Debian bug report logs - #1507 , boring messages ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Message sent to debian-devel@pixar.com: Subject: Bug#1507: Still no /etc/services Reply-To: Michael Alan Dorman , debian-bugs@pixar.com Resent-From: Michael Alan Dorman Resent-To: debian-devel@pixar.com Resent-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 1995 01:03:02 GMT Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk X-Debian-PR-Package: base X-Debian-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool for debian-bugs; Fri, 29 Sep 1995 01:03:02 GMT Received: with rfc822 via encapsulated-mail; Fri, 29 Sep 1995 00:54:51 GMT Received: from pixar.com by mongo.pixar.com with smtp (Smail3.1.28.1 #15) id m0syTi1-000GdHC; Thu, 28 Sep 95 17:53 PDT Received: from lot49.med.miami.edu by pixar.com with SMTP id AA01195 (5.67b/IDA-1.5 for debian-bugs-pipe@mongo.pixar.com); Thu, 28 Sep 1995 17:53:29 -0700 Received: (from mdorman@localhost) by lot49.med.miami.edu (8.6.12/8.6.12) id UAA05578; Thu, 28 Sep 1995 20:49:04 -0400 Date: Thu, 28 Sep 1995 20:49:03 -0400 (EDT) From: Michael Alan Dorman To: debian-bugs@pixar.com Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Package: base After an uneventful install, I logged in to find that /etc/services has apparently been overlooked. I realize that there was some discussion as to whether or not it actually belonged in netbase, but it has to be a zillion times more relevant to the base installation than, say, smb.conf or pcnfsd.conf, both of which are present, leading me to believe that this was a simple oversight. Mike. -- "And I swear that I don't have a gun." ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Message sent: From: iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson) To: Michael Alan Dorman Subject: Bug#1507: Acknowledgement (was: Still no /etc/services) In-Reply-To: References: Thank you for the problem report you have sent regarding Debian GNU/Linux. This is an automatically generated reply, to let you know your message has been received. It is being forwarded to the developers' mailing list for their attention; they will reply in due course. If you wish to submit further information on your problem, please send it to debian-bugs@pixar.com, but please ensure that the Subject line of your message starts with "Bug#1507" or "Re: Bug#1507" so that we can identify it as relating to the same problem. Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message, unless you wish to report a problem with the bug-tracking system. Ian Jackson (maintainer, debian-bugs) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Message sent: From: iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson) To: imurdock@debian.org (Ian Murdock) In-Reply-To: References: Subject: Bug#1507: marked as done (was: Still no /etc/services) Your message dated Wed, 11 Oct 95 14:35 EST with message-id and subject line Bug#1507: has caused the attached bug report to be marked as done. It is your now responsibility to ensure that the bug report is dealt with. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I'm talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Ian Jackson (maintainer, debian-bugs) Received: with rfc822 via encapsulated-mail; Fri, 29 Sep 1995 00:54:51 GMT From lot49.med.miami.edu!mdorman Thu Sep 28 17:53:49 1995 Return-Path: Received: from pixar.com by mongo.pixar.com with smtp (Smail3.1.28.1 #15) id m0syTi1-000GdHC; Thu, 28 Sep 95 17:53 PDT Received: from lot49.med.miami.edu by pixar.com with SMTP id AA01195 (5.67b/IDA-1.5 for debian-bugs-pipe@mongo.pixar.com); Thu, 28 Sep 1995 17:53:29 -0700 Received: (from mdorman@localhost) by lot49.med.miami.edu (8.6.12/8.6.12) id UAA05578; Thu, 28 Sep 1995 20:49:04 -0400 Date: Thu, 28 Sep 1995 20:49:03 -0400 (EDT) From: Michael Alan Dorman To: debian-bugs@pixar.com Subject: Still no /etc/services Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Package: base After an uneventful install, I logged in to find that /etc/services has apparently been overlooked. I realize that there was some discussion as to whether or not it actually belonged in netbase, but it has to be a zillion times more relevant to the base installation than, say, smb.conf or pcnfsd.conf, both of which are present, leading me to believe that this was a simple oversight. Mike. -- "And I swear that I don't have a gun." ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Message sent: From: iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson) To: Michael Alan Dorman Subject: Bug#1507 acknowledged by developer (was: Still no /etc/services) References: In-Reply-To: This is an automatic notification regarding your bug report. Responsibility for it has been taken by one of the developers, namely imurdock@debian.org (Ian Murdock). You should be hearing from them with a substantive response shortly, if you have not already done so. If not, please contact them directly, or email debian-bugs@pixar.com or myself. Ian Jackson (maintainer, debian-bugs) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Ian Jackson / iwj10@thor.cam.ac.uk , with the debian-bugs tracking mechanism This page last modified 07:43:01 GMT Wed 01 Nov