                       THE TRINITY ANSWER 

     I am suspicious of the Trinity doctrine but I accept it
because no other explanation fits the evidence.  The Mormon idea
does not fit the evidence.  They say the Godhead consists of three
distinct Gods who are united in purpose.  This does not fit verses
which say there is only one God Being (cf.Is 43:10,11).  The United
Pentecostal idea does not fit the evidence.  They say Jesus is
merely the Father in a different form.  But, we know Jesus was WITH
the Father from the beginning (John 1:1, Phil 2:6,7; John 17:5)!
So, it is not enough to say Jesus was God, you must also say he
was WITH God, making him a distinct person, other than the Father.
In addition, Jesus prays to his Father (John 17:5) which also
proves Jesus is a different person than the Father.  The Jehovah's
Witness idea does not fit the evidence.  They make Jesus to be a
created being when scripture identifies him as from everlasting
(Micah 5:2) to everlasting (Heb 7:3).  But, just what is the
evidence?  Basically there are five categories of evidence. 

   The Five Evidences only one Being is truly God, and His name is
Jehovah.  The Father is identified as Jehovah or God.  Jesus is
identified as Jehovah or God.  The Holy Spirit is identified as
Jehovah or God.  All three are identified as separate persons from
one another.

   Let us presume for a moment all five are true.  If we do, then
the answer we come up with must not deny any of the five evidences. 
If you say there are three separate Beings like the Mormons do, you
contradict the first point.  If you say there is only one person
like the United Pentecostals do, you contradict the last point. 
If you say Jesus is only a created being like the Jehovah's
Witnesses do, you contradict the center point.  The only answer
which can fit all five pieces of evidence is the Trinity.  

   But, what is the definition of the Trinity?  That God is a
singular Spirit Being who is hypostatically three persons.  What
is meant by hypostatic?  First, realize we are dealing with a Being
of Spirit.  It may help to compare a Spirit Being to a Being of
Light or a Being of Fire.  Imagine a single flame which divides
itself into three flames and then the three move together as one
again, but the three remain distinctly different from each other
while burning together as one flame.  Hear them speaking to each
other within the flame.  Yet, when they speak to us they speak in
the singular, I AM.  Or picture a Ball of Light which separates
itself into three balls of Light and then comes together again as
one glowing orb.  Yet, the three remain distinct from each other
within the one.  That is Hypostatic Union.

   A hypostatic union is where there is absolute unity of essence
without loss of individual identity.  But, Light and Fire can not
pass through walls whereas Spirit can.  So Spirit lends itself
fully to hypostatic union as compared to Light or Fire.  Someone
might say to me the flame was not three (3) until it divided
itself, therefore there was a time when the other two did not
exist.  That is due to the weakness of my illustration. I ask you
to imagine it was always three in one.  Besides, if I reach down
in the fireplace and pull out a log and there is fire on that log,
which is older?  Is the fire in the fire place older or the fire
on the log?  They are both the same age.  They are both the same
name.  Further, if I move the fire which is on the log back into
the fire which is in the fire place, all I did was restore it the
way it was.  Therefore it was already two in one before I pulled
it out!   

   Let us suppose Jesus came from the Father like fire comes from
fire.  God from God, fire from fire.  Is he any younger than his
Father?  No.  Is there any difference in the type of substance or
nature?  No.  The fire on the log demonstrates all of that.  Yet,
though the fire on the log is equal in age and substance it is
logically subordinate to the fire in the fire place, because that
is where it came from.  So, there is a sequential relationship but
not one we should measure by time.

   But all of this presumes the Five evidences exist.  Here are
some proofs to help you decide. 

I. Only one Being is truly God, and His name is Jehovah.

   In Isaiah 43:10,11 we read:  "..Ye are my witnesses, saith the
LORD (Jehovah) ...before me there was no God formed neither shall
there be after me..". 

   You might ask where I get authority to place Jehovah in
parenthesis.  Any place in the KJV Old Testament where the word
Lord is in all capital letters (LORD), it is the name Jehovah. 
[There is some question as to which vowels go between the
consonants, therefore LORD is used.]  Here is another proof Jehovah
is the only God Being: "...I am the first and I am the last and
beside me there is no God....Is there a God beside me? yea, there
is no God; I know not any".  Isaiah 44:6,8 

   As you can see, there is no room for two Gods nor for three.
Jehovah says none exist except for himself.  This rules out the
Mormon idea of three Gods and it rules out the J.W. idea that Jesus
is "a" god. No God exists except Jehovah.  We have proven our first
point.  Only one Being is truly God and his name is Jehovah. 

