Date: 22 Aug 92 00:01:17 EDT From: Bob McClenon <76476.337@COMPUSERVE.COM> Subject: File 1--Electronic Pests - Whiners, Thumpers, and Others This is a draft think piece for now. I have been thinking in the last few weeks, based on experience on various bulletin board and mail systems, about a taxonomy of electronic pests -- people who make bulletin board systems unpleasant. I propose four categories for now: whiners; thumpers; snipers; and dumpers. Whiners are unhappy people who complain a great deal. Some whiners do nothing but complain; they never ask for advice (which they wouldn't accept anyway); offer advice; or engage in pleasantries. A few whiners ask for advice but don't like it. There is no hard and fast line between acceptable behavior and whining, but "you'll know it when you read it". Whiners are unassertive unhappy people. (Bulletin board users who are assertive about their unhappiness become other types of pests.) In my experience most whiners have been female, possibly because they have been socialized to be unassertive. Whiners are the least destructive class of BBS pest, because they can generally be ignored, and will usually heed a sysop warning to cool it. Thumpers are doctrinaire or ideological people who believe that all the answers that matter can be found by reference to a holy book or similar authority. The prototype for a thumper is a Christian Bible-thumper. Objectivists thump the works of Ayn Rand. Communists thump the works of Marx. Pseudo-scientists or adherents of pseudo-scientific cults are sometimes thumpers, if they have accepted a single truth rather than pursuing bizarre truths electically; for instance, Velikovskians are thumpers. I have also seen thumpers holding subviews in the true sciences. Thumpers are a common problem in the comp. newsgroups of Usenet, and are one reason why the number of issues of digests constantly increase, to deal with their constant counter-flamings. One difference between thumpers and other believers is that thumpers habitually denigrate other views, rather than ignoring them or engaging in real dialogue. Their usual objective is to win converts; however, they generally do not succeed, because they do little to persuade the unpersuaded. Telling a skeptic to read the Bible is not useful; he may have already read it and find it complex and requiring difficult interpretation. Telling him to read the Bible and understand it is empty unless one already understands a particular interpretation. Telling someone to read Atlas Shrugged who finds it flawed literature is not helpful. Thumpers are common in religious or ideological sections. They may be harmless there. But their intolerance may cause others to lose faith, especially if the faith is one, like Christianity, that has a tradition of tolerance. They often engage in internal quarrels. However, I have seen that a few Bible-thumpers in a political and general section can be destructive, because they squelch questioners by their thumping. They are very difficult for a sysop to silence because they are convinced of their own rightness. The best way to deal with thumpers, if possible, is to isolate them. This is not always possible. Snipers are angry people who lie in wait for the unsuspecting and lash out at them. Sometimes they do so briefly and obnoxiously, sometimes at length. Unlike both whiners and thumpers, they are usually silent, but when they are aroused they can cause great unpleasantness, and can even be slanderous. Snipers are difficult to control because they snipe at sysops. Dumpers are a special class of whiners. They complain, but they also attack people or classes of people whom they believe (rightly or wrongly) have made them unhappy. They in particular "dump" torrents of abuse on people and classes. They are difficult to control because when admonished they dump on the sysop about the unfairness of censorship. Does anyone have any comments? Has anyone experienced other classes of pests or unpleasant users? Downloaded From P-80 International Information Systems 304-744-2253