ORG:LET THE OCEANS SPEAK  by Harold Camping

   Introduction

   1> The Oceans - A Key to the Past

   2> Time Schedule Based on Ocean Water

   3> A Look at Sediments

   4> Another Look at Sediments

   5> Ocean Sediments Analyzed

   6> Summary

   7> TABLE I - Elements in Sea Water and in the Earth's Crust 

   8> TABLE

   II - Residency Periods for Chemicals in Ocean Solution 

   9> References

   Copyright 1982 by
   Family Stations, Inc.
   290 Hegenberger Road
   Oakland, California 94621

   INTRODUCTION

   Creationists are certain that the Bible is accurate, authoritative
and trustworthy in every field of knowledge, whether that be
theological, historical, scientific or any other. The Bible contains a
definite and precise chronological timetable that begins with the
creation of this world and the first man, Adam, and covers the great
historical events of the first 11,000 years of history.(1)

   Actually, evidence in the secular record is not at all in
disagreement with the sacred record, and the sacred record can be used
to place the secular record in proper perspective. Because the Bible is
true and accurate in its accounts of people, places and time, men can
use it to distinguish between what is true and false about the secular
viewpoints.

   Data from the observable universe concerning the earth's past
history is becoming increasingly available as men search out the
secrets of the universe. But is the world far older than 13,000 years
as deduced from Biblical evidence? Can creationists really expect to
find correlation between the Biblical and secular records if they
insist on the literal interpretation of the creation story and the
flood account? Isn't the evidence for a world that is billions of years
old so conclusive that it is hardly possible even to expect complete
reconciliation between the Bible and true science?

   A point must be emphasized. Because this world is under the bondage
of decay, with much of the record confused and obliterated by storms,
floods, decay, fire, pestilence, etc., modern man cannot expect to
resconstruct the history of the world in a complete and detailed
manner. But even so, some indication of the timetable of the past
should be obtainable from the secular record.

   The Oceans - A Key to the Past

   In an earlier generation scientists suggested that the oceans might
be of real help in determining the age of the earth. After all, the
seas completely surround the land masses and thus receive the output of
the rivers that flow into them. The rivers carry sediment and chemicals
in solution which have eroded from the continents.

   Scientists have assumed, therefore, that most of the chemical
composition of ocean water is derived from the weathering of rocks.
Sverdrup et al wrote: "According to present theories, most of the solid
materials dissolved in the sea originated from the weather of the crust
of the earth."(2)

   H. Kuenen wrote in 1965: "Apart from meteoric dust and gaseous
matter, the ultimate sources of all sediments are igneous and
metamorphic rocks."(3) And Kuenen continued:

   Ground water containing dissolved matter including silica, calcium,
sodium, iron, magnesium, phosphorus, humic acids, etc., reaches the sea
by way of rivers, or directly by seepage along the shore. Apart from
gases, including carbon dioxide, derived directly from the atomosphere,
this is the main source of dissolved matter in the sea water . . . A
minor contribution comes from volcanic exhalations and from the
expulsion of sea water trapped between the grains of the older marine
sediments.(4)

   Thus today scientists expect that much of the past history of the
earth can be deduced from the chemical content of the oceans. For
instance, the salt NaCl is the most abundant constituent of sea water,
and both Na and Cl are present in the rocks.

   Therefore scientists have supposed that a knowledge of the amount of
NaCl in the sea, compared with the amount entering the seas each year
by the weathering of the land, would give a close approximation of the
age of the earth. An earth age of about 100 million years was estimated
by earlier scientists by following this assumption.

   But other dating methods have been developed. Based on radioactive
decay analysis, scientists have decided that the earth must be
approximately 4.5 billions years old. The age of millions of years
deduced from the ocean evidence was decisively rejected in favor of the
longer radioactive ages.

   Supposedly a much more acceptabe timetable was gained for all of the
developments imagined by evolutionists. Very little is heard today from
researchers investigating the content of sea waters as far as total
earth dating is concerned.

