Debian bug report logs - #960 , boring messages ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Message sent to debian-devel@pixar.com: Subject: Bug#960: base? Reply-To: jimr@simons-rock.edu, debian-bugs@pixar.com Resent-To: debian-devel@pixar.com Resent-From: "James A. Robinson" Resent-Sender: iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk Resent-Date: Thu, 08 Jun 1995 12:03:01 GMT Resent-Message-ID: X-Debian-PR-Package: base? X-Debian-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool for debian-bugs; Thu, 08 Jun 1995 12:03:01 GMT Received: with rfc822 via encapsulated-mail id 060812024715288; Thu, 08 Jun 1995 12:02:47 GMT Received: from pixar.com by mongo.pixar.com with smtp (Smail3.1.28.1 #15) id m0sJgGN-0005OZC; Thu, 8 Jun 95 05:00 PDT Received: from plato.simons-rock.edu by pixar.com with SMTP id AA19012 (5.67b/IDA-1.5 for debian-bugs-pipe@mongo.pixar.com); Thu, 8 Jun 1995 04:58:55 -0700 Received: from simons-rock.edu by plato.simons-rock.edu with smtp (Smail3.1.29.1 #3) id m0sJgFn-00000zC; Thu, 8 Jun 95 08:00 EDT Message-Id: X-Mailer: MH 6.8.3 To: Debian Bugs Cc: Ian Murdock , mbaily@simons-rock.edu Dcc: Date: Thu, 08 Jun 1995 08:00:03 -0400 From: "James A. Robinson" package: base? version: .935-current I'm not sure where it came from, but there was an "available" file in /var/lib/dpkg/, and it was completely messed up. It looks like perhaps pdpkg had a fit when it generated the list, with random garbage and swapped key-value entries. On the same note, there is a Packages file in debian.cps.cmich.edu under /pub/debian/binary, and it is also completely messed up. Jim ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Message sent: From: iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson) To: jimr@simons-rock.edu Subject: Bug#960: Acknowledgement (was: base?) In-Reply-To: References: Thank you for the problem report you have sent regarding Debian GNU/Linux. This is an automatically generated reply, to let you know your message has been received. It is being forwarded to the developers' mailing list for their attention; they will reply in due course. If you wish to submit further information on your problem, please send it to debian-bugs@pixar.com, but please ensure that the Subject line of your message starts with "Bug#960" or "Re: Bug#960" so that we can identify it as relating to the same problem. Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message, unless you wish to report a problem with the bug-tracking system. Ian Jackson (maintainer, debian-bugs) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Message sent: From: iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson) To: imurdock@debian.org (Ian Murdock) In-Reply-To: References: Subject: Bug#960: marked as done (was: base?) Your message dated Wed, 11 Oct 95 14:34 EST with message-id and subject line Bug#960: has caused the attached bug report to be marked as done. It is your now responsibility to ensure that the bug report is dealt with. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I'm talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Ian Jackson (maintainer, debian-bugs) Received: with rfc822 via encapsulated-mail id 060812024715288; Thu, 08 Jun 1995 12:02:47 GMT From simons-rock.edu!jimr Thu Jun 8 05:00:40 1995 Return-Path: Received: from pixar.com by mongo.pixar.com with smtp (Smail3.1.28.1 #15) id m0sJgGN-0005OZC; Thu, 8 Jun 95 05:00 PDT Received: from plato.simons-rock.edu by pixar.com with SMTP id AA19012 (5.67b/IDA-1.5 for debian-bugs-pipe@mongo.pixar.com); Thu, 8 Jun 1995 04:58:55 -0700 Received: from simons-rock.edu by plato.simons-rock.edu with smtp (Smail3.1.29.1 #3) id m0sJgFn-00000zC; Thu, 8 Jun 95 08:00 EDT Message-Id: Reply-To: jimr@simons-rock.edu X-Mailer: MH 6.8.3 To: Debian Bugs Cc: Ian Murdock , mbaily@simons-rock.edu Dcc: Subject: base? Date: Thu, 08 Jun 1995 08:00:03 -0400 From: "James A. Robinson" package: base? version: .935-current I'm not sure where it came from, but there was an "available" file in /var/lib/dpkg/, and it was completely messed up. It looks like perhaps pdpkg had a fit when it generated the list, with random garbage and swapped key-value entries. On the same note, there is a Packages file in debian.cps.cmich.edu under /pub/debian/binary, and it is also completely messed up. Jim ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Message sent: From: iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson) To: jimr@simons-rock.edu Subject: Bug#960 acknowledged by developer (was: base?) References: In-Reply-To: This is an automatic notification regarding your bug report. Responsibility for it has been taken by one of the developers, namely imurdock@debian.org (Ian Murdock). You should be hearing from them with a substantive response shortly, if you have not already done so. If not, please contact them directly, or email debian-bugs@pixar.com or myself. Ian Jackson (maintainer, debian-bugs) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Ian Jackson / iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk , with the debian-bugs tracking mechanism This page last modified 07:43:01 GMT Wed 01 Nov