool for debian-bugs; Thu, 21 Sep 1995 01:33:02 GMT
Received: with rfc822 via encapsulated-mail; Thu, 21 Sep 1995 01:18:45 GMT
Received: from pixar.com by mongo.pixar.com with smtp
(Smail3.1.28.1 #15) id m0svaGb-000G9wC; Wed, 20 Sep 95 18:17 PDT
Received: from gregor.com (gregor.coil.com) by pixar.com with SMTP id AA08813
(5.67b/IDA-1.5 for debian-bugs-pipe@mongo.pixar.com); Wed, 20 Sep 1995 18:17:00 -0700
Received: from gregor.com (dgregor@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gregor.com (8.6.10/8.6.10) with ESMTP id VAA23504; Wed, 20 Sep 1995 21:26:45 -0400
Message-Id: <199509210126.VAA23504@gregor.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6 4/21/95
To: Ian Jackson <iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk>, debian-bugs@Pixar.com
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 21 Sep 1995 00:14:00 -0000."
<m0svYL6-0002YOA@chiark.al.cl.cam.ac.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 1995 21:26:36 -0400
From: "D.J. Gregor" <dgregor@gregor.com>
Ian,
Working on it. I should have it uploaded in a day or two.
Also, thanks for the hints...
--D.J.
PS: I am making my second set of PGP keys. I'll be making the public
key available in a week or two.
--
D.J. Gregor N8QLB dgregor@gregor.com http://www.coil.com/~dgregor
Message sent:
From: iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson)
To: "D.J. Gregor" <dgregor@gregor.com>
Subject: Bug#1405: Info received (was Bug#1405: vim doesn't use update-alternatives)
In-Reply-To: <199509210126.VAA23504@gregor.com>
References: <199509210126.VAA23504@gregor.com>
Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this problem report. It has been forwarded to the developers to
accompany the original report.
If you wish to continue to submit further information on your problem,
please do the same thing again: send it to debian-bugs@pixar.com, ensuring
that the Subject line starts with "Bug#1405" or "Re: Bug#1405" so that
we can identify it as relating to the same problem.
Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message,
unless you wish to report a problem with the bug-tracking system.
Ian Jackson
(maintainer, debian-bugs)
Message sent:
From: iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson)
To: sr1@irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de (Sven Rudolph)
In-Reply-To: <199510241604.RAA02478@irz101.inf.tu-dresden.de>
References: <199510241604.RAA02478@irz101.inf.tu-dresden.de> <m0svYL6-0002YOA@chiark.al.cl.cam.ac.uk>
Subject: Bug#1405: marked as done (was: vim doesn't use update-alternatives)
Your message dated Tue, 24 Oct 1995 17:04:29 +0100
with message-id <199510241604.RAA02478@irz101.inf.tu-dresden.de>
and subject line Bug#1405: Acknowledgement (was: vim doesn't use update-alternatives)
has caused the attached bug report to be marked as done.
It is your now responsibility to ensure that the bug report is dealt
with.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I'm
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Ian Jackson
(maintainer, debian-bugs)
Received: with rfc822 via encapsulated-mail; Wed, 20 Sep 1995 23:48:58 GMT
From cus.cam.ac.uk!iwj10 Wed Sep 20 16:47:22 1995
Return-Path: <iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk>
Received: from pixar.com by mongo.pixar.com with smtp
(Smail3.1.28.1 #15) id m0svYrI-000G8NA; Wed, 20 Sep 95 16:47 PDT
Received: from bootes.cus.cam.ac.uk by pixar.com with SMTP id AA03268
(5.67b/IDA-1.5 for debian-bugs-pipe@mongo.pixar.com); Wed, 20 Sep 1995 16:47:00 -0700
Received: by bootes.cus.cam.ac.uk
(Smail-3.1.29.0 #36) id m0svYps-000C13A; Thu, 21 Sep 95 00:45 BST
Received: by chiark
id <m0svYL6-0002YOA@chiark.al.cl.cam.ac.uk>
(Debian /\oo/\ Smail3.1.29.1 #29.33); Thu, 21 Sep 95 00:14 BST
Message-Id: <m0svYL6-0002YOA@chiark.al.cl.cam.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 95 00:14 BST
From: Ian Jackson <iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk>
To: Debian bugs submission address <debian-bugs@pixar.com>
Subject: vim doesn't use update-alternatives
Precedence: air-mail
Package: vim
Version: 3.0-3
Setting up vim ...
A link to /usr/bin/vi already exists, so a link will not be made
A link to /usr/man/man1/vi.1 already exists, so a link will not be made
Not linking vim to vi in /usr/bin or /usr/man/man1
vim should use update-alternatives instead. Taking a leaf out of
nvi's postinst:
update-alternatives --install /usr/bin/vi vi /usr/bin/vim 20 \
--slave /usr/man/man1/vi.1 vi.1 /usr/man/man1/vim.1
would seem appropriate, with a corresponding
if [ $1 != "upgrade" ]
then
update-alternatives --remove vi /usr/bin/vim
fi
in the prerm.
Ian.
Message sent:
From: iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson)
To: Ian Jackson <iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk>
Subject: Bug#1405 acknowledged by developer (was: vim doesn't use update-alternatives)
References: <199510241604.RAA02478@irz101.inf.tu-dresden.de> <m0svYL6-0002YOA@chiark.al.cl.cam.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <m0svYL6-0002YOA@chiark.al.cl.cam.ac.uk>
This is an automatic notification regarding your bug report.
Responsibility for it has been taken by one of the developers, namely
sr1@irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de (Sven Rudolph).
You should be hearing from them with a substantive response shortly, if
you have not already done so. If not, please contact them directly,
or email debian-bugs@pixar.com or myself.
Ian Jackson
(maintainer, debian-bugs)
Ian Jackson /
iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk,
with the debian-bugs tracking mechanism