COM:COMMENTARY OF GENESIS chapter 9

   9:1-3: "And God blessed Noah and his sons, and said unto them, Be
fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth. And the fear of you
and the dread of you shall be upon every beast of the earth, and upon
every fowl of the air, upon all that moveth upon the earth, and upon
all the fishes of the sea; into your hand are they delivered. Every
moving thing that liveth shall be meat for you; even as the green herb
have I given you all things."

   "AND GOD BLESSED NOAH AND HIS SONS."

   This explains why Noah's curse falls on Ham's seed instead of Ham,
himself (Gen. 9:25), and thus it prevents the race-mixer from
understanding the passage. (See comments on Gen. 9:25 later in this
chapter.)

   "BE FRUITFUL, AND MULTIPLY, AND REPLENISH...."

   This is the original commission given to Adam (see Gen. 1:28). Noah
is a type of Adam in that:

   1. They both were sole possessors of the earth.

   2. They both had a direct commission from God.

   3. They both replaced races which God did not want controlling the
earth.

   4. They both had three sons by name.

   5. One of their sons was a type of Christ.

   6. One was a type of Antichrist.

   7. Shem and Abel are connected with Christ.

   8. Cain and Canaan are both cursed.

   9. Adam is naked when he sins, exactly as Noah.

   10. Adam and Noah partake of "forbidden fruit."

   11. Adam's prohibition is a VINE, and Noah's prohibition is BLOOD
(see Gen. 9:5).

   "AND THE FEAR OF YOU AND THE DREAD OF YOU."

   Something "new" had been added. In a world where animals have lost
their docility (see Isa. 11:1-11), man is given "the reach" in the
fight. An instinctive fear of man is placed in the animals, which is
apparent to this day, and not without good reason. Any animal in his
right mind--not "rabid"--gives man a wide berth when he approaches.
There are animals such as Army ants, or pirhana (a South American
fish), who will devour a man if he is helpless, but these animals
cannot tell the body (or corpse) of man from that of a cow or a dog.
Any animal that KNOWS what man is will stay out of his way. Killer
whales, gray sharks, tiger sharks, and Mayo sharks will occasionally
attack man, but one must remember that this only takes place where man
invades the animal's domain. No barracuda or manta ray will take the
trouble to go swimming into the city water system to bite a man washing
his hands in the basin! (Man, on the other hand, will pick up mask,
fins, footgear, aqua lung, and spear guns, to go out and hunt these
animals IN THEIR HOMES.) In India, a cobra may attack a man, but this
is only because the cobra has been regarded as a sacred animal (and has
been left unmolested) for so long, he knows he can "get away with it."
Turn some hunters loose there for about ten years, and the cobras would
be hiding in the bushes all day and praying to St. Christopher before
they stuck their heads out at night.

   German shepherds would appear to cancel the decree of Genesis 9:2,
but one must remember that this breed of dog (as the Doberman Pinscher)
was bred for police work and war work. Where man has projected his
authority over the processes of nature, some "men killers" can be bred.
However, not even a lone German shepherd on a street at night (without
his master) will cross the street to attack a stranger. Brown bears
(and Kodiaks) who have attacked men (as water buffalo and leopards have
also done) NORMALLY do not hunt for men for food. They will not fight
or attack unless cornered, and they will usually exhaust every resource
in "getting away" before they will stand at bay and face a man with a
loaded rifle.

   "EVERY MOVING THING THAT LIVETH SHALL BE MEAT FOR YOU."

   This explains the previous statement, for at Genesis 9, man becomes
a "meat eater" (cf. Gen. 3:17). Nimrod (Gen. 10:9) is the first
outstanding representative of this class of men who begin "bringing
home the bacon" in Genesis 9:3. The animals of the earth learn quickly
enough that man's menu was changed after the flood. The whistle of
arrows and darts, the sailing shaft of the spear, the thud of flying
rocks, and the grunts, bellows, screeches, and roars of their
companions tell the animals that "the kingdom must be coming" and that
"every day in every way things are getting better and better," etc. (I
say this facetiously of course; undoubtedly animals have better sense
about these things than men do.)

   9:4-7: "But flesh with the life thereof, which is the blood thereof,
shall ye not eat. And surely your blood of your lives will I require;
at the hand of every beast will I require it, and at the hand of man;
at the hand of every man's brother will I require the life of man.
Whoso sheddeth man's blood, by man shall his blood be shed: for in the
image of God made he man. And you, be ye fruitful, and multiply; bring
forth abundantly in the earth, and multiply therein."

   The eating (or drinking) of raw blood is forbidden by this taboo.
The same warning occurs in Leviticus 17, under the LAW, and again in
Acts 15, under GRACE. This is one of the great "do not cross" warnings
placed in the Word. Using the words of Jesus (taken out of the context
of John 6) the Papist "crosses the deadline" for the "glory of God and
Holy mother church," etc., and offer the "drink offering of blood" (Ps.
16:4), which Paul calls "the cup of devils" (1 Cor. 10:21). This
"MASSacre" (misnamed after "to dismiss") is called a "SACRIFICE" in
Roman Catholic literature, and professes to be not merely a
"continuation" of the Sacrifice at Calvary, but also a "REPETITION"
(see any publication by the Knights of Columbus). Since this pagan
heresy is rebuked in no uncertain terms in Hebrews 10:8-14, and since
the act itself would be a violation of three testaments--BEFORE, DURING
and AFTER the Law--the Bible believer takes the same attitude toward a
"Pontifical Mass" as he would take toward a rattlesnake; HE AVOIDS IT.

   "AT THE HAND OF EVERY MAN'S BROTHER...."

   Here, capital punishment is instituted, and to match its companion
pronouncement on blood, the decree of capital punishment is found
BEFORE (here), DURING (Numbers 35), and AFTER (Acts 25:11; Rom. 13:1-4)
the Law. Capital punishment is not a subject of debate among real Bible
believers, any more than "the Mass" is. The true believer accepts the
infallible statements of the word on both subjects to be scientifically
accurate, morally correct, infallibly inspired, perfectly preserved,
and absolutely unimpeachable. If the greatest Christians who ever
lived--Peter, James, John and Paul--turned thumbs down on the pagan
practice of the partaking of literal blood (Acts 15:20; 21:25), then
the modern Christian has no business even thinking that the literal
blood of Jesus Christ is present in the intoxicating liquor used by the
priests of Baal. If the greatest follower of Christ--to whom one-third
of the New Testament was given--submitted cheerfully to capital
punishment, without comment, then the Bible believer already has his
standards to follow. What socialists, Communists, judges, civil rights
workers, college professors, psychiatrists, lawyers, and popes "think"
about these issues is immaterial. When a man "thinks" something
contradictory to the revelation of three dispensations 2,000 years
apart, given by the supreme Judge of the Universe, well, really...!