II. The Father is identified as Jehovah or God.

   The Father is identified as Jehovah in Ps 110:1: "The LORD
(Jehovah) said unto my Lord, Sit thou at my right hand until I make
thine enemies thy footstool".  Also in Psalms 2:7: "I will declare
the decree: the LORD (Jehovah) hath said unto me, Thou art my Son;
this day have I begotten thee." 

   The person speaking is the Father, and the person being spoken
to is Jesus.  This makes the Father Jehovah. It might interest you
that the Mormons deny the Father is Jehovah!

   In case there is still doubt the Father is the one speaking in
these two verses, I refer you to Heb 1:5.  We have proven our
second point.  The Father is Jehovah. 

III. Jesus is identified as Jehovah or God.

   There are numerous verses which identify Jesus as Jehovah.  Let
us begin with Heb 1:10-12: "And (the context means, "And also the
Father says this about Jesus" see v.8), Thou, Lord, in the
beginning hast laid the foundation of the earth; and the heavens
are the works of thine hands; They shall perish but thou remainest;
and they shall wax old as doth a garment; And as a vesture shalt
thou fold them up, and they shall be changed: but thou art the
same, and thy years shall not fail."

   Someone might ask how the verse makes Jesus to be Jehovah. 
Well, the whole passage is a quote from Psalms 102:25-27.  The only
difference is Psalms makes it refer to Jehovah whereas Hebrews
makes it refer to Jesus!  Ask yourself these questions: 

   In Psalms, who is it that laid the foundation of the earth
(V.25)? Jehovah (cf v.1).  In Hebrews, who is it that laid the
foundation of the earth?  Jesus (v.10). 

   In Psalms, the heavens are the work of whose hands (v.25)?
Jehovah.  But, whose hands were they according to Hebrews (v.10)?
Jesus. 

   In Psalms, who is it that shall endure longer than the heavens
(26)? Jehovah. But, who is it in Hebrews (11)? Jesus.

   In Psalms who is it that never changes (v.27)? Jehovah.  But,
who is it that never changes in Hebrews (12)? Jesus. 

   Here is another passage which does pretty much the same thing:
"I the LORD (Jehovah) search the heart, I try the reins, even to
give every man according to his ways, and according to the fruit
of his doings." Jeremiah 17:10 

   Now, compare that to this: "...I am he which searcheth the reins
and hearts: and I will give unto everyone of you according to your
works." Rev 2:23 

   So, who is it that searches the reins and hearts?  Well, in
Jeremiah 17:10 it is Jehovah but, in Rev 2:23 it is Jesus!  This
is proven from v18,25,27 where it is clear Jesus is speaking.  We
have established our third point of the five.  Jesus is identified
as Jehovah. 

IV. The Holy Spirit is identified as Jehovah or God.

   In Acts 5:3-4, Ananias and his wife lied to the Holy Ghost.
Peter tells them they have not lied unto man but unto God.  And,
what about this well worn verse? "...baptizing them in the name of
the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost." Mat 28:19  By
mentioning the Holy Spirit equally with the Father and the Son, it
means the Holy Spirit must also be Jehovah.  And, here is one more:
"...well spake the Holy Ghost by Esaias (Isaiah) the prophet
...saying, Go unto this people, and say, Hearing ye shall hear,
and shall not understand..." Acts 28:25,26  The point is Jehovah
does the speaking in Isaiah 6:9 but Acts credits the Holy Ghost as
the speaker.  We have established our fourth point.  The Holy
Spirit is identified as Jehovah and/or God. 

V. All three are identified as separate persons from one another.

   This has already been proven with John 1:1 as far as Jesus and
the Father are concerned.  The Holy Ghost is proven to be a
distinct by the equal billing He is given in the baptismal formula
and by the words of Jesus in John 14:26, "But the comforter, which
is the Holy Ghost,...he shall teach you all things...."  Jesus
refers to the Holy Ghost in the third person ,"he".  So the fifth
point is established.  The Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are
identified as separate persons from one another. 

                           In Summary 

   The Trinity is the only solution which does justice to the five
evidences.  The theories offered by the Mormons, J.W's and the
United Pentecostals, all deny at least one of the five.  The
doctrine of the Trinity says Jehovah is a singular Being but
hypostatically triune.  One in Being, three in persons.  An example
of this would be three flames burning as a single flame.  Jesus may
have come from the Father as fire comes from fire.  There is no
difference in age or substance or name though there is a
distinction in personality.  Yet, it is a case where Jesus had
always been from the Father.  There was never a time when Jesus did
not exist as a distinct person.  As an example of how Jesus can
proceed from the Father but have always existed I offer this.  If
there was such a thing as an eternal flame then the heat and light
which proceed from it would also have been equally eternal and
there would never have been a time when the flame existed with out
the heat or light.