Debian bug report logs - #1530 , boring messages ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Message sent to debian-devel@pixar.com: Subject: Bug#1530: Source doesn't seem to depend on bin86 Reply-To: Michael Alan Dorman , debian-bugs@pixar.com Resent-From: Michael Alan Dorman Resent-To: debian-devel@pixar.com Resent-Date: Tue, 03 Oct 1995 00:33:02 GMT Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk X-Debian-PR-Package: X-Debian-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool for debian-bugs; Tue, 03 Oct 1995 00:33:02 GMT Received: with rfc822 via encapsulated-mail; Tue, 03 Oct 1995 00:22:16 GMT Received: from pixar.com by mongo.pixar.com with smtp (Smail3.1.28.1 #15) id m0szv6e-000EWYC; Mon, 2 Oct 95 17:21 PDT Received: from lot49.med.miami.edu by pixar.com with SMTP id AA18760 (5.67b/IDA-1.5 for debian-bugs-pipe@mongo.pixar.com); Mon, 2 Oct 1995 17:20:52 -0700 Received: (from mdorman@localhost) by lot49.med.miami.edu (8.6.12/8.6.12) id UAA01389; Mon, 2 Oct 1995 20:16:29 -0400 Date: Mon, 2 Oct 1995 20:16:28 -0400 (EDT) From: Michael Alan Dorman To: debian-bugs@pixar.com Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII I can think of a couple of reasons that bin86 might not be in the true-blue depends for the source package, but I'd think it'd at least be "recommended" since you can't compile a new kernel without it. Mike. -- "And I swear that I don't have a gun." ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Message sent: From: iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson) To: Michael Alan Dorman Subject: Bug#1530: Acknowledgement (was: Source doesn't seem to depend on bin86) In-Reply-To: References: Thank you for the problem report you have sent regarding Debian GNU/Linux. This is an automatically generated reply, to let you know your message has been received. It is being forwarded to the developers' mailing list for their attention; they will reply in due course. If you wish to submit further information on your problem, please send it to debian-bugs@pixar.com, but please ensure that the Subject line of your message starts with "Bug#1530" or "Re: Bug#1530" so that we can identify it as relating to the same problem. Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message, unless you wish to report a problem with the bug-tracking system. Your message didn't have a Package: line at the start (in the pseudo-header following the real mail header), or didn't have a psuedo-header at all. This makes it much harder for us to categorise and deal with your problem report; please ensure that you say which package(s) and version(s) the problem is with next time. Some time in the future the problem reports system may start rejecting such messages. Ian Jackson (maintainer, debian-bugs) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Message received at debian-bugs-request: From debian.org!imurdock Wed Oct 11 15:55:09 1995 Return-Path: Received: from pixar.com by mongo.pixar.com with smtp (Smail3.1.28.1 #15) id m0t3A3I-000GxjC; Wed, 11 Oct 95 15:55 PDT Received: from imagine.imaginit.com by pixar.com with SMTP id AA11941 (5.67b/IDA-1.5 for debian-bugs-request-pipe@mongo.pixar.com); Wed, 11 Oct 1995 15:54:45 -0700 Received: by imagine.imaginit.com id (Debian /\oo/\ Smail3.1.29.1 #29.33); Wed, 11 Oct 95 17:59 EST Message-Id: Date: Wed, 11 Oct 95 17:59 EST From: imurdock@debian.org (Ian Murdock) To: debian-bugs-request@pixar.com reassign 1530 source ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Ian Jackson / iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk , with the debian-bugs tracking mechanism This page last modified 07:43:01 GMT Wed 01 Nov