








  MINUTES OF VHDL ANALOG SUB-PAR GROUP IN SAN
  FRANCISCO CA. 6/21/91





  Document Number VIFANL-001


  July 19, 1991


  Mark Brown


  IBM
  Hwy. 52 and 37th. St. NW.
  Dept29M/Bldg.040-2
  Rochester, MN 55901








































  CONTENTS
  ________





  Overview   1
  General Discussions   1
    Selection of chair and vice-chair(s)   1
    Development process   1
    Scope of work   3
    Work items for the next meeting   3

  APPENDIX A.  ATTENDEES   5










































                                                                   Contents  ii









  OVERVIEW
  ________

  The meeting was held at the San Francisco Marriott in San Francisco CA. the
  afternoon of 6/21/91.  A list of the members in attendance is attached to
  this document. The primary goal of this meeting was to organize a group under
  the VASG to develop extensions to the 1076 VHDL language that address analog
  electrical design issues.

  The result of this meeting generated various work items for various members
  of the group.


  GENERAL DISCUSSIONS
  ___________________

  The proposed agenda for the meeting was as follows:

  o   Selection of chair and vice-chair(s)

  o   Development process

  o   Scope of work

  o   Work items for the next meeting


  SELECTION OF CHAIR AND VICE-CHAIR(S)

  The meeting began by opening the floor for nominations for chair and vice-
  chair. I was nominated and voted in as chair. Kevin Nolan from Analogy was
  nominated and voted in as North American vice-char. It was suggested that
  since Robert Cottrell from LSI in the UK. agreed to be the European contact
  for this effort, that he be elected to the position of European vice-chair. I
  took it as a work item for me to see if Robert would accept this position.


  DEVELOPMENT PROCESS

  There was general agreement that the development process that we should use
  to develop the language extensions should be the same one used for the 92
  restandardization work which is as follows:
















                                                                              1










           +-----------------------+
           | Requirements Submittal|
           +-----------------------+
                       |
                       V
           +-----------------------+
           | Requirements Analysis |
           +-----------------------+
                       |     +-------------------------+
                       |     |                         |
                       V     V                         |
           +-----------------------+      +-------------------------+
           |   Language Design     |      | Language Design Review  |
           +-----------------------+      +-------------------------+
                       |     |                         A
                       |     |                         |
                       |     +-------------------------+
                       |     +-------------------------+
                       |     |                         |
                       V     V                         |
           +-----------------------+      +-------------------------+
           |      Prototype        |      |    Prototype Review     |
           +-----------------------+      +-------------------------+
                       |     |                         A
                       |     |                         |
                       V     +-------------------------+
           +-----------------------+
           | Complete Documentation|
           +-----------------------+
                       |
                       V
           +-----------------------+
           | Submit for Balloting  |
           +-----------------------+
                       |
                       V
           +-----------------------+
           | Respond to Negative   |
           |       Ballots         |
           +-----------------------+
                       |
                       V
           +-----------------------+
           |   Submit to REVCOM    |
           +-----------------------+


  We then discussed the coordination of this PAR with the SCC 30 group.  Our
  conclusion was that the PAR should be "coordinated" not "cosponsored" with
  the SCC 30 group.





                                                                              2









  SCOPE OF WORK

  Al Gilman gave the group a brief report on the status of the MHDL work that
  Intermetrics is doing. This language has an emphasis on high frequency,
  spatial and frequency domain modelling. This was an area that the group gen-
  erally agreed we didn't want to touch (with a 10 meter pole).

  We then began a discussion of exactly what the scope of our work should be.
  We started out with some base assumptions:

  1.  Base language is the 92 version of 1076.

  2.  Goal is to create a DELTA language. (Don't change existing constructs)

  3.  Concentrate on time domain mixed-mode description and simulation.

      o   Leave frequency domain alone for now.

  From these assumptions we developed three possibilities for the scope of our
  work:

  1.  Formalize the foreign simulator interface requirement for the 92 restand-
      ardization work for continuous time simulation.

  2.  Develop mixed-mode behavior capability by extending a subset of VHDL to
      continuous time modelling. This effectively partitions a design into dis-
      crete sections of continuous time and discrete time behavior.  It will
      simplify the elaboration process for simulation builders.

  3.  Develop mixed-mode behavior capability by creating one language that can
      contain a mixture of discrete and continuous time behavior constructs.

  After further discussion, we concluded that our goal should be to:

  1.  Accomplish either item 2 or 3. Which specific one will be determined
      based on the initial analysis of the requirements.

  2.  Take item 1 back to the 92 restandardization group as a design require-
      ment (It turns out that it currently is a DR). A vote was taken to affirm
      this requirement. The result was unanimously in favor.


  WORK ITEMS FOR THE NEXT MEETING

  In order to start the requirements process off, Kevin Nolan agreed to chair
  the requirements analysis team.

  The following are the agreed-to work items to be completed by the next
  meeting along with the person(s) responsible:

  1.  Prepare a white paper dealing with scope item #1, describing what should
      be included in a continuous time <=> discrete time interface.  This paper
      will be presented to the language design team of the 92 restandardization
      group by 7/22/91. (Bill Hanna and Mark Brown)


                                                                              3









  2.  Complete and submit sub-PAR. (Mark Brown with John Hines and Stan
      Krolikoski, review by Al Lowenstein)

  3.  Gather current requirements and put out call for more requirements and
      participation. (Kevin Nolan, Robert Cottrell and Mark Brown)

  4.  Create a project plan with schedules. (Mark Brown)

  5.  Come up with a catchy name and acronym for the group (everyone)















































                                                                              4









  APPENDIX A.  ATTENDEES
  ______________________





  NAME                          ADDRESS

  MARK BROWN

                                IBM
                                Hwy. 52 and 37th. St. NW.
                                Dept.29M / Bldg.040-2
                                Rochester, MN. 55901
                                Tele: (507)-253-4001
                                Fax: (507)-253-1979
                                Email: brownm@ibm.com

  KEVIN NOLAN

                                Analogy Inc.
                                Email: uunet!analogy!kevin

  AL LOWENSTEIN

                                PCA
                                Email: a.lowenstein@ieee.org

  BILL HANNA

                                McDonnel Douglas
                                Email: hanna%vaxecl@mdcgwy.mdc.com

  ALFRED GILMAN

                                Intermetrics Inc.
                                4733 Bethesda Ave.
                                Bethesda, MD. 20814
                                Tele: (301)-657-3775
                                Email: gilman@i2wash.com

  ROBERT HILLMAN

                                Rome Lab
                                USAF
                                Email: hillmanr@rl.af.mil

  JEAN MERMET

                                IMT
                                Technopole de Chateau - Gombert
                                13451 Marseille Cedex 13 - France
                                Tele: 33-91054402
                                Fax: 33-91054343


                                                      Appendix A.  Attendees  5









  MIKE DUKES

                                WL/ELED
                                Wright-Patterson AFB
                                OH. 45433-6543
                                Tele: (513)-255-8626
                                Email: dukes@etd2.el.wpafb.af.mil

















































                                                      Appendix A.  Attendees  6




