From the Radio Free Michigan archives

ftp://141.209.3.26/pub/patriot

If you have any other files you'd like to contribute, e-mail them to
bj496@Cleveland.Freenet.Edu.
------------------------------------------------
BeastNet e-mail: BeastNet@farces.com        anonymous FTP: ftp.farces.com

BeastNet is a loosely affiliated private coalition of sovereign citizens
dedicated to fighting the Beast and its agents in all their manifestations.
BeastNet is an electronic champion for free speech, civil liberties and
Constitutional rights. BeastNet offers an open forum where information, opinion
and speculation about the nature and activities of The Beast can be freely
exchanged. BeastNet is privately funded by its members and receives no funding
or other support of any kind from government or corporate sources.

For more information on BeastNet or to join us in our battle against The Beast,
contact BeastNet via e-mail at: BeastNet@farces.com or via anonymous ftp at:
ftp.farces.com

=========================================================================

You've no doubt heard the rumors that there are massive concentration camps
under construction within the borders of the US. It makes for compelling
reading, but so far, there hasn't been too much hard evidence to back up
these claims. Below is an article (apparently written in 1979) that details
a number of ideas and theories behind the "concentration camp rumors." 

While there are some obvious holes in the logic of the article (not the least
of which is the collapse of communism in eastern Europe), it does offer some
valuable insight into a number of executive orders and "disaster" laws on
the books in the US and how they could be used in times of crisis to create
a fascist police state.

BeastNet has not independently verified any of the claims made in this article
and cannot support or advocate any of the specific theories espoused, but the
article is provided here to be judged on its own merits. 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------


Concentration Camp Plans for U.S. Citizens 

Supplied by Free Enterprise Society 300 W. Shaw Avenue Suite 205 Clovis, CA
93612 209/294-0665 Call for quantity discounts

Transcript of taped message concerning the implementation of a dictatorial
government in the United States.

A NATIONAL EMERGENCY: TOTAL TAKEOVER This is William R. Pabst. My address is
1434 West Alabama Street, Houston, Texas, 77006. My telephone number is: area
code 713/521-9896. This is my 1979 updated report on the concentration camp
program of the Department of Defense of the United States. On April 20, 1976,
after a rapid and thorough investigation, I filed suit on behalf of the People
of the United States against various personages that had a key part in a
conspiratorial program to do away with the United States as we know it. This is
a progress report to you, the plaintiffs, you the People of the United States.
The civil action number is 76-H-667. It is entitled, Complaint Against the
Concentration Camp Program of the Department of Defense. It was filed in the
U.S. District Court for southern district of Texas, Houston division. The judge
responsible for the case was Judge Carl Beau [phonetic spelling]. You have no
doubt heard the story: Once upon a time, under the Nazi regime in Germany, a man
worked on an assembly line in a baby carriage factory. His wife was going to
have a baby, but the Nazi government would not let anybody buy a baby carriage.
The man decided he would secretly collect one part from each department and
assemble the carriage himself. When this was done, he and his wife gathered up
the pieces and assembled it. When they were finished, they did not have a baby
carriage; they had a machine gun. And that is exactly the situation that I am
going to present to you at this time. The center for the Study for Democratic
Institutions recently completed a proposed constitution for the Newstates of
America. The Center is Rockefeller funded. To give you an indication of the
type of constitution proposed, the term national emergency is mentioned 134
times. The document did not have a Bill of Rights, and the right to own arms was
taken away. At the same time, House Concurrent Resolution #28 awaited for
calling a constitutional convention on or before July 4, 1976. The presiding
officer of such an event would have been Nelson Rockefeller, Vice President and
president pro tem of the Senate. This particular resolution awaited in
committee. Obviously money would not be spent on these massive programs unless
there would be the chance for the actual implementation of such a scheme.
However, in case the American people do not voluntarily adopt a new constitution
less troublesome to those who desire dictatorship, there is Executive Order
#11490, which will include its predecessors when it is site herein. The
Executive Order authorizes the secretaries of the various agencies to prepare
for any national emergency type situationincluding, but not limited to, those
specified in the Executive Order itself. If you read the Order, there is nothing
at all left to the imagination. For any conceivable pretext, a national
emergency may be declared based upon this frightening decree, dated October
1969. The Order itself was prefaced in March of 1969 by another Executive Order
which established the federal regions and their capitals. All the departments of
the government were involved, including the LEAA (Law Enforcement Assistance
Administration) and HEW (Health, Education and Welfare). Congressman Larry
McDonald has revealed to Congress that various guerilla and terrorist groups
were being financed by the federal government. If they (the terrorist groups)
actually began in search of activities, Executive Order #11490 would be
activated. But as mentioned previously, if you will read Executive Order #11490,
you will see that a national emergency may be declared for any conceivable
pretext whatsoever. If the Order itself were activated, here is what would
happen. The next day you and your family would be standing in front of your
local post office with your neighbors, the front doors bursting with block-long
lines of people waiting to be registered. After waiting in line with your family
for hours, you finally get channeled through the doors. Once inside, you
overhear the postal clerk with his sidearm on telling a frightened registrant,
Look, there is nothing I can do. The truck behind the building will take you to
a work camp where you have been assigned. Your wife has been assigned to a
factory and theres nothing I can do. Then your son or daughter looks up at you
with a quivering voice and asks, Dad, why are we here?


