Debian bug report logs - #579 missing /usr/man/man8 manpages Package: image (?) ; Reported by: Bill Mitchell ; 239 days old . ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Message received at debian-bugs: From bronze.coil.com!dgregor Wed Mar 8 10:41:12 1995 Return-Path: Received: from pixar.com by mongo.pixar.com with smtp (Smail3.1.28.1 #15) id m0rmQfW-000AMHC; Wed, 8 Mar 95 10:41 PST Received: from bronze.coil.com by pixar.com with SMTP id AA05459 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for ); Wed, 8 Mar 1995 10:41:04 -0800 Received: from localhost (dgregor@localhost) by bronze.coil.com (8.6.4/8.6.4) id NAA25715; Wed, 8 Mar 1995 13:42:18 -0500 From: DJ Gregor Message-Id: <199503081842.NAA25715@bronze.coil.com> Subject: Re: Bug#579: missing /usr/man/man8 manpages To: iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk, debian-bugs@Pixar.com Date: Wed, 8 Mar 1995 13:42:17 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: from "Ian Jackson" at Mar 8, 95 01:17:00 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 172 > I'd like volunteer(s) to write these two manpages, please. The > scripts seem to be stable, and they're small. I'll write the man page for update-rc.d. -D.J. Gregor ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Message sent: From: iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson) To: DJ Gregor Subject: Bug#579: Info received (was Bug#579: missing /usr/man/man8 manpages) In-Reply-To: <199503081842.NAA25715@bronze.coil.com> References: <199503081842.NAA25715@bronze.coil.com> Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this problem report. It has been forwarded to the developers to accompany the original report. If you wish to continue to submit further information on your problem, please do the same thing again: send it to debian-bugs@pixar.com, ensuring that the Subject line starts with "Bug#579" or "Re: Bug#579" so that we can identify it as relating to the same problem. Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message, unless you wish to report a problem with the bug-tracking system. Ian Jackson (maintainer, debian-bugs) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Message sent to debian-devel@pixar.com: Subject: Bug#579: missing /usr/man/man8 manpages Reply-To: DJ Gregor , debian-bugs@pixar.com Resent-To: debian-devel@pixar.com Resent-From: DJ Gregor Resent-Sender: iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk Resent-Date: Wed, 08 Mar 1995 18:48:01 GMT Resent-Message-ID: X-Debian-PR-Package: image (?) X-Debian-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool for debian-bugs; Wed, 08 Mar 1995 18:48:01 GMT Received: with rfc822 via encapsulated-mail id 030818423119229; Wed, 08 Mar 1995 18:42:31 GMT Received: from pixar.com by mongo.pixar.com with smtp (Smail3.1.28.1 #15) id m0rmQfW-000AMHC; Wed, 8 Mar 95 10:41 PST Received: from bronze.coil.com by pixar.com with SMTP id AA05459 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for ); Wed, 8 Mar 1995 10:41:04 -0800 Received: from localhost (dgregor@localhost) by bronze.coil.com (8.6.4/8.6.4) id NAA25715; Wed, 8 Mar 1995 13:42:18 -0500 From: DJ Gregor Message-Id: <199503081842.NAA25715@bronze.coil.com> To: iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk, debian-bugs@Pixar.com Date: Wed, 8 Mar 1995 13:42:17 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: from "Ian Jackson" at Mar 8, 95 01:17:00 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 172 > I'd like volunteer(s) to write these two manpages, please. The > scripts seem to be stable, and they're small. I'll write the man page for update-rc.d. -D.J. Gregor ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Message received at debian-bugs: From mdd.comm.mot.com!mitchell Wed Mar 8 09:51:56 1995 Return-Path: Received: from pixar.com by mongo.pixar.com with smtp (Smail3.1.28.1 #15) id m0rmPtq-0005oBC; Wed, 8 Mar 95 09:51 PST Received: from ftpbox.mot.com by pixar.com with SMTP id AA02196 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for ); Wed, 8 Mar 1995 09:51:51 -0800 Received: from pobox.mot.com (pobox.mot.com [129.188.137.100]) by ftpbox.mot.com (8.6.10/8.6.10/MOT-3.5) with ESMTP id LAA25888; Wed, 8 Mar 1995 11:49:59 -0600 Received: from mdd.comm.mot.com (mdisea.mdd.comm.mot.com [138.242.64.201]) by pobox.mot.com (8.6.10/8.6.10/MOT-3.5) with SMTP id LAA21206; Wed, 8 Mar 1995 11:49:58 -0600 Received: from bb29c.mdd.comm.mot.com by mdd.comm.mot.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA03736; Wed, 8 Mar 95 09:49:56 PST Received: by bb29c.mdd.comm.mot.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA16749; Wed, 8 Mar 95 09:49:49 PST Date: Wed, 8 Mar 95 09:49:49 PST From: mitchell@mdd.comm.mot.com (Bill Mitchell) Message-Id: <9503081749.AA16749@bb29c.mdd.comm.mot.com> To: debian-bugs@pixar.com, iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk Subject: Re: Bug#579: missing /usr/man/man8 manpages 754 > > Bill Mitchell writes ("Bug#579: missing /usr/man/man8 manpages"): > > It seems like we ought to figure out what our policy is on who should > > supply manpages and, once we know what our policy is, check to see > > that we follow it. > > How about the following design criteria: > > * There should be no manpages installed unless the corresponding > program is installed. > > * If man.deb is installed all the base system manpages should be. > > * If a program is installed its manpages should usually be, though > this may require installation of an additional package, say fooman.deb > (which would be Recommended: by the original foo.deb), or man.deb. > > This leads me to the following proposed policy: > > * A base system package should contain manpages for its programs > either in itself or in man.deb. We may wish to decide that all the > base system manpages should be in man.deb, though this may prove > logistically difficult and may cross boundaries between developers in > a nasty way. > > * A non-base package should contain all of its manpages in its .deb > file or in a separate fooman.deb file. The latter doesn't seem too > helpful for most packages, so it should probably be discouraged. > > * There should be no manpages in man.deb relating to non-base > packages. > > > While looking at this, I noted that a number of the /usr/man/man8 > > manpages document programs which are installed in directories other > > than /sbin and /usr/sbin. > > This is normal. A nice example is install-info, which should be in > the normal PATH because it might be used to update a user's private > info `dir' file, but whose manpage definitely belongs in section 8. > Section 8 is for system maintenance commands, many of which are also > useful to the normal user and so belong in .../bin rather than sbin. > > Ian. > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Message sent: From: iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson) To: mitchell@mdd.comm.mot.com (Bill Mitchell) Subject: Bug#579: Info received (was Bug#579: missing /usr/man/man8 manpages) In-Reply-To: <9503081749.AA16749@bb29c.mdd.comm.mot.com> References: <9503081749.AA16749@bb29c.mdd.comm.mot.com> Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this problem report. It has been forwarded to the developers to accompany the original report. If you wish to continue to submit further information on your problem, please do the same thing again: send it to debian-bugs@pixar.com, ensuring that the Subject line starts with "Bug#579" or "Re: Bug#579" so that we can identify it as relating to the same problem. Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message, unless you wish to report a problem with the bug-tracking system. Ian Jackson (maintainer, debian-bugs) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Message sent to debian-devel@pixar.com: Subject: Bug#579: missing /usr/man/man8 manpages Reply-To: mitchell@mdd.comm.mot.com (Bill Mitchell), debian-bugs@pixar.com Resent-To: debian-devel@pixar.com Resent-From: mitchell@mdd.comm.mot.com (Bill Mitchell) Resent-Sender: iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk Resent-Date: Wed, 08 Mar 1995 18:03:02 GMT Resent-Message-ID: X-Debian-PR-Package: image (?) X-Debian-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool for debian-bugs; Wed, 08 Mar 1995 18:03:02 GMT Received: with rfc822 via encapsulated-mail id 030817571314991; Wed, 08 Mar 1995 17:57:13 GMT Received: from pixar.com by mongo.pixar.com with smtp (Smail3.1.28.1 #15) id m0rmPtq-0005oBC; Wed, 8 Mar 95 09:51 PST Received: from ftpbox.mot.com by pixar.com with SMTP id AA02196 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for ); Wed, 8 Mar 1995 09:51:51 -0800 Received: from pobox.mot.com (pobox.mot.com [129.188.137.100]) by ftpbox.mot.com (8.6.10/8.6.10/MOT-3.5) with ESMTP id LAA25888; Wed, 8 Mar 1995 11:49:59 -0600 Received: from mdd.comm.mot.com (mdisea.mdd.comm.mot.com [138.242.64.201]) by pobox.mot.com (8.6.10/8.6.10/MOT-3.5) with SMTP id LAA21206; Wed, 8 Mar 1995 11:49:58 -0600 Received: from bb29c.mdd.comm.mot.com by mdd.comm.mot.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA03736; Wed, 8 Mar 95 09:49:56 PST Received: by bb29c.mdd.comm.mot.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA16749; Wed, 8 Mar 95 09:49:49 PST Date: Wed, 8 Mar 95 09:49:49 PST From: mitchell@mdd.comm.mot.com (Bill Mitchell) Message-Id: <9503081749.AA16749@bb29c.mdd.comm.mot.com> To: debian-bugs@pixar.com, iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk 754 > > Bill Mitchell writes ("Bug#579: missing /usr/man/man8 manpages"): > > It seems like we ought to figure out what our policy is on who should > > supply manpages and, once we know what our policy is, check to see > > that we follow it. > > How about the following design criteria: > > * There should be no manpages installed unless the corresponding > program is installed. > > * If man.deb is installed all the base system manpages should be. > > * If a program is installed its manpages should usually be, though > this may require installation of an additional package, say fooman.deb > (which would be Recommended: by the original foo.deb), or man.deb. > > This leads me to the following proposed policy: > > * A base system package should contain manpages for its programs > either in itself or in man.deb. We may wish to decide that all the > base system manpages should be in man.deb, though this may prove > logistically difficult and may cross boundaries between developers in > a nasty way. > > * A non-base package should contain all of its manpages in its .deb > file or in a separate fooman.deb file. The latter doesn't seem too > helpful for most packages, so it should probably be discouraged. > > * There should be no manpages in man.deb relating to non-base > packages. > > > While looking at this, I noted that a number of the /usr/man/man8 > > manpages document programs which are installed in directories other > > than /sbin and /usr/sbin. > > This is normal. A nice example is install-info, which should be in > the normal PATH because it might be used to update a user's private > info `dir' file, but whose manpage definitely belongs in section 8. > Section 8 is for system maintenance commands, many of which are also > useful to the normal user and so belong in .../bin rather than sbin. > > Ian. > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Message received at debian-bugs: From cus.cam.ac.uk!iwj10 Wed Mar 8 07:39:19 1995 Return-Path: Received: from pixar.com by mongo.pixar.com with smtp (Smail3.1.28.1 #15) id m0rmNpW-0005oGC; Wed, 8 Mar 95 07:39 PST Received: from bootes.cus.cam.ac.uk by pixar.com with SMTP id AA27717 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for ); Wed, 8 Mar 1995 07:39:11 -0800 Received: by bootes.cus.cam.ac.uk (Smail-3.1.29.0 #30) id m0rmNoR-000C0EC; Wed, 8 Mar 95 15:38 GMT Received: by chiark (Smail3.1.28.1 #3) id m0rmLcF-0002gOZ; Wed, 8 Mar 95 13:17 GMT Message-Id: Date: Wed, 8 Mar 95 13:17 GMT From: iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson) To: debian-bugs@pixar.com Subject: Re: Bug#579: missing /usr/man/man8 manpages Bill Mitchell writes ("Bug#579: missing /usr/man/man8 manpages"): > The following programs are missing manpages: [...] > /usr/sbin/start-stop-daemon > /usr/sbin/update-rc.d I'd like volunteer(s) to write these two manpages, please. The scripts seem to be stable, and they're small. NB that I'd expect a manpage to be more than a converted usage message. Detailed descriptions (reverse engineered from the code and from common sense) of the actions of the script and the semantics of the options are required. start-stop-daemon is in Perl, update-rc.d is in sh. The volunteer for each manpage will have to be competent at reading another programmer's code in Perl or sh, respectively. Ian. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Message sent: From: iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson) To: iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson) Subject: Bug#579: Info received (was Bug#579: missing /usr/man/man8 manpages) In-Reply-To: References: Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this problem report. It has been forwarded to the developers to accompany the original report. If you wish to continue to submit further information on your problem, please do the same thing again: send it to debian-bugs@pixar.com, ensuring that the Subject line starts with "Bug#579" or "Re: Bug#579" so that we can identify it as relating to the same problem. Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message, unless you wish to report a problem with the bug-tracking system. Ian Jackson (maintainer, debian-bugs) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Message sent to debian-devel@pixar.com: Subject: Bug#579: missing /usr/man/man8 manpages Reply-To: iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson), debian-bugs@pixar.com Resent-To: debian-devel@pixar.com Resent-From: iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson) Resent-Sender: iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk Resent-Date: Wed, 08 Mar 1995 16:03:09 GMT Resent-Message-ID: X-Debian-PR-Package: image (?) X-Debian-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool for debian-bugs; Wed, 08 Mar 1995 16:03:09 GMT Received: with rfc822 via encapsulated-mail id 03081556033069; Wed, 08 Mar 1995 15:56:03 GMT Received: from pixar.com by mongo.pixar.com with smtp (Smail3.1.28.1 #15) id m0rmNpW-0005oGC; Wed, 8 Mar 95 07:39 PST Received: from bootes.cus.cam.ac.uk by pixar.com with SMTP id AA27717 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for ); Wed, 8 Mar 1995 07:39:11 -0800 Received: by bootes.cus.cam.ac.uk (Smail-3.1.29.0 #30) id m0rmNoR-000C0EC; Wed, 8 Mar 95 15:38 GMT Received: by chiark (Smail3.1.28.1 #3) id m0rmLcF-0002gOZ; Wed, 8 Mar 95 13:17 GMT Message-Id: Date: Wed, 8 Mar 95 13:17 GMT From: iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson) To: debian-bugs@pixar.com Bill Mitchell writes ("Bug#579: missing /usr/man/man8 manpages"): > The following programs are missing manpages: [...] > /usr/sbin/start-stop-daemon > /usr/sbin/update-rc.d I'd like volunteer(s) to write these two manpages, please. The scripts seem to be stable, and they're small. NB that I'd expect a manpage to be more than a converted usage message. Detailed descriptions (reverse engineered from the code and from common sense) of the actions of the script and the semantics of the options are required. start-stop-daemon is in Perl, update-rc.d is in sh. The volunteer for each manpage will have to be competent at reading another programmer's code in Perl or sh, respectively. Ian. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Message received at debian-bugs: From cus.cam.ac.uk!iwj10 Wed Mar 8 07:39:04 1995 Return-Path: Received: from pixar.com by mongo.pixar.com with smtp (Smail3.1.28.1 #15) id m0rmNpH-0005oGC; Wed, 8 Mar 95 07:39 PST Received: from bootes.cus.cam.ac.uk by pixar.com with SMTP id AA27707 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for ); Wed, 8 Mar 1995 07:38:55 -0800 Received: by bootes.cus.cam.ac.uk (Smail-3.1.29.0 #30) id m0rmNoT-000C0FC; Wed, 8 Mar 95 15:38 GMT Received: by chiark (Smail3.1.28.1 #3) id m0rmLmg-0002gOZ; Wed, 8 Mar 95 13:28 GMT Message-Id: Date: Wed, 8 Mar 95 13:28 GMT From: iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson) To: debian-bugs@pixar.com Subject: Re: Bug#579: missing /usr/man/man8 manpages Bill Mitchell writes ("Bug#579: missing /usr/man/man8 manpages"): > It seems like we ought to figure out what our policy is on who should > supply manpages and, once we know what our policy is, check to see > that we follow it. How about the following design criteria: * There should be no manpages installed unless the corresponding program is installed. * If man.deb is installed all the base system manpages should be. * If a program is installed its manpages should usually be, though this may require installation of an additional package, say fooman.deb (which would be Recommended: by the original foo.deb), or man.deb. This leads me to the following proposed policy: * A base system package should contain manpages for its programs either in itself or in man.deb. We may wish to decide that all the base system manpages should be in man.deb, though this may prove logistically difficult and may cross boundaries between developers in a nasty way. * A non-base package should contain all of its manpages in its .deb file or in a separate fooman.deb file. The latter doesn't seem too helpful for most packages, so it should probably be discouraged. * There should be no manpages in man.deb relating to non-base packages. > While looking at this, I noted that a number of the /usr/man/man8 > manpages document programs which are installed in directories other > than /sbin and /usr/sbin. This is normal. A nice example is install-info, which should be in the normal PATH because it might be used to update a user's private info `dir' file, but whose manpage definitely belongs in section 8. Section 8 is for system maintenance commands, many of which are also useful to the normal user and so belong in .../bin rather than sbin. Ian. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Message sent: From: iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson) To: iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson) Subject: Bug#579: Info received (was Bug#579: missing /usr/man/man8 manpages) In-Reply-To: References: Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this problem report. It has been forwarded to the developers to accompany the original report. If you wish to continue to submit further information on your problem, please do the same thing again: send it to debian-bugs@pixar.com, ensuring that the Subject line starts with "Bug#579" or "Re: Bug#579" so that we can identify it as relating to the same problem. Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message, unless you wish to report a problem with the bug-tracking system. Ian Jackson (maintainer, debian-bugs) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Message sent to debian-devel@pixar.com: Subject: Bug#579: missing /usr/man/man8 manpages Reply-To: iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson), debian-bugs@pixar.com Resent-To: debian-devel@pixar.com Resent-From: iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson) Resent-Sender: iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk Resent-Date: Wed, 08 Mar 1995 15:48:10 GMT Resent-Message-ID: X-Debian-PR-Package: image (?) X-Debian-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool for debian-bugs; Wed, 08 Mar 1995 15:48:10 GMT Received: with rfc822 via encapsulated-mail id 03081541281330; Wed, 08 Mar 1995 15:41:29 GMT Received: from pixar.com by mongo.pixar.com with smtp (Smail3.1.28.1 #15) id m0rmNpH-0005oGC; Wed, 8 Mar 95 07:39 PST Received: from bootes.cus.cam.ac.uk by pixar.com with SMTP id AA27707 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for ); Wed, 8 Mar 1995 07:38:55 -0800 Received: by bootes.cus.cam.ac.uk (Smail-3.1.29.0 #30) id m0rmNoT-000C0FC; Wed, 8 Mar 95 15:38 GMT Received: by chiark (Smail3.1.28.1 #3) id m0rmLmg-0002gOZ; Wed, 8 Mar 95 13:28 GMT Message-Id: Date: Wed, 8 Mar 95 13:28 GMT From: iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson) To: debian-bugs@pixar.com Bill Mitchell writes ("Bug#579: missing /usr/man/man8 manpages"): > It seems like we ought to figure out what our policy is on who should > supply manpages and, once we know what our policy is, check to see > that we follow it. How about the following design criteria: * There should be no manpages installed unless the corresponding program is installed. * If man.deb is installed all the base system manpages should be. * If a program is installed its manpages should usually be, though this may require installation of an additional package, say fooman.deb (which would be Recommended: by the original foo.deb), or man.deb. This leads me to the following proposed policy: * A base system package should contain manpages for its programs either in itself or in man.deb. We may wish to decide that all the base system manpages should be in man.deb, though this may prove logistically difficult and may cross boundaries between developers in a nasty way. * A non-base package should contain all of its manpages in its .deb file or in a separate fooman.deb file. The latter doesn't seem too helpful for most packages, so it should probably be discouraged. * There should be no manpages in man.deb relating to non-base packages. > While looking at this, I noted that a number of the /usr/man/man8 > manpages document programs which are installed in directories other > than /sbin and /usr/sbin. This is normal. A nice example is install-info, which should be in the normal PATH because it might be used to update a user's private info `dir' file, but whose manpage definitely belongs in section 8. Section 8 is for system maintenance commands, many of which are also useful to the normal user and so belong in .../bin rather than sbin. Ian. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Message received at debian-bugs: From mdd.comm.mot.com!mitchell Wed Mar 8 07:03:10 1995 Return-Path: Received: from pixar.com by mongo.pixar.com with smtp (Smail3.1.28.1 #15) id m0rmNGT-0005oGC; Wed, 8 Mar 95 07:03 PST Received: from motgate.mot.com by pixar.com with SMTP id AA27178 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for ); Wed, 8 Mar 1995 07:02:59 -0800 Received: from pobox.mot.com (pobox.mot.com [129.188.137.100]) by motgate.mot.com (8.6.10/8.6.10/MOT-3.5) with ESMTP id JAA25199; Wed, 8 Mar 1995 09:02:18 -0600 Received: from mdd.comm.mot.com (mdisea.mdd.comm.mot.com [138.242.64.201]) by pobox.mot.com (8.6.10/8.6.10/MOT-3.5) with SMTP id JAA11160; Wed, 8 Mar 1995 09:02:16 -0600 Received: from bb29c.mdd.comm.mot.com by mdd.comm.mot.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA25856; Wed, 8 Mar 95 07:02:14 PST Received: by bb29c.mdd.comm.mot.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA15647; Wed, 8 Mar 95 07:01:53 PST Date: Wed, 8 Mar 95 07:01:53 PST From: mitchell@mdd.comm.mot.com (Bill Mitchell) Message-Id: <9503081501.AA15647@bb29c.mdd.comm.mot.com> To: debian-bugs@pixar.com, matt@aodc.gov.au Subject: Re: Bug#579: missing /usr/man/man8 manpages matt@aodc.gov.au (Matthew Hannigan) said: > > name=`basename $8 .8` > ^^ > > [ .. ] > > Is this just a typo in your message or is it > in your working script? Sigh.... It's a typo in the script itself, of course, and not the only problem with it. Thanks for seeing that I'd missed this and rubbing my nose in it. I can use a good public drubbing every now and then ;-). This comes from typing the script directly into "cat>scriptfile" after base system install, and then proofreading carefully enough, and being too rushed to validate the output before posting it. ( I see that the base system now does include /usr/bin/ed, and I really ought to reacquaint myself with ed. ) I've fixed the problems I saw and re-run the script on a virgin 0.93R4 installation. I've also added a script sections to detect and report man8 programs installed in the bin directories and man1 programs installed in the sbin directories. Here's the revised script, for your proofreading pleasure. #!