   But the oceans still exist. Since this world is presumably more than
4 billions years old, and since oceans as well as continents have
existed continuously, certain relationships and equilibriums must exist
between the continents and the oceans. Contentions of earlier
scientists about an earth-ocean time relationship should still be
valid. Assuming that present natural phenomena are a key to the past,
examination of the relationship of the materials of the continents to
those of the oceans should result in some kind of a timetable for
geological history.

   Time Schedule Based on Ocean Water

   As noted, geologists concluded that the chemical composition of sea
water and the ocean floor sediments is principally a product of the
weathering of continental rocks. If this weathering of rocks was a very
short time phenomenon, then one would expect to find far different
proportions of elements in sea water than are found within the average
rocks of the continents. This seems logical since some rocks erode more
easily than others, and therefore easily erodable chemicals should be
most abundant in sea water. Differences in relative chemical
proportions would also be due to other variables, such as the fact that
some elements are not as readily transportable by rivers and ocean
currents as others, and some are less soluble in water than others.

   Nevertheless, if the duration of erosion was long enough, elements
in the sea water and on the sea floor should quite accurately coincide
with the chemical content of continental masses. Even the hardest of
rocks would be eroded, and even the least transportable of minerals
would ultimately be carried by the rivers to the sea.

   Thus when scientists talk about millions of years, on a world-wide
basis, the proportion of one element in the sea water and on the sea
floor to all other elements in the same environment should be
approximately the same ratio as that element to all other elements in
the continental masses, for in a very general way all the mass must
shomhow be conserved. For example, if the percentage of silicon in the
continental masses is 27.5%, then if the oceans were old enough, the
total of all the silicon in the ocean water and on the ocean floor
should be 27.5% approximatey. Furthermore, if the total quantities of
various elements in the seas and sea floor and the approximate rate of
world-wide erosion could be known, then the length of time required to
bring present elements into the ocean could be estimated. In turn, an
approximate age for the earth might be deduced.

   Fortunately, scientists have determined rather accurately the
chemical composition of both the sea water and the land masses.
Sverdrup et al prepared a table (Table I)(5) showing the amounts of
various chemicals that should have entered the oceans during a period
of 260 millions of years. This is the estimated length of time which
would be required to provide the present quantity of salt in the ocean
water, assuming uniform weathering throughout this period of time.

   He mentions an estimate by Goldschmidt in 1933 that accumulation of
the present concentration of salt (NaCl) in solution would have
required weathering of 600 grams of rock for each kilogram of water in
the ocean. Thus according to Table I, 17,000 mg. (17 gr.) of sodium
were released and 165,000 mg. (165 gr.) of silicon were likewise
released for accumulation in the oceans for each 600 grams of rock
weathered.

   With this estimate of potential elements available, one wonders what
is the actual quantity of elements in sea water. An estimate for each
element is given in the second column of Table I.

   For example, in a kilogram of sea water there is on the average
about .5 mg. of aluminum in solution. This is only .001% of the
estimated 53,000 mg. expected if weathering had continued for as long
as 260 million years, the estimated time required to provide the
observed amount of salt.

   In fact, after close examination of all the elements listed in Table
I, one concludes there is a total lack of relationship between the
chemicals in the oceans and the continents. For example, chlorine is 67
times too prevalent in sea water, nickel is 500,000 times too scarce.
Silicon, which is one of the most common constituents of rocks, should
be 50,000 times more plentiful in ocean water if it were in proportion
to that in continental rocks.

   Perhaps one reason for this total disproportion between the expected
volumes of elements in the sea water and their actual occurrence is
that sea water will hold in solution only a tiny bit of each element.
In other words, most of the silicon goes out of solution to the sea
bottom either by precipitation or by the action of organisms. That sea
water is not saturated with silicon is supported by F.A.J. Armstrong:

   Sea water is undersaturated with respect to silica, although since
reported values for its solubility are somewhat inconsistent, it is not
possible to say how much.(6)

   And Kuenen has written:

   Under normal conditions sea water is not supersaturated with any
product, and circulation is automatically set up in areas of excess
evaporation, preventing the formation of excessive concentrations.(7)

   Apparently, then, many elements are far too insufficient in ocean
water as compared with the quantities that should be present if the
oceans were millions of years old. And further, the sea water in
general is not saturated with chemical elements.