IMPLEMENTING THE NEW GOVERNMENT Well, you see theres much more to life in a
free country than paying your mortgage. You have to be aware of what is going
on and act accordingly and participate in government; that is, get involved.
Examine the organization chart on Executive Order #11490 to discover how we have
all helped finance (through our tax dollars) the mechanics of the overthrow of
our Constitution. Executive Order #11490 designates certain authorities to the
Office of Preparednesswhich in turn designates authority to the various
departments of the federal government. If the Order were implemented, the Post
Office Department would be responsible for a national registration. The State
Department would be responsible for the protection of the United Nations
personnel or property and prevention of escape from the United States. The
Department of Defense would be responsible for its expropriation of industry;
direction of service and national production systems; control of censorship; and
communication expropriation of non-industrial facilities. The Commerce
Department would be responsible for expropriation, selection and international
distribution of commodities (which would be the actual looting of the United
States), census information and human resources. The Treasury Department would
be responsible for collection of cash and non-cash items and the recreation of
evidence of assets and liabilities. The Justice Department would have concurrent
responsibility with the Department of State for prevention of escape from the
U.S.; for replenishing the stockpile of narcotics; for a national police force;
for correctional and penal institutions; for mass feeding and housing of
prisoners; and for use of prisoners to augment manpowerwhich would be slave
labor. The Federal Bank (which is not a FEDERAL bank would be responsible for
regulation of withdrawal of currency. The GSA (General Services Administration)
would be responsible for confiscation of private property for government use.
HEW would be responsible for nationalization of education (which the Department
of Education has already done), health services, hospitals and mental
institutions. The Labor Department would be responsible for recruiting manpower,
referring manpower, and allocating manpower so each particular person that was
registered at hte post office in this national registration would be told where
he (or she) was going to work. HUD (Housing & Urban Development) woudl be
responsible for transfer of persons to temporary or permanent housing in
regional emergency planning and cooperation. The Transportation Department is
responsible for emergency enforcement and control and movement of passengers and
the emergency operation of the Alaskan railroad. There are two specific agencies
here that we need to look at and to keep in mind. They are: HEW and the Justice
(Department), as those two agencies are related to the Department of Defense.
The various military departments are part of the Department of Defense. Under
it, we have the Secretary of Army, Chief of Staff, Deputy Chief of Staff of
Personnel and law enforcement, U.S. Armys forces command, and continental Army
Reserve & National Guard. And under that we have the four armies dividing up the
Untied States. Under the FIfth Army we have the provost marshal, who is directly
connected to the Deputy Chief of Staff for law enforcement personnel. Under the
provost marshal for the Fifth Army we have the 300 Military Police
Prisoner-of-War (POW) Command at Lebonia, Michigan. At this point I quote from
retired Admiral Elmo Zumoffs [phonetic spelling] book, On Watch: Kissinger
states, I believe the American people lack the will to do the things necessary
to achieve parity and to maintain maritime superiority. I believe we must get
the best deal we can in our negotiations before the United States and the
Soviets both perceive these changes and the balance that occurs. When these
perceptions are in agreement, and both sides know the U.S. is inferior, we must
have gotten the best deal we can. Americans at that time will not be happy that
I have settled for second, but it will be too late. Zumoff said, Then why not
take it to the American people? They will not accept the decision to become
second best while we are in a position of Gross National Product twice that of
the USSR. Kissinger responds, Thats a question of judgement. I judge that we
will not get their support, and if we seek it and tell the fact as we would have
to, we would lose our negotiating leverage with the Soviets. Zumoff stated,
But isnt that the ultimate immorality in a democracy; to make a decision for
the people of such importance without consulting them? Kissinger stated,
Perhaps, but I doubt that there are one million who could even understand the
issue. Zumoff responded, Even if that presumption is correct, those one
million can influence the opinions of the majority of the people. I believe it
is my duty to take the other course. Kissinger responded, You should take
care, lest your words result in a reduction in the Navy budget. So we see what
the intention of the State Department is regarding the People. Another fact: On
December 30, 1975, the California National Guard announced in a press release
(which I have) that the states Military Police battalions were organized and
trained to provide immediate response to virtually every civil and man-made
disaster, as well as to assist law enforcement officers in emergency situations;
to carry out their law enforcement as well as their military mission. When I
asked four of the defendants in this case for their mission statement they did
not provide italthough they say it is public information. The training spoken
of for the California National Guard covers such subjects as dealing with
individual civilians/civil population, detention procedures, citizens rights,
and similar matters. And you know as well as I do that when there is Martial
Law, or Martial Rule, citizens have no rightsbecause the Constitution is
pre-empted. Even the uniforms of the National Guards who participate in this
program are different from the regular uniforms. But the Los Angeles Sheriffs
Department paramilitary units, who have received this training also, have army
fatigues died black for their uniforms. A further fact is the disaster
preparedness plan for the Marine Corp Supply Center in Barstow, California.
Quoting from the document: Under the Constitution and the laws of the United
States, the preservation of law and order is the responsibility of local and
state government. And the authority to maintain the peace and enforce the law is
invested in the authorities of those governmentts. There are specific
exceptions to the above concept. One of these pertains to federal intervention
to civil disturbances in certain situations. Military commanders are deemed to
have the inherent authority to take any measure reasonably necessary for the
protection of life and property in the event o fa sudden unexpected public
calamity which disrupts the normal process of government and presents an
emergency so eminent as to make it dangerous to await instructions from
appropriate authorities. This includes law enforcement duties. The manual
mentions something called Garden Plot Forces, which we will discuss at length
in a few minutes. Don Bell (who writes a weekly report) reported on July 25,
1975 that in May of 1975 the 303 Civil Affairs group of the U.S. Army Reserves
in Kearny, New Jersey, conducted an exercise to sharpen plans for a military
takeover of the state government in New Jersey. According to Colonel Frances
Clark, they had conducted similar studies on how to seize municipal and county
government over the past few years. But this was the first time they had studies
state government. Such units were trained during World War II to operate
captured governments in the foreign. We never had federal troops training to
take over governments in the United States. When local violence or catastrophe
struck, the National Guardunder command of the governorwent into action. This
is definitely not the situation at this time 



CONTROLLING THE MASSES On February 16, 1975, in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune
it was reported that the LEAA (funded by the Department of Justice) and the
Police Foundation (funded by the Ford Foundation) are prime movers toward
implementing a national police force. Each, however, contends they support local
police agencies. The total program involves military units that have the
function of taking over the administration of local nad state governments. That
program is Operation Cable Splicerby Army civil affairs groups, a sub-plan of
Operation Garden Plot (the Martial Law program). The method by which the
national police concept is being presented to the public has changed. It was
first disguised under the cover of protection against civil disturbances. This
program was as follows: A) Keep the people from gathering in the streets. B)
Isolate and neutralize the revolutions leadership. C) Dispersal of crowds and
demonstrators. This is followed by successful prosecution in order to: 1)
Validate the action of the police; 2) Denying the arrestees propaganda
materials; and 3) Denying them the opportunity to recover money damages against
the police for arresting them. Let me quote for you the scenario which was
developed for Cable Splicer One, Two and Three to justify the needs for dealing
with civil disturbances: Phase Onean arrest and shooting provoke crowd unrest
and threats against public officials and a riot begins for form; Phase
Twopolice vehicles are ambushed, various attempted assassinations of public
officials occur, destruction and raiding of armories occur, and thousands of
people begin to gather and local police lose control; Phase Threeincreased
movement of rioters and the crowds must be dispersed before they become
sympathetic with the rioters. The National Guard and the local police lose
control. This scenario provides for an orderly transition from state to federal
control. The Deputy Attorney General of California commented at a Cable Splicer
Three conference, that anyone who attacks the Stateeven verballybecomes a
revolutionary and an enemy by definition. They are the enemy and must be
destroyed. This program was taught in almost every state west of the Mississippi
River and included as participants local active military, reserve military and
civilian police. The course name was Civil Emergency Management Course. The
official explanation that was to be given if any questions were asked about the
program was: This activity is a continuous, joint law enforcement-military
liaison effort and a continuation of coordination established last year. In
1976, the Oakland Tribune carried the most complete explanation of what is
planned. It is reported in its entirety in the National Chronicle which added an
analysis to the story. (The Oakland Tribunes editor died suddenly after the
story was published.) And I quote: Last Saturday the California National Guard
unveiled a new Law Enforcement Assistance ForceLEAF, a specially trained and
outfitted Military Police Unit, whose members will serve as shock-troops in the
states war against political protesters and demonstrators. I saw a full-dress
exhibition of what the California National Guard has planned for the next
American revolution. Helicopters, SWAT teams, civilian military policemen in
jack boots and helmets, twelve-guage shotguns, .38 and .45 caliber pistols,
radios, walkie talkies, and electrically-controlled intelligence centers wired
for instant communications with any police force in the state. LEAF is a 1,000
member unit put together this year to handle unique law enforcement problems
such as mass civil disobedience, protest demonstrations and riots. In other
words, breaking heads and taking names. LEAF has the support of Governor Brown,
a quarter-million dollars worth of grants from the federal government, and no
public opposition from civil liberties groups. For all its ineptitude, however,
LEAF has a frightening possibility from a civil liberty standpoint. It is a
direct product of the California Cable Splicer conferencesa series of
high-level secret meetings between government officials, law enforcement
officers and military planners held during the late 60s and early 70s. The
meetings were held as late as 1975 so far, as many public records show. These
were the conferences which Counter-Spy magazine had identified as Californias
Garden Plot Sub-plan. Gary DavisGovernor Browns right-hand mansays LEAF is
to assist civil police, not to replace them. Gary says, Civilians could expect
a civilian type law enforcement rather than what is commonly known as Martial
Law. Despite this assurance, LEAFs exercises look disturbingly like the
military coup described in the novel, Seven Days in May. LEAF soldiers with
nightsticks stood at intersections, stopping cars with suspicious occupants,
checking ID cards and generally intimidating onlookers with their SWAT-style
uniforms, their sidearms and helmets. Perhaps more ominously, several
participants in the role-playing exercises Saturday admitted that even under
simulated pressure there have already been a number of incidents where the LEAF
troops used excessive force to quell disturbanceseven though their orders
forbade it. (That ends the quotation.) Former LEAA administrator, Charles Ross
Dovan [phonetic spelling], is on record as having stated that local law
enforcement has failed and must be replaced by a national police force. Patrick
Murphy, the administrator of the Police Foundation, states, I have no fear of a
national police force. Our 40,000 police departments are not sacred.
Ex-Attorney General William Saxby warned that if we can go on as we are, crime
will invade us and the national police will take over. For the policemen who do
not cooperate and still want to be policemen, there is a program of Contemporary
Research, Inc.an organization of psychologists, sociologists, education
specialists and economic expertswho work toward a solution of many of todays
social problems. The same organization develops specialized computer programming
for the new world-wide military command and control system, as well as computer
base systems for law enforcement agencies at all levels of government. The LEAA
alone will receive over a billion dollars a year over the next four yearseven
though it has been ineffective against crime. This is because the LEAA is not
geared to fighting crime; its geared to developing a system for takeover of the
United Styates with the assistance of the Department of Defense.

