In 1962, a man by the name of W. Cleon Skousen wrote one of his many books called 'Naked Communist' during his sixteen years working for the FBI. This was a serious enough and well documented enough book on the research of communist ideology and action plan that Congress had a section read into the Congressional Record on January 10, 1963 called "CURRENT COMMUNIST GOALS." There are 45 of them and one of them deals with the United Nations: #11 - Promote the UN as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a ONE-WORLD GOVERNMENT with its own INDEPENDENT ARMED FORCES. Some communist leaders believe the world can be taken over as easily by the UN as by Moscow. I read that in the Congressional Record for May 31, 1955 a quote by Zack Kornfeld, who had broke with the Communist Party as follows: "War to the hilt between communism and capitalism is inevitable. Today, of course, we are not strong enough to attack. Our time will come in 20 to 30 years. To win, we shall need the element of surprise. The bourgeoisie will have to be put to sleep. so we shall begin launching the most spectacular peace movement on record. There will be electrifying overtures and unheard of concessions. The capitalist countries, stupid and decadent, will rejoice to cooperate in their own destruction. They will leap at another chance to be friends. As soon as their guard is down, we will smash them with our clenched fist." None Dare Call It Treason- 25 Years Later, p 210 After reading the post on Public Law 87-297, I decided that it would be good to find the original Act. I went to a local university which is one of many federal government repositories. There I found and obtained a copy of the following: 1) United States Statutes at Large 1961, volume 75 at pages 631 through 639 - Public Law 87-297-Sept 26, 1961. 2) Micro fiche - Public Law 88-186, amendment to 87-297, Nov 26, 1963 adding amendment to exempt individuals. 3) United States Code 1970 edition, volume 5, Title 22, chapter 35 - Arms Control and Disarmament. 4) United States Code 1976 edition, volume 6, Title 22, chapter 35 - Arms Control and Disarmament. 5) United States Code 1982 edition, volume 9, Title 22, chapter 35 - Arms Control and Disarmament. 6) United States Code 1988 edition, volume 9, Title 22, chapter 35 - Arms Control and Disarmament. 7) United States Statutes at Large 1989, Public Law 101-216, December 11, 1989 general amendment to PL 87-297. 8) Yearbook of the United Nations 1961 - United States Declaration and Programme of 25 September 1961. pp 9-20. 9) The Dynamics of World Power-The United Nations. A Documentary History of United States Foreign Policy 1945-1973, volume 5, 1973. pp 120-165. I would like to begin with, we're in trouble. Based on these few documents, our political servants, in that time frame of 1961, unquestionably sold out our sovereignty as a nation to the NWO/UN. The university also has, on micro-film rolls, The New York Times going back into the 1800's. On September 26, 1961, right there on the front page is the three stage disarmament plan. So, this was well known and publicized at that time. I wondered how can that be. So, I went back through the paper and documents and it looks like one of the greatest coups in thesis, anti-thesis, synthesis in history. Let me explain. We know that during World War II that the Manhattan Project developed the atomic bomb. The head of that project was Dr. Robert J. Oppenheimer. His wife, brother, and mistress were avowed communists and Communist Party members and had contributed large sums of money to the Communist Party during WWII. (None Dare Call It Treason, 25 Years Later, p. 120) It turns out that they fed the theories, design, and construction plans of nuclear weapons to the Communist government in Russia. According to a book From Major Jordon's Diary, a man by the name of Harry Hopkins who worked with the President, was instrumental in transferring the then top secret data on 35mm film to Russia via the north polar route by plane. When we exploded the first bomb and told Krushchev about it, he was not surprised. Thesis - The Russians build tremendous numbers of nuclear weapons. The United States to counter this threat, built up vast amounts of nuclear weapons. This was well publicized. The public, the world over begins to cry, "what to do, what to do?" Anti-thesis - Sabers are rattled, threats are made, and total global annilation becomes eminent. The people are now practically screaming for anybody to do something. Synthesis - The NWO puppet masters come out and say that a plan for verifiable, global disarmament could be had through the United Nations. The threat could be taken away if only all nations submit to a global plan of disarmament and all nations build a common one world army by which no one individual country could defeat. There would be agreed to methods and inspections within each country that would maintained on a constant basis. (Peace keeping troops in each country.) "Today, every inhabitant of this planet must contemplate the day when this planet may no longer be habitable. Every man, woman and child