Debian bug report logs - #1729 Naming of commands Package: lrzsz ; Reported by: Juho A Vuori ; Done: Michael Alan Dorman . ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Message received at debian-bugs-done: From lot49.med.miami.edu!mdorman Sun Oct 22 07:38:16 1995 Return-Path: Received: from pixar.com by mongo.pixar.com with smtp (Smail3.1.28.1 #15) id m0t71XU-0006F1C; Sun, 22 Oct 95 07:38 PDT Received: from lot49.med.miami.edu by pixar.com with SMTP id AA20323 (5.67b/IDA-1.5 for debian-bugs-done-pipe@mongo.pixar.com); Sun, 22 Oct 1995 07:37:50 -0700 Received: (from mdorman@localhost) by lot49.med.miami.edu (8.6.12/8.6.12) id KAA11435; Sun, 22 Oct 1995 10:32:57 -0400 Date: Sun, 22 Oct 1995 10:32:57 -0400 (EDT) From: Michael Alan Dorman To: Juho A Vuori , debian-bugs-done@Pixar.com Subject: Re: Bug#1729: Naming of commands In-Reply-To: <199510212234.AAA27322@kruuna.helsinki.fi> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII On Sun, 22 Oct 1995, Juho A Vuori wrote: > Oops, after sending my last mail, I noticed another thing. The man pages > of lrz and lsz speak about commands called rz, sz, rb, ..., but the > actual binaries are named lsz, ... In my opinion, it would be better if > the commands were also called traditionally rz, sz, ..., but if not, > then, please modify the man-pages. Or keep the original commands, but > make symlinks to the traditional commands (and man-pages). I have also done this in the updated lrzsz package --- the binaries are now accessible under their traditional names, as they were in the minicom-1.71 and as they weren't in lrzsz-0.11. Cheers, Mike. -- "I'm a dinosaur. Somebody's digging my bones." ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Notification sent to Juho A Vuori : Bug acknowledged by developer. Full text available. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Reply sent to Michael Alan Dorman : You have taken responsibility. Full text available. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Message received at debian-bugs: From cc.helsinki.fi!javuori Sat Oct 21 15:34:53 1995 Return-Path: Received: from pixar.com by mongo.pixar.com with smtp (Smail3.1.28.1 #15) id m0t6mVB-0006F3C; Sat, 21 Oct 95 15:34 PDT Received: from kruuna.helsinki.fi (kruuna-fddi.Helsinki.FI) by pixar.com with SMTP id AA05096 (5.67b/IDA-1.5 for debian-bugs-pipe@mongo.pixar.com); Sat, 21 Oct 1995 15:33:48 -0700 Received: (javuori@localhost) by kruuna.helsinki.fi (8.6.12+Emil1.1/8.6.5) id AAA27322 for debian-bugs@pixar.com; Sun, 22 Oct 1995 00:34:10 +0200 From: Juho A Vuori Message-Id: <199510212234.AAA27322@kruuna.helsinki.fi> Subject: Naming of commands To: debian-bugs@pixar.com Date: Sun, 22 Oct 1995 00:34:09 +0200 (EET) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Length: 443 Package: lrzsz Version: 0.11 Oops, after sending my last mail, I noticed another thing. The man pages of lrz and lsz speak about commands called rz, sz, rb, ..., but the actual binaries are named lsz, ... In my opinion, it would be better if the commands were also called traditionally rz, sz, ..., but if not, then, please modify the man-pages. Or keep the original commands, but make symlinks to the traditional commands (and man-pages). ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Acknowledgement sent to Juho A Vuori : New bug report received and forwarded. Full text available. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Report forwarded to debian-devel@pixar.com : Bug#1729 ; Package lrzsz . Full text available. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Ian Jackson / iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk , with the debian-bugs tracking mechanism This page last modified 07:43:01 GMT Wed 01 Nov