Date: Thu, 17 Sep 92 01:08:27 CDT From: Jim Thomas Subject: File 1--XmasCon Problems: HoHo's from HoJo's For the past few years, a conference called "XmasCon" (or HoHoCon) has been held in Texas in December. As reported previously (CuD #4.40), it will be held again this year from 18-21 December. For those unfamiliar with it, XmasCon is a national meeting of curious computer afficianados, journalists, scholars, computer professionals, and others, who meet for three days and do what people do at other conferences: Discuss common interests and relax. XmasCon is approaching in a few months, so I called down to the Houston Airport Howard Johnson's where conference arrangements apparently had been made to check out reservations. I encountered the most bizarre and crude interactions I have ever experienced with reservation-making. The bottom line, it seems, is that XmasCon will not be at HoJos this December. It will be located elsewhere. But, we're getting ahead of the story. My call to the HoJo receptionist began routinely. I indicated that I would like to make reservations for a December conference. The receptionist asked for some preliminary information, including my name, phone number, dates, how long I would be staying, and what type of room I wanted. I asked her what the conference rates were, and she asked which conference I would be attending. I said, "XmasCon." Her tone changed, and the mood dramatically shifted. She paused for a few seconds, and said: "We don't take no reservations for XmasCon." Her initially polite behavior (and attention to grammatical conventions) had changed. Aha, I thought, what an odd response. So, I mustered up the only intelligent question I could think of to a double negative: "What?" "That conference has been cancelled," she replied. Her response surprised me, because I had heard nothing of a cancellation. "Cancelled?" I asked? "Yes," she repeated, "That conference has been cancelled." I asked if she meant that the conference had been cancelled or whether it was being held elsewhere. She said she didn't know, and she wasn't allowed to give out any information about it. A most unusual twist of phrase and a rather odd turn of events, I thought. So, suspecting something was not quite right, I thought it wise to obtain additional information. So, I asked if I could talk to a supervisor. I was connected to "Gloria" (who refused to provide a last name). The encounter began politely. I gave her my name and affiliation and explained that the receptionist had informed me that XmasCon was cancelled, but would give out no further information. Gloria said that the receptionist was correct, the conference was cancelled. I asked (the conversation was still routine and polite) whether she knew if it was cancelled or simply being held elsewhere. She said it that it would not be held at Howard Johnsons; it was cancelled. Now, there's a rather substantial difference between cancelling a conference and holding it elsewhere. The conversation was still polite and routine, and I asked whether she meant that the conference itself was cancelled or simply that the original arrangements with HoJos were cancelled. The fit hit the shan! "WHY DO YOU PEOPLE KEEP DOING THIS?!??" she screamed! Uh oh. This was no longer a normal routine conversation. Either I was dealing with a psychotic terrorist who had taken over the office, or else something was going on that I didn't know about. I suspected the former, so I thought tact the best approach. I asked "what people" she thought I was, and what it was that "we people" kept doing. She never did explain what "we people" she thought I was. I explained that if by "we people," she meant criminology professors, we normally to "this" to reserve a room in exchange for our money. She seemed to care little who or what I was, and angrily explained that she was instructed not to talk about XmasCon because "you people" had lawyers calling. Uh, lawyers? What *is* going on, I began to wonder. So I asked. She repeated that she couldn't talk about it. Actually, I wasn't given the opportunity to ask much, because she talked over me and cut me off whenever I tried to ask a question. Gloria tersely informed me that if I wanted any information, I would have to obtain it from the manager, James Marx, on Monday. Thank you Gloria. Having seen no reports of psychotic terrorists in the Houston area on the news, I can only conclude that Gloria was, sadly, a representative of HoJos. Normally, receptionists and supervisors don't freak-out on callers, especially when no ostensible behavior triggered the assault. In my substantial experience with conference hotels, the policy of reputable sites when conference venue has been changed (especially by the original hotel) is to inform an inquirer that the conference will be held elsewhere and identify that location. If the original site does not know the location, they so-state and suggest that the caller inquire with the organizers. In this case, however, I was informed that the conference was cancelled. Even though Gloria ultimately indicated that she did not know if the conference was cancelled or not, and finally indicated that she only knew that it would not be held there, it took the entire conversation to obtain this nugget of information and only after considerable verbal abuse. Now, I'm not one to fall back on professional status. But, even though I *politely* explained that I was a criminal justice professor at Northern Illinois University and was simply trying to obtain routine information, she continued to subject me to discourtesy. Not even an "I apologize" at the end. Not even a softening. Odd. Very odd, I say to myself. Something, however, is going on, so my next step was calling James Marx. I again called the airport HoJos (713-644-1261) and asked to speak to Mr. James Marx. I was connected to his office. The call to James Marx was less than satisfactory. The conversation began: JM: "This is James." JT: "Mr. Marx, my name is Jim Thomas, a criminal justice professor at Northern Illinois University. I'm calling in regards to