Subject: Linux-Misc Digest #400
From: Digestifier <Linux-Misc-Request@senator-bedfellow.MIT.EDU>
To: Linux-Misc@senator-bedfellow.MIT.EDU
Reply-To: Linux-Misc@senator-bedfellow.MIT.EDU
Date:     Fri, 8 Jul 94 13:13:17 EDT

Linux-Misc Digest #400, Volume #2                 Fri, 8 Jul 94 13:13:17 EDT

Contents:
  Re: automounter for LINUX (Mitchum DSouza)
  Re: Problems with gcc and gdb (Mitchum DSouza)
  Re: CQ de sm0fcj + k (Bill Tate)
  Re: NCR53c810 (Was: Need help building ultimate Linux system) (Andrew Anderson)
  Re: Extraneous crap in Linux distributions (Richard Brooksby)
  Re: [term] Boo-hoo! (Dylan Smith)
  Re: why won't old socket connections disapp (Alan Cox)
  Re: OS/2 and Linux discussed (Re: TCP/IP: The reason I dumped OS/2) (Alan Cox)
  Why? ->"Too many TCP sochets for netinfo" (Eric Poole)
  Re: Need help building ultimate Linux system (Nate Williams)
  Howto?? -> Run DOS/Windows Telnet/FTP clients with Linux SLIP Server? (Eric Poole)
  Re: Can a DOS virus harm my linux partition? (Eric Poole)
  Slackware Professional CD available from the ACC Catalog (Robert Wolf)
  Something wrong with hostname/domainname? (Hallvard Paulsen)
  Re-Release v0.10  (was Re: When was Linux born?) (Dan Newcombe)
  Re: Is the adaptec AHA-2842VL SCSI controller supported. (Tanvir Hassan)
  Re: Need help building ultimate Linux system (Michael L. VanLoon)
  Internet Connections (56k/T1) & Linux (David H Dennis)
  HELP: Run two different things iin 2 XTERM windows ("V.S.Carpenter")
  Re: Linux better than OS/2 for net surfing (Mark Aurit)
  Linux S3 864 X Server Available!!! (Doug Braun)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Mitchum DSouza <m.dsouza@mrc-apu.cam.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: automounter for LINUX
Date: 8 Jul 1994 09:19:46 -0400
Reply-To: m.dsouza@mrc-apu.cam.ac.uk

Bill Heiser: 
| Is there an AUTO-MOUNTER that will work with LINUX?
| 
| Thanks in advance,


Yes. Please read section 11.3 in the NET-2-HOWTO on 

        sunsite.unc.edu:/pub/Linux/docs/HOWTO

Mitch

------------------------------

From: Mitchum DSouza <m.dsouza@mrc-apu.cam.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: Problems with gcc and gdb
Date: 8 Jul 1994 09:29:03 -0400
Reply-To: m.dsouza@mrc-apu.cam.ac.uk

Simon:
|         I am unfamiliar with using gcc and gdb and I am having trouble
| compiling C programs with gcc v2.5.8.  The C code originally came from an
| Iris Indigo, which uses the MIPs ucode C compiler.  Under Linux, these programs
| compile without error messages without using any flags on the command line.
| On running the program, I get a segmentation fault right away and no core file 
| is generated.  When I run the program under gdb v4.8, I get the following error
| message:
| 
|         Program received signal 11, Segmentation fault
|         0x3a66 in __libc_init () 
| 
|         I am running Linux from SLS 1.00 on a 486-50DX.  Is there a quick fix to
| my problem?  Is there a way for me to generate a core file when the program 
| crashes, so that I can try to figure out what's going on?  Thanks in advance.

Core's are created/supressed by your shell. So it is not a gcc/gdb problem.

Please read the GCC-FAQ on

        sunsite.unc.edu:/pub/Linux/docs/faqs

for more info about debugging, core generation etc...

Mitch

------------------------------

From: btate@encore.com (Bill Tate)
Subject: Re: CQ de sm0fcj + k
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 1994 11:46:27 GMT

mah@ka4ybr.com (Mark A. Horton KA4YBR) writes:

>Terry Dawson (terryd@extro.ucc.su.OZ.AU) wrote:
>: iiitac@uk.ac.swan.pyr (Alan Cox) writes:

>: >In article <1141@blox.se> bj0rn@blox.se (Bjorn Ekwall) writes:
>: >>Are my eyes just extra sensitive to ham callsigns, or does Linux
>: >>have a special attraction for people such as us?