THE PLANNED POLICE STATE One of the programs the LEAA works on in its fight
against crime is psycho-surgery. If you dont cooperate with their programs, you
are merely operated on so that you will be as cooperative as an adding machine.
Or, the LEAA supports drug research for the same purposeto neurological sources
violence. Hence, as an example, if a law were passed whereby the ownership of
firearms was declared to be illegal, you would be placed in one of these
programs if you did not cooperate. The LEAA control exercise (at the states
level) is from the Office of Criminal Justice Planning of the Governors Office.
Here in Texas, Mr. Robert C. Klowers is still the executive director in that
office. But all states have that particular department. In May, 1975, the LEAA
Newsletter describes the function of one of its organizations: the National
Institute of Law Enforcement & Criminal Justice. This organization funds
something called the United Nations Clearinghouse in Rome, Italy. The function
of that organization is, among other things, the exchange of Criminal Justice
System information with the Soviet Union. And it goes without saying that we
have nothing to learn from the Criminal Justice System of the Soviet Union.
These incredible projects are being funded with our tax dollars. The code name
for these projects are: Garden Plot and Cable Splicer. Garden Plot is the
program to control the population. Cable Splicer is the program for an orderly
takeover of the  state and local governments by the federal government. An
investigation was completed in November, 1975, by four sources: The conservative
publication American Challenge, the leftist New Times, the foundation-financed
Fund for Investigative Journalism, and Don Wood of the trustworthy Ozark
Sunbeam. It involves the potential creation of a Police State through the use of
the Pentagon and its computerized intelligence dossier (lodged in the Pentagon
basement) of thousands of citizens by the National Guard, state and local police
departments, the LEAA, plainclothes military forces, SWAT teams and the
Department of Justice. Brigadier General J. L. Julienit [phonetic spelling],
senior Army officer of the Pentagon National Guard Bureau, has admitted, I know
of no state that did not have some form of these exercises within the last
year. Today the Cable Splicer handbook is composed of six loose-leaf three-ring
binders that are merely an outline for the impending takeover and destruction of
our Constitution. The Sixth Army used the term Cable Splicer for the name of
the operation, but it is not revealed the name of the operation in the other
military areas within the U.S. On page four, paragraph ten on Public
Information, the instructions state: As a means to prevent adverse publicity or
misleading psychological effects in regard to coordinating, planning, and
conducting this exercise, all military participants involved will perform such
duties in civilian clothing when exercise oriented activities are conducted at
lwa enforcement facilities. In the event inquireies are received regarding this
exercise, the response should be limited to identifiying the activity as a
continuous, joint law enforcement-military liaison effort for a continuation of
coordination established last year. On page six, security guidance is explained
to the effect that if anybody asks any questions, limit the information that is
given out on the basis of it being in the interest of national interest
(security). Now, in the festivities celebrating the success of completion of the
exercises, Attorney General Stanly R. Larsen, the commanding general of the
Sixth Army, stated, The most serious challenge facing all of us will be the
challenge of discharging our legitimate responsibilities. For a significant
portion of a society at large is likely to regard us with suspicion and to
question, even challenge our authority on the basic assumption of our
profession. Part of this challenge we must be prepared to deal with; a
potentially dangerous portion of our society which, in truth, could well become
the domestic enemy. The manual includes instructions on operation of
confinement facilities, handling and processing prisonersincluding searching,
transporting, feeding, housing and handling of the special class of persons
called detainees. The plan also specifically includes a proposition for the
confiscation of privately-owned weapons and ammunition.

