Debian bug report logs - #1729 , boring messages ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Message sent to debian-devel@pixar.com: Subject: Bug#1729: Naming of commands Reply-To: Juho A Vuori , debian-bugs@pixar.com Resent-From: Juho A Vuori Resent-To: debian-devel@pixar.com Resent-Date: Sat, 21 Oct 1995 22:48:02 GMT Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk X-Debian-PR-Package: lrzsz X-Debian-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool for debian-bugs; Sat, 21 Oct 1995 22:48:02 GMT Received: with rfc822 via encapsulated-mail; Sat, 21 Oct 1995 22:36:18 GMT Received: from pixar.com by mongo.pixar.com with smtp (Smail3.1.28.1 #15) id m0t6mVB-0006F3C; Sat, 21 Oct 95 15:34 PDT Received: from kruuna.helsinki.fi (kruuna-fddi.Helsinki.FI) by pixar.com with SMTP id AA05096 (5.67b/IDA-1.5 for debian-bugs-pipe@mongo.pixar.com); Sat, 21 Oct 1995 15:33:48 -0700 Received: (javuori@localhost) by kruuna.helsinki.fi (8.6.12+Emil1.1/8.6.5) id AAA27322 for debian-bugs@pixar.com; Sun, 22 Oct 1995 00:34:10 +0200 From: Juho A Vuori Message-Id: <199510212234.AAA27322@kruuna.helsinki.fi> To: debian-bugs@pixar.com Date: Sun, 22 Oct 1995 00:34:09 +0200 (EET) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Length: 443 Package: lrzsz Version: 0.11 Oops, after sending my last mail, I noticed another thing. The man pages of lrz and lsz speak about commands called rz, sz, rb, ..., but the actual binaries are named lsz, ... In my opinion, it would be better if the commands were also called traditionally rz, sz, ..., but if not, then, please modify the man-pages. Or keep the original commands, but make symlinks to the traditional commands (and man-pages). ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Message sent: From: iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson) To: Juho A Vuori Subject: Bug#1729: Acknowledgement (was: Naming of commands) In-Reply-To: <199510212234.AAA27322@kruuna.helsinki.fi> References: <199510212234.AAA27322@kruuna.helsinki.fi> Thank you for the problem report you have sent regarding Debian GNU/Linux. This is an automatically generated reply, to let you know your message has been received. It is being forwarded to the developers' mailing list for their attention; they will reply in due course. If you wish to submit further information on your problem, please send it to debian-bugs@pixar.com, but please ensure that the Subject line of your message starts with "Bug#1729" or "Re: Bug#1729" so that we can identify it as relating to the same problem. Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message, unless you wish to report a problem with the bug-tracking system. Ian Jackson (maintainer, debian-bugs) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Message sent: From: iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson) To: Michael Alan Dorman In-Reply-To: References: <199510212234.AAA27322@kruuna.helsinki.fi> Subject: Bug#1729: marked as done (was: Naming of commands) Your message dated Sun, 22 Oct 1995 10:32:57 -0400 (EDT) with message-id and subject line Bug#1729: Naming of commands has caused the attached bug report to be marked as done. It is your now responsibility to ensure that the bug report is dealt with. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I'm talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Ian Jackson (maintainer, debian-bugs) Received: with rfc822 via encapsulated-mail; Sat, 21 Oct 1995 22:36:18 GMT From cc.helsinki.fi!javuori Sat Oct 21 15:34:53 1995 Return-Path: Received: from pixar.com by mongo.pixar.com with smtp (Smail3.1.28.1 #15) id m0t6mVB-0006F3C; Sat, 21 Oct 95 15:34 PDT Received: from kruuna.helsinki.fi (kruuna-fddi.Helsinki.FI) by pixar.com with SMTP id AA05096 (5.67b/IDA-1.5 for debian-bugs-pipe@mongo.pixar.com); Sat, 21 Oct 1995 15:33:48 -0700 Received: (javuori@localhost) by kruuna.helsinki.fi (8.6.12+Emil1.1/8.6.5) id AAA27322 for debian-bugs@pixar.com; Sun, 22 Oct 1995 00:34:10 +0200 From: Juho A Vuori Message-Id: <199510212234.AAA27322@kruuna.helsinki.fi> Subject: Naming of commands To: debian-bugs@pixar.com Date: Sun, 22 Oct 1995 00:34:09 +0200 (EET) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Length: 443 Package: lrzsz Version: 0.11 Oops, after sending my last mail, I noticed another thing. The man pages of lrz and lsz speak about commands called rz, sz, rb, ..., but the actual binaries are named lsz, ... In my opinion, it would be better if the commands were also called traditionally rz, sz, ..., but if not, then, please modify the man-pages. Or keep the original commands, but make symlinks to the traditional commands (and man-pages). ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Message sent: From: iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson) To: Juho A Vuori Subject: Bug#1729 acknowledged by developer (was: Naming of commands) References: <199510212234.AAA27322@kruuna.helsinki.fi> In-Reply-To: <199510212234.AAA27322@kruuna.helsinki.fi> This is an automatic notification regarding your bug report. Responsibility for it has been taken by one of the developers, namely Michael Alan Dorman . You should be hearing from them with a substantive response shortly, if you have not already done so. If not, please contact them directly, or email debian-bugs@pixar.com or myself. Ian Jackson (maintainer, debian-bugs) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Ian Jackson / iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk , with the debian-bugs tracking mechanism This page last modified 07:43:01 GMT Wed 01 Nov