Debian bug report logs - #670 , boring messages ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Message sent to debian-devel@pixar.com: Subject: Bug#670: gs_both (Recommended) -depends-> xbaseR6 (optional) Reply-To: iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson), debian-bugs@pixar.com Resent-To: debian-devel@pixar.com Resent-From: iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson) Resent-Sender: iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk Resent-Date: Thu, 30 Mar 1995 21:48:11 GMT Resent-Message-ID: X-Debian-PR-Package: Package classification X-Debian-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool for debian-bugs; Thu, 30 Mar 1995 21:48:11 GMT Received: with rfc822 via encapsulated-mail id 0330213814282; Thu, 30 Mar 1995 21:38:14 GMT Received: from pixar.com by mongo.pixar.com with smtp (Smail3.1.28.1 #15) id m0ruRtE-0007G5A; Thu, 30 Mar 95 13:36 PST Received: from bootes.cus.cam.ac.uk by pixar.com with SMTP id AA17408 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for ); Thu, 30 Mar 1995 13:36:07 -0800 Received: by bootes.cus.cam.ac.uk (Smail-3.1.29.0 #30) id m0ruRqj-000BzUA; Thu, 30 Mar 95 22:33 BST Received: by chiark (Smail3.1.28.1 #3) id m0ruRV2-0002gOA; Thu, 30 Mar 95 22:11 BST Message-Id: Date: Thu, 30 Mar 95 22:11 BST From: iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson) To: Debian bugs submission address Precedence: air-mail Package: Package classification Version: Debian 0.93R5 The gs_both package quite properly mentions a dependency on xbaseR6. However, gs_both is Recommended and xbaseR6 is only optional. Either xbaseR6 should be made at least Recommended or gs_both should be made Optional. Ian. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Message sent: From: iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson) To: iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson) Subject: Bug#670: Acknowledgement (was: gs_both (Recommended) -depends-> xbaseR6 (optional)) In-Reply-To: References: Thank you for the problem report you have sent regarding Debian GNU/Linux. This is an automatically generated reply, to let you know your message has been received. It is being forwarded to the developers' mailing list for their attention; they will reply in due course. If you wish to submit further information on your problem, please send it to debian-bugs@pixar.com, but please ensure that the Subject line of your message starts with "Bug#670" or "Re: Bug#670" so that we can identify it as relating to the same problem. Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message, unless you wish to report a problem with the bug-tracking system. Ian Jackson (maintainer, debian-bugs) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Message sent: From: iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson) To: imurdock@debian.org (Ian Murdock) In-Reply-To: References: Subject: Bug#670: marked as done (was: gs_both (Recommended) -depends-> xbaseR6 (optional)) Your message dated Wed, 11 Oct 95 21:15 EST with message-id and subject line Bug#670: has caused the attached bug report to be marked as done. It is your now responsibility to ensure that the bug report is dealt with. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I'm talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Ian Jackson (maintainer, debian-bugs) Received: with rfc822 via encapsulated-mail id 0330213814282; Thu, 30 Mar 1995 21:38:14 GMT From cus.cam.ac.uk!iwj10 Thu Mar 30 13:36:28 1995 Return-Path: Received: from pixar.com by mongo.pixar.com with smtp (Smail3.1.28.1 #15) id m0ruRtE-0007G5A; Thu, 30 Mar 95 13:36 PST Received: from bootes.cus.cam.ac.uk by pixar.com with SMTP id AA17408 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for ); Thu, 30 Mar 1995 13:36:07 -0800 Received: by bootes.cus.cam.ac.uk (Smail-3.1.29.0 #30) id m0ruRqj-000BzUA; Thu, 30 Mar 95 22:33 BST Received: by chiark (Smail3.1.28.1 #3) id m0ruRV2-0002gOA; Thu, 30 Mar 95 22:11 BST Message-Id: Date: Thu, 30 Mar 95 22:11 BST From: iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson) To: Debian bugs submission address Subject: gs_both (Recommended) -depends-> xbaseR6 (optional) Precedence: air-mail Package: Package classification Version: Debian 0.93R5 The gs_both package quite properly mentions a dependency on xbaseR6. However, gs_both is Recommended and xbaseR6 is only optional. Either xbaseR6 should be made at least Recommended or gs_both should be made Optional. Ian. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Message sent: From: iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson) To: iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson) Subject: Bug#670 acknowledged by developer (was: gs_both (Recommended) -depends-> xbaseR6 (optional)) References: In-Reply-To: This is an automatic notification regarding your bug report. Responsibility for it has been taken by one of the developers, namely imurdock@debian.org (Ian Murdock). You should be hearing from them with a substantive response shortly, if you have not already done so. If not, please contact them directly, or email debian-bugs@pixar.com or myself. Ian Jackson (maintainer, debian-bugs) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Ian Jackson / iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk , with the debian-bugs tracking mechanism This page last modified 07:43:01 GMT Wed 01 Nov