++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The BIRCH BARK BBS / 414-242-5070
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
* The Future of Freedom Foundation * July/94 *


Will You Be Safer if Guns Are Banned?: Part I
==============================================
by Jarret B. Wollstein    

Violence is out of control, and guns are a major cause. This is a
belief many Americans now share. This belief is fueling a
nationwide movement that could result in a total prohibition on
private-gun ownership in the near future.

Ownership of private guns is being banned one step at a time. The
recently enacted Brady Bill mandates a national five-day waiting
period and background check for all handgun purchases. Maryland has
just passed a law that requires a state license for any handgun
purchase and limits purchases to one per month. And President
Clinton has banned the importation of most foreign-made,
semiautomatic rifles.  

On February 28, 1994, Treasury Secretary Lloyd Bentsen announced
that several 12-gauge semiautomatic shotguns were being
reclassified in the same category as machine guns. The Bureau of
Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms simultaneously announced that they
would trace the owners of 18,000 of these shotguns and order them
to be fingerprinted and to register their guns with the ATF within
30 days, or face ten years imprisonment and a $250,000 fine.

On the same day that semiautomatic shotguns were reclassified,
Senator Howard Metzenbaum introduced legislation that would require
all handgun owners to get a federal license, pass a safety test,
and register their weapons with police. 

Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan has proposed legislation that would
raise the tax on some ammunition up to 10,000 percent. The price of
a single box of Winchester 9-millimeter hollow-tipped cartridges
would increase to $15,000. 

Would banning guns reduce crime?

According to recent polls, most Americans now support gun licensing
as a way to reduce crime. Crime has certainly been increasing,
particularly violent crime. Between 1960 and 1980, robberies
nationwide increased by 300 percent. In the same period, both the
number of handguns and the national murder rate doubled.

But is the proliferation of guns the cause of violence or a
response to  violence? As Daniel D. Polsby of Northwestern
University demonstrated in his article "The False Promise of Gun
Control," which appeared in the March 1994 issue of The Atlantic
Monthly, there is no evidence that firearms cause violence:

If firearms increased violence and crime, then rates of spousal
homicide would have skyrocketed, because the stock of privately
owned handguns has increased rapidly since the mid-1960s. But . .
. rates of spousal homicide in the years 1976 to 1985 fell.
 
If firearms increased violence and crime, the crime rate should
have increased throughout the 1980s, while the national stock of
privately owned handguns increased by more than a million units in
every year of the decade. It did not.

If firearms increased violence and crime, Florida's murder rate
should not have been falling since the introduction, seven years
ago, of a law that makes it easier for ordinary citizens to get
permits to carry concealed handguns. Yet the murder rate has
remained the same or fallen every year since the law was enacted.
. . .
 
Paradoxically, although firearms do not increase crime and
violence, gun-control laws do!  Throughout the U.S., when strict
gun-control laws are passed, crime and violence get worse.

Since 1976, it's been illegal in Washington, D.C., to own any
handguns or to keep any type of gun in your home fully assembled.
Nevertheless, Washington, D.C., has among the highest murder rates
in the nation. New York City has had a virtual ban on firearms
since 1967, yet it also ranks among the most dangerous places in
the country to live. In both New York and Washington, violent
criminals can easily obtain machine guns and other deadly weapons
on the streets within minutes.

Why does increased violence go hand-in-hand with gun-control laws?
The reason is that a disarmed people make easy targets.

If an armed criminal attacks you on the street or in your home, you
cannot afford to wait 30 minutes, 20 minutes or even 10 minutes for
police to arrive,  assuming you even get the chance to call police
and they respond. Ten minutes is more than enough time for a thug
to rob you, rape you, shoot you, or cripple you for life. If the
government takes away your guns, you are at the criminal's mercy.

Self-defense does work. According to Morgan Reynolds of Texas A&M 
University, armed citizens deter one million crimes each year. "In
98 percent of the cases, simply brandishing the weapon or firing a
warning shot is sufficient deterrence." 

In Florida, forcible rapes sharply declined in Orlando and other
cities after police trained women to use guns.

During the Los Angeles riots, armed Korean merchants successfully
defended their stores from looters after police retreated. Many
undefended stores were burned to the ground. 

In Los Angeles, many neighborhoods were protected from rampaging
mobs only by residents blockading their streets and brandishing
guns. If guns had been illegal, their homes would have been looted
and burned, and many would have been raped or killed.

Why the rise in crime and violence?

If armed self-defense works, and if gun ownership is increasing,
why does violent crime continue to escalate? 

Of course there are many reasons, including the breakdown of
families, violence generated by drug prohibition, and the lack of
jobs for young adults, particularly in the inner city. But as
economist Paul Craig Roberts points out, a major reason is that
outside of our homes, we are already a disarmed society. 

In most of the U.S., it is a crime to carry a gun on the street, so
most people do not. And criminals know it. Not surprisingly, 87
percent of all violent crimes occur outside the home.