FILES ON POTENTIAL PRISONERS The Army has over 350 separate record centers
containing substantial information on civilian-political activities. Virtually
every major Army unit has its own set aside from this. The Fifth Army of San
Antonio has over 100,000 files of its own. The overall operation command post is
a domestic room at the Pentagon. There are 25 million cards on individuals and
760,000 on organizations held by the Defense Central Index of investigations
alone. And this information includes political, sociological, economic and
psychological profiles. All this type of information on 25 million Americans.
Since 1970, local, county and state police forces all over the country have
undertaken crash programs to install various kinds of computerized information
systems. A large portion of this is being paid for by the LEAA. Beginning in
1970, Congress and the Joint Chiefs of Staff ordered the destruction of all
these data banks, but they were not destroyed. All the outlawed collection is
now located at Mt. Weather, Clark County, West Virginia and similar Pentagon
facilities designed as adjuncts to the presidents emergency powers under the
Executive Orders. The cadre of specialized persons to enforce this plan are
found in the U.S. Army Reserves-Military Police POW Command at Lebonia,
Michigan. Mr. Fenren [phonetic spelling] of the 300th Military Police POW
Command at Lebonia told me, when I called him from the Federal Information
Center at Houston, that the camps in the Command were for foreign
prisoners-of-war and for enemies of the United States. I asked him if enemies
of the United States included U.S. citizens. He became angry, wouldnt deny it,
and referred me to a very sinister individual at the Army Reserve facility here
at Houston who I talked to; who explained to me that the prisoners were called
inventory and internees. He would not deny that the camps were for U.S.
citizens. I called the Pentagon, spoke with the defendant there, and then with
the provost marshal for the Fifth Army, and do you know what? Not one of these
persons would deny that the system was for U.S. citizens. The provost marshal
for the Fifth Armywhen I mentioned the names of all the camp sitessaid, Well
at least youve got that right. The names of the detention facilities that I
gave him were a list that I had acquired from the Ozark Sunbeam. That list of
names was the same list of facilities designated under the old Detention Act of
1950 as emergency detention centers. But there is only one problem: That act
was supposed to have been repealed in 1971. After some research, I found out
what the problem was. One Congressmanwhen the hearings were held for the repeal
of the Emergency Detention Actmentioned that there are 17 other bits of law
that provided for the same thing. So it didnt matter whether they ever repealed
the Emergency Detention Act. The public was in fact tricked by the Congress of
the United States! Here the designated sites: Tucked away in the Appalachian
Mountains of central Pennsylvania is a bustling town of approximately 10,000
people. Fifteen to twenty years ago it was a sleepy village of 400. Allanwood,
Pennsylvania, is linked to New York City by Interstate U.S. 80. It takes up
approximately 400 acres and is surrounded by a 10-foot barbed-wire fence. It now
holds approximately 300 minimum security prisoners to keep in shape. It could
hold 12,000 people from one day to the next. Thirty miles from Oklahoma City on
U.S. 66 is El Reno, Oklahoma, with an approximate population of 12,000. Due
west, six miles from town, almost in sight of U.S. 66, is a complex of buildings
which could pass for a small school. However, the facility is overshadowed by a
guard house which appears to be something like an airport control towerexcept
that its manned by vigilant, uniformed guard. This is a federal prison camp or
detention center. These camps are all located near super-highways or near
railroad tracks or both. The federal prison camp at Florence, Arizona, could
hold 3,500 prisoners. It is presently kept in condition by approximately 400
legally convicted prisoners. Wickenburg, Arizona, is famous for its municipal
airport, which was once government-owned. It is now occupied by a private party.
It is rumored to be capable of being taken back by the federal government
without notice. Now there are a couple other of these facilities which are
probably existing under the same arrangements. This particular rumor of instant
taking back without notice has existed for about nine or ten years. The only way
it can actually be established is by looking at the local contract for the
Wickenberg Municipal Airport itself and the parties that have possession of it.
As I mentioned previously, these names were ratified by the provost marshal of
the Fifth Army, who is in charge of the 300th Military Police POW Command. He is
the one who verified them. He said, as I mentioned before, Well, at least
youve got that right. Some of the locations are: Tool Lake in Californianow
in private hands. It can be retaken without notice. Some of the others: We have
Mill Point, West Virginia. I couldnt find a thing on Mill POint, West Virginia,
but in that area we have all kinds of prisons. Among them are: Alderson, West
Virginia, a womans federal reformatory; Lewisburg, West Virginia, a federal
prison; Greenville, South Carolina in Greenville County is now occupied by the
State Youthful Offenders Division. Even that is a mystery to the people of that
area. At Montgomery, Alabama, we have a federal civilian prison camp at Maxwell
Air Force Base. Now does that sound right? Theres one at Tucson, Arizona, David
Munson Air Base. In Alaska we have Elmendorf at Eielson Air Force Base. And that
brings us to a facility in Florida called Avon Park, Florida. I sent a
representative to see what was at Avon Park, Florida. He found the Avon Park
Bombing and Gunnery Range, which is also listed as the Avon Park Correctional
Institute. No one is permitted because it is a bombing and gunnery range. This
was one of the places ratified by the provost marshal of the Fifth Army. In
1976, as well as on March 20, 1979, I went to the Sheriffs Department in
Houston to see if our local Sheriffs Department had been infiltrated by these
plans. Well, it appears so. I was put in contact with a Lt. Kiljan [phonetic
spelling] who was in charge of some secret unit in the department. I asked him
if he had participated in military training or in training with military
personnel here in the Sheriffs Department. He denied it, and when I asked him
if he would testify so under oath he became angry and stated, You are just an
ordinary citizen. I dont have to tell you anything. I later discovered that
Lt. Kiljan is the ex-director of the Houston branch office of the U.S. Secret
Service. Now, where does his money come from? The area is administrated by the
Houston-Galveston Area Council. In this regional-government plan, each federal
region is divided into state clearing houses, and each state clearing house is
divided into area clearing houses. And for our area we have the
Houston-Galveston Area Council. It serves as a conduit for federal funds in two
major areas: LEAA and HEW. Most everybody thinks this organization (the
Houston-Galveston Area Council) is for the development of the areathe
geographical area here in Houston. But it is not. It is for the development of
LEAA and HEW projects. Now, this finds its counterpart in every community across
the U.S. It provides for these agencies a liaison for intergovernmental
communications, interaction and coordination.

