A Slayed Beast - History of the Dragon computer 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= 

1. The conception, the formative months and the birth. 

Rumours abounded in the summer of 1982 that a little known UK toy 
manufacturer was about to make an entrance into the home computer market. 
At that time Sinclair Research, pioneers of the early home computing scene 
in the UK, were having difficulties with there new machine - the Spectrum - 
and it was doubtful that a newcomer with such a lack of experience would be 
able to break into such a competitive market. Then the Dragon 32 was 
launched in August by Dragon Data (a subsiduary of Mettoy). For its time it 
was a good and powerful design but many were sceptical as the parent toy 
company appeared to be in serious financial difficulties. 

The Dragon 32 was a revolutionary design - for the UK at least - in that it 
broke away from tradition and offered a Motorola 6809 microprocessor at its 
heart instead of the more popular, but less powerful, Zilog Z80 and Mostek 
6502 ICs. This would appear to be a wise decision for it would make the 
programmers' tasks less daunting, but not many had seen these devices 
before - the popular machines of the market were the 6502 based Apple II 
and Commodore PET ranges, plus the early Tandy and Sinclair models of Z80 
origin. But in the United States, Tandy had 2 years earlier released their 
Color Computer to great success - and this was a 6809 design using a 
standard Motorola chipset for the video display and interfacing. 

Mettoy's staff were in close contact with Motorola at their UK 
semi-conductor base in Strathclyde (Scotland), and with their help (and 
offer of bigger discounts for purchasing more Motorola products) they 
constructed the Dragon from the same chipset as Tandy were using. The 
machine of questionable copyright even used the same keyboard layout, 
cartridge connector, joystick ports (Tandy 5-pin could be used, but not 
6-pin due the Dragon's use of 5-pin DIN sockets), and memory map. You could 
also say that the tape connector was the same but as this was a standard, 
its hardly worth mentioning. Dragon Data; like Tandy/Radio Shack; enlisted 
Microsoft to provide the computer's Basic interpreter, but unlike Tandy 
they chose Extended Basic so all of the machines features could be 
unleashed with no upgrades necessary - witness the early Tandy models with 
no hires graphics. Admittadly this was partly due to these machines 
possesing pitiful amounts of memory (4K or 16K), but Mettoy worked around 
this by making their machine 32K: it was to be 16K, but Sinclair announced 
that another Spectrum model would be launched soon after the 16K version 
had arrived, and that it would have an extra 32K of RAM on board. Mettoy 
didn't want to be left behind in the technological stakes. 

To solve possible legal action from Tandy, the Dragon engineers came up 
with a work-around solution. A parallel printer socket would be included 
instead of the serial device on their counterparts machine; this was a 
better solution for the end-user wishing to connect a printer because no 
setting up is needed - plug in and go - no messy dip switches to set baud 
rate and parity etc. So that the electronics would be simpler, the printer 
data lines would use the same Motorola 6821 PIA port as the keyboard - this 
allowed the keyboard to be remapped also, so that it looked the same as a 
Tandy, but operated differently (eg Dragon Q is Tandy 1). Most importantly 
though the Basic ROM had the keyword 'tokens' reworked and re-assembled so 
that both the Basic and Extended Basic parts were mixed, and as Tandy's 
were seperate the routines addresses would be at different locations. Part 
of this re-assembly included a partially re-written BIOS (the original 
belonged to Tandy) - witness the the letters DNS apperring for no-reason, 
as these are the authors initials; Duncan Smeed who before joining Dragon 
lectured in computing at Strathcylde University (were he has since 
returned). 

So the Dragon had been born. The idea of getting into the lucrative home 
computer market by a Mettoy employee keen to save the company had been 
conceptualized and launched to a waiting public. Although they had pulled a 
large coup by persauding Boots; the large high-street chain whose stores 
were traditionally pharmacies which stocked health and beauty products too, 
but now also included photographic equipment, calculators, tape-recorders 
and toys (including Mettoy's products); to take their machine, the 
unexpectadly high demand (mostly due to the problems Acorn and Sinclair had 
in supplying Electrons and Spectrums to shops - concentrating on mail-order 
instead) outstripped supply, and the fairy tale for Mettoy was not to last. 





2. The adoption pt I and the early growth - the Tony Clarke year. 

Come October 1982, Mettoy's finances were getting worse. If only the banks 
would provide them with the money to finance the expansion of the Dragon 
production lines everything would be okay. But they said no. Dragon Data 
management knew that a takeover was the only option and that they needed to 
take it. 

Managing Director, Mr. Tony Clarke, talked to many financial institutions 
and persauded them to buy into and re-finance Dragon Data. This left Mettoy 
with only a 15.5% shareholding after the Welsh Development Agency bought 
23% and Pru-tech (the high-tech investment division of Prudential 
Insurance) the largest holding with 42%. With new money being ploughed in, 
Dragon Data would be able to contract out work (to Race Electronics who 
also built BBCs for Acorn), enabling them to build up the production rate 
to come closer to meeting the high demand for their product. 

As part of the deal with the Welsh Development Agency, Dragon Data would 
prepare to move to a larger factory with increased manufacturing capacity 
compared to the current site within Mettoy - this being the imfamous 
factory at Kenfig near Port Talbot which eventually led to their downfall. 

