                          Abduction Digest, Number 58
 
                           Thursday, April 23rd 1992
 
     (C) Copyright 1992 Paranet Information Service.  All Rights Reserved.
 
Today's Topics:
 
                                 Ellen Crystall
                       Implants Are Real--Get Yours Today!
                                    Research
                                 Ellen Crystall
                          Secret Life - Questions, 2/3
                              I'm back once again.
                                 Ellen Crystall
                        Re: Secret Life - Questions, 2/3

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: Ellen Crystall
Date: 16 Apr 92 21:14:00 GMT


 > Crystall speculates that aliens avoid being photographed clearly by
 > surrounding their craft with shortwave radiation that interferes
 > with the emulsion of photographic film.

  Ahem....IMHO anyone who'd make such a statement hasn't a clue.

                                           jbh

--  
John Hicks - via ParaNet node 1:104/422
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: John.Hicks@f29.n363.z1.FIDONET.ORG



--------------------------------------------------------------------


From: ns-mx.uiowa.edu!jrblack
Subject: Implants Are Real--Get Yours Today!
Date: 18 Apr 92 00:12:37 GMT

From: James Roger Black <jrblack@ns-mx.uiowa.edu>

In an article in talk.politics.misc on Usenet News, dated 2 Apr 92, 
Jim Mason (jrm@gnv.ifas.ufl.edu), writes:

|> Chanced upon an episode of that Australian TV show 'Beyond 2000' last night
|> on TDC. I arrived at the tail end of a story about a device called
|> 'KIDSCAN'. This appears to be an adaptation of a lab-animal ID tag that
|> is regularly advertized in the weekly science journals like 'AAAS SCIENCE'
|> and 'NATURE'. What you have is a tiny glass capsule containing a passive
|> radio re-transmitter designed to be injected directly under the skin of
|> the animal. These things are very tiny - looks like maybe 0.75x2.0 mm.
|> They are designed to derive energy from an RF field and then re-transmit
|> at another frequency. The transmission contains a multi-digit ID code that
|> allows each animal to be positively identified. 
|> 
|> KIDSCAN is the same principal ... but is being sold as something you have
|> implanted into your children - for their health and safety according to
|> the seller. These versions appear to be a little larger and can transmit
|> for a several block radius. 

So there you have it:  tracking-implant technology for the masses.  If
this kind of stuff is being advertised in science magazines, just
imagine what the black-budget folks must have come up with by now.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Roger Black                                             roger-black@uiowa.edu
 Disclaimer:                My employer doesn't even know I have any opinions.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------




--------------------------------------------------------------------


From: Keith.Basterfield@f12.n1040.z9.FIDONET.ORG (Keith Basterfield)
Subject: Research
Date: 17 Apr 92 04:50:00 GMT

In a previous message Roger Black asked an interesting point re the 
ability of someone who uses either spectacles or contact lenses, to 
see during an abduction. This issue raised itself with me during an 
interview with an Australian woman who was experiencing "apparitions". 
During the interview she wore spectacles and commented that without 
them she was not able to see clearly at other than short distances. 
However, awakening during the night, to observe an "apparition" in her 
bedroom she noted that she could observe every detail extremely 
clearly. This clarity was not consistent with her normal vision. In 
abduction research does anyone know the answer to Roger's question? If 
not, it is a point worth checking next time you interview an abductee.

--  
Keith Basterfield - via ParaNet node 1:104/422
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: Keith.Basterfield@f12.n1040.z9.FIDONET.ORG



--------------------------------------------------------------------


From: Clark.Matthews@f816.n107.z1.FIDONET.ORG (Clark Matthews)
Subject: Ellen Crystall
Date: 18 Apr 92 18:49:00 GMT

In a message to Sheldon Wernikoff <16 Apr 92 14:14> John Hicks wrote:

 >> Crystall speculates that aliens avoid being photographed clearly by
 >> surrounding their craft with shortwave radiation that interferes
 >> with the emulsion of photographic film.

 JH>  Ahem....IMHO anyone who'd make such a statement hasn't a clue.

A localized time shift could shift light from a UFO into IR or UV, or even make
it invisible.  But if that's what they're up to, they probably aren't doing it
to waste folks' FotoMat dollars...  :-)

Best,
 Clark


--  
Clark Matthews - via ParaNet node 1:104/422
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: Clark.Matthews@f816.n107.z1.FIDONET.ORG



--------------------------------------------------------------------


From: John.Powell@p5.f134.n109.z1.FIDONET.ORG (John Powell)
Subject: Secret Life - Questions, 2/3
Date: 18 Apr 92 22:38:58 GMT

In a message to John Powell <12 Apr 92 16:13> Linda Bird wrote:

 LB> Hi John,

How are ya Linda!?  Things sure have been strange around here lately.  If I
didn't know better I'd swear that it was my turn to be under the microscope...

 LB> ...one of your questions, "While switched off, don't people get cramped
 LB> or need to go to the bathroom?"

(Seems I really bombarded him...  His book answered a number of questions I've
had for awhile but it also crystalized a number of other questions that I've
been ruminating on...)  The question above is representative of the general
'Switched Off' aspect of the phenomenon that concerns me.

 LB> About a year ago when Jim Speiser was investigating Lydia, she
 LB> mentioned that she needed to use the bathroom, and thinking to herself
 LB> (so she thought), she thought, "I have to go to pottie..."  At
 LB> this point, the Alien to who she was talking, looked surprised
 LB> and concerned, and hit some kind of lever at the end of the
 LB> examination table.  The next thing Lydia knew, she was back in
 LB> her bedroom in bed with a need to use the bathroom.