lives under a nuclear sword of Damocles, hanging by the slenderest of threads, capable of being cut at any moment by accident or miscalculation of by madness. The weapons of war must be abolished before they abolish us. Men no longer debate whether armaments are a symptom or a cause of tension. The mere existence of modern weapons - ten million times more powerful than any that the world has ever seen, and only minutes away from any target on earth - is a source of horror, and discord and distrust. Men no longer maintain that disarmament must await the settlement of all disputes - for disarmament must be a part of any permanent settlement. And men may no longer pretend that the quest for disarmament is a sign of weakness - for in a spiraling arms race, a nation's security may well be shrinking even as its arms increase. For 15 years this organization has sought the reduction and destruction of arms. Now that goal is no longer a dream - it is a matter of life or death. The risks inherent in disarmament pale in comparison to the risks inherent in an unlimited arms race." President John F. Kennedy before the United Nations General Assembly's sixteenth session September 25, 1961. AH-HA, one world government you say. Well, this is not explicitly called for in these documents, but how could you have a undefeatable one world army maintaining "peace" in all countries without a central point of control or central government? Ok, I'll answer, you can't. As to the PL 87-297, we have the NWO's United States program for military disarmament, ending military training, closure of bases, and transfer of remaining forces to the United Nations unified army. The following is a quote from the said document. Interesting items have been made into all caps. Public Law 87-297 AN ACT To establish a United States Arms Control and Disarmament Agency. Title I - Short Title, Purpose, and Definitions SHORT TITLE Section 1. This Act may be cited as the "Arms Control and Disarmament Act". PURPOSE Section 2. An ultimate goal of the United States is a world which is free from the scourge of war and the dangers and burdens of armaments; in which the use of force has been subordinated to the rule of law; and in which international adjustments to a changing world are achieved peacefully. It is the purpose of this Act to provide impetus toward this goal by creating a new agency of peace to deal with the problem of reduction and control of armaments looking toward world disarmament. Arms control and disarmament policy, being an important aspect of foreign policy, must be consistent with national security policy as a whole. The formation and implementation of the United States arms control and disarmament policy in a manner which will promote the national security can best be insured by a central organization charged by statute with primary responsibility for this field. This organization must have such a position within the government that it can provide the President, the Secretary of State, other officials of the executive branch, and the Congress with recommendations concerning United States arms control and disarmament policy, and can assess the effect of these recommendations upon our foreign policies, our national security policies, and our economy. This organization must have the capacity to provide the essential scientific, economic, political, military, PSYCHOLOGICAL, and technological information upon which realistic arms control and disarmament policy must be based. It must be able to carry out the following primary functions: (a) The conduct, support, and coordination of research for arms control and disarmament policy formulation; (b) The preparation for and management of United States participation in international negotiations in the arms control and disarmament field; (c) The dissemination and coordination of public information concerning arms control and disarmament; and (d) The preparation for, operation of, or as appropriate, direction of United States participation in such control systems as may become part of United States arms control and disarmament activities. DEFINITIONS Section 3. As used in this Act- (a) The terms "arms control" and "disarmament" mean the identification, verification, inspection, limitation, control, reduction, or ELIMINATION, OF ARMED FORCES AND ARMAMENTS OF ALL KINDS UNDER INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENT including the necessary steps taken under such an agreement to establish an effective system of international control, or CREATE AND STRENGTHEN INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF PEACE. (b) The term "Government agency" means ANY EXECUTIVE department, commission, agency, independent establishment, corporation wholly or partly owned by the United States which is an instrument of the United States, or any board, bureau, division, service, office, officer, authority, administration, or other establishment IN THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT. (c) The term "Agency" means the United States Arms Control and Disarmament Agency. Under Title III - Functions, you