   The statement is that both man and animals will incur "blood guilt"
from murdering a man. (The rules for cleansing the guilt of innocent
blood are found in Deuteronomy 21. MANSLAUGHTER is distinguished from
MURDER in Numbers 35, and armed COMBAT is distinguished from MURDER in
I Kings 2:5.) What is complex, obscure, difficult, intricate,
complicated, or "knotty" in the law courts, and the books on higher
education is shockingly simple and clear in the A.V. 1611, which is
available to any 6th grade reader, any time he might care to pick it up.

   "WHOSO SHEDDETH MAN'S BLOOD, BY MAN SHALL HIS BLOOD BE SHED."

   Isaiah 26:21 is the final reaping of man for a series of actions
which began with Genesis 4 and will not end until Revelation 19. Note
the peculiar emphasis on BLOOD in the Holy Bible that is missing from
the other great "scriptures" of the world.

   1. The first blood shed is the blood of a LAMB (see Gen. 3).

   2. The second blood shed is that of a "SHEPHERD" (Gen. 4:5-8).

   3. The Good Shepherd of John 10 sheds BLOOD (Col. 1:14).

   4. The Christian has PEACE through this blood (Col. 1:20), is
JUSTIFIED by this blood (Rom. 5:9), is CLEANSED by this blood (I John
1:7), is REDEEMED by this blood (Eph. 1:7), is PURGED by this blood
(Heb. 9:14), and is SAVED by this blood (Eph. 2:13).

   5. Judas goes to the "field of Blood" (Acts 1:19).

   6. Pilate tries to get innocent blood off his hands (Matt. 27:24).

   7. Mystery Babylon is guilty of the blood of saints and martyrs
(Rev. 17:5,6).

   8. Her followers DRINK blood (Rev. 16:6).

   9. Blood is forbidden in both Testaments (see text).

   10. Christ's garment at the Second Advent is dipped in blood (Isa.
63; Rev. 19:13).

   11. Both Testaments are instituted with blood (Heb. 9:8-22).

   12. "Innocent blood" is always avenged (Matt. 23:35; II Kings 9:26).

   13. The Christian will DIP HIS FEET in blood at the Second Advent!
(Ps. 58:10; 68:23.)

   In more than 350 verses the word appears: blood, blood, blood,
blood. The Bible is a Bloody Book and it capstones the bloody account
of man's bloody history with the statement that the Blood shed on
Calvary was more than a man's, IT WAS GOD'S BLOOD!! (Acts 20:28). (Now
watch all the new translations rush to change that verse!)

   The doctrine of retribution for "shed blood" needs no confirmation
from scholars in any century. The history of this earth is the history
of Adam's noble line, now killing to "bring in the peace," now killing
to "maintain the peace," now killing because it is the only way to
"survive" (Darwin's interpretation), now killing to keep others from
multiplying (Darwin again), now killing at the commandment of God (I
Sam. 15), now killing voluntarily for sport (II Sam. 2:14-16), and
occasionally killing "to bring in the kingdom" (Crusades, Revolution of
1776, Civil War, etc.). Killer Cain is the first man born, and all his
kinfolk practice his profession. If man could stop killing for 100
years, the past ledger of indebtedness might eventually be cancelled
out, and the books "closed" on the account; but since this has never
happened, is not happening, and will not happen, the bloody horror goes
on:

   Nishar, Herat, Ostend, Austerlitz, Fontenoy, Chalons, Verdun, Crecy,
Chatigny, Mont Blanc, Torgau, Bliethen, Blenheim, Chateau Theirry,
Bellau Words, Concord, Lexington, New Orleans, Metz, St. Vith,
Bastogne, Thermopolae, Chates, Agincourt, Casablanca, El Alamein,
Midway, Wake, Guam, Omaha Beach, Peleliu, Pusan, Taegu, Osan, Cold
Harbor, Bull Run, Chikamauga, Argonne Forest, the Marne, Soissons,
Tobruk, New Georgia, Saipan, Okinawa, Trawa, Leyte Gulf, St. Lo,
Stalingrad, Anzio, Salerno, Manasseh, Antietam, the Reichswald,
Hamburg, Polesti, Nagasaki, Vicksburg, Heartbreak Ridge, Pork Chop
Hill, Seoul, Chosem, Saigon, etc., etc., and through all this ghastly
blood- letting science and religion deceive men into thinking that a
BLOODLESS religion can redeem them! FERMENTED LIQUOR IS NOT BLOOD!
Neither are the findings of a computer.

   As the war in Vietnam retaliated for the Viet Cong, who were
retaliating against the French, who were retaliating against England,
who was retaliating against the Normans, who were retaliating
against...! So, 20th century man is caught up in an infernal Ferris
wheel of retribution that has been spinning for five-and-a-half
millenniums, and it cannot stop spinning until the "blue blood" shoes
up (Rev. 19; Joel 2; Matt. 24; Mark 13; Isa. 11).

   From maddened mountaineers, sniping at their vengeful neighbors with
buckshot, to the slaughter of Flanders Field (500,000 British
casualties in a single engagement), man gives a clear-cut testimony to
his basic nature. Where a nation rests between wars and speaks
cheerfully and optimistically of "peace," four to six other nations
keep things going so the economy doesn't fall apart. With man's rapid
"progress" in education, and his "tremendous strides" in the field of
science (see your State College Catalogue), we have now made such
progress that we have only had 19 wars in the last 50 years. These wars
were the Manchurian war, the Spanish Revolution, World War I, World War
II, the Chinese-Japanese War, the Mexican Revolt, the Cuban Revolt, the
Invasion of Hungary, the Invasion of Czechoslovakia, the war on the
Gaza Strip, the Israeli- Egyptian War, the Korean War, the French
Vietnam War, the Israel-Arab War, the Nicaraguan revolt, plus two
uprisings in Pakistan and Morocco. We may call many of these slaughter
pens "battles" or "skirmishes" because the term "war" has now come to
mean an engagement in which a dozen nations are involved. The "war" in
Vietnam was quietly referred to by some optimists as "the struggle for
peace"! Isn't that just splendid?

   19 "struggles" in 50 years is real headway! Why just think, that's
only one war every two and a half years. Bravo Darwin!

   For comment on verse 7, see notes under Genesis 9:1.

   9:8-10: "And God spake unto Noah, and to his sons with him, saying,
And I, behold, I establish my covenant with you, and with your seed
after you; And with every living creature that is with you, of the
fowl, of the cattle, and of every beast of the earth with you; from all
that go out of the ark, to every beast of the earth."

   This is the Noahic Covenant. Its sign is a rainbow (see verse 13),
called simply "bow," as only the 180 degree arch is visible. The
covenant is made with animals as well as men, and it means that animals
will suffer capital punishment (verses 5,6) for killing men exactly as
government executioners will kill men for the same thing (see Ex.
21:28-32).

   The covenant is longer than the one given to Adam; and all
subsequent covenants make additions. Notice the lengthy one given to
Abraham (first part in Gen. 12:1-4, and the second part in Gen.
15:13-21), and then the still more lengthy one given to Moses (Ex.
20-28).

   All covenants from Genesis 1-12 are binding until the Millennium,
which is apparent in the most artless study of history (see Gen.
3:16-19). Since the Law was given to a nation--not a man such as Adam,
Noah or Abraham--it is temporarily displaced by the dispensation of
grace, after the nation of Israel rejects their Messiah (see Eph. 2;
Gal. 2,3; Rom. 7; 13:10).