>: >It seems to , since I've released the Linux AX.25 I've been suprised the
>: >number of Radio amateur people using Linux - and a lot of them since before
>: >Linux had any usable amateur radio support even Wampes. In fact some quite
>: >big names in packet radio seem to have Linux systems.

>: >Alan
>: >GW4PTS

>: Seems to me to be the 'free' OS that best supports the Amateur Radio
>: operator ethic.

>: Terry
>: vk2ktj

>: -- 
>: --- Terry Dawson, terryd@extro.ucc.su.oz.au

>Anyone up for a project to write a complete packet/station monitor/control
>package for Linux?  Could be a lot of fun!

>73, de ka4ybr, Mark

>--
>"Linux!     Guerrilla UNIX Development     Venimus, Vidimus, Dolavimus."
>------------------------------------------------------------
>Mark A. Horton       ka4ybr             mah@ka4ybr.atl.ga.us
>P.O. Box 747 Decatur GA US 30031-0747         mah@ka4ybr.com
>+1.404.371.0291                     33 45 31 N / 084 16 59 W

Sounds like a great project and one I have thought about.  I have a
lot of the c source code for the TCP/IP Parts.


73, de WB4UAH, Temp AA,  Bill

------------------------------

From: andersoa@news.db.erau.edu (Andrew Anderson)
Crossposted-To: comp.periphs.scsi
Subject: Re: NCR53c810 (Was: Need help building ultimate Linux system)
Date: 8 Jul 1994 02:49:00 GMT

Drew Eckhardt (drew@kinglear.cs.colorado.edu) wrote:
: It works fine on most systems, although I've seen some compatability 
: problems on certain systems due to outdated and buggy PCI BIOSes,
: as well as some strange hardware interactions with certain PCI 
: video hardware.

Can you say which systems/bios work with your driver?  I'm about to
put in a PO for a Linux server, and I'd like to get as much performance
out of it as I can.  I'd rather use a PCI SCSI card than an Adaptec
154x.

: Actually, I've seen one place that had them for $70 in Q1, $62 in 
: Q20.

Where?  I'd like to pick one up for home if they're that cheap!

--
|===========================================================================|
|  Andrew Anderson                              andersoa@erau.db.erau.edu   |
|  Novell Network System Administrator          andersoa@bart.db.erau.edu   |
|  Linux System Administrator                   andrew@wilbur.db.erau.edu   |
|                                                                           |
| I don't speak for ERAU, and God knows I don't want them to speak for me!  | 
|===========================================================================|

------------------------------

From: richard@harlequin.co.uk (Richard Brooksby)
Subject: Re: Extraneous crap in Linux distributions
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 1994 11:45:29 GMT

I wrote:

> I have sampled several Linux distributions in the hope of finding something
> stable and sensible that I can use without fuss.  Why is it that the
> distributions feel the need to include piles of junk in /etc/profile and
> /etc/skel?  Are these file the distribution maintainer's personal
> preferences?  If so, why is he imposing them on everyone else?
>
> Every time I try a distribution I have to spend days hacking out all the
> rubbish here and elsewhere.

I have received a fair amount of mail telling me off for being so ungrateful
to all the people who spend their time putting Linux distributions together,
and those who spent their time writing all this free software.

Well, I'd just like to say that I am very grateful.  Linux is pretty damn good
and has enabled me to continue my work from home, which is very helpful.
Thanks to everyone involved.

I apologize if my tone was a little too abrasive, but I am concerned about the
_quality_ of the software and distributions.  Managing quality is a very
difficult task (I should know) so I shouldn't expect everything to be perfect.
Linux is good compared to a lot of free stuff.

Thanks again.
---
Richard Brooksby <richard@harlequin.co.uk>


------------------------------

From: dylan@formalhaut (Dylan Smith)
Subject: Re: [term] Boo-hoo!
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 1994 11:38:18 GMT
Reply-To: dylan@vnet.ibm.com

Michael Edward Chastain (mec@shell.portal.com) wrote:

: My first contention is that the service provider will *lose money* providing
: continuous access at $20/month.
...
...
: You claim that $85/month for SLIP is overpriced.  I claim that
: $20/month for unlimited shell access is underpriced.  Service providers

Well, here in England we manage it. Demon Internet services run dialup
IP services for 10 pounds sterling (approx $17) per month, and are still
in business (and therefore make a profit). And I thought England was
supposed to be backward in Internet connectivity...obviously we are not!