   Therefore the oceans could be very young, because if the oceans had
existed long enough, those elements which are especially soluble would
have reached a saturated condition in many parts of the world.

   Using the unsaturated condition of the oceans, researchers should be
able to measure the age of oceans since an estimate can be made of the
average annual quantity of chemicals flowing into the ocean from the
rivers. Dividing the total quantity of an element existing in an
unsaturated condition in ocean solution by the quantity of the same
element flowing into the ocean should result in some concept of the
ocean's age.

   This information is found in Table II.(8) Evidently 2.0 x 10^7 (20
million) years of continental weathering would have been required to
supply all the lithium (Li) presently found in ocean solution.
Presumably, sodium (Na) would have been accumulating for some 2.6 x
10^8 (260 million) years.

   Nevertheless, a very strange fact becomes evident upon careful study
of Table II. Some of the elements are in very short supply in the
oceans. Therefore only 100 years of continental weathering would have
been required for accumulation of the tiny quantity of aluminum in
ocean solution. In fact, nineteen of the elements in sea water are
found in such small amounts that the concentrations could have
accumulated in 1,000 years of continental weathering. Two conclusions
are possible from this startling information: l. The oceans must be
very young because small quantities of many of the elements are in
solution.

   2. The oceans must be very young because of the wide discrepancy of
residency periods of various chemicals. Differential erosion over a
relatively short period of time together with other variables, such as
water transportability and solubility of elements, could account for
this wide spread in residency times.

   One other fact should be noted in this regard. Chlorine, sulphur,
bromine and boron exist in much larger amounts (See Table I) than those
which would be supplied while the elements, such as sodium, with which
they are normally associated, were being weathered from rocks into the
ocean waters. Therefore a third conclusion is possible:

   3. That salt (NaCl) and perhaps a number of other chemicals are in
the oceans completely apart from normal rock weathering.

   A Look at Sediments

   But the question concerning the paucity of elements in sea water
still persists. Because of the paucity of so many of the chemicals in
the oceans, one might conclude that they must have been taken out of
solution in some manner, even though sea water does not appear to be
with many, if any, of the chemicals that enter it.

   Now the mechanisms of solution in, and the removal from, sea water
are rather complex. Scientists are busily engaged in attempting to
understand them. But if the chemicals are not in the sea water, they
must be on the sea floor.

   Therefore, even though the chemicals in the water are not
proportional quantitatively to those in the rocks, surely the remainder
would be found on the sea floor, with the overall chemical content
reflecting an ancient ocean. Such expectation, however, cannot be
supported by the facts.

   Obviously much more work must be done before a complete analysis of
the quantity and composition of the sea floor sediments can be known.
However, many cores have been taken already, and there is much
literature available concerning this question.

   Present knowledge is summed up perhaps in the comment of H. Kuenen:
"The differences in composition between oceanic and continental
sediments, both as to major constituents and trace elements are
large."(9) In other words, whether the composition of sea water or the
composition of the ocean sediments is studied, no data has been
collected yet to substantiate a long time relationship between the
oceans and the continents. Wilson sets forth these problems:

   The failure to recover any rocks older than Creataceous from the
ocean floors suggests that the ocean basins may be younger than the
continents. It has also become evident that the petrology,
sedimentations, and structural geology of ocean chasms are quite
different from these of continents . . .the ocean basins and oceanic
islands are dramatically different from continents in crustal
thickness, age, composition, ore deposits, structures, magnetic
anomalies, and in the patterns and characteristics of their active
mountain belts and earthquakes. Several continents have rocks at least
3.2 x 10^9 years old, which is 20 times the age of the oldest oceanic
island, dredging, or core.(10)

   Thus, because of the tremendous chemical disproportions between the
oceans and the continents, the most probable conclusion is that the
oceans are very young.