/bin/sh # echo echo programs without man8 pages for i in /sbin/* /usr/sbin/* do name=`basename $i .8` if [ ! -f /usr/man/man8/$name.8 ] then echo $i fi done # echo echo programs without man1 pages for i in /bin/* /usr/bin/* do name=`basename $i .1` if [ ! -f /usr/man/man1/$name.1 ] then echo $i fi done # echo echo man8 pages without programs in /sbin, /usr/sbin for i in /usr/man/man8/* do name=`basename $i .8` if [ ! -f /sbin/$name -a ! -f /usr/sbin/$name ] then echo $i fi done # echo echo man8 programs installed in /bin, /usr/bin for i in /usr/man/man8/* do name=`basename $i .8` if [ -f /bin/$name ] then echo $i /bin/$name fi if [ -f /usr/bin/$name ] then echo $i /usr/bin/$name fi done # echo echo man1 pages without programs in /bin, /usr/bin for i in /usr/man/man1/* do name=`basename $i .1` if [ ! -f /bin/$name -a ! -f /usr/bin/$name ] then echo $i fi done # echo echo man1 programs installed in /sbin, /usr/sbin for i in /usr/man/man1/* do name=`basename $i .1` if [ -f /sbin/$name ] then echo $i /sbin/$name fi if [ -f /usr/sbin/$name ] then echo $i /usr/sbin/$name fi done # And here's the output it produces when run on a virgin 0.93R4 system: programs without man8 pages /sbin/depmod /sbin/ifconfig /sbin/insmod /sbin/installkernel /sbin/ksyms /sbin/lsmod /sbin/modprobe /sbin/rmmod /sbin/route /usr/sbin/flushb /usr/sbin/mkboot programs without man1 pages /bin/dmesg /bin/mount /bin/nm /bin/perl /bin/rbash /bin/run-parts /bin/sync /bin/tar /bin/umount /usr/bin/[ /usr/bin/banner /usr/bin/bashbug /usr/bin/chvt /usr/bin/cmp /usr/bin/diff /usr/bin/diff3 /usr/bin/disalloc /usr/bin/dpkg /usr/bin/dpkg-deb /usr/bin/dselect /usr/bin/fdformat /usr/bin/genksyms /usr/bin/getopt /usr/bin/install-info /usr/bin/mapscrn /usr/bin/md5sum /usr/bin/perl /usr/bin/renice /usr/bin/resize /usr/bin/sdiff /usr/bin/setfdprm /usr/bin/setfont /usr/bin/showfont /usr/bin/tput /usr/bin/tunelp /usr/bin/vmstat man8 pages without programs in /sbin, /usr/sbin /usr/man/man8/MAKEDEV.8 /usr/man/man8/dmesg.8 /usr/man/man8/dpkg-deb.8 /usr/man/man8/fdformat.8 /usr/man/man8/genksyms.8 /usr/man/man8/install-info.8 /usr/man/man8/mapscrn.8 /usr/man/man8/mount.8 /usr/man/man8/ramsize.8 /usr/man/man8/renice.8 /usr/man/man8/rootflags.8 /usr/man/man8/run-parts.8 /usr/man/man8/setfdprm.8 /usr/man/man8/setfont.8 /usr/man/man8/swapdev.8 /usr/man/man8/sync.8 /usr/man/man8/tunelp.8 /usr/man/man8/umount.8 /usr/man/man8/vidmode.8 /usr/man/man8/vmstat.8 man8 programs installed in /bin, /usr/bin /usr/man/man8/dmesg.8 /bin/dmesg /usr/man/man8/dpkg-deb.8 /usr/bin/dpkg-deb /usr/man/man8/fdformat.8 /usr/bin/fdformat /usr/man/man8/genksyms.8 /usr/bin/genksyms /usr/man/man8/install-info.8 /usr/bin/install-info /usr/man/man8/mapscrn.8 /usr/bin/mapscrn /usr/man/man8/mount.8 /bin/mount /usr/man/man8/renice.8 /usr/bin/renice /usr/man/man8/run-parts.8 /bin/run-parts /usr/man/man8/setfdprm.8 /usr/bin/setfdprm /usr/man/man8/setfont.8 /usr/bin/setfont /usr/man/man8/sync.8 /bin/sync /usr/man/man8/tunelp.8 /usr/bin/tunelp /usr/man/man8/umount.8 /bin/umount /usr/man/man8/vmstat.8 /usr/bin/vmstat man1 pages without programs in /bin, /usr/bin /usr/man/man1/bash-builtins.1 /usr/man/man1/insmod.1 /usr/man/man1/ksyms.1 /usr/man/man1/lsmod.1 /usr/man/man1/rmmod.1 man1 programs installed in /sbin, /usr/sbin /usr/man/man1/insmod.1 /sbin/insmod /usr/man/man1/ksyms.1 /sbin/ksyms /usr/man/man1/lsmod.1 /sbin/lsmod /usr/man/man1/rmmod.1 /sbin/rmmod ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Message sent: From: iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson) To: mitchell@mdd.comm.mot.com (Bill Mitchell) Subject: Bug#579: Info received (was Bug#579: missing /usr/man/man8 manpages) In-Reply-To: <9503081501.AA15647@bb29c.mdd.comm.mot.com> References: <9503081501.AA15647@bb29c.mdd.comm.mot.com> Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this problem report. It has been forwarded to the developers to accompany the original report. If you wish to continue submit further information on your problem, please do the same thing again: send it to debian-bugs@pixar.com, ensuring that the Subject line starts with "Bug#579" or "Re: Bug#579" so that we can identify it as relating to the same problem. Please do not to reply to the address at the top of this message, unless you wish to report a problem with the bug-tracking system. Ian Jackson (maintainer, debian-bugs) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Message sent to debian-devel@pixar.com: Subject: Bug#579: missing /usr/man/man8 manpages Reply-To: mitchell@mdd.comm.mot.com (Bill Mitchell), debian-bugs@pixar.com Resent-To: debian-devel@pixar.com Resent-From: mitchell@mdd.comm.mot.com (Bill Mitchell) Resent-Sender: iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk Resent-Date: Wed, 08 Mar 1995 15:18:02 GMT Resent-Message-ID: X-Debian-PR-Package: image (?) X-Debian-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool for debian-bugs; Wed, 08 Mar 1995 15:18:02 GMT Received: with rfc822 via encapsulated-mail id 030815061327649; Wed, 08 Mar 1995 15:06:13 GMT Received: from pixar.com by mongo.pixar.com with smtp (Smail3.1.28.1 #15) id m0rmNGT-0005oGC; Wed, 8 Mar 95 07:03 PST Received: from motgate.mot.com by pixar.com with SMTP id AA27178 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for ); Wed, 8 Mar 1995 07:02:59 -0800 Received: from pobox.mot.com (pobox.mot.com [129.188.137.100]) by motgate.mot.com (8.6.10/8.6.10/MOT-3.5) with ESMTP id JAA25199; Wed, 8 Mar 1995 09:02:18 -0600 Received: from mdd.comm.mot.com (mdisea.mdd.comm.mot.com [138.242.64.201]) by pobox.mot.com (8.6.10/8.6.10/MOT-3.5) with SMTP id JAA11160; Wed, 8 Mar 1995 09:02:16 -0600 Received: from bb29c.mdd.comm.mot.com by mdd.comm.mot.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA25856; Wed, 8 Mar 95 07:02:14 PST Received: by bb29c.mdd.comm.mot.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA15647; Wed, 8 Mar 95 07:01:53 PST Date: Wed, 8 Mar 95 07:01:53 PST From: mitchell@mdd.comm.mot.com (Bill Mitchell) Message-Id: <9503081501.AA15647@bb29c.mdd.comm.mot.com> To: debian-bugs@pixar.com, matt@aodc.gov.au matt@aodc.gov.au (Matthew Hannigan) said: > > name=`basename $8 .8` > ^^ > > [ .. ] > > Is this just a typo in your message or is it > in your working script? Sigh.... It's a typo in the script itself, of course, and not the only problem with it. Thanks for seeing that I'd missed this and rubbing my nose in it. I can use a good public drubbing every now and then ;-). This comes from typing the script directly into "cat>scriptfile" after base system install, and then proofreading carefully enough, and being too rushed to validate the output before posting it. ( I see that the base system now does include /usr/bin/ed, and I really ought to reacquaint myself with ed. ) I've fixed the problems I saw and re-run the script on a virgin 0.93R4 installation. I've also added a script sections to detect and report man8 programs installed in the bin directories and man1 programs installed in the sbin directories. Here's the revised script, for your proofreading pleasure. #!