PHONICS RESEARCH FINDING: Children get a better start in reading if they are taught phon- ics. Learning phonics helps them to understand the relationship between letters and sounds and to "break the code" that links the words they hear with the words they see in print. COMMENT: Until the 1930's and 1940's, most American children learned to read by the phonics method, which stresses the relationships between spoken sounds and printed letters. Children learned the letters of the alphabet and the sounds those letters represent. For several decades thereafter, however, the "look-say" approach to reading was dominant: children were taught to identify whole words in the belief that they would make more rapid progress if they identified whole words at a glance, as adults seem to. Recent research indicates that, on the average, children who are taught phonics get off to a better start in learning to read than children who are not taught phonics. Identifying words quickly and accurately is one of the corner- stones of skilled reading. Phonics improves the ability of children both to identify words and to sound out new ones. Sounding out the letters in a word is like the first tentative steps of a toddler: it helps children gain a secure verbal footing and expand their vocabularies beyond the limits of basic readers. Because phonics is a reading tool, it is best taught in the context of reading instruction, not as a separate subject to be mastered. Good phonics strategies include teaching children the sounds of letters in isolation and in words (s/i/t), and how to blend the sounds together (s-s-i-i-t). Phonics should be taught early but not over-used. If phonics instruction extends for too many years, it can defeat the spirit and excitement of learning to read. Phonics helps children pronounce words approximately, a skill they can learn by the end of second grade. In the meantime, children can learn to put their new phonics skills to work by reading good stories and poems. Anderson, R. C., et al. (l985). Becoming a Nation of Readers: The Report of the Commission on Reading. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading. Becker, W. C., and Gersten, R. (l982). "A Follow-up of Follow- Through: The Later Effects of the Direct Instruction Model on Children in Fifth and Sixth Grades." American Educational Re- search Journal, Vol. l9, No. 1, pp. 75-92. Chall, J. S. (l983). Learning to Read: The Great Debate (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. Perfetti, C. A., and Lesgold, A. M. (l979). "Coding and Compre- hension in Skilled Reading and Implications for Reading Instruc- tion." In L. B. Resnick and P. A. Weaver (Eds.), Theory and Practice of Early Reading, Vol. 1, pp. 57-84. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates. Smith, N. B. (l965). American Reading Instruction: Its Develop- ment and Its Significance in Gaining a Perspective on Current Practices in Reading. Newark, DE: International Reading Asso- ciation.