From server@firefly.prairienet.org Fri Apr 28 21:10:26 1995
	id VAA09578; Fri, 28 Apr 1995 21:10:17 +0200
	id AA09408; Fri, 28 Apr 95 13:37:13 CDT
Subject: Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 4 Num. 72


              Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 4  Num. 72
             ======================================
                    ("Quid coniuratio est?")
 
 
-----------------------------------------------------------------
 
Many thanks to Mr. John DiNardo, who has been doing yeoman's work 
to get the truth out, for the following information:
 
 +  +  +  +  +  +  +  +  +  +  +  +  +  +  +  +  +  +  +  +  +  +
 
Part 1, 4/26, INTELLIGENCE REPORT on the Oklahoma City Bombing
              ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
JOHN STADTMILLER:
Mark, without further ado, I think we'll bring on Mr.
Ken L. Gunderson. Mr. Gunderson, are you there?
 
KEN GUNDERSON:
Yes, I am.
 
JOHN STADTMILLER:
Okay. Mr. Gunderson, I'm sitting here and I'm reading
what you've been involved in -- what you've been doing
since you retired from the F.B.I.  You have quite a record
of service, sir:
 
   senior special agent for Los Angeles from 1977 to 1979;
 
   special agent-in-charge of Memphis, Tennessee 
     from 1973 to 1977;  
 
   in Dallas, in 1973, chief inspector;
 
   from 1965 to 1973, you were assistant special agent-
     in-charge of New Haven, Connecticut and
     Philadelphia, Pennsylvania;
 
KEN GUNDERSON:
I retired in 1979. I was in the F.B.I. from 1950 to 1979.
And I was in Washington, D.C. in the `60s, as a supervisor.
And then I became a chief inspector in the early `70s.
And from there I went to Memphis, Dallas and Los Angeles,
where I headed up those three offices.
 
JOHN STADTMILLER:
Okay. Very good.
Now, I understand that you can shed some light on the
incident [bombing] that happened in Oklahoma City.
 
KEN GUNDERSON:
Well, several days ago, I received a copy of the seismogram,
which is from the University of Oklahoma Geological 
Department, Norman, Oklahoma.  This seismogram shows that
there were two surface waves in the seismogram that was
being monitored by the University of Oklahoma. Of course,
they normally monitor for earthquakes. 
 
But I called this morning and talked to Dr. Ken Luza.
I asked him to read and interpret this seismogram for me.
He told me that there were two surface waves on the morning
of April the 19th. One was at 9:02 A.M. and 13 seconds,
and the other was at 9:02 A.M. and 23 seconds, ten 
milliseconds apart.
   [JD: Actually, ten seconds apart.]
I asked him what that means, and he said that this indicates 
that there were two detonations of a bomb, not one, as our
Government would like to have you believe. 
 
So, with that, I did a more little research, through some of 
my sources and contacts, and I came up with what I think is 
probably the bomb that was used. At least it appears to have
been the bomb, based on my research and my contacts.
 
It was not a fertilizer bomb [as the U.S. Government states].
There are too many reasons why it was not a fertilizer bomb.
The [actual] bomb is called an "electro-hydrodynamic gaseous fuel
device" -- a barometric bomb.  Now what that does ... it's
similar to the Army Blue-82 bomb, which is called the
"Daisy Cutter". The primary detonation sets up a cold [coal?]
cloud, a chemical cloud, which is energized with the electrostatic
voltage, and the second detonation produces an enhanced
explosion due to electrostatic microfronts.
 
I called the person (whom I happen to know) who developed this
bomb, and I relayed the information from the seismogram to him,
and pointed out to him that there were ten milliseconds [or is it
"seconds"? between explosions]. And he says that he is confident 
that that is the bomb that he invented, or that he developed.
 
Now, the bomb has a signature [such] that barometric pressure 
increases so rapidly and dramatically that it blows out the
windows in buildings within a two-to-three-block radius.
And, believe it or not, the bomb is the size of a pineapple.
 
Now, the reason that I do not believe, nor do my two
technicians believe (and I talked to two individuals on this)
that this was a fertilizer bomb is because there is not
enough "breisance" in an explosion of fertilizer to cause
the shock wave that destroyed that building.
 
JOHN STADTMILLER:
>From what I understand, with these blasts that we're talking
about, we're actually talking about frequencies. And with 
the [Government-declared] fertilizer bomb [story], they
[the Government] keep increasing the size of the bomb.
It started out being a thousand to fifteen hundred pounds. 
And now they're up to two tons of it.
But, even still, that type of blasting device is a low-yield,
low-frequency [device], not capable of doing the type of
damage that was witnessed upon that Federal Building.
 
KEN GUNDERSON:
You said it before I did, and that's exactly what I was
going to say next. And that is exactly what was said by
the technicians whom I had talked to.
                    (to be continued)
*    *    *    *    *    *    *    *    *    *    *    *    *
 
    I urge you to post the episodes of this ongoing series to other 
    newsgroups, computer networks, computer bulletin boards and 
    computer mailing lists.  It is also important to post hardcopies
    on the bulletin boards of campuses, churches, supermarkets,
    laundromats, etc. -- any place where this vital information may  
    be read by concerned citizens.  
    Our people's need for Paul Reveres and Ben Franklins is as urgent
    today as it was 220 years ago.
 
                         John DiNardo    
 
-----------------------------------------------------------------
     I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
  For information on how to receive the new Conspiracy Nation 
  Newsletter, send an e-mail message to bigxc@prairienet.org
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail 
address, send a message in the form "subscribe conspire My Name" 
to listproc@prairienet.org -- To cancel, send a message in the 
form "unsubscribe conspire" to listproc@prairienet.org
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et 
  pauperem.                    -- Liber Proverbiorum  XXXI: 8-9 

 Brian Francis Redman    bigxc@prairienet.org    "The Big C"
--------------------------------------------------------------
    Coming to you from Illinois -- "The Land of Skolnick"        
--------------------------------------------------------------