XmasCon, about which I have a few questions and what I consider a serious complaint." JM: XmasCon will not be held here. JT: I understand that, sir, but I have several questions and I have a complaint about my treatment by one of your employees. JM: What are your questions? JT: I understand the conference was cancelled.... JM: They cancelled it. JT: *They* cancelled it? JM: Yes.... JT: Voluntarily? JM: Uh, no. JT: May I ask, sir, the circumstances of the cancellation? JM: No, you may not. The conversation was downhill from there. I **POLITELY** attempted several times to inquire about the nature of the cancellation. He indicated that he would not give me any information, and that I would have to ask the conference organizers. Although indicating that "the hotel decided to cancel it," he offered nothing further. He indicated that the conference organizers did not inform him of the new site, so HoJos could not direct callers elsewhere, and were therefore telling callers that the conference was cancelled. I attempted to ask why they used that choice of words, rather than indicate to callers that the conference was not, in fact, cancelled. Why not say that it was elsewhere and they simply didn't know where it was. I suggested that the phrasing of the response was misleading to people like myself. He said, "I told you. *No more questions*!" Ok, fine. Now to voice my complaint about "Gloria." So: "I would also like to discuss with you my complaint." "What is it?" he grumbled. I explained that, in the middle of a routine conversation, Gloria, without provocation, screamed at me: "Why do you people keep doing this?" Says he, interrupting, "I told you, I'm *not* going to answer any questions!" He threatened to hangup. Uh, Mr. Marx, I tried to explain, I'm not asking you a question, I'm describing an event. You just asked me a question, says he. Hmmm, this gets stranger. "Sir," I said, realizing that the normal conventions of communication had disintegrated, "That's not *my* question. That's the question Gloria screamed at me! I'm not really the type to tolerate this kind of unprovoked rudeness, and I'm simply telling you what happened. I'm a criminal justice professional, and not used to being treated so shabbily without provocation when discussing reservations in good faith." Wrong thing to say. "Sounds like you're threatening me," says he. Uh oh. "Mr. Marx, what have I said to threaten you?" I was genuinely surprised. "You people" (ah, that term again) "have threatened us with law suits." Hmmm....attempting to describe the discourteous behavior of an employee to the manager in polite, matter-of-fact discourse is threatening a lawsuit? Did I miss something somewhere? Before I could respond, I was cut off with: "You'll have to talk with the conference organizers. I told you! No more questions!" But, how could the conference organizers tell me why Mr. Marx thought I was threatening him? Ooops---that's a question. "You'll just have to talk to them, I told you." Still curious about why he thought I was threatening him, it turns out that the fact that I identified myself as a criminal justice professor was the threat. Now, it's generally my habit to identify myself so the people at the other end know who they're talking to. This is the first time in 13 years as a crim justice type that anybody ever was threatened by my occupation. Why was that threatening and how did he infer a lawsuit from my mentioning on introduction that I was a CJ prof and a second time, during explaining the complaint, making an off-handed reference that I was a CJ professional who found rudeness unacceptable? Turns out, it seems, that "you people" (another reference to "us") keep calling and identifying "yourselves" with the legal profession and threatening suits. In a rather nifty bit of paralogia, he explained that criminal justice has something to do with law, right? "And you can't tell me that it doesn't!" Uh, right. Guess he's got me there. Criminals break the law, I study criminals, so guess that means I'm threatening a law suit. He then indicated that I should put whatever complaints I had about his employees in writing and send them to the owner, Mr. Henry Woo, at the HoJo airport address, and that he was going to terminate the conversation. Ok, 10 minutes of weirdness is about all I can take in a day, so it seemed best to say, "Thank you for your time" and end it. Click. Had I been in set: snippy mode, I could better understand the HoJo response to me. However, I had donned my politest professional persona. I do not know what the background is to the cancellation, but it is clear that the hotel "decided not to have it." But I do know that something went awry at HoJos instigation, and I do know that neither Gloria or Mr. James Marx are people to whom I want to give my money. I'm not sure what their problem is, but I'll sleep in my car before I ever patronize another Howard Johnson's hotel, in Houston or anywhere else. If I could ask a few questions of Howard Johnson's in Houston, I would be especially interested to learn: 1) Why did the hotel cancel arrangements after they were already made? 2) Why not have a standard and courteous reply to callers, rather than put them through a ritual of abuse when they attempted to obtain further information? 3) Why did Gloria "freak out" for no explicable reason? 4) What "people" am I, and what is it "we keep doing?" If they have a thing against criminology professors, it would be useful to know for future reference. 5) What possible rationale could justify abusive behavior to strangers attempting routine inquiries? 6) Why could not James Marx listen to my original complaint of abusive behavior without himself becoming abusive? 7) Why is it necessary for the hotel manager to belittle and criticize my profession without cause or provocation? 8) What's with the Airport Howard Johnson's in Houston? I am hoping that Mr. Henry Woo, the owner of the Airport Howard Johnson's Lodge and the home office in Phoenix can provide some answers. Downloaded From P-80 International Information Systems 304-744-2253