MENTAL COOPERATION IN TAKEOVER PLANS I examined their projects to see what they
were doing. This regional-government program distributes federal funds for two
major purposes: 1) Radio hookups between every police agency in the state to
Fort San Houston, and: 2) Mental health programs, including programs for the
mentally ill having priority of beds and hospitals. Another interesting fact to
consider is that in the Pine Bluff Arkansas Arsenal B-Z is stored. Its a
nerve gas which creates sleepiness, dizziness, stupor and the incapacity to move
about. According to the Associated Press, the agent can be sprayed by aerosol,
injected or sprayed over large areas by a bomb. The Military has admitted that
one potential use of the gas is for civilian control. So whatever is planned,
theyve also planned a way for you to go to your destination in a tranquil state
of mind. HEW, by law, is operated in conjunction with the United Nations through
the World Health Organization. Back in 1948, the International Congress on
Mental Healtha U.N. organizationdeclared in its pamphlet, Mental Health and
World Citizenship, that prejudice, hostility or excessive nationalism may
become deeply imbedded in the developing personality without awareness on part
of the individual concerned. In order to be effective. efforts of changing
individuals must be appropriate to the successive stages of the unfolding
personality. While in a case of a group of society, change will be strongly
resisted unless and attitude of acceptance has first been engendered.
Principles of mental health cannon be successfully furthered in any society
unless there is progressive acceptance of the concept of world citizenship, the
document states. Programs for social change to be effective require a joint
effort of psychiatrists and social scientists, working together in cooperation
with statesmen, administrators and others in positions of responsibility. The
three phases of the development are: 1) Mental hospitals for segregation, care
and protection of persons of unsound minds; 2) Community Mental Health Care
Centers, so that persons may be treated in their own neighborhood; 3) Child Care
Centers for dealing with early difficulties of nationalism in a childs life.
Two years earlier, Major General G.B. Chisholm, Deputy Minister of Health in
Canadawho later became director of the United Nations World Health
Organizationexplained, Self defense may involve a neurotic reaction when it
means defending ones own excessive material wealth from others who are in great
need. This attitude leads to war  So his solution to the problem is: Lets
redistribute the wealth among everyone. Further, the reinterpretation and
eventual eradication of the individuals concept of right and wrongwhich has
been the basis of child trainingare the belated objectives of practically all
effective psychotherapies. Now if we digress even further, to Buria [phonetic
spelling], the director of the Soviet Secret Police in the 1930s, we see he
explained the communist political strategy through the use of mental healings
of psychiatry: Psycho-politics is the art and science of asserting and of
maintaining a dominion over the thoughts and loyalties of individuals, officers,
bureaus and masses, and the effecting of the conquest of enemy nations through
mental healing. You must work, he stated, until every teacher of psychology
unknowingly or knowingly teaches only communistic doctrine under the guise of
psychology. If you look at the Russian manual of instruction of
psycho-political warfare, we see in chapter 9, Psycho-political operations
should at all times be alert to the opportunities to organize for the betterment
of the community mental health centers. Now, under the new national Mental
Health program at this moment there are more than 600 of these community mental
health centers across the United States. The whole thing was promoted by Dr.
Stanly F. Yoles [phonetic spelling], who was the director of the National
Institute of Mental Health in 1969. And he stated back then, that the newest
trend in treating mental illness is care at local health care centers where the
patient is not isolated form his (or her) family and friends. They have been
working on this program for 46 years publicly, and now across the U.S.through
your tax dollarsyou have 603 centers (to be exact); Community Health Centers
that are all part of this program. And this is how they are part of the program.
(It has already happened): In the mid-1950s, there were set into motion an
interesting chain of events. About 1956 the Alaska Mental Health Bill was
proposed and later passed. It granted approximately $12 million and one million
acres of public land to Alaska so that it could develop its own mental health
program. Now this was a little abnormal since Alaska only had a little over 400
people who were classified as mentally ill! After the bill was passed, Alaska
passed its own enabling legislation to get into the mental health business. They
started by adopting the essential elements of the Publis Health Service Draft
Act on the hospitalization of the mentally ill in the old Interstate Compact on
Mental Healthnow called the Uniform Mental Health Act. There were no
provisions for jury trial in it or anything else. You would just be picked up
and taken to the Alaskan-Siberian Asylumincommunicadoand the state would also
confiscate all of your personal and real property! And they actually tried to do
it in 1954 in the case of Ford vs. Milinak [phonetic spelling], which declared
the act as adopted in another state (the state of Missouri) as unconstitutional.
But the act itself still existsand modifiedbut essentially in the same form,
the Uniform Mental Health Act, to which approximately six states subscribe. And
in passing most State Constitutionsif you will check them from the period of
1935made a part of their constitution the practice of having a person submit to
a 90-day mental examination to determine his (or her) sanity, without any
provisions for a trial by jury. This was part of the national program at that
time. In this act, the governor could have anyone picked up and sent to the
Mental Health Institution in Alaska or elsewhere. The results as rumors back in
the 50s, were that there was in fact a sinister, Frankenstein-type mental
health prison in Alaska. I wrote to Alaska (the officials, that is) and asked
them for a description of the land of one million acres that they were eligible
to receive under the Alaska Mental Health Act. And I also asked them for a copy
of the inventory they ran for their facilities back at the same time. Well, so
far no answer. And probably, I will never receive an answer without a court
order. But through the years, there was a spot in Alaska that was continually
referred to: Southeast of Fairbanks; southwest of Fairbanks; northwest of
Fairbanks; somewhere near Fairbanks. Then I received information that a pilot
had flown over the area once and had had his license revoked. And so, for $1.85
each, I ordered the low-level navigation maps from the federal government for
Alaska and located the Alaskan-Siberian Asylum for the treatment of enemies of
the United States. Its right where rumor over the past twenty years had placed
it: Southwest of Fairbanks. It stands out like a sore thumb! Its the only one
of that geometric configuration within the state of Alaska, and you will note a
black line running up through Fairbanks and down over near that area of the map.
That is the railroad that the Department of Transportation would take the
emergency operation of, under the Executive Orderif the Executive Order went
into effect. And HEW would be responsible for making a determination of whether
or not you were mentally disturbed because of your nationalistic tendencies,
your love for the United States, or your adherence to any political or religious
doctrine. But lets look a little further into the type of program that the LEAA
is paying for through the Department of Justice. The Federal Bureau of
Prisonslocated in the backwoods of North Carolina, near a tiny village called
Butneris constructing a mammoth 42 acre research complex for prisoners from
throughout the East. Who will be sent for experiments to test the new behavioral
programs and techniques? Target date for completion of the entire system is
ironically 1984. And so, theyre using right now, under the LEAA program,
something called anectine [phonetic spelling]. Punishment for troublesome
behavior within the prison is being done by drugs and shock, likely to be the
most selected examples of programs that have made use of anectinea derivative
of South American curari. Anectine was originally used as a beginning factor to
electro-convulsive shock. Such shocks applied to the head are so strong they can
break and graze bones under the strain of resulting muscle contractions. Since
anectine paralyzed the muscles without dampening consciousness or the ability to
feel pain, by first injecting the inmates with it, researchers can turn up the
voltage as high as they want without cracking the inmates skeleton when his
body is thrown into convulsions by the jolt. What the anectine does, in short,
is to simulate death within 30 to 40 seconds of injection. It brings on
paralysis first, with the small rapidly moving muscles in the nose, fingers and
eyes, and then in the diaphragm and the cardiovascular system. As a result, the
patient cannot move or breath and yet remains fully conscious, as though
drowning and dying. This is from the 1974 publication, Human Behavior.

THE PEOPLE VS. THE CONSPIRATORS The federal government answered my suit in June
(1976) by filing an unsworn general denial of everything I had alleged. I spoke
with the assistant U.S. Attorney in charge of the case and asked him if he had
gone to the trouble to call any of the parties mentioned in the suitssince I
had provided not only the addresses, but thier telephone numbers to provide a
faster means of investigation. He said he had not. He had not even done a
minimal amount of investigation of the case, but yet he filed a denial of my
allegations. I filed a motion in the mean time to take the deposition of the
person who writes the training programs for the concentration camp guards, Mr.
Richard Burragethe 75th Maneouver Air Command at Army Reserve Center at
Houston, Texasstating that in light of all the recent activity of government
agents, one of the agencies involved might attempt to murder this key witness,
the author of the training camp program. The federal judge denied my motion,
stating that I had not quoted enough cases to him justifying my request.
However, he was also aware as that there were no cases existing on this set of
facts, but as you will see as I go along with this report, he chose to ignore
it. I then made an agreement with the assistant U.S. Attorney to take the
deposition to Mr. Burrae. After I made the arrangements, the U.S. Attorney
refused to voluntarily go along with taking the deposition. It is very difficult
to find justice in our system of courts, which usually practiced by the buddy
system, hence the court rules are overlooked or not followed. On July 20, a
hearing was held at the magistrate of Norman Black, U.S. District Court in
Houston. The courtroom was completely filed with spectators. And although the
news media had been contacted, no representatives of the press were there. There
is a news media blackout on this matter here in Houston. Brief oral arguments
were presented. The U.S. Attorney explained that I was not the proper person to
bring the suit because, although the free exercise of my constitutional rights
was threatened by the concentration camp program I alleged, it did not
constitute my injury. The magistrate was impressed with the information I had
thus far collected and stated that he would bring it to the attention of the
federal judge. The U.S. Attorney tried to have my investigation of the case
halted, but the magistrate would not go along that far with a pre-arranged
decision. As an additional indication of what I was up against, the original
hearing was scheduled for 10:30 in the morning. However, the U.S. Attorney had
secretly had the time changed to 2:30 in the afternoon. The magistrate gave the
U.S. Attorney permission to file for motion to dismiss becasue he felt that the
concentration camp programto be used for persons who exercise their freedom of
speechdid not present any injury. Now, on July 23, I had placed in the Houson
Post and in the Houston Chronicle newspapers the following advertisement in the
legal section. Quote: Solicitation for witnesses in Civil Action 78-H-667,
Federal District Court of Houston, People extemporal William Pabst vs. Gerald
Ford et. al. The action titled: Complaint Against the Concentration Camp Program
of the Dept. of Defense. Attention: If you have participated in Operation Garden
Plot, Operation Cable Splicer, the 300th Military Police Prisoner of War
Command, or the Army Reserve Civil Affairs group, you may be involved in a
program that needs to be disclosed for this suit. To give your testimony call or
write; (and here I placed my name, address and telephone number). As I
previously mentioned, there is a news media blackout on the story here in
Houston. Both newspapers refused to carry the ad. First, at the Houston Post, I
had to threaten them with a law suit to carry out the ad, even though I was
paying for it. And then at the Chronicle, I had to meet with the president and
various vice presidents becasue a refusal from that paper had come from their
own lawyers. Both newspapers finally carried it, but only after two days of
complaining. The inital response of both papers was We dont carry stories like
that and Dont you think that the people planning the concentration camps have
our best interests in mind? As you will hear for yourselves, the policies
definitely do not reflect our best interests. 