--
#include <disclaimer.h>
Internet: dylan@vnet.ibm.com  | JANET: dylan%vnet.ibm.com@uk.ac.nsfnet-relay

------------------------------

From: iialan@iifeak (Alan Cox)
Subject: Re: why won't old socket connections disapp
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 1994 12:10:20 GMT

In article <19940707.173248.813466.NETNEWS@ESOC> kkeyte@dpd13.dev.esoc.esa.de writes:
>That's all very nice & good, but it's inconsistent. I have seen this
>behaviour sometimes and not others. If I have a server type program that
>binds to a well-known port and I want to kill it and restart it then I'm
>stuck until the timed-wait expires. SOMETIMES it lets me restart immediately.

void make_address_reusable(int s)
{
        int optval=1;
        if(setsockopt(s,SOL_SOCKET,SO_REUSEADDR,&optval,sizeof(optval))==-1)
                perror("Can't mark address for reuse");
}

>Dunno why! The timed wait is also sometimes very annoying for this reason.
>I would like to be able to decide myself about the behaviour of a closing
>socket; often I'm in a position to KNOW whether more data is expected or
>not.

No you are not. The network can cause duplicates, and there may be out of
order lost data in transmission to the socket over the internet. So you
are NOT in any position at all. Believe it or not the designers of TCP
knew what they were doing.

Alan
-- 
Alan Cox: gw4pts@gw4pts.ampr.org      \\  //          GW4PTS@GB7SWN
=======================================\\//===================================
<<<<<<     Toolkits are for WIMPS :::: //\\Lib :::: the only way to fly >>>>>>
======================================//==\\==================================

------------------------------

Crossposted-To: comp.os.os2.advocacy
From: iialan@iifeak (Alan Cox)
Subject: Re: OS/2 and Linux discussed (Re: TCP/IP: The reason I dumped OS/2)
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 1994 12:14:11 GMT

In article <CsLnoq.I7t@visix.com> david@visix.com (David Charlap) writes:
>You claimed that Linux can be fully productive with only a single
>floppy disk.

It can depending on what you need to do. Ditto DOS, ditto OS/2 and just
about ditto Windows. Of course if I want the C compiler then I need about
10Mb handy (or 30-40Mb for many other systems).

>Now, let's try again.  What can you do on a single disk boot of Linux
>if you don't have the rest of the system installed somewhere else on
>your network?

IP & AX.25 routing, network monitoring, SNMP, telnet/ftp/rlogin/etc network
client machine, nethack.

The thing is you can put together a custom disk set for any small set of
tasks.

Alan

-- 
Alan Cox: gw4pts@gw4pts.ampr.org      \\  //          GW4PTS@GB7SWN
=======================================\\//===================================
<<<<<<     Toolkits are for WIMPS :::: //\\Lib :::: the only way to fly >>>>>>
======================================//==\\==================================

------------------------------

From: epoole@leotech.mv.com (Eric Poole)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.help
Subject: Why? ->"Too many TCP sochets for netinfo"
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 94 01:14:42 GMT
Reply-To: epoole@scoot.netis.com

Several times today I've gotten the message

        oops, too many TCP sockets for netinfo.

 ... on the console, usually repeated several up to a few dozen times
in a row.

Any idea what's causing this?  This is the first time I've noticed it
in a few months of running 0.99pl15.

I grepped through about 18,000 c.o.l.h. and 6000 c.o.l.m. articles and
found only one reference to something like that ... and that one
mentioned editing net.h to change NSOCKETS from 128 to some higher
number (256?  512?).  I'd appreciate some advice (confirm or deny)
here before I go charging off and do that ...

Please respond e-mail to epoole@scoot.netis.com, and I'll summarize
to the group ... thanks.

 . . . . . ep


------------------------------

From: nate@bsd.coe.montana.edu (Nate Williams)
Crossposted-To: comp.windows.x.i386unix
Subject: Re: Need help building ultimate Linux system
Date: 7 Jul 1994 19:20:55 GMT

In article <michaelv.773568382@ponderous.cc.iastate.edu>,
Michael L. VanLoon <michaelv@iastate.edu> wrote:
>The PCI NCR controllers are fine, I'm sure.  But you must remember
>these are dumb controllers.  I.e. the CPU has to process all the
>information going into and out of the system -- the SCSI chip simply
>converts the information into signals on the SCSI bus.  While it's
>doing this, it can't be doing anything else, meaning your CPU is tied
>up for the duration of the SCSI transaction.  You get what you pay
>for.

