Debian bug report logs - #1634 , boring messages ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Message sent to debian-devel@pixar.com: Subject: Bug#1634: revision should be package_revision Reply-To: Erick Branderhorst , debian-bugs@pixar.com Resent-From: Erick Branderhorst Resent-To: debian-devel@pixar.com Resent-Date: Tue, 10 Oct 1995 17:18:08 GMT Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk X-Debian-PR-Package: gsfonts X-Debian-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool for debian-bugs; Tue, 10 Oct 1995 17:18:08 GMT Received: with rfc822 via encapsulated-mail; Tue, 10 Oct 1995 17:15:21 GMT Received: from pixar.com by mongo.pixar.com with smtp (Smail3.1.28.1 #15) id m0t2aDi-000BG5C; Tue, 10 Oct 95 01:39 PDT Received: from mailgate.eur.nl by pixar.com with SMTP id AA17753 (5.67b/IDA-1.5 for debian-bugs-pipe@mongo.pixar.com); Tue, 10 Oct 1995 01:39:02 -0700 Received: from hp750.fgg.eur.nl by mailgate.eur.nl (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA04582; Tue, 10 Oct 95 09:39:19 +0100 Message-Id: <9510100839.AA04582@mailgate.eur.nl> Received: by hp750.fgg.eur.nl (1.38.193.4/16.2) id AA20018; Tue, 10 Oct 1995 09:42:55 +0100 From: Erick Branderhorst To: debian-bugs@pixar.com Date: Tue, 10 Oct 95 9:42:55 MET Mailer: Elm [revision: 70.85] Package: gsfonts Version: 2.6.1- Libc: libc.so.4.6.27 Kernel etc: Linux morris 1.2.10 #1 Tue Jun 13 18:37:28 EST 1995 i486 Reporter: repair 0.1 Subject: Package_Revision field is missing $ dpkg --info gsfonts-2.6.1-2.deb old debian package, version 0.939000. size 1703146 bytes: control archive= 267, main archive= 1702866. 150 bytes, 5 lines control PACKAGE: gsfonts VERSION: 2.6.1 REVISION: 2 MAINTAINER: Ted Hajek DESCRIPTION: Fonts for the ghostscript interpreter REVISION should be Package_Revision according to Debian Guidelines -- Erick Branderhorst@heel.fgg.eur.nl 00++10-46351542 Deparment of General Surgery (Intensive Care) University Hospital Rotterdam NL ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Message sent: From: iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson) To: Erick Branderhorst Subject: Bug#1634: Acknowledgement (was: revision should be package_revision) In-Reply-To: <9510100839.AA04582@mailgate.eur.nl> References: <9510100839.AA04582@mailgate.eur.nl> Thank you for the problem report you have sent regarding Debian GNU/Linux. This is an automatically generated reply, to let you know your message has been received. It is being forwarded to the developers' mailing list for their attention; they will reply in due course. If you wish to submit further information on your problem, please send it to debian-bugs@pixar.com, but please ensure that the Subject line of your message starts with "Bug#1634" or "Re: Bug#1634" so that we can identify it as relating to the same problem. Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message, unless you wish to report a problem with the bug-tracking system. Ian Jackson (maintainer, debian-bugs) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Message sent: From: iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson) To: Ian Jackson In-Reply-To: References: <9510100839.AA04582@mailgate.eur.nl> Subject: Bug#1634: marked as done (was: revision should be package_revision) Your message dated Tue, 10 Oct 95 20:21 BST with message-id and subject line Bug#1634: revision should be package_revision has caused the attached bug report to be marked as done. It is your now responsibility to ensure that the bug report is dealt with. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I'm talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Ian Jackson (maintainer, debian-bugs) Received: with rfc822 via encapsulated-mail; Tue, 10 Oct 1995 17:15:21 GMT From fgg.eur.nl!branderhorst Tue Oct 10 01:39:31 1995 Return-Path: Received: from pixar.com by mongo.pixar.com with smtp (Smail3.1.28.1 #15) id m0t2aDi-000BG5C; Tue, 10 Oct 95 01:39 PDT Received: from mailgate.eur.nl by pixar.com with SMTP id AA17753 (5.67b/IDA-1.5 for debian-bugs-pipe@mongo.pixar.com); Tue, 10 Oct 1995 01:39:02 -0700 Received: from hp750.fgg.eur.nl by mailgate.eur.nl (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA04582; Tue, 10 Oct 95 09:39:19 +0100 Message-Id: <9510100839.AA04582@mailgate.eur.nl> Received: by hp750.fgg.eur.nl (1.38.193.4/16.2) id AA20018; Tue, 10 Oct 1995 09:42:55 +0100 From: Erick Branderhorst Subject: revision should be package_revision To: debian-bugs@pixar.com Date: Tue, 10 Oct 95 9:42:55 MET Mailer: Elm [revision: 70.85] Package: gsfonts Version: 2.6.1- Libc: libc.so.4.6.27 Kernel etc: Linux morris 1.2.10 #1 Tue Jun 13 18:37:28 EST 1995 i486 Reporter: repair 0.1 Subject: Package_Revision field is missing $ dpkg --info gsfonts-2.6.1-2.deb old debian package, version 0.939000. size 1703146 bytes: control archive= 267, main archive= 1702866. 150 bytes, 5 lines control PACKAGE: gsfonts VERSION: 2.6.1 REVISION: 2 MAINTAINER: Ted Hajek DESCRIPTION: Fonts for the ghostscript interpreter REVISION should be Package_Revision according to Debian Guidelines -- Erick Branderhorst@heel.fgg.eur.nl 00++10-46351542 Deparment of General Surgery (Intensive Care) University Hospital Rotterdam NL ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Message sent: From: iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson) To: Erick Branderhorst Subject: Bug#1634 acknowledged by developer (was: revision should be package_revision) References: <9510100839.AA04582@mailgate.eur.nl> In-Reply-To: <9510100839.AA04582@mailgate.eur.nl> This is an automatic notification regarding your bug report. Responsibility for it has been taken by one of the developers, namely Ian Jackson . You should be hearing from them with a substantive response shortly, if you have not already done so. If not, please contact them directly, or email debian-bugs@pixar.com or myself. Ian Jackson (maintainer, debian-bugs) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Ian Jackson / iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk , with the debian-bugs tracking mechanism This page last modified 07:43:01 GMT Wed 01 Nov