   9:11-13: "And I will establish my covenant with you; neither shall
all flesh be cut off any more by the waters of a flood; neither shall
there any more be a flood to destroy the earth. And God said, This is
the token of the covenant which I make between me and you and every
living creature that is with you, for perpetual generations: I do set
my bow in the cloud, and it shall be for a token of a covenant between
me and the earth."

   This very verse slaps the last seal of authenticity on the Universal
Flood, which modern conservative scholars deny. God, here, forces the
Bible rejecting "Christian" into the position where he has to make a
liar out of God in the text, and by so doing, he also makes a liar out
of his Saviour! (see John 5:46-47). In addition to the Universal
Testimony which all nations give to the flood, and in addition to the
fact that a local flood would have launched the ark in an ocean instead
of on top of a 16,000-foot mountain, it is the final and shattering
statement THAT GOD WILL NOT EVER REPEAT AGAIN WHAT HE DID IN GENESIS
7,8! If the flood of Genesis 7,8 was a LOCAL FLOOD then God lied to
Noah, or Moses lied when he wrote the account, or the man who rejects
the account is a liar himself (Rom. 3:3,4). There have been thousands
of floods since Genesis 7,8; 100,000 people drowned in a flood at
Friesland (1228); 10,000,000 were left homeless, starved or drowned in
floods in North China (1929); floods in Eastern and Southern China left
1,000,000 homeless or killed (1950); and 445 people were killed in 1963
in flash floods northwest of Barcelona; not to mention the Johnstown
flood (1889) here, in America, where 2,000 died.

   You see, the attacks on the word of God are conducted in such
"scholarly atmospheres" with such deep "intellectual approaches," and
dynamic "rethinking of values," that it never occurs to anyone that the
men partaking in them are GOD DEFYING, BIBLE REJECTING LIARS. Under the
guise of "rethinking" (Sin is always "cloaked"--see John 15:22.), the
seminary faculties of orthodox schools discuss "The Flood Problem," or
"Evaluating the Deluge," or "The Flood Story in the Light of Modern
Science," and not one of the God-forsaken rascals discussing the
problem will call anyone's attention to the plain English of the A.V.
1611 text (Gen. 9:11), WHICH STATES THAT IF THE FLOOD WAS NOT A
UNIVERSAL FLOOD, THEN GOD WAS A LIAR. "All flesh be cut off ANY
MORE...neither shall there ANY MORE...." Did you notice the "any
mores"? IT WAS DONE. You cannot back out by saying, "Well, He is saying
that a universal flood will NEVER take place, but local floods will."
That is not the sense, meaning, construction, wording, phrasing, or
spelling of the sentence. It is "any more," "any more." You don't say,
"I won't hit you ANY MORE," when you never hit a lick to start with.

   "THIS IS THE TOKEN OF THE COVENANT."

   The covenant is "BERITH" (Hebrew), which means "to cut a covenant."
The "cutting" is apparent in the Abrahamic Covenants (see Gen. 15-17),
but not so apparent here. The primitive idea is the cutting of the head
off the sheep (Gen. 4:3-4), and among primitive tribes it is preserved
as the cutting of the wrist of two men, mingling their blood by
incisions to leave a permanent scar; thus the two men become "blood
brothers." (You may have noticed that "creeping things" are omitted
from the covenant here {vs. 10} even though they entered the Ark in
Genesis 7:14.)

   "I DO SET MY BOW IN THE CLOUD."

   This is the first mention of both natural objects. The bow is a full
"rainbow" in Revelation 4, and one can see this "full circle" of the
spectrum when flying at high altitudes; it will appear as a circle
around the shadow of the airplane on the cloud bank below it. The moral
lesson is obvious. The higher we go the clearer we can see, and we'll
"Understand it better bye and bye," because we only see HALF the bow
down here.

   9:14-17: "And it shall come to pass, when I bring a cloud over the
earth, that the bow shall be seen in the cloud: And I will remember my
covenant, which is between me and you and every living creature of all
flesh; and the waters shall no more become a flood to destroy all
flesh. And the bow shall be in the cloud; and I will look upon it, that
I may remember the everlasting covenant between God and every living
creature of all flesh that is upon the earth. And God said unto Noah,
This is the token of the covenant, which I have established between me
and all flesh that is upon the earth."

   "AND I WILL REMEMBER...."

   (See notes on Gen. 9:1.) The sign is a pledge to man that the deluge
will not return and a reminder to God that when He is tempted to repeat
the catastrophe (see Ex. 32:9,10) He will abide by His promise. Again,
in verse 15 the reader is reminded that the flood of Genesis 7,8 will
not happen again. If it were a LOCAL flood then God lied, for local
floods have happened scores of times since then. The verse can only
refer to a universal flood, unless you spend your time reading nonsense
like "Christianity Today."

   "THAT I MAY REMEMBER THE EVERLASTING COVENANT."

   This covenant goes to the end of the Millennium, and if it is taken
strictly in context--referring to a destruction by water--it is NEVER
abrogated. However, Simon Peter, the unlearned and ignorant fisherman
(Acts 4:13), reminds us that all flesh will be destroyed again; but
this time, SO AS BY FIRE (II Pet. 3:1-12).

   It is possible that Noah is the speaker in verse 16; however, this
would be unusual in view of the fact that up until here Noah has not
said a word--at least as far as the scriptural record is concerned. The
reference to God in the third person would indicate Noah is the
speaker, but then the Lord often refers to Himself in the third Person
(John 6:62; 3:16; 5:20,25; 11:4).

   We have already commented on verse 17 in relation to verses 9 and 12.

   9:18,19: "And the sons of Noah, that went forth of the ark, were
Shem, and Ham, and Japheth: and Ham is the father of Canaan. These are
the three sons of Noah: and of them was the whole earth overspread."

   We have already commented on the three boys somewhat (see Genesis
5:32 further in these comments). Two new developments crop up, however.

   1. "HAM IS THE FATHER OF CANAAN." Ham is singled out immediately
from the other two boys.

   2. "OF THEM WAS THE WHOLE EARTH OVERSPREAD" shows conclusively that
every man, woman, and child in the United States today, came from Shem,
Ham or Japheth or a combination of Shem, Ham, and Japheth. This is the
line of HOMO SAPIENS (Latin: "The same saps!"). No amount of
ethnological juggling will improve on the A.V. 1611 account.

   Anticipating the location of the sons, grandsons, and great
grandsons named in Genesis 10, we note that Japheth is the father of
the Caucasian race. Among his descendants are found the Celts, Picts,
Angles, Caledonians, Saxons, Waldons, Gauls, Frisians, Franks, Aryans,
and Norsemen of Northern Europe; the Circassians, Celts, Croatians,
Dorians, Bulgars, Bolls, Moravians, Parsees, Scythians, Phrygians,
Huns, Pisidians, Goths, Slavs, and Thracians from Russia, the Balkans
and North Persia; and the Lombards, Catalans, Etruscans, Basques and
Visigoths of North Spain and Italy.