Umm, I think you're confused.  The new NCR SCSI cards are bus-mastering
and perform pretty close (better/worse) to the newer Buslogic and older
Adaptec cards.    (Faster because of PCI, but I think in general the
performance and CPU utilization are pretty much the same as what I'm
seeing on equivalent hardware with Buslogic cards)



Nate
-- 
nate@bsd.coe.montana.edu     |  FreeBSD core member and all around tech.
nate@cs.montana.edu          |  weenie.
work #: (406) 994-4836       | 
home #: (406) 586-0579       |  Available for contract/otherwise work.

------------------------------

From: epoole@leotech.mv.com (Eric Poole)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.help
Subject: Howto?? -> Run DOS/Windows Telnet/FTP clients with Linux SLIP Server?
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 94 01:18:08 GMT
Reply-To: epoole@scoot.netis.com

If anyone has any DOS or Windows Internet clients (PC Eudora, NCSA
Telnet, Windows Mosaic, etc.) running via SLIP links to their Linux
machine, would you please drop me a note to epoole@scoot.netis.com?

I have all that stuff running over the Ethernet network to the Linux
box, but I can't get it to run with Linux as a SLIP server.

Hoping to hear from someone who's done it ...

 . . . . . ep


------------------------------

From: epoole@leotech.mv.com (Eric Poole)
Subject: Re: Can a DOS virus harm my linux partition?
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 94 01:22:48 GMT
Reply-To: epoole@scoot.netis.com


In article <newcombe.305.00C3A14D@aa.csc.peachnet.edu> newcombe@aa.csc.peachnet.edu writes:

> I remember reading a few years ago about a guy who had just finished 
> installing a 386 version of Unix (took him a while), and needed to boot up DOS 
> for something quick.  The boot disk he had overwrote the MBR, and boot sector 
> of the hard drive or something like that.   He lost the whole Unix system.

If you have a boot floppy or so-called "rescue" disk, can't you just
boot off that, and recover whatever you need or restore the boot
sectors of your drive?

(Or just boot off a floppy from then on ... I have both DOS and Linux
on my machine and I just boot off a floppy for Linux, and off of the
hard drive for MessDOS ... )

 . . . . . ep


------------------------------

From: acc-corp@tigger.jvnc.net (Robert Wolf)
Subject: Slackware Professional CD available from the ACC Catalog
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 1994 02:42:00 GMT

The Slackware Professional CD Available from 
the East Coast and Canadian Official Distributor:  
The ACC Bookstores Catalog, 
for only $37.95 US or $59.95 Canadian.  
As one of the first Official stocking locations 
first copies will ship in only two weeks!

Slackware Professional Linux Distribution on CD.
==================================================
Morse Telecommunications, Inc. and Patrick 
Volkerding, author of the popular Slackware(tm) 
Linux distribution are pleased to announce the long 
awaited Slackware Professional Linux 2.0, the 
authorized edition, ready-to-run on CDROM.

SUMMARY
============
Slackware Professional Linux 2.0 is the authorized 
CDROM-runnable version of Slackware version 2.0, 
now available on most common Linux FTP sites.
This version continues the distribution's tradition of 
being the easiest and most flexible version of Linux 
to install and maintain.

Slackware Professional Features and Enhancements:
======================================================
+ Linux kernel 1.1.18
+ Xfree 2.1.1
+ Beta version of X11r6 (XFree86 3.0) is included in 
binary form.
+ Can be run almost entirely from CDROM
+ Minimum installation is 8 meg on a native Linux 
partition
+ For users wishing to run from an MSDOS partition, 
Slackware Professional can be be run directly from 
CDROM while using as little as 11 megabytes of DOS 
file space.
+ For unsupported CDROM drives, installation is 
supported through either floppy disk or MSDOS 
partition. What this means is that if your CDROM 
drive is unsupported, you can still run Slackware 
Professional.
+ 90 days of on-call technical support

ACC Bookstores PC UNIX-LINUX CATALOG.
=============================================
ACC Bookstore's new 16 page four-colour catalog 
with over 75 items, is filled with software and 
books related to making Unix work on PC's.  It includes
4 different Linux CD's, SWiM (motif) for Linux, and 
several other new commercial tools and applications 
for Linux.