/bin/sh # echo echo programs without man8 pages for i in /sbin/* /usr/sbin/* do name=`basename $i .8` if [ ! -f /usr/man/man8/$name.8 ] then echo $i fi done # echo echo programs without man1 pages for i in /bin/* /usr/bin/* do name=`basename $i .1` if [ ! -f /usr/man/man1/$name.1 ] then echo $i fi done # echo echo man8 pages without programs in /sbin, /usr/sbin for i in /usr/man/man8/* do name=`basename $i .8` if [ ! -f /sbin/$name -a ! -f /usr/sbin/$name ] then echo $i fi done # echo echo man8 programs installed in /bin, /usr/bin for i in /usr/man/man8/* do name=`basename $i .8` if [ -f /bin/$name ] then echo $i /bin/$name fi if [ -f /usr/bin/$name ] then echo $i /usr/bin/$name fi done # echo echo man1 pages without programs in /bin, /usr/bin for i in /usr/man/man1/* do name=`basename $i .1` if [ ! -f /bin/$name -a ! -f /usr/bin/$name ] then echo $i fi done # echo echo man1 programs installed in /sbin, /usr/sbin for i in /usr/man/man1/* do name=`basename $i .1` if [ -f /sbin/$name ] then echo $i /sbin/$name fi if [ -f /usr/sbin/$name ] then echo $i /usr/sbin/$name fi done # And here's the output it produces when run on a virgin 0.93R4 system: programs without man8 pages /sbin/depmod /sbin/ifconfig /sbin/insmod /sbin/installkernel /sbin/ksyms /sbin/lsmod /sbin/modprobe /sbin/rmmod /sbin/route /usr/sbin/flushb /usr/sbin/mkboot programs without man1 pages /bin/dmesg /bin/mount /bin/nm /bin/perl /bin/rbash /bin/run-parts /bin/sync /bin/tar /bin/umount /usr/bin/[ /usr/bin/banner /usr/bin/bashbug /usr/bin/chvt /usr/bin/cmp /usr/bin/diff /usr/bin/diff3 /usr/bin/disalloc /usr/bin/dpkg /usr/bin/dpkg-deb /usr/bin/dselect /usr/bin/fdformat /usr/bin/genksyms /usr/bin/getopt /usr/bin/install-info /usr/bin/mapscrn /usr/bin/md5sum /usr/bin/perl /usr/bin/renice /usr/bin/resize /usr/bin/sdiff /usr/bin/setfdprm /usr/bin/setfont /usr/bin/showfont /usr/bin/tput /usr/bin/tunelp /usr/bin/vmstat man8 pages without programs in /sbin, /usr/sbin /usr/man/man8/MAKEDEV.8 /usr/man/man8/dmesg.8 /usr/man/man8/dpkg-deb.8 /usr/man/man8/fdformat.8 /usr/man/man8/genksyms.8 /usr/man/man8/install-info.8 /usr/man/man8/mapscrn.8 /usr/man/man8/mount.8 /usr/man/man8/ramsize.8 /usr/man/man8/renice.8 /usr/man/man8/rootflags.8 /usr/man/man8/run-parts.8 /usr/man/man8/setfdprm.8 /usr/man/man8/setfont.8 /usr/man/man8/swapdev.8 /usr/man/man8/sync.8 /usr/man/man8/tunelp.8 /usr/man/man8/umount.8 /usr/man/man8/vidmode.8 /usr/man/man8/vmstat.8 man8 programs installed in /bin, /usr/bin /usr/man/man8/dmesg.8 /bin/dmesg /usr/man/man8/dpkg-deb.8 /usr/bin/dpkg-deb /usr/man/man8/fdformat.8 /usr/bin/fdformat /usr/man/man8/genksyms.8 /usr/bin/genksyms /usr/man/man8/install-info.8 /usr/bin/install-info /usr/man/man8/mapscrn.8 /usr/bin/mapscrn /usr/man/man8/mount.8 /bin/mount /usr/man/man8/renice.8 /usr/bin/renice /usr/man/man8/run-parts.8 /bin/run-parts /usr/man/man8/setfdprm.8 /usr/bin/setfdprm /usr/man/man8/setfont.8 /usr/bin/setfont /usr/man/man8/sync.8 /bin/sync /usr/man/man8/tunelp.8 /usr/bin/tunelp /usr/man/man8/umount.8 /bin/umount /usr/man/man8/vmstat.8 /usr/bin/vmstat man1 pages without programs in /bin, /usr/bin /usr/man/man1/bash-builtins.1 /usr/man/man1/insmod.1 /usr/man/man1/ksyms.1 /usr/man/man1/lsmod.1 /usr/man/man1/rmmod.1 man1 programs installed in /sbin, /usr/sbin /usr/man/man1/insmod.1 /sbin/insmod /usr/man/man1/ksyms.1 /sbin/ksyms /usr/man/man1/lsmod.1 /sbin/lsmod /usr/man/man1/rmmod.1 /sbin/rmmod ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Message received at debian-bugs: From aodc.gov.au!matt Tue Mar 7 20:30:11 1995 Return-Path: Received: from pixar.com by mongo.pixar.com with smtp (Smail3.1.28.1 #15) id m0rmDNu-0006MPC; Tue, 7 Mar 95 20:30 PST Received: from metro.ucc.su.OZ.AU by pixar.com with SMTP id AA18058 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for ); Tue, 7 Mar 1995 20:29:54 -0800 Received: from AODC.gov.au (beluga.aodc.gov.au) by metro.ucc.su.OZ.AU with SMTP id AA01726 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for ); Wed, 8 Mar 1995 14:28:29 +1000 Received: from pygmy.gov.au by AODC.gov.au (5.0/SMI-SVR4) id AA23421; Wed, 8 Mar 1995 14:28:06 --1000 Received: by pygmy.gov.au (5.0/SMI-SVR4) id AA10727; Wed, 8 Mar 1995 14:27:02 --1000 Date: Wed, 8 Mar 1995 14:27:02 --1000 From: matt@aodc.gov.au (Matthew Hannigan) Message-Id: <9503080427.AA10727@pygmy.gov.au> To: mitchell@mdd.comm.mot.com, debian-bugs@Pixar.com Subject: Re: Bug#579: missing /usr/man/man8 manpages X-Sun-Charset: US-ASCII Content-Length: 451 Bill Mitchell wrote in part > [ .. ] > I looked at this a bit more after getting home. I ran > the following script on a virgin 0.93R4 install, and > again after installing man.deb. > > #!/bin/sh > [ .. ] > echo man8 pages without programs > for i in /usr/man/man8/* > do > name=`basename $8 .8` ^^ > [ .. ] Bill, Is this just a typo in your message or is it in your working script? -matt ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Message sent: From: iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson) To: matt@aodc.gov.au (Matthew Hannigan) Subject: Bug#579: Info received (was Bug#579: missing /usr/man/man8 manpages) In-Reply-To: <9503080427.AA10727@pygmy.gov.au> References: <9503080427.AA10727@pygmy.gov.au> Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this problem report. It has been forwarded to the developers to accompany the original report. If you wish to continue submit further information on your problem, please do the same thing again: send it to debian-bugs@pixar.com, ensuring that the Subject line starts with "Bug#579" or "Re: Bug#579" so that we can identify it as relating to the same problem. Please do not to reply to the address at the top of this message, unless you wish to report a problem with the bug-tracking system. Ian Jackson (maintainer, debian-bugs) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Message sent to debian-devel@pixar.com: Subject: Bug#579: missing /usr/man/man8 manpages Reply-To: matt@aodc.gov.au (Matthew Hannigan), debian-bugs@pixar.com Resent-To: debian-devel@pixar.com Resent-From: matt@aodc.gov.au (Matthew Hannigan) Resent-Sender: iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk Resent-Date: Wed, 08 Mar 1995 04:33:09 GMT Resent-Message-ID: X-Debian-PR-Package: image (?) X-Debian-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool for debian-bugs; Wed, 08 Mar 1995 04:33:09 GMT Received: with rfc822 via encapsulated-mail id 030804311510547; Wed, 08 Mar 1995 04:31:15 GMT Received: from pixar.com by mongo.pixar.com with smtp (Smail3.1.28.1 #15) id m0rmDNu-0006MPC; Tue, 7 Mar 95 20:30 PST Received: from metro.ucc.su.OZ.AU by pixar.com with SMTP id AA18058 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for ); Tue, 7 Mar 1995 20:29:54 -0800 Received: from AODC.gov.au (beluga.aodc.gov.au) by metro.ucc.su.OZ.AU with SMTP id AA01726 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for ); Wed, 8 Mar 1995 14:28:29 +1000 Received: from pygmy.gov.au by AODC.gov.au (5.0/SMI-SVR4) id AA23421; Wed, 8 Mar 1995 14:28:06 --1000 Received: by pygmy.gov.au (5.0/SMI-SVR4) id AA10727; Wed, 8 Mar 1995 14:27:02 --1000 Date: Wed, 8 Mar 1995 14:27:02 --1000 From: matt@aodc.gov.au (Matthew Hannigan) Message-Id: <9503080427.AA10727@pygmy.gov.au> To: mitchell@mdd.comm.mot.com, debian-bugs@Pixar.com X-Sun-Charset: US-ASCII Content-Length: 451 Bill Mitchell wrote in part > [ .. ] > I looked at this a bit more after getting home. I ran > the following script on a virgin 0.93R4 install, and > again after installing man.deb. > > #!/bin/sh > [ .. ] > echo man8 pages without programs > for i in /usr/man/man8/* > do > name=`basename $8 .8` ^^ > [ .. ] Bill, Is this just a typo in your message or is it in your working script? -matt ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Message received at debian-bugs: From mdd.comm.mot.com!mitchell Tue Mar 7 18:12:27 1995 Return-Path: Received: from pixar.com by mongo.pixar.com with smtp (Smail3.1.28.1 #15) id m0rmBEg-0006fgC; Tue, 7 Mar 95 18:12 PST Received: from motgate.mot.com by pixar.com with SMTP id AA14664 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for ); Tue, 7 Mar 1995 18:12:23 -0800 Received: from pobox.mot.com (pobox.mot.com [129.188.137.100]) by motgate.mot.com (8.6.10/8.6.10/MOT-3.5) with ESMTP id UAA11240 for ; Tue, 7 Mar 1995 20:12:23 -0600 Received: from mdd.comm.mot.com (mdisea.mdd.comm.mot.com [138.242.64.201]) by pobox.mot.com (8.6.10/8.6.10/MOT-3.5) with SMTP id UAA03216 for ; Tue, 7 Mar 1995 20:12:22 -0600 Received: from bb29c.mdd.comm.mot.com by mdd.comm.mot.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA03693; Tue, 7 Mar 95 18:12:21 PST Received: by bb29c.mdd.comm.mot.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA14937; Tue, 7 Mar 95 18:12:19 PST Date: Tue, 7 Mar 1995 18:12:18 -0800 (PST) From: Bill Mitchell X-Sender: mitchell@bb29c To: debian-bugs@pixar.com Subject: Re: Bug#579: missing /usr/man/man8 manpages Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII I looked at this a bit more after getting home. I ran the following script on a virgin 0.93R4 install, and again after installing man.deb. #!