Date: Thu, 28 Jan 93 0:15:02 EST Day Two of the Steve Jackson Games trial, from Shari Steele. Hi everyone. Well, day two of the Steve Jackson Games trial was a long one -- the judge heard plaintiffs' case from 8:30 a.m. until 6:30 p.m. By the end of the day, the plaintiffs had finished. The day started off with Steve Jackson back on the stand. Steve talked about how all copies of the slated-to-be-released-soon fantasy game GURPS Cyberpunk had been seized. He went to the Secret Service office in Austin the next day with a box of formatted floppies to copy all of the seized disks, accompanied by a local attorney. When he arrived, Agent Foley set the ground rules. Steve would only be permitted to copy files from the one computer that had been sitting on Loyd Blankenship's desk (which did not contain the BBS). He was not permitted to physically touch the computer. He was to state which files he wanted to copy, and Secret Service agents would read the text of the files first and then determine if he could have a copy. Sitting down next to an agent at the computer, Steve asked for a directory listing to determine which files to request. The agent did not know how to call up a directory list. (For those of you unfamiliar with Cc: eff-austin-directors@tic.com, these groups@tic.com DOS, this is VERY BASIC stuff.) Steve further testified that agents reading the files made derogatory comments. (At one point, reading a file from GURPS Cyberpunk that Steve had requested to copy, Agent Foley asked if Steve realized he was writing a handbook for computer crime.) After less than two hours, and with only nine files out of several hundred copied, Agent Foley called an end to the copying. One week later, Steve laid off eight out of his 18 employees. As Steve described, this whole incident has "made me grouchier, angrier and harder to get along with." The Secret Service never told him why they were investigating him. If they had asked, he would have given them access to the materials they wanted. Cross examination on Steve revealed that SJG had had two bad years financially before the Secret Service raid -- in fact, Steve admitted about looking into chapter 11 bankruptcy at the end of 1989. In addition, there was evidence that GURPS Cyberpunk was not going to make deadline days before the raid took place. The defense then tried to imply that the company, which made profits in 1991 and 1992, may have been *helped* by the publicity of the raid. The judge did not seem to buy it. The three other plaintiffs were each called in turn. They each testified about personal e-mail that had been deleted from the system and how they had expected their communications to be as private as telephone calls. They described fearing the Secret Service would investigate them personally, since there was no comforting explanation for why the raid took place. One plaintiff told how he never could solicit feedback on a manuscript he had written for SJG, since feedback was generally given on the seized BBS. The next witness called was Wayne Bell, the programmer who developed the WWIV software that ran the BBS. Wayne testified that he looked at the backup disk Steve had made when the files were returned from the Secret Service. According to that file, all electronic mail had been deleted from the system. Some of it, at least, had been deleted on March 20, 1993 (almost 3 weeks after the Secret Service had seized the computer), since that was the last day the mail file had been accessed. The mail file itself had not been deleted, and some fragments of files could be recovered using Norton's utilities. These facts indicated that the mail had been deleted one message at a time after it had been displayed on a user's screen, implying that the Secret Service had read all of the mail on the system. This testimony was very technical, and I'm not sure the judge really understood what was going on. Our old friend Henry Kluepfel, Director of Network Security Technology at Belcore, was next to take the stand. He advanced a new theory. The application for the search warrant contained facts supplied in large part by Hank. Yet the facts of the case indicated that the BBS running out of Loyd Blankenship's home, called the Phoenix Project, was the one that contained the evil 911 document, not the Illuminati BBS running out of SJG. Hank testified that after February 7, he couldn't figure out where the Phoenix Project resided -- there was no answer at its old number. Since Loyd Blankenship also had sysop privileges at the Illuminati BBS, and both BBSs ran on the same software (WWIV), Hank concluded that it was possible that Illuminati was actually the Phoenix Project, or that the Phoenix Project BBS was hidden behind a door on Illuminati. Hank testified that it was quite common to hide BBSs within other BBSs. (?) Anyway, during cross, Pete Kennedy asked how many users the two BBSs had in common according to the user lists Hank had printed out from both boards. Loyd was the only mutual user! Hank also went into a lengthy (and boring) description of an evil password decryption scheme Erik Bloodaxe and Loyd were plotting on the Phoenix Project. (BTW, Hank's handle during his investigation was rot.doc.) Next up was William Cook, retired US Attorney out of Chicago. Cook's testimony was the most helpful of the day. He put together the warrant, and claimed the evil E-911 document was worth the same $79,000 that was shot down in Craig Neidorf's trial. So Cook got to go through a bit of the expenditure breakdown, until the judge put an end to it and warned Pete Kennedy to move on. Cook testified that he did not know SJG was a publisher and had made no efforts to determine what type of a business it was. He did not advise the Secret Service of the Privacy Protection Act, which protects publishers from having their works-in-progress seized. He didn't advise the SS that there was e-mail involved. And he never advised the SS of the wiretap statute. He next said two things that I found extremely interesting. First, he told of the Computer Emergency Response Team (C.E.R.T.), an arm of the defense department that is "responsible for policing the Internet." Gulp! (They apparently were the group that visited Craig in Missouri.) The other interesting thing to me was, when Pete Kennedy said, "Isn't it true that no charges have been brought against Loyd Blankenship?", Cook replied, "There is still an ongoing investigation. No charges have yet been filed." They don't usually admit that stuff! One victorious moment worth mentioning: Cook said that if the Secret Service had been told that SJG was a publishing company, they should have ceased doing the search. Yesterday we saw part of a homemade video courtesy of the SS themselves that clearly had an SJG employee telling an SS agent that they were a publishing company. Cook also interpreted ECPA (Electronic Communications Privacy Act) as not applying here, since these were stored communications, not in transit. The judge made a big deal of asking him if this conclusion of unread e-mail not being in transit was his own interpretation of the statute, or if he was getting it from somewhere. Cook admitted it was his own interpretation. The final person to testify was an accountant who explained why SJG is seeking over $2 million in damages and Steve Jackson is seeking over $150,000 in lost royalties. Tomorrow . . . the government begins its case. Shari Downloaded From P-80 International Information Systems 304-744-2253