   Another Look at Sediments

   But let us now examine the ocean sediments from another aspect. If
the annual amount of sediments flowing by rivers into the ocean basins
and some idea of the volume of sediments on the ocean floor are known,
division of the second quantity by the first should result in an
approximate age of the oceans. Or to put it another way, if the annual
quantity of sediments flowing into the ocean is known, this figure
could be multiplied by, say, 100 million years, 4.5 billions years, or
any other length of time which supposedly approximates the age of the
earth, and then the average thickness of sediments on the ocean floor
could be estimated.

   Let us compute the thickness of sediment that should be found if the
oceans were 260 million years old as deduced in accordance with the
salt content. Calculations of the quantities added to the oceans by the
rivers of the world will be considered first. Clarke (11) has estimated
that the rivers contribute 2.73 x 10^15 grams of dissolved solids to
the sea each year. A total of 7.1 x 10^23 grams of solids would have
been dissolved in the 2.6 x 10^8 years required presumably for the
present sodium to accumulate. Of this total, 5 x 10^22 grams are
presently in solution (12) in the ocean water.

   Therefore (71.0 x 10^22 ) - (5 x 10^22 ), or 66.0 x 10^22 grams,
should have gone out of solution and become part of ocean sediment. A
small part of this may have been recycled due to ocean spray, etc., but
the major part must still be present somewhere in the oceans.

   This estimate of 66 x 10^22 grams of sediment might be checked by
approaching the question from another viewpoint. Sverdrup et al
reported (13) some estimates by Goldschmidt. According to Goldschmidt,
for the present concentration of salt (NaCl) to accumulate in ocean
solution, a total of 600 grams of rock has been weathered for each
kilogram of water in the ocean. This is the basis upon which Table I
was developed.

   Since there are 278 kg. of water for each square centimeter of the
earth's surface, and the area of the earth's surface is 5.1 x 10^18
cm^2 , the total weight of water equals 278 x 5.1 x 10^18 kg., or 1.42
x 10^21 kg.

   Goldschmidt estimated further that for every 600 gr. of rock that
have been weathered, 65% or 390 grams actually should have become
available for solution in the oceans or as sediment on the ocean floor.
This equals 390 x 1.42 x 10^21 grams = 5.53 x 10^23 grams.

   Since 5 x 10^16 metric tons or 5 x 10^22 grams are in solution, the
amount that must have become sediment equals (55.3 x 10^22) - (5 x
10^22) or 50 x 10^22 grams. This is very close to the 66 x 10^22 grams
based on Clarke's estimate of river sediments.

   With the knowledge that there are presently an estimated 5 x 10^22
grams of chemicals in ocean solution and at least another 50 x 10^22
grams in sediments (based on an ocean age of 260 million years), let us
determine what the ocean floor should look like. Sverdrup (14)
estimated that, if the 5 x 10^22 grams of chemicals, which are
presently in ocean solution, could be extracted, then a layer of salts
45 meters thick over the entire earth would result. Since the oceans
cover 70.8% of the earth's surface, this hypothetical layer would be
63.5 meters thick on the ocean floor. Since sediments equal to a
minimum of 50 x 10^22 grams would accumulate in an ocean 260 million
years old, then one could expect an average sediment depth of ten times
63.5 or 635 meters or 2,100 feet (with the ocean area the same), that
is, if the continents had been weathering uniformly for 260 million
years. Since the continents presumably have been here far longer
(minimum 3 billions years), one could expect logically that the
sediments should be far deeper than 635 meters. In fact, in that time
the oceans should have almost filled up, and the land should have
pretty well been eroded to level plains.

   Conceivably these figures would have been changed some by presumed
mountain building some hundred million years ago, but the basic concept
of the oceans filling with sediment as the land masses eroded should
hold true.