/bin/sh # echo echo programs without man8 pages for i in /sbin/* /usr/sbin/* do if [ ! -f /usr/man/man8/$i.8 ] then echo $i fi done # echo echo programs without man1 pages for i in /bin/* /usr/bin/* do if [ ! -f /usr/man/man1/$i.1 ] then echo $i fi done # echo echo man8 pages without programs for i in /usr/man/man8/* do name=`basename $8 .8` if [ ! -f /sbin/$name -a ! -f /usr/sbin/$name ] then echo $i fi done # echo echo man1 pages without programs for i in /usr/man/man1/* do name=`basename $i .1` if [ ! -f /bin/$name -a ! -f /usr/bin/$name ] then echo $i fi done This produced quite a list of discrepancies, which I've compressed and uuencoded below to spare those not interested in the details. begin 644 details.gz M'XL(""\M7"\"`V1E=&%I;',`[5C;;MPV$'WW5^BQ1;%.XS1%^KAM-D&0Q"GL M($#1AX(228D5+PI)[>WK2U&D-%PJ;A"X`>JL`6/GG!'OPQG.K%;97[%^\7YS M4[RZOGV_?O/FU?7+XL?+7Y[<_%3\NK[=%+=_W+[?O+VXZ+2J-1*FV#';J-X6 M`LEG18=J8BX>F9+)1R7")5=5&W$U@"!C4O8U-1/JA,(1]*(C5Y-N$*=F)^(E MV=LKB`63;!^(FEA["'*#N`TBHY62E-412C9II)EGX8!%G+=$2\(#UY98(TLB M8IR[+YY&R%4=&[?F(.+\.4[&XV`,T8)UBI8:N!Z/X7I$:W:HBT!A=P!EG$O' ML*)15CNBXQ":E$K%!6HQCZW=D<76NI><;*=EFJ:W6.UDA&Y412E$D^I@P*HM MX6`W;2_!ZOH.^YWKC1X)A'%OB`9,13$S+20:[><^$:+TI7S2B5R`2I0C8(3:V[*/J# M&$6_TUX,VG%F7@H?81I^F0Z"(*8.HC18"<2D1"(T(Z[34:*(FT#6O3RR,$(] M28W;GKGA8-*CQ,.*)Z`2ML$:Y'`7L`I*`&UIN,,-NX!P&QP M&A`]@5"G.^6NMG.FJ@),U]8I6KFH`1A#.*G@@#V41=>2@YD9@H%<:P(VA,@M M`/L.29Q@L)$44Z4%-`Z:]D49;$P%_%)QJ-*$0*3`OM+9-?KKFEA=362(+S-C M50<&2F=4.U??P:^/9`]&;@C"$.UGS^?C(%"&F)@1*R:IFMF_%0,6XX+F7\[; M@1%#X)P)CL$@7"&>N+75/$Y$R2MJ$ MX`2;A!#$HM1*C`N,)^TS,NI3AQ3+]E'@/R#!I>0L0S> MBL&G@$W?(G>KF`)VOQ7N-H.Y[8"8W-<=V+U=HQ*`!`-8,VC&>Z1K,(,#`>"8 MA*AC:E1'YW2AB1Y3#W<<'Q\3=%?RXF).1Z;G6GR_C9^Z#X;_9X_>KE]OGF\^ M7#X[X<,3->.GO";3C$_8G/8/V9P>.LG8D!GE_."&93&1T# MVX)B:4G+?<24;%GCDYE,%+AS(E?\N:Y9V#R2.1V2ITPQ M7"T7*G+>I58YZ1/3!7H(1CGMOJ4Y'EN"/VR)7SB:+<,#]$YYWW(R&B? M/>[U^N2D^;&YN7[V[+JXNKU8_ MGPMHYP+:N8!V+J!]5DGAX#Y+?'A?LO)KU_S:9,S_H`2H3D?XMYI@ M2TZ/S\6J!,!:BX-#C>X>BXKP.GQQB5&F-G6/%4=:VL0B.U9]>3VR+.^J3E)X M4`^H6.D>>^)SBY=6HX.[`>8+ZIGE9Q8WLR!\/^7.U`(?7O4S]1'G:NBY&OHU CJZ'3*^/_6R>-@?9<0OTV2Z@QM)V+JP^TN/H/Z88*DV(H```S ` end ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Message sent: From: iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson) To: Bill Mitchell Subject: Bug#579: Info received (was Bug#579: missing /usr/man/man8 manpages) In-Reply-To: References: Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this problem report. It has been forwarded to the developers to accompany the original report. If you wish to continue submit further information on your problem, please do the same thing again: send it to debian-bugs@pixar.com, ensuring that the Subject line starts with "Bug#579" or "Re: Bug#579" so that we can identify it as relating to the same problem. Please do not to reply to the address at the top of this message, unless you wish to report a problem with the bug-tracking system. Ian Jackson (maintainer, debian-bugs) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Message sent to debian-devel@pixar.com: Subject: Bug#579: missing /usr/man/man8 manpages Reply-To: Bill Mitchell , debian-bugs@pixar.com Resent-To: debian-devel@pixar.com Resent-From: Bill Mitchell Resent-Sender: iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk Resent-Date: Wed, 08 Mar 1995 02:18:02 GMT Resent-Message-ID: X-Debian-PR-Package: image (?) X-Debian-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool for debian-bugs; Wed, 08 Mar 1995 02:18:02 GMT Received: with rfc822 via encapsulated-mail id 03080213366063; Wed, 08 Mar 1995 02:13:36 GMT Received: from pixar.com by mongo.pixar.com with smtp (Smail3.1.28.1 #15) id m0rmBEg-0006fgC; Tue, 7 Mar 95 18:12 PST Received: from motgate.mot.com by pixar.com with SMTP id AA14664 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for ); Tue, 7 Mar 1995 18:12:23 -0800 Received: from pobox.mot.com (pobox.mot.com [129.188.137.100]) by motgate.mot.com (8.6.10/8.6.10/MOT-3.5) with ESMTP id UAA11240 for ; Tue, 7 Mar 1995 20:12:23 -0600 Received: from mdd.comm.mot.com (mdisea.mdd.comm.mot.com [138.242.64.201]) by pobox.mot.com (8.6.10/8.6.10/MOT-3.5) with SMTP id UAA03216 for ; Tue, 7 Mar 1995 20:12:22 -0600 Received: from bb29c.mdd.comm.mot.com by mdd.comm.mot.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA03693; Tue, 7 Mar 95 18:12:21 PST Received: by bb29c.mdd.comm.mot.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA14937; Tue, 7 Mar 95 18:12:19 PST Date: Tue, 7 Mar 1995 18:12:18 -0800 (PST) From: Bill Mitchell X-Sender: mitchell@bb29c To: debian-bugs@pixar.com Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII I looked at this a bit more after getting home. I ran the following script on a virgin 0.93R4 install, and again after installing man.deb. #!/bin/sh # echo echo programs without man8 pages for i in /sbin/* /usr/sbin/* do if [ ! -f /usr/man/man8/$i.8 ] then echo $i fi done # echo echo programs without man1 pages for i in /bin/* /usr/bin/* do if [ ! -f /usr/man/man1/$i.1 ] then echo $i fi done # echo echo man8 pages without programs for i in /usr/man/man8/* do name=`basename $8 .8` if [ ! -f /sbin/$name -a ! -f /usr/sbin/$name ] then echo $i fi done # echo echo man1 pages without programs for i in /usr/man/man1/* do name=`basename $i .1` if [ ! -f /bin/$name -a ! -f /usr/bin/$name ] then echo $i fi done This produced quite a list of discrepancies, which I've compressed and uuencoded below to spare those not interested in the details. begin 644 details.gz M'XL(""\M7"\"`V1E=&%I;',`[5C;;MPV$'WW5^BQ1;%.XS1%^KAM-D&0Q"GL M($#1AX(228D5+PI)[>WK2U&D-%PJ;A"X`>JL`6/GG!'OPQG.K%;97[%^\7YS M4[RZOGV_?O/FU?7+XL?+7Y[<_%3\NK[=%+=_W+[?O+VXZ+2J-1*FV#';J-X6 M`LEG18=J8BX>F9+)1R7")5=5&W$U@"!C4O8U-1/JA,(1]*(C5Y-N$*=F)^(E MV=LKB`63;!^(FEA["'*#N`TBHY62E-412C9II)EGX8!%G+=$2\(#UY98(TLB M8IR[+YY&R%4=&[?F(.+\.4[&XV`,T8)UBI8:N!Z/X7I$:W:HBT!A=P!EG$O' ML*)15CNBXQ":E$K%!6HQCZW=D<76NI><;*=EFJ:W6.UDA&Y412E$D^I@P*HM MX6`W;2_!ZOH.^YWKC1X)A'%OB`9,13$S+20:[><^$:+TI7S2B5R`2I0C8(3:V[*/J# M&$6_TUX,VG%F7@H?81I^F0Z"(*8.HC18"<2D1"(T(Z[34:*(FT#6O3RR,$(] M28W;GKGA8-*CQ,.*)Z`2ML$:Y'`7L`I*`&UIN,,-NX!P&QP M&A`]@5"G.^6NMG.FJ@),U]8I6KFH`1A#.*G@@#V41=>2@YD9@H%<:P(VA,@M M`/L.29Q@L)$44Z4%-`Z:]D49;$P%_%)QJ-*$0*3`OM+9-?KKFEA=362(+S-C M50<&2F=4.U??P:^/9`]&;@C"$.UGS^?C(%"&F)@1*R:IFMF_%0,6XX+F7\[; M@1%#X)P)CL$@7"&>N+75/$Y$R2MJ$ MX`2;A!#$HM1*C`N,)^TS,NI3AQ3+]E'@/R#!I>0L0S> MBL&G@$W?(G>KF`)VOQ7N-H.Y[8"8W-<=V+U=HQ*`!`-8,VC&>Z1K,(,#`>"8 MA*AC:E1'YW2AB1Y3#W<<'Q\3=%?RXF).1Z;G6GR_C9^Z#X;_9X_>KE]OGF\^ M7#X[X<,3->.GO";3C$_8G/8/V9P>.LG8D!GE_."&93&1T# MVX)B:4G+?<24;%GCDYE,%+AS(E?\N:Y9V#R2.1V2ITPQ M7"T7*G+>I58YZ1/3!7H(1CGMOJ4Y'EN"/VR)7SB:+<,#]$YYWW(R&B? M/>[U^N2D^;&YN7[V[+JXNKU8_ MGPMHYP+:N8!V+J!]5DGAX#Y+?'A?LO)KU_S:9,S_H`2H3D?XMYI@ M2TZ/S\6J!,!:BX-#C>X>BXKP.GQQB5&F-G6/%4=:VL0B.U9]>3VR+.^J3E)X M4`^H6.D>>^)SBY=6HX.[`>8+ZIGE9Q8WLR!\/^7.U`(?7O4S]1'G:NBY&OHU CJZ'3*^/_6R>-@?9<0OTV2Z@QM)V+JP^TN/H/Z88*DV(H```S ` end ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Message received at debian-bugs: From mdd.comm.mot.com!mitchell Tue Mar 7 08:58:27 1995 Return-Path: Received: from pixar.com by mongo.pixar.com with smtp (Smail3.1.28.1 #15) id m0rm2aY-0006LFC; Tue, 7 Mar 95 08:58 PST Received: from motgate.mot.com by pixar.com with SMTP id AA29825 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for ); Tue, 7 Mar 1995 08:58:11 -0800 Received: from pobox.mot.com (pobox.mot.com [129.188.137.100]) by motgate.mot.com (8.6.10/8.6.10/MOT-3.5) with ESMTP id KAA27258 for ; Tue, 7 Mar 1995 10:50:40 -0600 Received: from mdd.comm.mot.com (mdisea.mdd.comm.mot.com [138.242.64.201]) by pobox.mot.com (8.6.10/8.6.10/MOT-3.5) with SMTP id KAA05612 for ; Tue, 7 Mar 1995 10:50:39 -0600 Received: from bb29c.mdd.comm.mot.com by mdd.comm.mot.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA09102; Tue, 7 Mar 95 08:50:37 PST Received: by bb29c.mdd.comm.mot.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA13396; Tue, 7 Mar 95 08:50:35 PST Date: Tue, 7 Mar 95 08:50:35 PST From: mitchell@mdd.comm.mot.com (Bill Mitchell) Message-Id: <9503071650.AA13396@bb29c.mdd.comm.mot.com> To: debian-bugs@pixar.com Subject: Re: Bug#579: missing /usr/man/man8 manpages bruce@pixar.com (Bruce Perens) said: > From: Bill Mitchell > > The following programs are missing manpages: > > I find manpages for some of these on my system. Can you check again? I took a quick look. In general, the situation seems to be: 1. After base system installation, we have some programs with manpages installed and some programs without man pages. I haven't yet checked for man pages without programs. 