The next event that occured was that the U.S. Attorney filed a Statement of
Authority, showing the reasons that he could find why I should not be allowed to
take depositions to get more information from the person who was writing the
concentration camp guard training program. However, his brief was completely
filed with misquotes of the law from many cases. Hed mention the case and then
invent whatever the case should say. In my brief to the court at this point, I
notified the judge of the violation of the law requiring honesty in such
matters. But the notificaiton was ignored by the judge, who apparently
sanctioned this most dishonest of acts commonly known as quoting out of
context.

THE GENEVA CONVENTION My brief was filed on August 27. On August 31, formal
arguments were set. The new courtroom of the magistrate was almost filled again.
However, no one from the news media showed up for this hearing either. The few
who were contacted had been told not to go; they would lose their jobs. At the
hearing I introduced evidence that heretofore had never been introduced in any
court of law in the U.S. The U.S. Attorney had denied, you will remember,
everything in my suit without so much as even a tiny investigation. So I
introduced him to evidence the following letter from the Department of the Army,
Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff of Personnel, signed by; 1B Sergeant,
Colonel G.S., Acting Director of Human Resources Development. Quoting: On
behalf of President Ford, I am replying to your letter 27 May, 1976, regarding a
news article in the Dallas Morning News. As much as he would like to, the
president cannot reply personally to every communication he receives. Therefore,
he has asked the departments and agencies of the federal government in those
instances where they have special knowledge or special authority underlogued.
For this reason your communication was forwarded to officials of the Department
of Defense. Within the Department of Defense, the Army is responsible for
custody and treatment of enemy prisoners of war and civilian internees as
defined under terms of the Geneva Convention of 1949. Therefore, the Army is
prepared to detain prisoners of war and detainees as defined in Article IV of
the 1949 Geneva Convention relative to the treatment of prisoners of war and
protection of civilian persons. It is U.S. policy that its Armed Forces adhere
to the provisions of international law to set the example for other countries of
the world to follow and respecting the rights and dignity of those who become
victim of international conflict. It should be noted that the Army program is
designed for implementation during conditions of war between the U.S. and one or
more foreign countries. The Army had no plans nor does it maintain detention
camps to imprison American citizens during domestic crises. The problem with
this letter is that its not true, and thats what Im going to discuss at this
point. First of all, in verifying the authenticity of the claims in the letter,
I checked the Geneva text. There is no article in the Geneva Convention entitled
as the letter states. There is, however, on each of the classifications;
Protection of War Victims/Civilian Persons: and a separate article on
Prisoners of War. That was the first discrepancy. Then I turned to Article IV
of the Geneva Convention. That article did not set up any requirements or
authorizations for military units of any type and does not even suggest it.
Hence, the second discrepancy. The next problem with the letter from President
Fords representative is that it states that the prisoner of war guard program
is set up for the implemenation for conditions of war between the U.S. and one
or more (foreign) countries. However, Article III of the Geneva Convention
reads that the treaty applies to (and I am quoting): In case of an armed
conflict, not of an international character, occurring within the territory of
one of the high contracting parties. Obviously an armed conflict occurring
within ones own territory did not mean between one or more of the parties to
the treaty, especially if only one is involved. Now, the examples of this type
of conflict are: civil ware, armed insurgency and guerilla activities. In other
words, theyre speaking of a domestic conflict. An even more shocking item is
found in the last pages of the 1949 Geneva Convention under Protection of War
Victims/Civilian Persons. You will find the index card, the identification
card, forms to be sued to writing your family, and everything necessary for the
administration of a concentration camp is contained in this treaty that the U.S.
signed and ratified. Further, if there is a conflict in the U.S. involving only
the U.S. this convention or treaty can go into operationwhich includes the
procedures for setting up the concentration camps. Article LXVIII of the
Convention states (and I paraphrase): If you commit an offense that is soley
intended to harm the occupying power, not harming the life or limb of members of
the occupying power, but merely talking against such a forcesuch as the Martial
Law situationyou can be imprisoned provided that the duration of such
imprisonment is proportionate to the offense committed. Well, President Dwight
Eisenhower didnt feel that provision was strong enough. So he had the following
additions placed in the treaty, which states: The U.S. reserves the right to
impose the death penalty in accordance with the provisions of Article LXVIII
without regard to whether the offense is referred to therein are punishable by
death under the law of the occupied territory at the time the occupation
begins. So not only can you be imprisoned for having exercised freedom of
speech; you can be put to death under the provisions of the Geneva Convention in
1949 for having exercised, or attempting to exercise freedom of speech. The next
item that I introduced into evidence was a field manual: FM 41-10, Civil
Affairs Operation. You will remember at the outset that I mentioned Civil
Affairs groups. Let me quote to you from that manual what one of the functions
of the Civil Affairs activities includes: Item 4. Assumption of full or partial
executive, legislative and judicial authority over a country or area. So lets
see what a country or area is defined as in the same manual. It includes:
small towns and rural areas, municipalities of various population sizes,
districts, counties, provinces or states, regions of national government.
Nowhere in the manual does it exclude this program from being put into effect
right here in the United States. As a matter of fact, in Kearny, New Jersey, the
Civil Affairs group went into that area and practiced taking over that
governmental unit. And yet the Armyin its letteer of June 16states that these
programs are not for us. Yet they are practiced here in the United States under
conditions that can only occur here at home. The study outline of field manual
FM 41-10 on page j-24 under Penal Institutions 1-B, you see there is a program
on concentration camps and labor campsnumber, location and capacity. It is
important to note that a concentration camp and a labor camp are always located
near each other for obvious reasons. Again on page d-4 of the same manual youll
find a sample receipt for seized property; a sample receipt written in English
and containing terminology applicable to only U.S. territory. On page 8-2 of the
same manual, under the heading Tables of Organization and Equipment, we find
that there are three other organizations that would be working along with the
Civil Affairs operation: the Chemical Service Organization, the Composite
Service Organization, and the Psychological Operations Organization, along with
the various Civil Affairs organizations. In July of that year (1976), the
following Civil Affairs groups met with the following airborne groups at a
staging area in Fort Chaffee, Arkansas. A staging area is where military units
meet before they go into action. They met with the 82nd Airborne and part of the
101st Airborne; the 32nd Civil Affairs group of San Antonio, Texas headquarters;
the 362nd Civil Affairs brigade from Dallas, Texas; the 431st Civil Affairs
company from Little Rock, Arkansas headquarters; the 306th Civil Affairs group,
U.S. Army Reserves, Fayetteville, Arkansas commanded by Lt. Colonel N. McQuire
[phonetic spelling] and William Highland. The 486th Civil Affairs company from
Tulsa, Oklahoma; the 418th Civil Affairs company from Kansas City, Missouri; the
307th Civil Affairs group from St. Louis, Missouri; the 490th Civil Affairs
group from Abilene, Texas; the 413th company from Hanlin, Louisiana; the 12th
S.S. group, 2nd Battalion (headquarters unknown). Theyre ready to go into
action. The problem is as it appears they were ready to take over the entire
government of the United States as their mission sets out. One man who attended
this staging area talked to a Civil Affairs sergeant and asked him what his job
was. The sergeant explained that the civilians of this country will really be
surprised some day when the Civil Affairs groups begin to operate the
government. Now, the Department of the Army still maintains that all this is not
for the United Statesyet this training continues here for us. The evidence is
overwhelming; the plan exists for the imprisonment of millions of U.S. citizens.
And even though all this information was presented to the federal magistrate, he
still felt that no one was injured by such a plot. On the 2nd day of September,
1976, the magistrate recommended to the federal judge that the case be
dismissed. And the sole basis for his reasoning to dismiss was that we have to
be actually physically injured before we can maintain a law suit of this type.
He did not feel that, although all this active planning, preparation and
training had been going on, that any U.S. citizen had been injuredeven though
the citizen may fear exercising his or her freedom for fear of being detained
and imprisoned in a concentration camp at a later date.