Another major reason why crime is increasing is that crime pays,
and in our tax-ridden, regulation-crushed economy, many people
cannot economically survive through low-end jobs. As Professor
Polsby points out, "The income that offenders can earn in the world
of crime, as compared with the world of work, all too often makes
crimes appear to be the better choice." 

In Washington, D.C., it costs $7,000 in city fees to open a
pushcart. In California, up to 80 federal and state licenses are
required to open a small business. In New York, a medallion to
operate a taxicab costs $150,000. Over 700 occupations in the U.S.
require a government license. Throughout the country, church soup
kitchens for the homeless are being closed by departments of
health. No wonder so many people turn to crime and violence to
survive.

Banning guns solves none of these problems. And "tough crime laws"
also will not help. The risk of being caught if you are a criminal
is extremely low: nationwide, only 1.2 percent of all burglaries
result in a conviction. 

But we can protect ourselves and deter crime by owning guns and
knowing how to use them. Professors James Wright and Peter Rossi's
landmark study for the Department of Justice found that 85 percent
of felons serving time in prison agreed that "smart criminals" will
try to find out if their potential victim is armed before attacking
him. Fifty-three percent did not commit a crime, for fear that the
victim was armed. And 60 percent felt that most criminals feared
armed citizens more than police. (Wright and Rossi, Armed and
Considered Dangerous: A Survey of Felons and Their Firearms, 1986.)

There are many dramatic examples of how Americans have used guns to
protect themselves and stop criminals. Here is one that I
particularly like:

Until recently it was legal to carry loaded guns in public in
Texas. Twelve years ago, when a holdup man in Dallas tried to rob
a bank, he got a deadly surprise. No less than two bank customers
and one teller pulled out guns and shot him dead. Not surprisingly,
the bank-robbery rate in Dallas has been a fraction of what it is
in other large cities.

The initial effect of stringent new gun control in the U.S. has
been exactly the opposite of what was intended. It has produced a
huge surge in gun purchases. 

Dean Barber, business columnist for the Birmingham News, reports,
"In the gun trade, of which Birmingham is a national center, there
is an incredible run on guns and ammunition." Panic buying is now
the norm "because of the perception that you will not be able to
buy the gun of your choice in the not-so-distant future."
(Llewellyn Rockwell Jr., "Bull market in weapons," The Washington
Times, January 13, 1994.)

Millions of Americans want to be able to defend their homes, their
families, and themselves, and they will break the law to do it. As
Professor David Kopel explains in his book The Sumurai, the Mountie
and the Cowboy:

American gun owners, even more than their counterparts in other
countries,  will massively resist any form of gun control.

Registration laws for semiautomatic firearms in Denver and Boston
have achieved a one percent compliance rate. It is evident that New
York City's near-prohibition is not voluntarily obeyed; estimates
of the number of illegal guns in the city range from seven hundred
thousand to three million.

The New York state commissioner of prisons testified that if one
percent of illegal handgun owners in New York City were caught,
tried, and sent to prison for a year, the state prison system would
collapse. 

Mr. Wollstein is the co-author of two recent books, The Rage of
Islam  and What Really Happens When They Confiscate Your Gold,
published by the  Financial Privacy Report, P.O. Box 1277,
Burnsville, MN 55337.  He is also a director of the International
Society for Individual Liberty, 1800 Market Street, San Francisco,
CA 94102.

**************************************************************************
                 * The Future of Freedom Foundation *
                  ----------------------------------
                  11350 Random Hills Road, Suite 800
                          Fairfax, VA 22030
                         Tel. (703) 934-6101
                         Fax: (703) 803-1480 

Dear Friend of Freedom:

	We invite you to subscribe to our monthly publication, 
Freedom Daily ($15 per year; $20 foreign), and to become a financial 
supporter of The Future of Freedom Foundation.

	Our mission is to present an uncompromising moral, philosophical, 
and economic case for the libertarian philosophy. In the five years we 
have been publishing our essays, no one has ever found any compromise of 
libertarian principles. Whatever the issue the welfare state; the regulated 
economy; gun control; the CIA; Waco; Randy Weaver; health care; public 
schooling; the drug war; the Persian Gulf War; trade restrictions; immigra-
tion controls; civil liberties; Social Security we hit hard and we do not 
pull our punches. We have never advocated "reform." When it comes to 
advancing liberty, we always talk in terms of abolishing, ending, 
eliminating, and repealing.

	We hope you will subscribe to Freedom Daily and become a financial 
contributor to The Future of Freedom Foundation.  And we believe that you 
would find our books and tapes highly rewarding. We are certain that you 
will not find another foundation that applies libertarian principles in 
such a consistent, uncompromising, and hard-hitting way.

				Yours for liberty,

				Jacob G. Hornberger 
				Founder and President
				The Future of Freedom Foundation
[end]