   Shem is obviously the progenitor of the "people of the East" (see
Gen. 10:30). His descendants include "native" Americans (Mayas, Aztecs,
Comanches, Shoshones, Cherokees, Crows, Creeks, Mohawks, Apaches,
Navajos, Seminoles, Sioux, Mohican, Chippewa, Pawnees, Blackfeet,
Algonquins, and the Incas in the Americas), the Marshall Islanders,
Maoria, Samoans, Hawaiians, Sumatrans, Siamese, Chinese, Koreans,
Kalmuks, Japanese, Sumerians, Manchurians, Eskimos, Persians, Kurds,
Turks, Mongols, AND JEWS.

   Father Ham begets Egyptians, Canaanites, Tunisians, Algerians,
Cameroons, Charis, East Sudanese, Bushmen, Hottentots, Zulus, Kaffir,
Veddahs, Fijians, Negritoes, Tasmanians, Sengalese, Bantus,
Philistines, and Berbers.

   There is overlapping of course, but since the science of ethnology
decreases as the sciences of transportation and communications
increase, the subject of "breeding" and "half- breeding" now bears the
curious nomenclature of "racism," or "racists." This is one of those
Associated Press words, which is part of an overall Madison Avenue,
"soap selling" gimmick to promote a mongrel race of brain-washed
passivists, who will be ruled by the Son of Perdition at Rome. The
results of human breeding and cross breeding are more predictable and
more stable than those of animals. The fact that Hitler misused such
data, or the fact that the NAACP does not wish such data to be known,
does not change the facts or the truths regarding it. You do not get
thoroughbreds by taking the fence down and turning the animals loose on
the street; you get them by isolation, where the fences keep mongrels
out. THIS IS A LAW OF LIFE AND NATURE. Your opinion or the opinion of
the Supreme Court (WHO ARE SUBJECT TO THE LAWS OF LIFE AND NATURE) has
no bearing on the law. This law operates regardless of anyone's opinion
about it.

   It would be very interesting to see Life Magazine run a series of
stories on races, where they had been clinically tested and exact data
had been procured. Is it not very strange that in an age gone mad on
searching FOR MAN'S "ORIGINS" THAT NO SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL DARES PRINT
ANY FINDINGS ON MAN'S PROGRESS WHERE IT CONCERNS HIS THREE MAJOR
GROUPS? What kind of scientific objectivity is that? Here is a nation
of science- mad, education-crazy, nuclear nuts, blowing gas and steam
around the world about "man's progress," "directed evolution,"
"controlled evolution," etc., and none of them from the least to the
greatest can even deliver, publicly, a scientific report on their own
species! This is God's big "20th century" circus--a mass of people who
have to ignore obvious differences among themselves, in order to bring
in "the kingdom," and by so doing renounce their sanity, the facts of
history, the investigations of science, and their own future MORAL
progress. While doing this, the deluded idiots talk about "inhabiting
outer space." What makes you think there is any difference between
Jupiter, Saturn, and Venus? Do they not all have equal rights? Just
because they differ in size, weight, speed, wave length, distance,
color, and atmosphere, what makes you think they are not the same? Are
they not all planets? "Have we not all one Father?" (Mal 2:10). Just
mix them up indiscriminately so none of them will feel like they are
being discriminated against! That is what Picasso did with lines. That
is what Miro did with figures. That is what the gays do in Greenwich
Village. That is what Copland did with notes. That is what the
government did to the public schools. Do you finally see clearly what
"science" is in this age? It is a political hypocrite.

   Where Ham's descendants in South Asia overlap with Shem's, one finds
the Malay, the Moros, the Filipinos and the inhabitants of South India,
Arabia, and Ceylon. Where Shem overlaps with Japheth in North Asia and
Asia Minor, one will find the Greek, Ottoman and Seljuk Turk, the Jew,
the Persian, the Mongol, the Tartar, and Russian. Where Ham and Japheth
overlap you will find the Carthaginians, Moroccans, Catalan, the Old
Aragonese, and the Mozarabics. (Note the differences in the gutturals
found in the Castilian, Leonese, Galicon, and Basque dialects in Spain,
from the Andalusian and Mozarabic dialects.)

   Science is always very careful to avoid giving detailed reports on
anything regarding races. For example, Darwin's history of man has no
"meaning" when applied to "races" UNLESS SOME RACES ARE AHEAD OF
OTHERS. Just let some fanatic like Fritz Kuhn, Adolph Hitler, George
Lincoln Rockwell, Gerald Winrod, or Horst Wessel accuse someone of
having "Negro blood" or "Jew blood," and then watch the fur fly. Just
imply that Latins, for example, are intermixed in the remote past with
Ham, instead of Shem, and then you'll see how objective "Modern Man"
is! The inbred characteristics of the three divisions of men coupled
with their histories and achievements is part of man's blood stream,
and he can no more deny them than deny his existence. However, in order
to get all nations together under the Man of Sin, the three divisions
with their histories, characteristics, and achievements will have to be
rejected. THAT IS, IN ORDER TO ATTAIN RELIGIOUS UNITY, MAN WILL HAVE TO
DENY HIS SANITY AND COMMON SENSE.

   The descendants of Shem, Ham, and Japheth have 3,000 years to get to
America before Christopher Columbus' great-
great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great grandfather had
his diapers changed, so there is no problem in race distribution except
the problems presented by half-mad race mixers who cannot tell the
difference between their mouth and a hole in the ground. At the
tremendous migratory rate of 100 YARDS a day the American Indians
travel 61,307 miles before the First Crusade (1000 A.D.). This means
that the Patagonians in South America have been buying, building,
selling, and planting 400 years before Columbus left Spain. (This does
not include Shemites going via "Kontiki" to South America at a speed of
5,000 yards a day!) Crocodiles have swum 558 miles at sea, polar bears
have made it for 19 miles, reindeer for 12-and-a- half miles. Toads,
frogs, and salamanders can't go through salt water, but any of them can
make it on sailboats, dugouts, outriggers, or canoes! Tigers have been
known to make it 10 miles through water. Seeds from spider chutes have
blown 5,000 feet at 45 miles an hour, and have been found 10,000 feet
high. Why would any man under heaven think that Darwin was more
accurate than Moses?

   Now the problem presents itself, how do we account for the color
differences? The most obvious answer is that before the change in
atmosphere (see Gen. 6:10 and 2:6), the rays from the sun (which now
penetrate the atmosphere) were blocked or distorted. The 360-day year
of pre-deluge days is the standard year of the ancient chronologists of
Africa, Asia, and Europe until after the time of Solomon. This means
that something very definitely happened to the earth's orbital journey
around the sun and the moon's orbital journey around the earth at the
time of Noah, and there were subsequent disturbances of the atmosphere
which accompanied these changes. There is a possibility that Shem's
red-brown skin begins to turn BROWN, during the 190-day stay on Mt.
Ararat. At the same time the reddish-brown skin of Brother Japheth
begins to turn to a LIGHT BROWN, and Ham turns a darkish brown. The
theory is unnecessary if one presumes that Noah had a dark-skinned
wife, or that Ham had one. For in this case, all three variations would
be found in the offspring. But in that case, the "color line" would
have to be drawn BEFORE the flood (Gen. 4:9-15). The Darwinian theory
that "climate" determined skin color is of course--like other Darwinian
hallucinations--about as "scientific" as Einstein's theory of
"meaning." Ham's descendants gravitate to the Equator, but they remain
black in Sweden, or New York, except where they are interbred sexually
with white people.