2. After man.deb installation, we appear to have less programs without man pages, but we've picked up some manpages without programs. 3. Installation of other packages (e.g. netbase, netstd) probably supplies more man pages for programs which were provided in the base system without man pages. While looking at this, I noted that a number of the /usr/man/man8 manpages document programs which are installed in directories other than /sbin and /usr/sbin. It seems like we ought to figure out what our policy is on who should supply manpages and, once we know what our policy is, check to see that we follow it. I can survey the way things are done by the 0.93R4 base disk set and the various .deb packages I currently have, but I'm not sure that'd accomplish much until we determine and state the policy. At first blush, it seems as if whoever supplies the program should supply the man pages. An exception might be the base system, which might supply _all_ base man pages in a separate package which could be omitted by anyone installing a sparse system without man pages (e.g., a disk constrained system used as an AX25 router). Anyone wishing to avoid package man page installation might symlink /usr/man to /dev/null after base system install (perhaps this would be best done via the existing special initial-login dialogue. Or, it occurs to me, it could be doce during dinstall dialogue prior to base system install -- which'd obviate the need to separate the man pages out of the base system into a separate package.). Sounds like something which needs discussion, and not like something which needs to be fixed before our still-upcoming release can take place. As a separate issue, I noted while looking at this that the base system supplied some programs which are later overwritten by non-base packages. I'd have to go back and recheck to confirm details, though. I think ping, for one, is an example of this. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Message sent: From: iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson) To: mitchell@mdd.comm.mot.com (Bill Mitchell) Subject: Bug#579: Info received (was Bug#579: missing /usr/man/man8 manpages) In-Reply-To: <9503071650.AA13396@bb29c.mdd.comm.mot.com> References: <9503071650.AA13396@bb29c.mdd.comm.mot.com> Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this problem report. It has been forwarded to the developers to accompany the original report. If you wish to continue submit further information on your problem, please do the same thing again: send it to debian-bugs@pixar.com, ensuring that the Subject line starts with "Bug#579" or "Re: Bug#579" so that we can identify it as relating to the same problem. Please do not to reply to the address at the top of this message, unless you wish to report a problem with the bug-tracking system. Ian Jackson (maintainer, debian-bugs) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Message sent to debian-devel@pixar.com: Subject: Bug#579: missing /usr/man/man8 manpages Reply-To: mitchell@mdd.comm.mot.com (Bill Mitchell), debian-bugs@pixar.com Resent-To: debian-devel@pixar.com Resent-From: mitchell@mdd.comm.mot.com (Bill Mitchell) Resent-Sender: iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk Resent-Date: Tue, 07 Mar 1995 17:18:03 GMT Resent-Message-ID: X-Debian-PR-Package: image (?) X-Debian-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool for debian-bugs; Tue, 07 Mar 1995 17:18:03 GMT Received: with rfc822 via encapsulated-mail id 03071705391479; Tue, 07 Mar 1995 17:05:39 GMT Received: from pixar.com by mongo.pixar.com with smtp (Smail3.1.28.1 #15) id m0rm2aY-0006LFC; Tue, 7 Mar 95 08:58 PST Received: from motgate.mot.com by pixar.com with SMTP id AA29825 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for ); Tue, 7 Mar 1995 08:58:11 -0800 Received: from pobox.mot.com (pobox.mot.com [129.188.137.100]) by motgate.mot.com (8.6.10/8.6.10/MOT-3.5) with ESMTP id KAA27258 for ; Tue, 7 Mar 1995 10:50:40 -0600 Received: from mdd.comm.mot.com (mdisea.mdd.comm.mot.com [138.242.64.201]) by pobox.mot.com (8.6.10/8.6.10/MOT-3.5) with SMTP id KAA05612 for ; Tue, 7 Mar 1995 10:50:39 -0600 Received: from bb29c.mdd.comm.mot.com by mdd.comm.mot.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA09102; Tue, 7 Mar 95 08:50:37 PST Received: by bb29c.mdd.comm.mot.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA13396; Tue, 7 Mar 95 08:50:35 PST Date: Tue, 7 Mar 95 08:50:35 PST From: mitchell@mdd.comm.mot.com (Bill Mitchell) Message-Id: <9503071650.AA13396@bb29c.mdd.comm.mot.com> To: debian-bugs@pixar.com bruce@pixar.com (Bruce Perens) said: > From: Bill Mitchell > > The following programs are missing manpages: > > I find manpages for some of these on my system. Can you check again? I took a quick look. In general, the situation seems to be: 1. After base system installation, we have some programs with manpages installed and some programs without man pages. I haven't yet checked for man pages without programs. 2. After man.deb installation, we appear to have less programs without man pages, but we've picked up some manpages without programs. 3. Installation of other packages (e.g. netbase, netstd) probably supplies more man pages for programs which were provided in the base system without man pages. While looking at this, I noted that a number of the /usr/man/man8 manpages document programs which are installed in directories other than /sbin and /usr/sbin. It seems like we ought to figure out what our policy is on who should supply manpages and, once we know what our policy is, check to see that we follow it. I can survey the way things are done by the 0.93R4 base disk set and the various .deb packages I currently have, but I'm not sure that'd accomplish much until we determine and state the policy. At first blush, it seems as if whoever supplies the program should supply the man pages. An exception might be the base system, which might supply _all_ base man pages in a separate package which could be omitted by anyone installing a sparse system without man pages (e.g., a disk constrained system used as an AX25 router). Anyone wishing to avoid package man page installation might symlink /usr/man to /dev/null after base system install (perhaps this would be best done via the existing special initial-login dialogue. Or, it occurs to me, it could be doce during dinstall dialogue prior to base system install -- which'd obviate the need to separate the man pages out of the base system into a separate package.). Sounds like something which needs discussion, and not like something which needs to be fixed before our still-upcoming release can take place. As a separate issue, I noted while looking at this that the base system supplied some programs which are later overwritten by non-base packages. I'd have to go back and recheck to confirm details, though. I think ping, for one, is an example of this. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Message received at debian-bugs: From pixar.com!bruce Mon Mar 6 20:23:27 1995 Return-Path: Received: from pixar.com by mongo.pixar.com with smtp (Smail3.1.28.1 #15) id m0rlqnu-0005pqC; Mon, 6 Mar 95 20:23 PST Received: from mongo.pixar.com by pixar.com with SMTP id AA19009 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for ); Mon, 6 Mar 1995 20:23:24 -0800 Received: by mongo.pixar.com (Smail3.1.28.1 #15) id m0rlqnM-0005pqC; Mon, 6 Mar 95 20:22 PST Message-Id: Date: Mon, 6 Mar 95 20:22 PST From: bruce@pixar.com (Bruce Perens) To: debian-bugs@pixar.com, debian-bugs@pixar.com, Bill Mitchell Subject: Re: Bug#579: missing /usr/man/man8 manpages From: Bill Mitchell > The following programs are missing manpages: I find manpages for some of these on my system. Can you check again? Thanks Bruce /sbin/depmod /sbin/ifconfig <- In netstd. /sbin/insmod <- In modules-1.1.87 . /sbin/installkernel /sbin/ksyms <- In modules-1.1.87 /sbin/lilo /sbin/lsmod <- In modules-1.1.87 /sbin/modprobe /sbin/rmmod <- In modules-1.1.87 /sbin/route <- In netstd /usr/sbin/Set_X5 /usr/sbin/Set_X6 /usr/sbin/flushb /usr/sbin/mkboot /usr/sbin/start-stop-daemon /usr/sbin/update-rc.d -- Bruce Perens AB6YM 510-215-3502 Bruce@Pixar.com Attention Ham Radio Operators: For information on "Linux for Hams", read the World Wide Web page http://www.rahul.net/perens/LinuxForHams ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Message sent: From: iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson) To: bruce@pixar.com (Bruce Perens) Subject: Bug#579: Info received (was Bug#579: missing /usr/man/man8 manpages) In-Reply-To: References: Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this problem report. It has been forwarded to the developers to accompany the original report. If you wish to continue submit further information on your problem, please do the same thing again: send it to debian-bugs@pixar.com, ensuring that the Subject line starts with "Bug#579" or "Re: Bug#579" so that we can identify it as relating to the same problem. Please do not to reply to the address at the top of this message, unless you wish to report a problem with the bug-tracking system. Ian Jackson (maintainer, debian-bugs) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Message sent to debian-devel@pixar.com: Subject: Bug#579: missing /usr/man/man8 manpages Reply-To: bruce@pixar.com (Bruce Perens), debian-bugs@pixar.com Resent-To: debian-devel@pixar.com Resent-From: bruce@pixar.com (Bruce Perens) Resent-Sender: iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk Resent-Date: Tue, 07 Mar 1995 04:33:02 GMT Resent-Message-ID: X-Debian-PR-Package: image (?) X-Debian-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool for debian-bugs; Tue, 07 Mar 1995 04:33:02 GMT Received: with rfc822 via encapsulated-mail id 03070424311262; Tue, 07 Mar 1995 04:24:31 GMT Received: from pixar.com by mongo.pixar.com with smtp (Smail3.1.28.1 #15) id m0rlqnu-0005pqC; Mon, 6 Mar 95 20:23 PST Received: from mongo.pixar.com by pixar.com with SMTP id AA19009 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for ); Mon, 6 Mar 1995 20:23:24 -0800 Received: by mongo.pixar.com (Smail3.1.28.1 #15) id m0rlqnM-0005pqC; Mon, 6 Mar 95 20:22 PST Message-Id: Date: Mon, 6 Mar 95 20:22 PST From: bruce@pixar.com (Bruce Perens) To: debian-bugs@pixar.com, debian-bugs@pixar.com, Bill Mitchell From: Bill Mitchell > The following programs are missing manpages: I find manpages for some of these on my system. Can you check again? Thanks Bruce /sbin/depmod /sbin/ifconfig <- In netstd. /sbin/insmod <- In modules-1.1.87 . /sbin/installkernel /sbin/ksyms <- In modules-1.1.87 /sbin/lilo /sbin/lsmod <- In modules-1.1.87 /sbin/modprobe /sbin/rmmod <- In modules-1.1.87 /sbin/route <- In netstd /usr/sbin/Set_X5 /usr/sbin/Set_X6 /usr/sbin/flushb /usr/sbin/mkboot /usr/sbin/start-stop-daemon /usr/sbin/update-rc.d -- Bruce Perens AB6YM 510-215-3502 Bruce@Pixar.com Attention Ham Radio Operators: For information on "Linux for Hams", read the World Wide Web page http://www.rahul.net/perens/LinuxForHams ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Message received at debian-bugs: From mdd.comm.mot.com!mitchell Mon Mar 6 19:29:08 1995 Return-Path: Received: from pixar.com by mongo.pixar.com with smtp (Smail3.1.28.1 #15) id m0rlpxL-0005oBC; Mon, 6 Mar 95 19:29 PST Received: from ftpbox.mot.com by pixar.com with SMTP id AA18220 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for ); Mon, 6 Mar 1995 19:29:02 -0800 Received: from pobox.mot.com (pobox.mot.com [129.188.137.100]) by ftpbox.mot.com (8.6.10/8.6.10/MOT-3.5) with ESMTP id VAA11059 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 1995 21:29:03 -0600 Received: from mdd.comm.mot.com (mdisea.mdd.comm.mot.com [138.242.64.201]) by pobox.mot.com (8.6.10/8.6.10/MOT-3.5) with SMTP id VAA13717 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 1995 21:28:31 -0600 Received: from bb29c.mdd.comm.mot.com by mdd.comm.mot.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA16301; Mon, 6 Mar 95 19:28:30 PST Received: by bb29c.mdd.comm.mot.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA13049; Mon, 6 Mar 95 19:28:26 PST Date: Mon, 6 Mar 1995 19:28:26 -0800 (PST) From: Bill Mitchell X-Sender: mitchell@bb29c To: debian-bugs@pixar.com Subject: missing /usr/man/man8 manpages Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII PACKAGE: image (?) VERSION: 0.93R4 The following programs are missing manpages: /sbin/depmod /sbin/ifconfig /sbin/insmod /sbin/installkernel /sbin/ksyms /sbin/lilo /sbin/lsmod /sbin/modprobe /sbin/rmmod /sbin/route /usr/sbin/Set_X5 /usr/sbin/Set_X6 /usr/sbin/flushb /usr/sbin/mkboot /usr/sbin/start-stop-daemon /usr/sbin/update-rc.d mitchell@mdd.comm.mot.com (Bill Mitchell) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Message sent: From: iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson) To: Bill Mitchell Subject: Bug#579: Acknowledgement (was: missing /usr/man/man8 manpages) In-Reply-To: References: Thank you for the problem report you have sent regarding Debian GNU/Linux. This is an automatically generated reply, to let you know your message has been received. It is being forwarded to the developers' mailing list for their attention; they will reply in due course. If you wish to submit further information on your problem, please send it to debian-bugs@pixar.com, but please ensure that the Subject line of your message starts with "Bug#579" or "Re: Bug#579" so that we can identify it as relating to the same problem. Please do not to reply to the address at the top of this message, unless you wish to report a problem with the bug-tracking system. Ian Jackson (maintainer, debian-bugs) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Message sent to debian-devel@pixar.com: Subject: Bug#579: missing /usr/man/man8 manpages Reply-To: Bill Mitchell , debian-bugs@pixar.com Resent-To: debian-devel@pixar.com Resent-From: Bill Mitchell Resent-Sender: iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk Resent-Date: Tue, 07 Mar 1995 03:33:08 GMT Resent-Message-ID: X-Debian-PR-Package: image (?) X-Debian-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool for debian-bugs; Tue, 07 Mar 1995 03:33:08 GMT Received: with rfc822 via encapsulated-mail id 030703301529489; Tue, 07 Mar 1995 03:30:16 GMT Received: from pixar.com by mongo.pixar.com with smtp (Smail3.1.28.1 #15) id m0rlpxL-0005oBC; Mon, 6 Mar 95 19:29 PST Received: from ftpbox.mot.com by pixar.com with SMTP id AA18220 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for ); Mon, 6 Mar 1995 19:29:02 -0800 Received: from pobox.mot.com (pobox.mot.com [129.188.137.100]) by ftpbox.mot.com (8.6.10/8.6.10/MOT-3.5) with ESMTP id VAA11059 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 1995 21:29:03 -0600 Received: from mdd.comm.mot.com (mdisea.mdd.comm.mot.com [138.242.64.201]) by pobox.mot.com (8.6.10/8.6.10/MOT-3.5) with SMTP id VAA13717 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 1995 21:28:31 -0600 Received: from bb29c.mdd.comm.mot.com by mdd.comm.mot.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA16301; Mon, 6 Mar 95 19:28:30 PST Received: by bb29c.mdd.comm.mot.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA13049; Mon, 6 Mar 95 19:28:26 PST Date: Mon, 6 Mar 1995 19:28:26 -0800 (PST) From: Bill Mitchell X-Sender: mitchell@bb29c To: debian-bugs@pixar.com Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII PACKAGE: image (?) VERSION: 0.93R4 The following programs are missing manpages: /sbin/depmod /sbin/ifconfig /sbin/insmod /sbin/installkernel /sbin/ksyms /sbin/lilo /sbin/lsmod /sbin/modprobe /sbin/rmmod /sbin/route /usr/sbin/Set_X5 /usr/sbin/Set_X6 /usr/sbin/flushb /usr/sbin/mkboot /usr/sbin/start-stop-daemon /usr/sbin/update-rc.d mitchell@mdd.comm.mot.com (Bill Mitchell) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Ian Jackson / iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk , with the debian-bugs tracking mechanism This page last modified 07:43:01 GMT Wed 01 Nov