   Ocean Sediments Analyzed

   Let us now examine the evidence as far as the ocean sediments are
concerned. In 1949 Maurice Ewing wrote in the National Geographic
Magazine concerning the exploration of the floor of the Atlantic Ocean.
His comments are as follows:

   In more than 3,000 places over vast areas of the Atlantic we have
now measured with sound echoes the depth of the sediment on top of the
bed-rock of the ocean floor. These measurements clearly indicate
thousands of feet of sediments on the foothills of the Ridge.
Surprisingly, however, we have found that in the great flat basins on
each side of the Ridge this sediment appears to be less than 100 feet
thick, a fact so startling that it needs further checking.(15)

   Much of the Pacific floor, too, is covered by sediments under 100
meters in depth,(16) with some areas as thin as 20 meters.(17) The
following statement relates to investigation of the East Pacific Rise:

   A deep-towed magnetometer profile made across the East Pacific Rise
crest shows sediment accumulation increases from less than 2 meters at
the rise crest axis to about 20 meters at the western end and 10 meters
at the eastern end of the profile.(18)

   Evidence from the oceans, it seems, may not be used automatically to
support the view of a very old earth. In fact, the opposite conclusion
seems to be better supported. Patrick M. Hurley wrote in the Scientific
American:

   The topography of the ocean floors has been rapidly revealed in the
past two decades by the depth recorder... It became a great puzzle how
in the total span of earth's history only a thin veneer of sediment had
been laid down. The deposition rate measured today would extend the
process of sedimentation back to the Cretaceous times, or 100 to 200
million years, compared with a continental and oceanic history that
goes back at least 3,000 million years. How could three-quarters of the
earth's surface be wiped clean of sediment in the last 5 per cent of
terrestrial time? Furthermore, why were all the oceanic islands and
submerged volcanoes so young?(19) Kuenen wrote:

   Two great problems challenge earth sciences in this domain. The huge
wedge of terrace sediment underlying the shelf off the east coast of
the United States has been built up in little more than 10^8 years,
that is in less than 2 or 3 per cent of geological time. What has
happened to the terraces that must have been produced earlier? Have
they subsided into the mantle and been absorbed; have they been pushed
under the continents; or have they been incorporated into mountain
chains? The second problem is the discrepancy between the estimated
thickness on the deep sea floor, and the values actually found. Various
suggestions have been offered? (1) the layers below the unconsolidated
sediment are mainly consolidated deposits; (2) the rate of
sedimentation has been much slower than in recent times, especially in
pre-tertiary times; (3) creep of the sea floor under the continental
blocks under the influence of convection currents in the mantle; (4)
the ocean floor is relatively young; (5) the sedimentary carpet has
been invaded from below and metamorphosed so completely as to become
basic rock.(20)

   Here, then, is a great enigma. If the oceans are only hundreds of
millions of years old, sediments averaging 600 or more meters (2,000
ft.) should be found all over the ocean floor. Instead, sediments are
found normally to be far less than this, and in many cases the ocean
floor is almost bare of sediment. No idea, other than that of a very
young ocean, has thus far been set forth that seems as plausible or
direct; and if the age of the earth were billions of years, then the
puzzle of the missing ocean sediments is increased enormously.

   Summary

   The following truths summarize this study:

   l. A great discrepancy exists between the three or four billion year
age date derived from radioactive decay data and the evidence
obtainable from the oceans. Either the ocean data is completely
untrustworthy, or there is a question regarding the dependability of
the radioactive dating.

   2. If the accumulation of sodium by the weathering of continental
rocks as a part of NaCl in the oceans is used as a guide for the age of
the oceans, a number of unanswerable problems remain:

   a. Some chemicals, (Cl, Br, etc.), must have been a part of the
oceans since the very beginning or must have been introduced apart from
rock weathering.

   b. The sediments in the ocean should be much thicker than actually
found.

   c. Almost all the other elements which supposedly weathered while
the sodium was weathering are in far too short supply to allow for a
weathering period of 260 million years, which is required to bring this
amount of sodium into oceans. Therefore, using NaCl as a standard
results in an untenable solution.

   3. If accumulation of the other major constituent of the ocean
salts, chlorine, is used as a guide for age dating, then the following
points would obtain:

   a. An accumulation period of about 2 to 3 billions of years would
result. This is much closer to the radioactive age determination. The
ocean can then be considered to have been devoid of chemicals in
solution at one time in its history.

   b. This would compound the sediment problem. In this long period of
time the oceans would have filled with sediment.

   c. This also provides no answer for the short supply of many of the
ocean chemicals. This, too, gives an untenable solution.