   Livingstone, Moffat, and their countrymen (German and English
"Imperialists" of South Africa) did not produce black children in 100
years, nor even dark brown children. We are to assume from Darwin's
theory that this would have happened in, say, 10,000 years (give or
take a few thousand).

   9:20-22: "And Noah began to be an husbandman, and he planted a
vineyard: And he drank of the wine, and was drunken: and he was
uncovered within his tent. And Ham, the father of Canaan, saw the
nakedness of his father, and told his two brethren without."

   We now approach the most universally hated and rejected passage of
scripture in the Bible since Genesis 3. We have already identified Noah
as a type of Adam (see Gen. 9:1-3), and the word "Husbandman" (in the
A.V. 1611 only!) makes the connections even closer. (The obscure
comments of Keil, Lange, Murphy, Wordworth, Kalisch, Kuyper, and
Delitzsch on the passage gives no light whatsoever. It is very typical
of commentators to borrow from each other, and to consider LINGUISTS as
great Seers and Interpreters of Truth. However, "Hermes" will usually
"stumble at the word, being disobedient" whereunto he also was
appointed! {I Pet. 2:8}. And the Hebrew scholars who major in the
etymological arts, very rarely do anything with a text but cover it
with a fog of verbiage that a searchlight couldn't shine through.)

   The word "husband," heretofore and herafter--by the standards of
definitions set up by the Bible itself in the English text--would mean
"one who tended a vine." The "fruitful wife" of Psalm 128:3 with her
"plants about the table," needs a caretaker, or "husbandman" (see Matt.
21:33-41). Note: "husband-MAN," not "husband-WOMAN." The Hebrew here in
Genesis 9:20, "man of the ground," sheds no light, whatsoever, on the
passage IN THE HANDS OF THE GREAT LINGUISTS OF THE CENTURIES. As a
matter of fact, their comments on the original language, not only are
fruitless, they even OBSCURE the cross-references and destroy the unity
of types and events. One must never mistake "linguistic ability" for
consecration, dedication, common sense, intelligence, ability to
interpret, ability to expound, ability to preach, or spiritual insight.

   "AND HE PLANTED A VINEYARD."

   Remind yourself again that the A.V. 1611 reveals more absolute Truth
within itself, by comparing scripture with scripture, than the last 30
sets of commentaries written by Hebrew and Greek scholars WHO RESENTED
THE TRUTH.

   "AND HE DRANK OF THE WINE."

   The wine is "YAYIN" (Isa. 5:11,12,22) in more than 100 instances in
the Old Testament. In its first occurrence, it is associated with
NAKEDNESS (vs. 21) as it was in Eden, and in Uz (Lam. 4:21), and in
Judah (Hab. 2:15). The modern teenager understands the association very
well, even if Delitzsch, Keil, Starke, Lange, Murphy, and Bleek failed
to notice it. ("Sound scholarship" is defined in the Scholar's Union as
a "discourse or exposition that presents all the facts, WITHOUT
APPLICATION OR REFERENCE TO ANYBODY CONTEMPORARY, OR ANYTHING GOING ON
NOW, OR IN THE FUTURE. See the Lord's comment on this type of
scholarship in Eze. 14:5-9.)

   "AND WAS DRUNKEN, AND HE WAS UNCOVERED..."

   If Adam is a type of Noah, and vice versa, the text has tremendous
implications, even though any novice in interpretation knows that types
cannot be pressed 100% into the service of interpretation (Joseph is a
type of Christ in 152 particulars--see Gen. 37--but Jesus Christ
certainly did not lie about a silver cup, nor was He put in a COFFIN in
Egypt at His death).

   Noah, following the advice of the faculty of Columbia, Harvard, and
Yale universities, gets rid of his inhibitions by discarding his "false
social morals" and "artificial moral standards," "expressing his true
self," and "abandoning false modesty." (And, incidentally, he gets
stoned and passes out, and lies in a drunken stupor as naked as a
jaybird. Do you see the difference between "sound scholarship" and
honesty?)

   Since "WINE" is written here for the first time, we should carefully
note its associations so that we will not "indiscriminately" mis-judge
future wine drinkers when they appear (Ben-hadad, Pope Leo, Lot, Pope
John, Belshazzar, Pope Paul, Nabal, Mystery Babylon, and Cardinal
Newman). The context of Genesis 9:21 is immorality, sodomy, a curse,
nakedness, drunkenness, and bondage (verses 21,22,24,25). What Carl
Sandburg thought about Billy Sunday's "Booze Sermon" (see his poem on
the "Contemporary Bunkshooter"), and what the Catholic priests think
about the Lord's Supper, is at variance with man's 5,000-year march
through history. The wine of Genesis 9 is not the "fruit of the vine"
(Matt. 26), which is found in the CLUSTER (Isa. 65:8), and is called
"pure blood" in Deuteronomy 32. The wine of Genesis 9 is the same old
"poison of dragons and asps" (Deut. 32:32,33) which ruined Noah, ruined
Ben-hadad, ruined Nabal, ruined Lot, destroyed the Roman Empire, made
Italy a fifth-rate power for 1,000 years, bankrupted France and
England, and killed more Americans on the highways in the last 60 years
than bullets have in two World Wars. Sam Morris of San Antonio, Texas,
has in his files more truth on Genesis 9:21 than can be found in the
combined commentaries of every Biblical expositor who ever tackled the
text. Drunkenness and nakedness are twin sisters on every College
Campus in the United States, and they both belong to the same
Sorority--Tau, Beta, Beta--The Bottomless Pit (see Prov. 5:5). (If the
liquor ads were taken out of Playboy and Life magazine, both magazines
would fold up in 6 months.)

   "AND HAM...SAW THE NAKEDNESS OF HIS FATHER."

   Again, the A.V. 1611 text interprets the words without recourse to
the Hebrew, the LXX, the Samaritan Pentateuch, the Targums, or the help
of any scholar of any distinction. The word "SAW" is interpreted as
"DONE" in verse 24. The expression "UNCOVER" is defined in Leviticus
18,20 as an intimate relationship involving sex. (Note Deut. 27:20 and
Lev. 18:18, where "uncovering" is the equivalent of the act of
fornication.) There is no doubt about the meaning of verse 22 in the
English text. Ham's boys have a "sex problem," which is documented by
the Congressional Investigations of the Public School System in
Washington, D.C. (1960-1964), and this is a commonly shared truth,
known and confessed by all nations and races except "Integrationists."
Ham's children settled Sodom (see Gen. 10:19). The police records of
any station in America--at least until the mid-1970s--contained records
of "sodomy." There is not the slightest doubt, whatsoever, about the
meaning of Genesis 9:22. The same act is attempted in Genesis 19:1-13,
and the crime is listed in Romans 1. (For further particulars contact
the officials of the city and county jails in Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania, any time in the next 10 years. A Bible commentary should
never confine its comments to the historical past, where the text
clearly states UNIVERSAL TRUTHS applicable to the future. Whereas
investigation into the Hebrew and Greek often leads the reader to an
historical dead-end in the past, as the contemporaries of the event
describe it, real Bible exposition, which compares scripture with
scripture, produces an understanding of life itself, as it is manifest
in every age before and since the event.)