To receive your free copy of ACC's PC UNIX and 
LINUX CATALOG, just call, fax, or send email to:
TEL:  (800) 546-7274
FAX:  (203) 454-2582
Email: info@acc-corp.com

------------------------------

From: hallpaul@immhp1.marina.unit.no (Hallvard Paulsen)
Subject: Something wrong with hostname/domainname?
Date: 8 Jul 1994 12:58:09 GMT
Reply-To: hallpaul@immhp1.marina.unit.no (Hallvard Paulsen)

Hello everybody.

I just installed Slackware yesterday and am very happy with it.
Just one thing is realy bothers me. The host name of this mashime
is just "none".

If I try to shange the hostname using "hostname host" it seams to work OK. But
there seems to be no difference between hostname and domainname.

This makes me very confused (as you might understand from this posting).

Hallvard




------------------------------

From: newcombe@aa.csc.peachnet.edu (Dan Newcombe)
Subject: Re-Release v0.10  (was Re: When was Linux born?)
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 1994 09:01:08 UNDEFINED

In article <1994Jul7.175534.461@golem.greenie.muc.de> andi@golem.greenie.muc.de (Andi Kleen) writes:
>> Instead of concentrating on the birth of Linux, why not consider
>> conception (idea in Linus' head), the first embryo (the initial two
>> task program), and the first widely available version (0.10? 0.12?).

You know what would be neat?   A "historic" release.   Linux Classic if you 
will.  

The early kernels should be re-released to show just how far Linux has come.
Hell, I'd love to see the AAAABBBBAAAABBBB program myself. 

What do ya think?

        -Dan

--
Dan Newcombe                    newcombe@aa.csc.peachnet.edu
Clayton State College           Morrow, Georgia
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
"And the man in the mirror has sad eyes."       -Marillion

------------------------------

Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.help
From: tanvir@netcom.com (Tanvir Hassan)
Subject: Re: Is the adaptec AHA-2842VL SCSI controller supported.
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 1994 06:29:30 GMT

Timothy D. Webster (tdwebste@sparta.uwaterloo.ca) wrote:
: The title says it all.

: Is the adaptec AHA-2842VL SCSI controller supported?

: -Tim.

As far as I can tell, the answer is NOT YET.  Some people are working
on it, but because the card is RISC based they had to write an assembler
for the RISC chip and then proceed to the writing of the driver.

There was some guy who had announced an alpha EISA AIC777 based driver.
Since I am VL bus, I did not look into it. 








-- 
Tanvir (tanvir@netcom.com)

------------------------------

From: michaelv@iastate.edu (Michael L. VanLoon)
Crossposted-To: comp.windows.x.i386unix
Subject: Re: Need help building ultimate Linux system
Date: 8 Jul 94 15:00:33 GMT

In <2vhkin$eh4@pdq.coe.montana.edu> nate@bsd.coe.montana.edu (Nate Williams) writes:

>Umm, I think you're confused.  The new NCR SCSI cards are bus-mastering
>and perform pretty close (better/worse) to the newer Buslogic and older
>Adaptec cards.    (Faster because of PCI, but I think in general the
>performance and CPU utilization are pretty much the same as what I'm
>seeing on equivalent hardware with Buslogic cards)

So I've been told several times.  It appears I had been misinformed
about the design/capabilities of this chip.  If it is indeed as good
as everyone says, I certainly hope the FreeBSD/NetBSD driver matures
quickly.  (Apparently the Linux driver is still kinda beta-ish, but
they're working hard on it also.)

-- 
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
 Michael L. VanLoon                 Iowa State University Computation Center
    michaelv@iastate.edu                    Project Vincent Systems Staff
  Free your mind and your machine -- NetBSD free Un*x for PC/Mac/Amiga/etc.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

------------------------------

From: dhd@netcom.com (David H Dennis)
Subject: Internet Connections (56k/T1) & Linux
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 1994 12:51:10 GMT

Has anyone run a T1 line over Linux?  Did it work well, or is there still a
lot to do?

I'd also like to hear any war (and peace!) stories from Internet providers
of any kind (SLIP to T1) who have run Linux.  Is it good enough yet?