will find an authorization for research. It is section 31 and directs the Director to "(2) to make arrangements for the conduct of research, development, and other studies in the field of arms control and disarmament by private or public institutions or persons;" do the following in research and development. This is a partial list. (a) the detection, identification, inspection, monitoring, limitation, reduction, control, and ELIMINATION OF ARMED FORCES AND ARMAMENTS, including thermonuclear, nuclear, missile, CONVENTIONAL, bacteriological, chemical, and radiological weapons; (d) the CONTROL, REDUCTION, and ELIMINATION OF ARMED FORCES and armaments in space, IN AREAS ON and beneath the earth's surface, and in underwater regions; (e) the structure and operation of INTERNATIONAL CONTROL and OTHER ORGANIZATIONS useful for arms control and disarmament; (h) the economic and political consequences of arms control and disarmament, including the problems of readjustment arising in industry and the REALLOCATION OF NATIONAL RESOURCES; You will also find a section 33 which is the policy formulation. As you will see, this disarmament act cannot be done except by treaty or by Congress. As that the courts have held that a treaty supersedes the Constitution then this un-constitutional act has a "legal" stand. Section 33. The Director is authorized and directed to prepare for the President, the Secretary of State, and the heads of such other government agencies, as the President may determine, recommendations concerning United States arms control and disarmament policy: Provided, however, That no action shall be taken under this or any other law that will obligate the United States to disarm or to reduce or to limit the Armed Forces or armaments of the United States, EXCEPT PURSUANT TO THE TREATY MAKING POWER OF THE PRESIDENT under the Constitution or UNLESS AUTHORIZED BY FURTHER AFFIRMATIVE LEGISLATION BY THE CONGRESS of the United States. On Nov 26, 1963 an amendment to section 33 added the following words. Sec 33 is amended by adding at the end thereof the following new sentence: "Nothing contained in this Act shall be construed to authorize any policy or action by any GOVERNMENT AGENCY which would interfere with, restrict, or prohibit the acquisition, possession, or use of firearms by an individual for the lawful purpose of personal defense, sport, recreation, education, or training." Public Law 88-187 Nov 26, 1963 As with many things within our servants' legal words and incantations these words look to be comforting on the surface. However, it is in fact misleading. Look back at the definition of "government agency." What you will find is it is defined as anything having to do with the executive office. So, what these added words have done is define who could remove firearms from individuals and that being Congress by "further affirmative legislation." The crime bill of 1994 certainly meets the further affirmative legislation rule by it's blatant violation of the 2nd amendment removing or banning certain Citizen militia firearms. Under a section titled as Transfer of Activities and Facilities to Agency we find the following cryptic statement. (b) The President, by Executive order, may transfer to the Director any activities or facilities of any Government agency which relate primarily to arms control and disarmament. In connection with any such transfer, the President may under this section or other applicable authority, provide for appropriate transfers of records, property, CIVILIAN PERSONNEL, and funds. Chattel once again. Sheeple, WAKE UP, WAKE UP! Is this legislation a dead issue? Well, I also found out that the 101st Congress passed another amendment to PL 87-297 on December 11, 1989. This is Public Law 101-216. In Title V, Sec 61 findings, it states, The Congress finds that - (2) as defined in this Act, the terms "arms control" and "disarmament" mean 'the identification, verification, inspection, limitation, control, reduction, or elimination, of armed forces and ARMAMENTS OF ALL KINDS UNDER INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENT TO ESTABLISH AN EFFECTIVE SYSTEM OF INTERNATIONAL CONTROL'; So, as of the end of 1989, we still have the same affirmation of intent by the Washington government to transfer our national soveriegnty in military might to the United Nations! To get a better understanding of what the intent of the globalists are, here is some information from the UN yearbook from 1961. USSR - UNITED STATES STATEMENT OF AGREED PRINCIPLES FOR DISARMAMENT NEGOTIATIONS A statement containing agreed principles as a basis for multilateral negotiations on disarmament was issued jointly by the USSR and the United States on 20 September 1961 for circulation to all United Nations Members. The programme for general and complete disarmament shall ensure that: States will have at their disposal ONLY those non-nuclear armaments, forces, facilities, and establishments as are agreed to be necessary to maintain internal order and protect the personal security of citizens; and that States shall support and provide agreed manpower