   Ham clearly violates Leviticus 18:6, and the fact that the passage
had not yet been written doesn't amount to anything in the light of
Romans 1:2-21.

   9:23,24: "And Shem and Japheth took a garment, and laid it upon both
their shoulders, and went backward, and covered the nakedness of their
father; and their faces were backward, and they saw not their father's
nakedness. And Noah awoke from his wine, and knew what his younger son
had done unto him."

   If the 3 major races come from Shem, Ham, and Japheth, then we are
already getting into trouble with the NAACP, the Supreme Court, the
United Nations, and the Popes, for Shem and Japheth come out "clean" in
this shakedown, and Ham comes out guilty. The modern solution is to
teach that we should judge every man as an individual, on his
individual merit, regardless of "race, color, or creed." In practice,
the modern solution means the mass-mixing of racial masses, without
consent of the individuals within them. There is no time to judge
"individuals," on an "individual basis," where a socialistic government
is erecting a "one world" situation. They are never judged on an
individual basis.

   Socialism deals with MASSES, exactly as Fascism or Communism deals
with them. And the originator of "masses" is Catholicism! THE WORD
"CATHOLIC" ITSELF IS A PLATONIC WORD, USED BY IGNATIUS (150 A.D.) TO
REPRESENT A "MASS" OF CHRISTIANS--NOT INDIVIDUALS.

   Now according to Darwin, the characteristics of animals are
"acquired." How this can be true and man be exempt from the "acquired
characteristics" of his RACE is one of the eight Wonders of the World.
If it works for animals, and man is a higher type animal, why then does
it not work for MEN? Ham has a sex problem. The rebuttal is: Well, that
was HIS problem, not his descendants. But history will make a liar out
of such an argument every time (see notes on Gen. 9:25).

   Verse 23 is self-explanatory. They obey Leviticus 20, and replace
the sheepskin robe (see Gen. 3:21) where God originally put it. If any
of the advocates of the "New Morality" (i.e. the Old Adultery) had been
present, they would have "demonstrated" with such signs as "Down with
Shem and Japheth," "Long live free love," "Sodomy with Consent is
Americanism," "Down with False Modesty," "Help Stamp Out Violence," and
"Help the mentally sick or I'll kill you!"

   "AND NOAH AWOKE FROM HIS WINE."

   Then what follows--distasteful though it may be to race mixers and
socialists--is pronounced by a preacher of righteousness (II Pet. 2:9)
who is "cold sober." You will notice that he awoke "FROM HIS WINE," not
"FROM HIS SLEEP!"

   "AND KNEW WHAT HIS YOUNGER SON HAD DONE UNTO HIM."

   Noah is sober and he is fully aware. He does not need Shem or
Japheth to tell him what happened; God reveals it to him and he knows
exactly what took place while he was "out like a light."

   9:25-27: "And he said, Cursed be Canaan; a servant of servants shall
he be unto his brethren. And he said, Blessed be the Lord God of Shem;
and Canaan shall be his servant. God shall enlarge Japheth, and he
shall dwell in the tents of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant."

   "CURSED BE CANAAN."

   Here we go again! More "hate literature." For thin- skinned "modern
man" the passage has nothing in it but prejudice, "negativism,"
prophesies of gloom, "racism," and superstitious legend. Still he must
abide by it, AND HE WILL. The racial prophecies of Noah are binding to
the Millennium, as are all covenants from Genesis 1 to Genesis 12.

   "CURSED BE CANAAN."

   Canaan, Ham's boy, is cursed because Ham has already been blessed
(Gen. 9:1). Canaan is cursed because he is Ham's SEED and Ham's sin was
connected with his "seed" (Gen. 9:22,24). Modern race-mixers grasp at
"Canaan" like a dying man grasps for air in an oxygen tent, and come
out with the ludicrous interpretation that the Noahic prophecies only
apply to one- fourth of Ham's posterity. In view of the fact that all
of Ham's posterity are Africans (see Gen. 10:1-20), it is amazing that
the modern race-mixer (conservatives among them) has failed to observe
that Ham's two brothers begat Europeans and Asiatics! Remarkable
oversight, eh what? The squeamish and frightened conservatives and
fundamentalists of 1960-1980, in prospect of vacations in mental
institutions and health clinics if they oppose the integration
movement, do not dare to believe what they read. Instead, we are to
believe that the Bible gives prophecies on the Caucasoid and Mongoloid
branches of humanity, but discminates against them by REFUSING TO
PROPHECY on Negroids. Where does a Negro get the "civil rights" to duck
out of three racial prophecies, which in their contexts apply to races,
NOT individuals? Simple. You simply eliminate all the NEGATIVE passages
in the Bible--of which Genesis 9:25 is one-- and retain the POSITIVE
passages of which Genesis 9:26,27 are two! THAT IS, YOU BECOME A
LIBERAL, WHILE PROFESSING TO BE A CONSERVATIVE.

   "A SERVANT OF SERVANTS SHALL HE BE...."

   And so it is. Whether Northerners run Hamites, or Southerners run
them, or whether black militants run them, or the NAACP runs them, or
they run themselves (see conditions in Africa since 1968!), they will
SERVE, and they are happy when they serve and they are not happy when
they begin to holler for "equality." (I realize that this is not in
harmony with Lincoln's Gettsyburg Address, the Statement in the Bill of
Rights, the principles of the French Revolution, the philosophy of Marx
and Trotsky, and similar Laodicean documents, but what we are
interested in, here, is the TRUTH--NOT POLITICAL EXPEDIENCE.)

   Where Ham serves, he excels: where he rules, he "kings" himself
(Martin Luther "King," "King Cassius," Nat "King" Cole, etc.), and
rides off at a gallop before he learned how to trot.

   But what saith the Scriptures?