IGNORING THE CONSTITUTION ttalion (headquarters unknown).The case of Tatum B.
Laird, heard before the SUpreme Court in 1974, is a case in point. It involved
teh Army intelligences collecting apparatus, which was developing a list of
names of persons who the Army felt were troublesome. The Supreme Court held that
the making of lists of this type did not of and by itself present any injuries.
The minority opinion in the case was that the injury in the case with a program
such as this made people afraid to use their freedom of speech for fear of being
sent to jail for it. But the majority did not buy that argument. The difference
between that case adn this casealthough we also have the computer programis
that we have something much further past that point: the concentration camp
guard program and the Civil Affairs program for the taking over of all functions
of our government. In light of that, the federal judge said that this is not an
injury. As a matter of fact, the U.S. Attorney alleged that even if people were
placed in concentration camps, if they were all treated the same they would
still not have the right to go to federal court. On the 20th day of September, I
filed a memorandum to notify the magistrate and the federal judge that I had
discovered that the federal government had a program for a number of years to
suspend our constitutional right of the writ of habeas corpus. This information
substantiated the complaint. Habeas corpus is the name of that legal instrument
utilized to bring someone before a judge when that person is being illegally
imprisoned or detained so that he or she may obtain his or her freedom. The
Constitution states that the writ of habeas corpus shall never be suspended. I
found the disturbing information in a report: 94-755, 94th Congress, 2nd Session
Senate, April 26, 1976, entitled Intelligence Activities and the Rights of
Americans Book II. On page 17-d, entitled First Amendment Rights, the report
states that more importantly the government surveillance activities in the
aggregate, whether expressly intended to do so, to deter the exercise of First
Amendment rights by American citizens who become aware of the governments
domestic intelligence program. Beginning on page 54 it is stated that,
beginning in 1946four years before the Emergency Detention Act of 1950 was
passedthe FBI advised the Attorney General that it had secretly compiled a
secret index of potentially dangerous persons. The Justice Department then made
tentative plans for emergency detention based on suspension of the priviledge of
the writ of habeas corpus. Department officials deliberately avoided going to
Congress. When the Emergency Detention Act of 1950 was passed, it did not
authorize the suspension of the writ of habeas corpus. But shortly after passage
of that act, according to the bureau document, Attorney General J.R. McGraft
told the FBI to disregard it and to proceed with the program as previously
outlined. A few sentences later on page 55 it states, With the security index,
use broader standards to determine potential dangerousness than those described
in the statute. And unlike the act, Department plans provided for issuing a
master search warrant and a master arrest warrant. This is the center
importance; it is the same thing that I am alleging in federal court. And yet
the magistrate chose to ignore these facts also. We have government officials
not only ignoring the will of Congress, but doing the opposite of what the
Constitution provides by planning illegally for the suspension of the writ of
habeas corpus. In addition, as mentioned before, the master search warrant and
the master arrest warrant are forms fed into the computer, which prints the
names and addresses on them from the tapes previously prepared by the
intelligence-gathering program. As you are arrested, your home will be searched
and anything found may be confiscated. This program has existed since 1946 up to
and including 1973, and without proper access to judicial discovery techniques.
It cant be determined whether the same plan now exists under the same name or
under another name, right now. This memorandum was filed on September 28, to
make the court aware of the danger that our rights of freedom of speech and
lawful assembly are in. But the court, on September 30after this notification
was receiveddismissed the case. However, in keeping with the practice of
federal courts in Houston of actively participating in the obstruction of
justice, I was not notified of the dismissal until the 6th of Octoberwhich gave
me just two working days to submit any further motion in a 10-day period before
tiem starts running for the appeal. What I have just said regarding the federal
courts in Houston is not only my opinion. The Houston Chronicle, surprisingly,
published an extensive document severely criticizing the federal courts in
Houston for making up their own rules as they go along with the proceedings, as
well as commenting on the communist-like Supreme Court attitude of the judges
and the court personnel. My experience here has been that the court has returned
to me almost every document I filed. Then after a big argument, they reaccept
the document, stating that they just made a mistake. In reality, the power
structure doesnt want these types of cases in any federal court.

