Date: Fri, 23 Oct 92 18:21:12 CDT From: Moderators Subject: File 5--Update on Toronto Bust of Early October When Toronto Metropolitan Police apprehended a 15 year old "computer hacker" in the first week of October for disrupting the Toronto E911 system, the details about the extent of computer use was raised. From initial reports, it appeared that the primary offense involved repeated telephone hoaxes rather than an actual penetration of the E911 computer system itself. Today, a spokesperson for the Toronto Metropolitan Police, the agency in charge of the case, provided further details. The disruption of the system itself involved a series of hoax calls to Toronto emergency services. However, the calls were made by "phone phreaking," in which calls were routed through a series of PBX-Alliance-Meridien systems in the United States. In addition to theft of communication, the youth is being charged on 24 separate counts of mischief and 10 counts of conveying false messages (false alarms to the E911 system). The spokesperson explained that under Canadian law, violations are divided into indictable offenses and summary offenses. The former are equivalent in the U.S. to felony charges, and the latter to misdemeanor charges. The spokesperson indicated that the charges in this case fall under provincial jurisdiction. The Canadian justice system is somewhat different than that of the U.S., which has federal, state, and local jurisdictions. In the U.S., computer crimes may fall under federal jurisdiction involving the Secret Service (for most telecommunications/computer crimes) or the F.B.I. (for crimes in which a federal computer is involved). Although Canada also has tri-level jurisdiction (federal, provincial--centralized authority in each province, and municipal--the equivalent of city police in the U.S.), computer crimes come under the jurisdiction of provincial or municipal police. Because the youth is a minor, the trial will be held in camera (closed session) and records will not be made public. The spokesperson said that, judging from the existing evidence, the youth was acting alone and the case was unrelated to the recent cases in New York/New Jersey. ------------------------------ Downloaded From P-80 International Information Systems 304-744-2253