   4. If the accumulation of the very smallest amounts of chemicals is
used for age dating, the following would obtain: a. The apparent age of
the ocean would be under 1,000 years.

   b. The ocean would have begun with essentially the present
compliment of salt and several of the other chemicals. This solution is
untenable on the basis of other histories.

   5. Another conclusion remains as the only plausible one, both in the
light of Biblical statements, as well as in the light of the evidence
obtained from studies of the oceans. That conclusion is that the ocean
and the earth are 13,000 years old. This conclusion may be supported by
the following secular evidences: a. Elements in the ocean water are not
found in a saturated condition. From this, one could deduce the flow of
chemicals into the ocean was a short-time phenomenon. b. Proportions of
elements found in the water or on the ocean floor are in no
relationship whatsoever to the proportions found in the continents.
Such variables as resistance to erosion, water transportability,
solubility, and others, over a very short period of weathering accord
with these extreme differences in chemical proportions. Again, the
conclusion seems most logical that the oceans are very young.

   c. The fact that many of the chemicals in ocean solution are present
in amounts that could have accumulated within the last 1,000 years or
less, if all rocks were equally susceptible to erosion, can be used
dramatically to support a 13,000 year age of the earth. For this is
precisely what would be expected in view of the differences in erosion
resistance, solubility, etc. of the continental rocks. Elements in
excess of those expected within 13,000 years could have accumulated
from easily eroded rocks, whereas far less than that expected in 13,000
years of history would have accumulated from very hard rocks.

   d. The concept of a very young earth is supported also by existence
of a thin layer of sediments on the ocean floor. This is especailly
true when consideration is given to the cataclysmic worldwide flood of
Noah's day. That phenomenon alone could have caused erosion of enormous
quantities of sediments for ocean solution and deposition. In fact,
impact of a worldwide flood upon the oceans would have been so severe
that no accurate estimate of time can ever be derived from ocean
chemicals.

   e. The fact that certain salts such as NaCl are in such abundance in
ocean solution could be interpreted to mean that they have been present
in essentally their present quantities from the very beginning.

   The all-important conclusion remains, however, that even without
considering the effect of the flood on the oceans, under no
circumstance may the ocean evidence be used to deduce an age of
millions of years. Then, when any recognition is given to the Noachian
flood sediments which must be subtracted from the elements in the
oceans, the contention for a very young ocean may be stated even more
emphatically. The 13,000 year date of the Bible appears to be the only
true alternative to popular concepts of a very old earth.

TABLE I

Elements in Sea Water and in the Earths Crust

Element Sea Water Potential "supply" Percentage
in 600 gr. of rock in solution
(mg/kg of sea water)

Silicon 4 165,000 0.002
Aluminum 0.5 53,000 0.001
Iron 0.002 31,000 0.0001
Calcium 408 22,000 1.9
Sodium 10,769 17,000 65
Potassium 387 15,000 2.6
Magnesium 1,297 13,000 10
Titanium -- 3,800 ?
Manganese 0.01 560 0.002
Phosphorus 0.01 470 0.02
Carbon 28 300 9
Sulphur 901 300 300
Chlorine 19,353 290 6,700
Strontium 13 250 5
Barium 0.05 230 0.02
Rubidium 0.02 190 0.1
Fluorine 1.4 160 0.9
Chromium p 120 ?
Zirconium -- 120 ?
Copper 0.01 60 0.02
Nickel 0.0001 60 0.0002
Vanadium 0.0003 60 0.0005
Tungsten -- 41 ?
Lithium 0.1 39 0.2
Cerium 0.0004 26 0.002
Cobalt p 24 ?
Tin p 24 ?
Zinc 0.005 24 0.02
Yttrium 0.0003 19 0.002
Lanthanum 0.0003 11 0.003
Lead 0.004 10 0.04
Molybdenum 0.0005 9 0.005
Thorium 0.0005 6 0.01
Cesium 0.002 4 0.05
Arsenic 0.02 3 0.7
Scandium 0.00004 3 0.001
Bromine 66 3 2,000
Boron 4.7 2 240
Uranium 0.015 2 0.8
Selenium 0.004 0.4 1
Cadmium p 0.3 ?
Mercury 0.00003 0.3 0.001
Iodine 0.05 0.2 25
Silver 0.0003 0.06 0.5
Gold 0.056 0.003 0.3
Radium 0.093 0.066 0.05