   The "servant" is not to be mistreated (I Pet. 2:18,19; Deut.
24:14-18). The runaway servant is to be returned (Philemon). The saved
servant is a spiritual "brother" to the saved master (I Tim. 6; I Cor.
7:20-24; Gal. 3:27,28), but "race mixing" is something else. Abraham's
Hamitic relationship ends with a loss of 13 years of fellowship with
God (Gen. 16:1- 4,15,16; 17:1-8). Lot's Hamitic relationship ends in
tragedy (Gen. 12:5-10; 13:10; 19:26), as does Moses' (Num 12:1;
20:1-5), as does David's (II Sam. 11:3), and Samson's (Jud. 14,15).
These are the actual facts about race-mixing, recorded and preserved by
the Holy Spirit, in the Holy Bible, and they are as much a part of the
"instruction in righteousness" and "sound doctrine" for the believer as
the virgin birth, the bodily resurrection, and the premillennial coming
of Jesus Christ. They are ignored or denied on the part of modern
Christians because modern Christians have settled down in the world
system and have become so much "part and parcel of it," that they
desire its approval, support, security, and good will (I John 2:15-17).
The present world system is preparing for a one world government, with
one language, one religion, and--IF POSSIBLE-- one race. This is the
gist of every speech made by every major political candidate in America
since World War II, and it is the meat of every Papal "address" since
1776.

   In view of this coming consolidation and integration of conflicting
elements, the modern Christian does not dare believe that only one race
is destined to "serve." The reasons for rejecting Genesis 9, again, lie
not in a proper understanding of the text, in the light of its
corollaries (Deut. 32:7,8; Acts 17:26,27), but in the Christian's
desire to escape the opposition and persecution which comes from taking
a stand with the Bible against the traditions and philosophy of the age
in which he lives (Col. 2:8). In the Bible, God segregates animals
(Lev. 11), nations (Gen. 11), Israelites (Ex. 3:10), Christians (II
Cor. 6:14-17), plants and vegetables (Deut. 22:9), and human beings of
every age (Rev. 20:13-15). In the Bible women have privileges which men
do not--bearing children! Men have privileges which women do not--being
apostles and bishops. Jews have privileges Gentiles do not--writing the
Bible. Gentiles have privileges Jews do not--believing the New
Testament (see Rom. 11:7-30). As a matter of truth, the entire Bible,
from "generation to resolution," is one endless blast and tirade of
dualism and absolutes: hot or cold, Heaven or Hell, saved or lost, just
or unjust, back or forth, in or out, Jew or Gentile, servant or master,
holy or unholy, Catholic or Christian, godly or ungodly, clean or
unclean, Old or New, RIGHT OR WRONG! And this old hell-bound,
Christ-rejecting generation of educators and scientists are sick and
tired of the Book! They are sick and tired of the "conflicts of
opposites" and the dogma of absolutes. What they long for is a
synthetic, synthesized, pliable, plastic, relativistic teaching for a
nondescript, integrated, passive population of indifferent,
disinterested, non-opinionated automen. This is the 20th century
"solution" for wars, and the only thing that stands in its way is the
A.V. 1611 Bible.

   In the Book, the descendants of Ham are to be "servant of servants,"
and if any SAVED descendant of Ham is a Bible believer, he will accept
this lot, cheerfully, thankfully, and optimistically, and will make the
most of it. Hamites who let Caucasians direct their affairs--Joe Louis,
Bubba Smith, Jackie Robinson, G.W. Carver, B.T. Washington, Lena Horne,
Paul Robeson, Sammy Davis, etc., usually come out fairly well
financially. Hamites who follow Representative Powell do not make out
quite so well, and those who follow Father Divine or the Reverend Ike
come out bankrupt. The followers of Michael (alias "Martin") Luther
King, Jr. built quite an estate for him and kept him in Cadillacs and
$200.00 suits most of his life-- but not a half dozen who obeyed his
orders made a living wage. The worst oppressor of the Negro is the
Negro, and this is not the prejudiced statement of a "white supremist."
It is the reason why the Negroes in America will never return to
Africa-- NOT EVEN IF THEY ARE PAID TO DO IT. The "ghettoes" (another
Associated Press word for purposes of distorting truth) of Harlem and
Philadelphia are never quite as bad as living conditions in the Congo
and French Equatorial Africa; in Ham's original homeland there was
neither social security, welfare, nor government pensions, and
certainly not free TV time for airing grievances!

   A successful Hamite is the one who receives the Lord Jesus as
Saviour (Acts 8) and serves in the capacity where God placed him (Acts
8). The last statement is not a racist's definition. It is the opinion
of the Holy Spirit recorded in Acts 8:39. Disgruntled, frustrated and
bitter Hamites, who have devoted a lifetime to overthrowing Genesis
9:25, in the interests of "their fellow sufferers," etc., may rage and
grind their teeth against the ordinances of Heaven, but they will
remain inflexible and unmoveable. The same ordinances dictate that the
Jews (another race!) will be restored to Palestine and will rule the
world for 1000 years (Jer. 31,33). Singing "we SHALL overcome" does not
impress the born-again child of God who has ALREADY OVERCOME (I John
4:4; 5:4), without the aid of Congress, demonstrations, or publicity.
John Knox, chained to the galley, was the Lord's "freeman" (I Cor.
7:22), while John Brown (1800-1859) and Abe Lincoln were "servants of
sin," even while "emancipating" the "servant of servants" (see John
8:34- 36). (Neither John nor Abe made any profession of the new birth,
and finding a clear cut Christian testimony in their speeches and
biographies is like listening for a whisper in a whirlwind.) What
passes for "emancipation" and "civil rights" and "integration," in the
final analysis, is little more than the operations of political groups,
and opportunists using Ham for their own ends. No man on earth was ever
any freer than George Washington Carver, who openly testified to his
saving faith in the blood of Jesus Christ; and no man sold on the block
was any more a slave than Jack Johnson, who spent his lifetime
consorting with white women and beating up white men in the ring.
Johnson was a slave of sin till he stumbled on the lid of his coffin
and toppled into the grave. If God called you to be a "servant of
servants," you will be happier in that calling than an emperor whom God
called to be a prime minister.

   "BLESSED BE THE LORD GOD OF SHEM."

   More discrimination! Why did He not say Japheth, or Ham? What right
does God have to pick out people, when He is "no respecter of persons"?
These are the objections of the 20th century man, and his method of
answering them is to throw the Bible out the window and pretend that
Gen. 9:25-27 was Noah's opinion.

   Still, history corroborates what a modern man thinks is just an
"opinion."

   "BLESSED BE THE LORD GOD OF SHEM."

   The "of" signifies subject or object, thus reading: "Shem is going
to bless the TRUE God (Ps. 103:20,21,22), who is the Lord God," or it
is "The Lord God of Shem"--not Japheth and Ham--who is "God blessed
forever" (see Rom. 9:5). To avoid these two scriptural interpretations,
the RSV (1952) has invented, "Blessed by the Lord my God be Shem." This
attempt to preserve racial equality at the expense of truth still
fails, as it is apparent that God still did not give this blessing to
Ham and Japheth.

   Shem plainly receives something spiritual in Noah's prophecy in
contrast to the physical blessings of Japheth. Although Shem lives in
India, Japheth (Sir Edmund Hillary) has to climb his mountains.
Although Shem lives in Japan, he must pattern his railways, planes,
motorcycles, and ships after Japheth. Although Shem lives in China, he
cannot develop his resources until Japheth (Russia) fires the primer
for the "Reds." It is Japheth, not Shem, who discovers both Poles, the
passage to India, the way to the Moon, electricity, the steam engine,
the wireless telegraph, the telephone, radio, airplane, tank, and
submarine. Shem plainly does not major in geographical conquests,
scientific inventions, and "higher standards of living."

