  (5.67a/IDA-1.5 for conspire-post@firefly.prairienet.org); Sun, 2 Oct 1994 20:05:23 -0500
Subject: Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 2 Num. 33


              Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 2  Num. 33
             ======================================
                    ("Quid coniuratio est?")
 
 
-----------------------------------------------------------------
 
LAROUCHE LAPAROTOMY
 
A laparotomy is a surgical section of the abdominal wall. In this 
Conspiracy Nation we will try to get to the guts of just what is 
LaRouche about?
 
I read the LaRouche paper, *The New Federalist*, and it is like a 
mathematical puzzle. I *know* I can figure this guy out. So I 
have been puzzling over the LaRouche conundrum. No solution yet, 
but here is what I've got so far.
 
Tonight on *60 Minutes* they opened with a piece on the U.N. 
war crimes tribunal vis a vis Bosnia. According to the report, 
yes, the Serbs have been committing atrocities. For example, one 
man had his legs broken, then was forced to watch as Serb 
"soldiers" took turns raping his wife and daughter. Finally, 
after a few days, they killed the two women.
 
*But* *who* *are* *ya* *gonna* *believe*?? Remember the item they 
were telling us about Iraqi soldiers ripping babies out of 
incubators? That turns out to have been a lie. So when the "news 
fakers" constantly lie and mislead us, how can we know when they 
are telling us the truth? Who can you trust?
 
So LaRouche says that, yes, it's true. The Serbs committed (and 
are committing too, I guess) genocide. And personally I believe 
he's right on that. But I can't say for sure.
 
But then we have LaRouche saying that Bill Clinton is not such a 
bad guy -- it's the British that are spreading these stories 
about him. Yet other sources, that I respect, say otherwise. *So* 
*who* *are* *ya* *gonna* *believe*? Should I just "ask the 
experts"? But the "experts" say that Oswald acted alone and that 
there was no conspiracy! So how can I put my trust in them?
 
So the puzzle aspect: Regarding the Clinton labyrinth, to whit -- 
Yes, Clinton is a scumbag... No, it's a British plot... Yes... 
No... Yes... No... (It just goes round and round): I think it is 
inescapable that Clinton has done or been connected with 
outrageous lies, questionable financial practices, pathological 
sex, and drug abuse. I say it is inescapable because the 
alternative is that persons such as Paula Jones, Larry Nichols, 
Sally Perdue, Terry Reed, L.J. Davis, and so many others are all 
of them British inventions. What, are they all actors telling us 
stories!? I don't think so. I say that, *without* *a* *doubt*, 
there *is* something there.
 
So the question becomes: Yes, but why is the British controlled 
press telling us about it? In other words, LaRouche is saying 
that there is something sinister in the fact that the British 
controlled press is merely reporting on things THAT HAVE 
HAPPENED. We have got a basic choice here: Either the conspiracy 
is (a) that the British press *is* reporting about it, or the 
conspiracy is (b) that the American press is *not* reporting 
about it.
 
So let's have a poll of the readers. I ask that you respond by 
choosing one of the following:
 
    (a) -- The conspiracy is that the British press *is* 
    reporting about the Clinton scandals.
 
    (b) -- The conspiracy is that the American press *is* 
    *not* reporting about the Clinton scandals.
 
 
Yes, LaRouche is a real puzzle. So how does our own press handle 
it? They just throw mud. "Why think? Just throw mud," they say. 
So for example, the local paper has reported gravely that 
LaRouche is an "anti-Semite" and a "racist". That is outrageous! 
I'm not going to go into details, but if you have read LaRouche's 
stuff then you know that those charges are lies.
 
But why does LaRouche defend Clinton? That is the bottom line. We 
have got irrefutable evidence that this Clinton is close to being 
an abomination on the face of the earth; that this Clinton is a 
pullulation and a lie. (I refer doubters to past Conspiracy Nation 
and Conspiracy for the Day issues, covering the mind-boggling 
lack of the remnants of a conscience that Mr. Clinton exhibits. 
Does William Jefferson Clinton still belong to the family of man? 
I don't think so.) Yet LaRouche declares that Bill Clinton is 
"not so bad." So why oh why is LaRouche lying?
 
It is a puzzlement. Why does this sometimes brilliant man lie to 
us about Clinton? Somewhere in the weekly *New Federalist* 
newspaper that is put out by LaRouche and the herd there may be 
an answer. Somewhere from past the *Tales of the Venetian Doge*, 
near to *Nicholas of Cusa: Our Hero*, but not exceeding 
*Adventures on the Orient Express*, there might be an answer. Ah 
hah! Here's an item about "The Confederate Masonic Circle Behind 
Whitewater Judge Sentelle: The Untold Story" (*New Federalist*, 
Sept. 26, 1994). Hmmm... Seems that Chief Justice Rehnquist is 
entrusted with selection of a special 3-judge panel which in turn 
designates independent counsels. *And*, Rehnquist was confirmed 
as Chief Justice in 1986 with the assistance of none other than 
Strom Thurmond of *South Carolina*. *South* *Carolina* *is* *the* 
*site* *of* *the* *founding* *of* *the* *Southern* *Jurisdiction* 
*of* *the* *Scottish* *Rite* *of* *Freemasonry*. Oh my God!! It 
all fits in! And what is *more*, THURMOND IS A 33RD DEGREE MASON. 
Well of course! Thurmond also helped confirm David Sentelle's 
appointment to the above-mentioned special 3-judge panel and then 
Sentelle in turn was behind the replacement of Whitewater special 
counsel Fiske with Kenneth Starr. It all fits in, *not*.
 
But I haven't solved the riddle yet. I don't know why LaRouche is 
lying on this one. But he is lying.
 
This is not to say that I don't enjoy reading the LaRouche 
materials. But it's like I said before, with LaRouche you get 
extreme polarities. It is like the Bill Cosby joke about how 
everyone in his old neighborhood grew up "to be either killers or 
priests. That's it! There was no middle ground." With LaRouche 
you either get the press and their herd saying "anti-Semite", 
etc., or you get LaRouche and his herd saying, "Hail LaRouche!"
 
Meanwhile it's like I said -- *So* *who* *are* *ya* *gonna* 
*believe*??
 
-----------------------------------------------------------------
     I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail 
address, send a message in the form "subscribe conspire My Name" 
to listproc@prairienet.org -- To cancel, send a message in the 
form "unsubscribe conspire" to listproc@prairienet.org
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et 
  pauperem.                    -- Liber Proverbiorum  XXXI: 8-9 

 Brian Francis Redman    bigxc@prairienet.org    "The Big C"
--------------------------------------------------------------
"Justice" = "Just us" = "History is written by the assassins."
--------------------------------------------------------------

