.id AA05971; Sat, 19 Aug 95 11:46:01 CDT
Date: Sat, 19 Aug 1995 11:46:00 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 5 Num. 83



              Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 5  Num. 83
             ======================================
                    ("Quid coniuratio est?")


-----------------------------------------------------------------

I spoke by phone with Mr. Skolnick on August 18, 1995. Note that 
in what follows I neither necessarily agree nor disagree with 
either all or parts of statements made by Mr. Skolnick. Persons 
mentioned are invited to send rebuttals, of reasonable length, 
for probable distribution.
                         -- Brian Francis Redman, Editor-in-Chief

 +  +  +  +  +  +  +  +  +  +  +  +  +  +  +  +  +  +  +  +  +  +

[...continued...]


          -+- The "Vacuum Pump" and the "Faucet" -+-


CONSPIRACY NATION:
Yeah, another one of my readers suggested that that's the weak 
link in all this, is that [James] Norman is a financial and 
business writer.


SHERMAN SKOLNICK:
Well let me tell ya what happened in the beginning, from the 
circumstances, that he went around questioning everybody. And 
then it did not appear that his publication, *Forbes* magazine, 
was gonna publish anything.

We put him in the category of a "vacuum pump". That is, on behalf 
of certain un-named principals, he was trying to "pick our 
brains". And establishment journalists act as purported spies all 
along: they show up, they question you, they lead you to believe 
that it's going on the air -- it is *not* going on the air. A 
transcript of their notes is then shared with the FBI, the NSA, 
the CIA. I know a lot about that.


CONSPIRACY NATION:
Yeah, in fact that rings true, that, down in Arkansas, there have 
been "journalists" doing videos of people who were witnesses or 
whatever in a lot of the stuff that's goin' on there. And I've 
been hearing that these videos never get marketed but that the 
people on them who volunteer to go "public" wind up in trouble 
over what they say.


SHERMAN SKOLNICK:
Let me just give you an example. I've already confronted a long- 
time radio broadcast journalist here in Chicago, Alan Bickley. 
And in 1970, when I had worldwide publicity on a story, a lawsuit 
I brought regarding the National Archives covering up documents 
they had which related to a plot against JFK, two-and-a-half 
weeks *before* Dallas, he interviewed me -- apparently not to go 
on the air -- and then he sort of off-handed admitted to me that 
he was in Dealey Plaza at the time of the assassination. And to 
disarm me from any questions said, "Well yeah, the CIA tried to 
recruit me, Skolnick." I said, "Oh really."

But then what I found out is, that thereafter -- and *prior* to 
that time -- Alan Bickley used to interview "peaceniks". You 
know, get all kinds of personal and biographical information from 
them, interview them on tape, and it never went on the air!

So then I ran into a courier for a service for "spooks" -- 
espionage. And he says that (the "spooks'" courier), told me how 
they transcribe these things, called "out-takes". Out-takes are 
film, tape, and notes that do not go on the air.

And Alan Bickley, from what I found out, specialized in out- 
takes. That is, he was a journalist-spy! (At least it seemed to 
me.) Because he interviewed a lot of peaceniks and people like 
me, not for the purpose of ever going on the air with any of it, 
but a transcript or copy of his notes, or tapes, would then end 
up with the FBI or the CIA.

The station that, I believe he still works for, [is] WBBM-AM 
radio in Chicago. An FBI official once ran the station. The place 
is loaded with FBI types, purporting to be technicians, etc., 
running the radio station, which is in Chicago.

But the point is, therefore when I ran into Norman, he seemed to 
be more of the same. He seemed to be more like Alan Bickley.


CONSPIRACY NATION:
Yeah, okay, and when he's purportedly complaining that he can't 
get you to produce what he purportedly calls "something real", in 
other words, there's a possibility that he may not be all he 
seems to be.


SHERMAN SKOLNICK:
All right, in the early 1970s, Carl Bernstein (he by-lined a 
story about Watergate with Bob Woodward) wrote a piece... I think 
it was in *Rolling Stone*, that somewhere between 200 and 400 
mass media types are actually spies!


CONSPIRACY NATION:
Yeah. In fact, I think I've got that. I think I had xeroxed that 
article {3}.


SHERMAN SKOLNICK:
I got in trouble with the media, prior to that story, by 
identifying who they were in Chicago. I was called a liar all the 
way around. Then when Bernstein's story came out, nobody 
apologized to me.

