Debian bug report logs - #1093
lpd used lpf by default

Message received at debian-bugs:

From ux5.cso.uiuc.edu!paunovic Tue Jul 11 15:21:18 1995
Return-Path: <paunovic@ux5.cso.uiuc.edu>
Received: from pixar.com by mongo.pixar.com with smtp
	(Smail3.1.28.1 #15) id m0sVng6-00063rC; Tue, 11 Jul 95 15:21 PDT
Received: from ux5.cso.uiuc.edu by pixar.com with SMTP id AA10200
  (5.67b/IDA-1.5 for debian-bugs-pipe@mongo.pixar.com); Tue, 11 Jul 1995 15:19:46 -0700
Received: (from paunovic@localhost) by ux5.cso.uiuc.edu (8.6.11/8.6.11) id RAA02385; Tue, 11 Jul 1995 17:21:14 -0500
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 1995 17:21:14 -0500 (CDT)
From: victor the cleaner <paunovic@students.uiuc.edu>
To: debian-bugs@pixar.com
Subject: lpd used lpf by default
Message-Id: <Pine.Sola.3.91.950711171746.980A-100000@ux5.cso.uiuc.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


Our basic problem here is that if we have a config file that does not 
set a filter, it automatically uses the filter lpf.

Note that filters can mutilate documents by assuming they are UNIX ASCII 
files and putting carriage returns in them.

I suggest that it be changed so that when no filter is specified, none is 
used.

Thank you,
homey@interaccess.com 
corey@interaccess.com

Your message didn't have a Package: line at the start (in the pseudo-header following the real mail header), or didn't have a psuedo-header at all.

This makes it much harder for us to categorise and deal with your problem report; please ensure that you say which package(s) and version(s) the problem is with next time. Some time in the future the problem reports system may start rejecting such messages.

Full text available.