D


------------------------------

Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.help,comp.windows.x.i386unix
From: CARPENTERV@vmsa.csd.mu.edu ("V.S.Carpenter")
Subject: HELP: Run two different things iin 2 XTERM windows
Date: Wed, 06 Jul 1994 23:56:33 -0500 (CDT)



Hi..  I have a question about Xterm that I am hoping someone out there 
can answer.  When I start X, I want to have two Xterm windows on screen
with the 1st connecting to another machine via a serial connection. 
I want the second Xterm window to have another program running.  How
do I do that??

I can startx with 2 xterms and then go to each one of them individually 
and start the programs I need, but I want to automate them.  I checked
into DISPLAY, but I haven't been able to figure it out.  Any help in
this matter will be greatly appreciated.

Thank you.

 
---
__    ___ __   ___   __    
  \     /   |     \    | V. S. Carpenter            | Sometimes I think I'd
   \   /    |      \   | Marquette University       | be better off dead.
      /     |    |  \  | carpenterv@vms.csd.mu.edu  | No, wait. Not me, you.
     /      |    |     | vinit@studsys.mscs.mu.edu  |           -Jack Handey
 

------------------------------

Crossposted-To: comp.os.os2.advocacy
From: maurit@world.nad.northrop.com (Mark Aurit)
Subject: Re: Linux better than OS/2 for net surfing
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 1994 19:07:26 GMT

In article <si56DRC00WB88xF90P@andrew.cmu.edu> Leo L Turetsky <professor+@CMU.EDU> writes:
>
>If you don't understand what the fuss is about and don't care either...
>stop posting, I don't want to waste my time replying to someone who
>doesn't care.
>


Sheesh, is this guy the pretender to Brian Sturgills throne or what?
Chill out, Turdsky, you're starting to sound rather sophomoric
(Websters: conceited and overconfident of knowledge but poorly
informed and immature).

Regards, Mark



-- 
Mark Aurit
Finance Client/Server Systems
Northrop Information Services Center
maurit@world.nad.northrop.com

------------------------------

From: dbraun@ilx049.iil.intel.com (Doug Braun)
Crossposted-To: comp.windows.x.i386unix
Subject: Linux S3 864 X Server Available!!!
Date: 6 Jul 1994 12:29:46 GMT
Reply-To: dbraun@iil.intel.com

I uploaded a version of the XF386_S3 X server, amde to work on
the S3 864 chipset, to ftp.cdrom.com.

It's in: /incoming/FreeBSD/XF86_S3_864.Linux.tar.gz

"Why is in the FreeBSD area. and not the linux area?", you may
ask? Well, /incoming/linux did not have write permission.
Hopefully the ftp.cdrom.com sysadmin will move it to the right
place.

The changes from the regular XF86_S3 are trivial; the code
recognizes the 864's ID byte (0xc0) as equivalent to the S3 928
chipset.

I am using this with the latest Slackware Linux release, on a
Pentium-60 box with a #9 GXE64 PCI-bus card with 2Meg of RAM. I
haven't noticed any problems, for 640x480, 800x600, and a ~980x860
interleaved resolution.

Thanks to Terry Lee (terry@uivlsi.csl.uiuc.edu) for how to do the
mod.


Doug Braun 

========================================================================
Email:          dbraun@inside.intel.com
Intel Mail:     IDC1-41
iNet:           8-435-5069              Long Distance:  011-972-4-655069
Fax:            8-435-5999              Long Distance:  011-972-4-655999
Snail Mail:     US:                     Other:
                PO Box 311              Intel Israel, Ltd.
                Mendham, NJ  07945      IDC-42
                                        Matam Scientific Center
                                        Haifa, Israel  31015
========================================================================

-- 

===================================================================
Doug Braun     Intel Israel, Ltd.      M/S: IDC-42 (new mailstop!)
               Tel: 011-972-4-655069   dbraun@inside.intel.com


------------------------------


** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **

The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:

    Internet: Linux-Misc-Request@NEWS-DIGESTS.MIT.EDU

You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.misc) via:

    Internet: Linux-Misc@NEWS-DIGESTS.MIT.EDU

Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
    nic.funet.fi				pub/OS/Linux
    tsx-11.mit.edu				pub/linux
    sunsite.unc.edu				pub/Linux

End of Linux-Misc Digest
******************************