I got taken off the air in the early 70s. I had been a media hero 
prior to *that* time. I used to be able to hold a press 
conference on my lawn at the drop of a hat. But because I did a 
forbidden thing, which was to identify *who* in the local media 
were assets of CIA, FBI, and NSA, I got blanked out, as if I 
ceased to exist.

And Norman acted in that pattern. If it's not true about him, all 
I can say is he acted in that pattern.

*Then*, he did a very mysterious thing: on Internet, in signed 
articles, either with his initials or actually signed by him, 
James Norman, he then attacked his employer, *Forbes* magazine, 
and mentioned that there was a conflict of interest {4}; that one 
of the bosses of *Forbes* magazine, Caspar Weinberger, the former 
secretary of defense, who was listed as "publisher emeritus" 
(that's like a title where he's... You know what "emeritus" 
means.)


CONSPIRACY NATION:
"Semi-retired" but involved.


SHERMAN SKOLNICK:
But the point is, he hinted at things that were already in my 
story ["Foster, Bush, Weinberger -- And Pollard" by Sherman H. 
Skolnick; see CN 5.49] and which Norman knew about. Namely, that 
Weinberger and [George] Bush were involved with Vincent W. 
Foster, Jr., the White House aide; that before he got into the 
White House, Foster was an NSA official, and with the help of 
Weinberger and Bush had released nuclear secrets to Pollard, who 
gave 'em to Israel for money.

But the strange thing is that, so far as I know, Norman has not 
been fired. Although I think the rationale behind that is, he may 
be threatening his boss with what is known in law as a 
"retaliatory discharge" case. That is, if you get fired because 
you did something that's good for the public, you can sue your 
employer. So it may be they figured out it will cost them more to 
defend such a lawsuit than to fire him.

So he continues to put stories on Internet condemning his 
employer {5}. He continues, apparently, to work as the senior 
editor. And he puts these stories that are not published in 
*Forbes* on the Internet, or *Media Bypass* magazine, about what 
he calls "Fostergate". And he updates some of these stories from 
time to time, according to signed items by him on Internet.

So, I mean, is he a possible questionable quantity? It may well 
be.

He seems to be a nice fellow, in discussions on the phone.


CONSPIRACY NATION:
All right. And moving along to this person, Orlin Grabbe...


SHERMAN SKOLNICK:
All right. As to him, he was formerly a professor at the Wharton 
School of Business. (Which is supposed to be a distinguished 
business school.) He purports to be the director of a 
conservative think tank, called the Cato Institute. And he 
purports to be an expert on bank encryption -- satellites. And he 
puts... As of now, I think he's put 18 different stories on 
Internet, under his by-line -- that relate to my story, by the 
way! -- and are very interesting and appear to be *correct*.

He apparently is what is known in the trade as a "faucet", which 
is a leaking apparatus on behalf of some faction that opposes 
some other faction in espionage. (In the espionage agencies they 
have different factions.) But [he seems to be] a front for a 
leaking faction.

                   [...to be continued...]

---------------------------<< Notes >>---------------------------
{3} "The CIA And The Media" by Carl Bernstein. *Rolling Stone* 
magazine, October 20, 1977.

{4} I, personally, have never seen the alleged articles that 
Skolnick mentions. If anyone has copies of same (i.e., besides 
"Fostergate", which I already have a copy of), please send them 
to me at bigxc@prairienet.org

{5} Again, I have not seen such stories as Skolnick mentions. If 
anyone has copy/copies, please e-mail them to me.

-----------------------------------------------------------------
     I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
  For information on how to receive the new Conspiracy Nation 
  Newsletter, send an e-mail message to bigxc@prairienet.org
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail 
address, send a message in the form "subscribe conspire My Name" 
to listproc@prairienet.org -- To cancel, send a message in the 
form "unsubscribe conspire" to listproc@prairienet.org
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Want to know more about Whitewater, Oklahoma City bombing, etc? 
(1) telnet prairienet.org (2) logon as "visitor" (3) go citcom
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et 
  pauperem.                    -- Liber Proverbiorum  XXXI: 8-9 

 Brian Francis Redman    bigxc@prairienet.org    "The Big C"
--------------------------------------------------------------
    Coming to you from Illinois -- "The Land of Skolnick"        
--------------------------------------------------------------

