AMIGA CONSOLES In the past there had always been talk of producing an Amiga 'console', and finally Commodore had a bash at it back in 1993, and came up with the CD³², which wasn't a bad little machine (I've got 6 of 'em!!), but I think the CD³² didn't offer anything substantial in new technology, an A1200 with a CD-ROM is essentially the same. And the CD³² is in fact a computer shoved in a console box. I'm getting pig sick of annoying little dick heads putting down the Amiga, and saying that it's crap for games, and that the graphics are crap. The amount of people I know who used to have an Amiga (usually an A500) and who all liked the CD³² when I first got one back in early 1994, but now them seem to forget, they have playstations, and suddenly are under the impression that the Amiga has the graphical power of a ZX81!! The Amiga can do graphics just as well as a Playstation, some of the AGA graphics are mind blowing, you have near-photo quailty images on the Amiga, you can't get much better! I keep having to show these people an AGA 3-D render to remind them, and they always say the same thing "oh, wow, that's actually good!", then 2 weeks later it's back to "Amiga graphics are good? hahahaha". The Amiga can do equal graphics, just that the Playstation is an out and out console and had a 3D animation chip, which is designed for moving 3D images around, which the Amiga as standard cannot do as well. But a 68060 Amiga could do just as well if games were written to support it, and a Power-PC equipt Amiga turds on any Playstation, just games software to support an Amiga with a PPC is non-existant, as yet, but I want it to hurry up and be common place, and remind these console blinded fools that the Amiga is, and has always been, and always will be the number one computer, and I've never forgotten what it's capable of. That's 'cos I'm clever ya see :) But one of my CD³²s is fitted with an SX32 and a 50Mhz 68030, a 1.2 gig hard disk, and a colour bubblejet. I have NewIcons installed, and a start bar program, and a nice backdrop, nicely arranged screen, and my machine totally kicks ass off any Windows '95 machine I've ever used, and people who have used my machine totally agree. I use A-Web 3 which I consider nicer to use than Internet Explorer or Netscape, although I'm starting to like Voyager NG as well, just it crashes a lot for me (maybe my machine), and I've just paid for Aweb 3. But don't forget what the Amiga is capable of if you spend the time getting it there. Nice thing happened to a friend of mine lately, he got a Pee Cee for FREE (giving the damn things away these days! :) so you know what he did? Deleted Win 95, and all the software on it, installed UAE (Amiga emulator) and used the hard disk and RAM for the Amiga side, runs just like an A1200 now, if a bit more dodgy, but that can be expected, after all it's a Pee Cee. But makes a good second best, and a damn sight better than working with Windoze 95. Dan Wood +RIPMAG+