TABLE II

Residency Periods for Chemicals in Ocean

Solution (in years)

Lithium 2.0 x 10^7 Silver 2.1 x 10^6
Beryllium 150 Gadolinium 5.0 x 10^5
Sodium 2.6 x 10^8 Tin 1.0 x 10^5
Magnesium 4.5 x 10^7 Antimony 3.5 x 10^5
Aluminum 100 Cesium 4.0 x 10^4
Silicon 8.0 x 10^3 Barium 8.4 x 10^4
Potassium 1.1 x 10^7 Lanthanum 440
Calcium 8.0 x 10^6 Cerium 80
Scandium 5.6 x 10^3 Praeseodymium 320
Titanium 160 Neodymium 270
Vanadium 1.0 x 10^4 Samarium 180
Chromium 350 Europium 300
Manganese 1400 Gladolinium 260
Iron 140 Dysprosium 460
Cobalt 1.8 x 10^4 Holmium 530
Nickel 1.8 x 10^4 Erbium 690
Copper 5.0 x 10^4 Thulium 1800
Zinc 1.8 x 10^5 Ytterbium 530
Gallium 1.4 x 10^3 Lutetium 450
Germanium 7.0 x 10^3 Tungsten 10^3
Rubidium 2.7 x 10^5 Gold 5.6 x 10^5
Strontium 1.9 x 10^7 Mercury 4.2 x 10^4
Yttrium 7.5 x 10^3 Lead 2.0 x 10^3
Niobium 300 Bismuth 4.5 x 10^4
Molybdenum 5.0 x 10^5 Uranium 5.0 x 10^5
Thorium 350

   REFERENCES

   (1) Camping, Harold. 1970. The Biblical calendar of history, Journal
of the American Scientific Affiliation, September, p. 98. 
   (2) Sverdrup, H. U., Martin W. Johnson, and Richard H. Fleming, 1942.
The Oceans, Prentice Hall, Inc., New York, p. 219.
   (3) Kuenen, H. 1965. Geological conditions of sedimentation (in)
Chemical Oceanography, Riley, J.P. and G. Skirrow. Editors. Academic
Press, London and New York, Vol. 2, p.1.
   (4) Ibid., p.4.
   (5) Sverdrup, H. U., Op. cit., p.220,
   (6) Armstrong, F.A.J. 1965. Silicon (in) Chemical Oceanography,
Riley, J.P. and G. Skirrow. Editors. Academic Press, London and New
York, Vol.2, p. 410.
   (7) Kuenen, H., Op. cit., p. 5.
   (8) Kuenen, H., Op. cit., Vol. 1, p. 164.
   (9) Kuenen, H., Op. cit., p. 20.
   (10) Wilson, Teyo J. 1967. Theories of building of continents (in)
the Earth's Mantle. T. F. Gaskell, Editor. Academic Press, London and
New York, p. 447.
   (11) Sverdrup, H. U., Op. cit., p. 172.
   (12) Ibid., p. 219.
   (13) Ibid., p. 219.
   (14) Ibid., p. 219.
   (15) Ewing, Maurice. 1949. New discoveries on the mid-Atlantic
ridge, National Geographic Magazine, November, p. 612, 613.
   (16) Ewing, John et al. 1968. North Pacific sediment layers measured
by seismic profiling, The crust and upper mantle of the Pacific area,
William Byrd Press, Richmond, VA, p. 150, 165. 
   (17) Ibid., p. 148.
   (18) Larson, Roger L. and Fred N. Spiers. 1969. East Pacific rise
crest, a near bottom geophysical profile. Science, January 3, p. 68.
   (19) Hurley, Patrick. 1968. The confirmation of continental drift,
Scientific American, April.
   (20) Kuenen, Op. cit., Vol 2, p. 20.
