Ex. 3c:
1.  According to the Wills Statute, a will must be signed in the presence of two witnesses.  Mr.
Beal signed his will with one witness standing next to him, and another witness in an ajoining
room with sight of the signing.  The signing of Mr. Beal's will was in accordance with this statute,
the facts show that two witnesses were present.
2.  The Solid Wastes Statute states, "no garbage dump may be established within 250 yards of any
residence without consent of the owner of the residence".  In this fact pattern, the garbage dump
is pre-existing.  The word "establish" pertains to new garbage dumps, therefore the statute does
not apply to this case.
3.  In a wrongful death action, the jury "may award damages as may seem fair and may direct how
the damages shall be distributed".   In Martha Smith's wrongful death action, a jury may award
damages and direct how the damages are to be distributed among the deceased's husband, natural
born child, adopted child, and illegitimate child.  The facts in this action fall within the statutory
description.
4.  Under the Worker's Compensation Statute, "If an employee suffers personal injury by an
action arising out of and in the course of employment, the worker is entitled to recover".  In this
fact pattern Nathan Hail, employee of a university's tennis facility, was injured during a tennis
match he played with a subscriber after teaching his classes.  the director of the facility had
previously stated that the teachers should be friendly to the subscribers.  The injury in question
falls within the statutory description, because it took place within the course of employment,
and arose out of the course of employment as understood by the tennis teacher, and implied by
the director.

Ex.3e.
a.  In order for the prosecuter to prove Theft of Lost or Mislaid Property he must show that
Miller knew of a reasonable method of identifying the owner, failed to take reasonable measures
to restore the property to the owner, and intended to deprive the owner of the use of the property
permanently.
b.  The statutory issues are:
1)  Was there a "reasonable method" in which the defendant could identify the owner of the
locket?
2)  Did the defendant take "reasonable measures to restore the property to the owner"?
3)Did the defendant "intend to deprive the owner permanently of the use of the property?
c.  The legally relevant facts are:
1)  Defendant knew the name of the team because of the YWCA uniforms they wore.
2)  Defendant found the locket just after the team finished practicing.
3)  Defendant put the locket in his pocket and walked away from the YWCA.
4) The locket was engraved with three initials.
5)  Defendants sister's initials were the same as the initials on the locket.
6)  Defendant was robbed about a block away from the place he picked up the locket.