   But when it comes to spiritual perception, you can't beat Shem! As a
matter of fact, Shem is the author of every religion on earth
(basically two of them--see Gen. 4:4-8). Students of comparative
religions have no trouble at all in tracing Rosicrucianism, Theosophy,
Unity, Christian Science, and Unitarianism back to India--Shem. Zen
Buddhism did not begin in Germany, Shintoism is not the state religion
of Spain, Confucianism was not invented in France, and the Vatican
State had nothing to do with Brahmanism or Hinduism. Shem is the author
of these religions. Shem is an introvert; he is a "meditator" and a
fatalist--he is a THINKER. Every author in the Bible can trace his
descent to Shem; the Saviour of the World confessed He was "of the
Jews" (not "Hebrews"--see John 4:22), and every branch of Orthodox
Christianity can trace its descent to Romans 11, where the "Gentiles"
were grafted into the good olive tree--Shem, again. The California
yogas and gurus of today are imitations of the "holy men of India" and
the Himalayas--Shem again. And everything found in the Catholic church,
whether it be stolen from Bible Christianity (the Nicene Creed), or
extorted from Israel (the literal promises of the Old Testament), or
borrowed from Babylon (Easter bunnies, X-mas, Mary), or adopted from
pagan Roman and Greek mysteries (sprinkling babies, sacraments, holy
water, etc.), can be traced to the Jewish Old Testament (Shem!), the
Jewish New Testament (Shem, again!), or Ancient Babylon (Shem and Ham).

   "BLESSED BE THE LORD GOD OF SHEM."

   The Saviour is of the "seed of David," according to the flesh (Rom.
1:2-6); his mother and foster-father are Shemites. Abraham, Isaac, and
Jacob are Shemites; Moses and David are Shemites, Paul and Peter are
Shemites. Whether a man is a Bullingerite (Paul), or a Papist (Peter),
he owes everything he knows to Shem, when it comes to spiritual things.

   "BLESSED BE THE LORD GOD OF SHEM."

   When Japheth invents a religion (Seventh-day Adventists, Jehovah's
Witnesses, "Church of Christ," "Christian Science," "Mormons"), or when
Ham invents a religion (voodoo, "Pentecostal, Wildfire, Apostolic
Holiness of the...Church," Black Muslims, etc.), it will have a certain
air of spuriousness about it that is easy to spot. It is the "Lord God
of Shem" who is the author of Spiritual Truth and Spiritual Revelation,
and eventually all religions will have to acknowledge Shem as the
master writer of books.

   "AND CANAAN SHALL BE HIS SERVANT."

   So said, and so done. Nimrod was the first and last descendant of
Ham to ever control Shem's territory. Hannibal was the first and last
Hamite to ever control Japheth's territory. Racial discimination in
America is a small thing compared to racial discrimination in India,
China, and Japan-- Shem's territory. Shem doesn't give Ham any
consideration. THERE HAS NEVER BEEN A NEGRO IN A GOVERNMENT POSITION IN
CHINA OR JAPAN SINCE ADAM TRIED ON A SUIT OF DOUBLE-BREASTED FIG LEAVES.

   "GOD SHALL ENLARGE JAPHETH...."

   This ends all doubt as to the nature of Noah's prophetic utterances.
They have to be racial, or they are nonsense. God is not going to put
50 pounds of fat on Japheth! He is going to "spread his descendants
out" across the earth. To confirm the prophecy, Japheth marches out
from Ararat, and crosses the Danube, swims the English Channel, sails
the Atlantic, sails the Pacific, flies over the Arctic and Antarctic
and then shoots off to the moon. And if that were not enough evidence
to prove that the despisers of the A.V. 1611 have brick bats for
brains, Japheth plumbs the depths in a bathysphere, clambers up Mt.
McKinley, Mt. Whitney, and Mt. Everest like he thought mountain
climbing was going out of style! Then he sets up military installations
and diplomatic stations in so many places in Asia and Africa that in
the 20th century Japheth is called "An Imperialist."

   "GOD SHALL ENLARGE JAPHETH."

   There is no problem here in trying to find out what God MEANT when
He said it through Noah. We are now gazing back at a record which has
been completely fulfilled. There is no question in Genesis 9:25-27
about "proper interpretation" in 1989. The Holy Spirit has saved you
the trouble. All the verses came to pass literally, as they appeared in
the 1611 text.

   "AND HE SHALL DWELL IN THE TENTS OF SHEM."

   The verse is spiritualized by most commentators to refer to the
"sharing of the redemptive revelations of the Hebrew nation," etc., but
such doggerel is unbecoming a man who professes to take God at His
word. "Tents," here, refers to TENTS. The "tents" are Shem's tents, and
a blind man would bump into them traveling across America in 1500, if
he couldn't have seen them 2 feet away. Shem crosses the Bering straits
and sets up "tents" from British Columbia to Cape Horn. Japheth crosses
the Atlantic and takes them from him--more discrimination!--and the
ground you are sitting on right now is not yours at all. You are no
AMERICAN; you are European or African (unless, of course, you are a
full-blooded American Indian!). The ground your "tent" is on was Shem's
hunting ground, where he pitched his tents from 1000 B.C. to 1800 A.D.

   "AND HE SHALL DWELL IN THE TENTS OF SHEM."

   Noah's racial prophecies are to be believed literally, as they
stand. They are TOTAL prophecies, involving the three major branches of
mankind. History confirms them, common sense confirms them, and the
Bible confirms them. Japheth has the tents, a plain case of
discrimination. Shem has the Saviour and the Bible, another plain case
of discrimination. Ham serves, a really plain case of discrimination;
and all subsequent "exceptions" prove the rule.

   9:28,29: "And Noah lived after the flood three hundred and fifty
years. And all the days of Noah were nine hundred and fifty years: and
he died."

   After Noah's "wine-bibbing," the Holy Spirit closes the record of
his "walk with God." He finishes the allotment of years granted to
pre-deluge patriarchs--950 years--and dies only two years before the
birth of Abraham. Undoubtedly, he lives to see the Divine Segregation
of the races at the Tower of Babel (see Gen. 11; Deut. 32:7,8), and
probably was pleased to see God honour his word which he had spoken to
Ham, for the founder of Babel was Nimrod, THE GRANDSON OF HAM, who
tried to "bring in the Kingdom" with a United Nations and Universal
Language (Gen. 11:1). Since Ham's descendants were plainly "out of
bounds" (Acts 17:26,27) in the Babel Cooperative Program, they were
dispersed and driven back to "the land of Ham" (Ps. 105:23); those who
refused to return, settled in Palestine until they were slaughtered
(Deut. 7:1-6). "Let my people go," in the original version (Ex. 3-10),
was not the Communist National Anthem of Black Supremists, trying to
take over Alabama, Mississippi, and Georgia; it was Shemites crying for
deliverance from Black Power, and eventually getting it by Divine
Discrimination and shed blood (see Ex. 12-15).