SUMMARY OF EVIDENCE On the 8th of October I had submitted a request for finding
the facts in the filing which had been established by the evidence presented: 1)
The 300th Military Police POW Command is located at Livonia, Michigan. 2) The
Department of the Army has stated that said Command exists per se the Geneva
Convention of 1949, a treaty of the U.S., Article IV thereof under the title
relative to the treatment of prisoners of war and protection of civilian
persons. 3) However, no such title exists in the Geneva Convention per se. 4)
Nevertheless, there are separate titles, one of which is: a) Multilateral
Protection of War Victims/Prisoners of War; b) Multilateral Protection of War
Victims/Civilian Persons. 5) Nevertheless, Article IV of both titles does not
provide for the creation of any military programs for concentration camps. 6)
Whether Mr. Henren of the 300th Military Police POW Command has stated that the
prupose of the Command is for the detention of foreign prisoners of war and
enemies of the United States. 7) Further, Article III, concerning civilian
persons, makes the treaty applicable to conflicts occurring solely within the
territory of the United States that are not of an international character, which
is capable of including any type of conflict in its description whether it be
civil war or guerilla activity or anything else. The text states: In case of
armed conflict not of an international character occurring in the territory of
one of the high contracting parties, each party to a conflict shall be bound to
apply to the minimum of the following provisions. 8) Department of the Army
field manual FM 41-10, Civil Affairs Operations of Civil Affairs Organization,
lists as one of its functions the assumption of full or partial executive,
legislative and judicial authority over a country or an area and there is no
specific exclusion of the United States as such a country or area. 9) Said
manual defines country along certain geographical population basis, county,
state regions and national government. 10) Said organization has in fact
conducted practiced takeovers of local and state governments in the continental
United States, including but not limited to the state of New Jersey. 11) Said
organization includes in its study outline on page j-24 a section on
concentration camps and labor camps. 12) Said organization includes in its
operations composite service operations and psychological operations
organziations. 13) Said psychological operation is working with the U.S. Public
Health Service, are prepared to operate any and/or all mental health facilities
in the United States as tools of repression against outspoken but nonviolent
political conduct of the United States citizens in conjunction with all the
above, which is to be used for the same purpose. 14) Further, the Department of
Justice, in conjunction with this program, has had plans for the suspension of
writ of habeas corpus since the year of 1946; has planned depriving persons
being detained under this total program any means for protection against
tyrannical repression. The plaintiff requested that the court make findings of
fact and draw conclusions of law, consistent therewith as shown by the evidence
on record before the court. The effect of this request is that the case must go
back to the district jude for further consideration. I mentioned that it
appeared that all this planning for concentration camps was to be directed
against anyone regardless of his political persuasion or his deo-ideology who
exercised freedom of speech against the established power structure of
international bankers and multinational corporations. But with Proposition
B-type movements threatening to reduce taxes throughout our nation, I foresee
the activation of emergency programs so that the parasites on the federal take
will continue to receive their checks.   


THE PRICE OF PATRIOTISM In the same Senate document, on intelligence activities
on the rights of Americans referred to on pages 166 and 167, you will find that
the federal government has targeted its intelligence activities against one
group of Americans. On page 166, the first classification listed is rightists
and anti-communist groups. And the first group on page 167 on Army surveillance
lists the John Birch Society as number one and the Young Americans for Freedom
as the number two target. Therefore, the groups of U.S. American citizens
considered to be the biggest enemy of the United States by the federal
government at this point is the conservative patriot. Although this information
has been available since April of this year (1979), no one has mentioned this
incredible discovery that the federal government considers the patriotic
conservative as its greatest enemy. I have received all kinds of information
regarding this case from all across the United States.

PRICE OF APATHY I obtained the 1945 report of the OSS (Office of Strategic
Services)the precursor of the CIA7th Army, William W. Quinn, GFCAC of the G2,
on the liberation of Dachau, a concentration camp during the liberation in
Germany. It contains much groups of information, but the relevant portion of the
report concerns itself with the section on the townspeople. Quoting from his
report, on why the people of this little town didnt complain or didnt
overthrow oppressors but just continued to go along and get along even though
they lost their freedom in the process. And I quote: These words crop up and up
again. They are the rationalization of a man who admits that he was a member of
the Nazi party. I was forced to do so by business reasons, they state. We were
lied to in every respect but they admit they knew the camp existed. But they saw
the work detail to the inmates passing through the streets under guard, and in
some instances the SS behaved brutally even towards the townspeople. When asked
if they realized that within the last three months before the liberation 13,000
men lost their lives within stones throw of where the people lived, they
claimed they were shocked and surprised. When asked if they never saw
transports of dead and dying pass through the streets along the railway, they
referred only to the last one. They insist that most of the trains came in at
night and that they were sealed cars. Did they never ask what was in the
endless procession of cars that came in full and always went out empty? A
typical reply was, We were told it was all army material and booty from
France. It is established that anyone who stated that he saw only one train
come in in the daytime was telling a flat lie. There are quite a few such people
in Dachau. The analysis of the anti-Nazi element of the town: 1) The people
knew what was going on in the camp, even ten years prior to liberation; 2) The
town did a thriving business from the concentration camp guard; 3) Ninety
percent are guilty and have dabbed themselves with the blood of innocent human
beings; 4) The people are to blame for their cowardicethey were all too
cowardly. They didnt want to risk anything. And that was the way it was in all
of Germany. The conclusion of this report written on Dachau written in 1945 on
the liberation of the concentration camp applies today. The conclusion is as
follows: If one is to attempt a tremendous task and accept the terrible
responsibility of judging a whole town, assessing it en masse as to collect a
guilt or innocence of all its inhabitants for their complicity in committing
this most heinous of crimes, one would do well to remember the fearsome shadow
that hangs over everyone in this state in which crime has been incorporated and
called the government. So you can see how the whole program is related here. My
lawsuit was against one single aspect of the total program: The enforcement arm
of the conspiracy. The people who make up the cadre that is going to occupy the
concentration camps where enemies of the United States will be placed. Remember
Solzhenitsyns words in the Gulag Archipelago: Resistance should have began
right there but it did not begin. You arent gagged, you really can and you
really ought to cry out that arrests are being made on the strength of false
accusations. If many such outcries had been heard all over the city arrests
would have no longer been so easy. They, the tyrants, cant work in the public
eye. Those people who were so apathetic, hoping that nothing was really wrong,
that nothing would happen to their persons and property, sat back and watched.
The anarchists, financed by multinational interests, looted and pillaed their
country. If you think that all [that] is necessary is to pay your house notes,
to pay your TV notes, to go vote when there is an election, and to stand back
during the rest of the year and watch as your country and way of life are
replaced by a system in which you will be a slave in a concentration camp,
younot the conspiratorsare guilty, because you, by silent acquiescence, invite
tyranny and oppression. And when you have to steal food to eat because our
production is for foreign use because the Department of Commercethrough
Executive Order 11490 and its predecessorsis responsible for international
distribution of our commodities, dont sit in the culvert hiding and eating and
wondering what happened, because you made it all possible. When your family is
split up and spread across the United States to do slave labor and you never see
your loved ones again, it will be your fault because you did nothing to prevent
it. And once we lose our freedom we are never going to regain it. That is why we
must stand together to prevent the loss of our freedom as citizens of the United
States. Thank you very much. 

[Conclusion of taped report.]

=========================================================================

This document is part of the BeastNet archives. While some portions of this
document may contain material originally posted elsewhere on the Internet, a
commercial information service or private or public BBS, it is posted here for
the general public good and as a service of BeastNet.

While BeastNet does not impose copyright restrictions on any documents posted in
its archives, some material contained within some BeastNet documents may be the
copyrighted intellectual propoerty of other entities, used by BeastNet either
with or without permission. Be aware that you may be violating copyright laws by
resposting BestNet materials, although BeastNet encourages the redistrubtion of
all its documents, provided our disclaimers and contact information remain
intact.

For more information on BeastNet or to join us in our battle against The Beast,
contact BeastNet via e-mail at: BeastNet@farces.com or via anonymous ftp at:
ftp.farces.com

------------------------------------------------
(This file was found elsewhere on the Internet and uploaded to the
Radio Free Michigan site by the archive maintainer.

 Protection of
Individual Rights and Liberties. E-mail bj496@Cleveland.Freenet.Edu)