Debian bug report logs - #1676 , boring messages ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Message sent to debian-devel@pixar.com: Subject: Bug#1676: w3-el-2.2.16-1.tar.gz doesn't build Reply-To: Raul Miller , debian-bugs@pixar.com Resent-From: Raul Miller Resent-To: debian-devel@pixar.com Resent-Date: Sat, 14 Oct 1995 17:18:02 GMT Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk X-Debian-PR-Package: X-Debian-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool for debian-bugs; Sat, 14 Oct 1995 17:18:02 GMT Received: with rfc822 via encapsulated-mail; Sat, 14 Oct 1995 17:16:12 GMT Received: from pixar.com by mongo.pixar.com with smtp (Smail3.1.28.1 #15) id m0t4AAv-000B17C; Sat, 14 Oct 95 10:15 PDT Received: from magenta.com by pixar.com with SMTP id AA03446 (5.67b/IDA-1.5 for debian-bugs-pipe@mongo.pixar.com); Sat, 14 Oct 1995 10:14:46 -0700 Received: (moth@localhost) by magenta.com (8.6.12/8.6.4) id NAA10523; Sat, 14 Oct 1995 13:10:17 -0400 Date: Sat, 14 Oct 1995 13:10:17 -0400 Message-Id: <199510141710.NAA10523@magenta.com> From: Raul Miller To: debian-bugs@pixar.com Cc: Karl Eichwalder Hmm... I just looked again at what I'm doing with w3 on install. Basically, I'm doing two things: (a) putting the w3 directory in emac's load path. (b) setting up autoloads for the typically useful entry points to w3. I don't think this is a bad thing. If you do, could you explain? -- Raul ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Message sent: From: iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson) To: Raul Miller Subject: Bug#1676: Acknowledgement (was: w3-el-2.2.16-1.tar.gz doesn't build) In-Reply-To: <199510141710.NAA10523@magenta.com> References: <199510141710.NAA10523@magenta.com> Thank you for the problem report you have sent regarding Debian GNU/Linux. This is an automatically generated reply, to let you know your message has been received. It is being forwarded to the developers' mailing list for their attention; they will reply in due course. If you wish to submit further information on your problem, please send it to debian-bugs@pixar.com, but please ensure that the Subject line of your message starts with "Bug#1676" or "Re: Bug#1676" so that we can identify it as relating to the same problem. Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message, unless you wish to report a problem with the bug-tracking system. Your message didn't have a Package: line at the start (in the pseudo-header following the real mail header), or didn't have a psuedo-header at all. This makes it much harder for us to categorise and deal with your problem report; please ensure that you say which package(s) and version(s) the problem is with next time. Some time in the future the problem reports system may start rejecting such messages. Ian Jackson (maintainer, debian-bugs) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Message received at debian-bugs-request: From tad.micro.umn.edu!rdm Tue Oct 24 13:27:27 1995 Return-Path: Received: from pixar.com by mongo.pixar.com with smtp (Smail3.1.28.1 #15) id m0t7pwV-0005h5C; Tue, 24 Oct 95 13:27 PDT Received: from rdm.legislate.com ([192.77.155.13]) by pixar.com with SMTP id AA24314 (5.67b/IDA-1.5 for debian-bugs-request-pipe@mongo.pixar.com); Tue, 24 Oct 1995 13:27:01 -0700 Received: by rdm.legislate.com id (Debian /\oo/\ Smail3.1.29.1 #29.33); Tue, 24 Oct 95 16:30 EDT Message-Id: Date: Tue, 24 Oct 95 16:30 EDT From: Raul Miller To: debian-bugs-request@pixar.com Subject: reassign 1744 dpkg reassign 1676 w3-el reassign 1675 w3-el reassign 1745 base?, perl? ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Ian Jackson / iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk , with the debian-bugs tracking mechanism This page last modified 07:43:01 GMT Wed 01 Nov