Interesting. I gather Lydia was a child... Why did you say "(so she thought)" ,
are there indications that this was a generated response/action as some sort of
test?

I think I've read a few accounts where the switched off people were also
monitired by "guards", (I think this is mentioned in Fowler's work?), but it
doesn't seem to be SOP.  Which seems _very_ inconsistent with the other secrecy
aspects of the Abduction Scenario.  I would think that leaving a group of
switched off people unattended would be incredibly risky...

 LB> Perhaps Jim has something further to add.

I hope so...

Thanks, take care.
John.

--  
John Powell - via ParaNet node 1:104/422
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: John.Powell@p5.f134.n109.z1.FIDONET.ORG



--------------------------------------------------------------------


From: John.Powell@p5.f134.n109.z1.FIDONET.ORG (John Powell)
Subject: I'm back once again.
Date: 19 Apr 92 19:28:39 GMT

In a message to All Users <14 Apr 92 23:46> David Jacobs wrote:

 DJ> I just  want to assure my friends and colleagues that I will try
 DJ> to get to most  of their questions soon (although there was a
 DJ> three-pager that I am not  sure I will be able to handle).

Sorry about the 3-pager.  I thought I'd just get everything out all at once
while it was fresh...  Please don't feel that you need to personally, or even
point by point, answer.  I'm sure the bulk of items will come up for
discussion here over time anyway.

Thanks, take care.
John.




--  
John Powell - via ParaNet node 1:104/422
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: John.Powell@p5.f134.n109.z1.FIDONET.ORG



--------------------------------------------------------------------


From: John.Burke@f9.n1012.z9.FIDONET.ORG (John Burke)
Subject: Ellen Crystall
Date: 22 Apr 92 08:12:00 GMT

John Hicks writes:

 > > Crystall speculates that aliens avoid being photographed clearly by
 > > surrounding their craft with shortwave radiation that interferes
 > > with the emulsion of photographic film.
 >
 >   Ahem....IMHO anyone who'd make such a statement hasn't a
 > clue.
 >
 >                                            jbh

In her book, Ellen Crystall indicates that her definition of 
"shortwave radiation" includes X-rays and gamma rays.  She 
believes that use of a camera with a plastic lens instead of a 
glass lens can help overcome this problem.  Does this make sense 
from the photographic standpoint? 

I've finally seen a copy of her book although I haven't had time 
to read it yet.  It's too bad that the pictures are printed in 
black and white.  I've seen them in color and they look a little 
more impressive, particularly the photograph which is reprinted 
in the book (I believe) as photo #13.  As far as the photos that 
are said to depict aliens go  ...  I think that a person who was 
not a witness to the actual event would almost have to be 
tripping in order to see the aliens in the pictures.  I think Bob 
Girard hit this book awfully hard because so much of what was 
discussed was based more on *belief* than detached observation. 
This is the problem when a book is written by a percipient rather 
than an investigator with no first-hand witnessing experience. 
Although Ellen emphasizes that she has never been abducted, she 
does claim a good bit of experience with CE I's thru III's with 
"humanoid sightings".  Compare the balls of light that she 
referrs to as "Tesla fields" to the balls of light in the Russian 
photographs which appear in Jaques Vallee's new (too tiny for 
$18) book on Russian ufology.  They might be something more than 
artifacts of the photographic process.  Whaddaya think?

                                  --  John

--  
John Burke - via ParaNet node 1:104/422
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: John.Burke@f9.n1012.z9.FIDONET.ORG



--------------------------------------------------------------------


From: Linda.Bird@f100.n1010.z9.FIDONET.ORG (Linda Bird)
Subject: Re: Secret Life - Questions, 2/3
Date: 23 Apr 92 03:44:00 GMT

Hi John,
 
Under the microscope instead of the weather, huh?  Hehehe
 
Well, Lydia said she was having a mental conversation with the aliens, 
that suddenly she could "hear" their thoughts in her head, and she 
answered back with a thought.  But when she was thinking to HERSELF,
"Gee, I have to go to pottie..." she thought this was a private thought
that the aliens wouldn't be able to pick up on.  Sort of like pressing 
the "mute" button on a remote control TV gadget.  Instead, the alien 
DID pick up on the thought!  He got her out of there, perhaps afraid 
she would make a mess.
 
I remember reading the account of the South American youth, somebody
Boas, I think, who was plowing in his field when he was abducted by 
Aliens.  He was there for the purpose of being seduced by an exotic
female alien, but before she appeared, some odd-smelling gas was 
emitted into his compartment on the craft.  He said that it made him 
sick, and he vomitted in a corner.  So, perhaps aliens are tired of
cleaning up after human messes.
 
Lydia was an adult when this experience occurred.
 
Take care!
 
Linda Bird
 

--  
Linda Bird - via ParaNet node 1:104/422
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: Linda.Bird@f100.n1010.z9.FIDONET.ORG


********************************************************************************
       For permission to reproduce or redistribute this digest, contact:

DOMAIN          Michael.Corbin@paranet.org
UUCP            scicom!paranet.org!Michael.Corbin

****************A**B**D**U**C**T**I**O**N****D**I**G**E**S**T*******************

Submissions UUCP..{ncar,isis,csn}!scicom!abduct
Submissions DOMAIN..abduct@scicom.alphacdc.com
Admin Address...abduct-request@shemtaia.weeg.uiowa.edu

Mail to private Paranet/Fidonet addresses from the newsletters:
DOMAIN..firstname.lastname@paranet.org
UUCP..scicom!paranet.org!firstname.lastname
 
****************A**B**D**U**C**T**I**O**N****D**I**G**E**S**T*******************