for a United Nations peace force. To this end, the programme for general and complete disarmament shall contain the necessary provisions, with respect to the military establishment of every nation, for (a) disbanding of armed forces, dismantling of military establishments, including bases, and cessation of the production of armaments as well as their liquidation of conversion to peaceful uses; (b) elimination of all stockpiles of nuclear, chemical, bacteriological and other weapons of mass destruction and cessation of the production of such weapons; (c) elimination of all means of delivery of weapons of mass destruction; (d) abolishment of the organization and institutions designed to organize the military effort of States, cessation of military training and closing of all military training institutions; and (e) discontinuance of military expenditures. The disarmament programme should be implemented in an agreed sequence, by stages, until it is completed with each measure and stage carried out within specified time-limits. Transition to a subsequent stage in the process of disarmament should take place upon a review of the implementation of measures included in the preceding stage and upon a decision that all such measures have been implemented and verified ant that any additional verification arrangements required for measures in the next stage are, when appropriate, ready to operate. Further on we find the three stage United States programme for complete disarmament. Paraphrasing the high points: Stage one limits total number of armed forces to 2.1 million for the US, USSR and any other significant States. It would set the stage for the establishment for a United Nations peace force. The second stage, which I believe we are near the end of, provides for the following. This one is most significant, so I have added a few comments to the points. Armed forces and armaments would be further reduced by: 1) "further restrictions on the production of armaments" The crime bill bans the manufacture, possession, sale, and transfer of Citizen militia firearms. This is really a ploy to cause the manufactures to go out of business and restrict production. 2) "the dismantling or conversion to peaceful uses of agreed military bases and facilities wherever they are located" There have been at least 131 US base closures and the next wave of closures is happening. The DOJ has requested that the bases be converted to prisons or turned over to industry for civilian use. Also, it has been shown that military weapons have been turned over to police departments, training has been given to police depts, sheriffs depts, state police at various military bases. The military has been used to facilitate and operate military weapons against civilians on US soil (Waco, Weavers, etc.) 3) "the halting of the production of chemical, biological and radiological weapons, ..." The third stage provides that complete control, militarily that is, of our nation is given over to the NWO United Nations. "The retention by States of only those forces, non-nuclear armaments, and establishments required for the purpose of maintaining internal order and for the provision of agreed manpower for the United Nations peace force which would be fully functioning; the prohibition of the manufacture of armaments except for those of agreed types and quantities to be used by the United Nations peace force and those required to maintain internal order; the destruction, or conversion to peaceful purposes, of ALL OTHER ARMAMENTS; the strengthening of the peace-keeping capabilities of the United Nations so as to assure peace and the just settlements of differences in a disarmed world." US sovereignty as a nation is completely removed at this point and we will exist only to serve our new masters, the United Nations. If you don't agree, then re-read this article. At the end of stage three, if you don't like the dictates of the UN, how could you make a change? They have all the weapons. He who controls the weapons of life or death thus has the say of what rights you have and what you will do. The United States will only be one State and one vote in the world body. If all the rest of the member states decide to need the United States property for other uses, what will stop them? They have all the weapons. The Crime Bill of 1994 provides many new un-constitutional laws to protect the government. They fall right in line with the transfer of sovereignty of our nation to the NWO/United Nations world body. Organizing and protesting, according to the Act's title VII, Terrorism and International, will land you in one of the many new federal prisons being funded through the tax-payer's (our) pockets. Additional funds for your incarceration will be the confiscation and sale of everything you own. But, the real kicker is, you don't even have to violate the United States law, you could violate a treaty law and another country can have you extradited to the world court and the court be held there! Don't believe? Go to the library and read it! WAKE UP! WAKE UP! WAKE UP! WAKE UP! WAKE UP! WAKE UP! WAKE UP!