Come Spring 1983 everything looked rosey. Forty Thousand Dragon 32s had 
been sold, Dragon Data had bceome the largest privately owned company in 
Wales and high-street shops were queing up to stock the popular machine; 
Dixons, Comet and Spectrum joining Boots as a Dragon retailer though the 
stationers WH Smith and John Menzies both gave Dragon Data the thumbs down, 
complaining they had enough on their plate with the Spectrum, Commodore 64 
and Oric. Dragon Data weren't too worried as it wasn't in their interests 
to have too many retailers competing on price, and with the capacity at the 
plant not large enough for demand others were only receiving a restricted 
allocation. 

March saw the completion of the move to the new premises and 5,000 Dragons 
rolled off the production line every week, and this was to be increased to 
10,000 units - Dragon Data rather nievely believing that sales would 
continue strongly during the summer as they had on the run-up to Christmas. 
Although extra capacity did allow Dragon Data to extend its range and a 
formidable hardware expansion was planned for the rest of '83. 

A single-disc system with interface would arrive in April at a cost of £275 
and the OS9 operating system would be licensed from Microware and made 
available shortly afterwards, but they didn't. Although they would come to 
market later, many of the planned releases never made it. This included a 
64K upgrade also adding twin RS232 interfaces at a cost of £30 and a 
monochrome 80-column card for increased usefulness of OS9 and the Dragon as 
a business solution, together with two new computers - the first a £400 BBC 
model B competitor and the second a full-blown business system aimed at the 
IBM PC/Sirius market. 

April saw two major announcements for Dragon Data - even if the Disc system 
was delayed by a few months; this being a good time for Premier 
Microsystems who had been offering a disc drive for the Dragon for several 
months, as Dragon Data hit a technical difficulty which Premier themselves 
had previously solved, this doing their sales no harm. Dragon Data 
announced that the 32 would be launched in the US that year, and after 
discussion with three interested American companies it would be 
manufactured in the US for economic reasons as a joint venture with the 
chosen US company. More importantly though the path to the US markets was 
eased, when Tandy denied claims that they were planning legal action 
against Dragon Data (for the similarirty of the 32 and the Color Computer), 
due to Tandy not owning any patents on its machine in the UK and that by 
the time it would be settled out of court, both machines would be out of 
date. 

An enormously welcomed Dragon Data independant product was launched that 
month - Dragon User hit the shelves of newsagents nationwide and acheived 
respectable sales of 36,000 for the first 2 years of sale. Providing all 
users with something it had an excellant mix of news, help, program 
listings, reviews of games, hardware and utilities, interviews with 
prominent people in the world of Dragon and a competition which always 
required a well ordered approach to solve by computer program. This format 
of magazine is now sadly lacking in the current market - even for machine 
specific magazines - which is a great shame because it catered for new and 
more experience users alike. For users wanting something extra from a 
magazine, Elkan Electronics imported 4 Color Computer magzines from the US 
- The Rainbow, Colour Computer News, The Color Computer Magazine and Hot 
Co-Co. Having personally only seen 2 issues of The Rainbow I can't comment 
on these magazines, but The Rainbow impressed me from what I saw - it was 
thick and had plenty of articles and listings. 

By May the 64K upgrade board for the Dragon 32 became a mainboard swap at 
an increased cost of £75, the board also being used in the newly announced 
Dragon 64 which was to priced at £250-300 but with extras such as an RS232 
interface included. A month later this had changed again, and Dragon Data 
were now going to offer a mainboard swap as before, but this would be a 
full Dragon 64 mainboard with RS232 interface and second Basic ROM onboard. 
(the first ROM was Dragon 32 mode, and the second a Dragon 64 mode with 
Basic occupying the upper 16K of 64K RAM). To facilitate the use of the 
serial port, service agents would also change the bottom half of the 32's 
moudling (adding an extra hole), at a total cost of £100 for the upgrade; 
the Dragon 64 was now expected to cost less than £275. 

Although this upgrade would be costly for Dragon 32 owners, this method of 
upgrade would give them the new machine (but in a 32 case), enabling them 
to run the OS9 operating system when it arrived and any other 64 specific 
software (which was little). It was mainly a user decision by Dragon Data, 
it making more sense to produce a new machine which had software and 
hardware compatibility with the Dragon 32 than having to produce two 
versions of products (by them or third-party suppliers). 

From that point the US was Dragon Data's goal and it had been decided that 
the Tano Corporation of New Orleans would be the Dragon manufacturer and 
distributer for the Americas and Caribbean Basin. The Dragon 64 would be 
avialable in the US from August at a cost of $399, with the first few 
thousand machines being made in Wales and the rest in the US once Tano's 
production was upto speed. Tano was the chosen company ahead of five 
others, due to its background in marine automation systems with the 6809 
microprocessor and that it already had experience of selling a micro - an 
Apple II clone designed in Holland and manufactured in Korea. When Dragon 
Data showed the 32 at an American computer show in April, 4000 dealers made 
enquires about the machine and although Dragon-Tano would only invlove 
400-500 initially (rising to 1,500 once production rose from 2000 machines 
a week), the partnership believed that they would sell alot of machines. 
Dealers had been losing margins as both Commodore, Atari and Texas 
Instruments cut the price of their machines and this would make then keen 
to stock the Dragon and promote it more than other brands - higher profit 
margins and a machine which had greater reliability than others, 
instigating in fewer returns. And higher prices can be an asset with many 
customers believing that they are getting something better - especially if 
the dealer persaudes them so. 

So August came and the Dragon 64 was launched on the 26th with a retail 
price of $399 in the US and £225 in the UK where it could be bought from 
early September, but the US package would also include a much improved 
manual, spreadsheet, mail-merge and Telewriter 64 word processor). A 
statement by Dragon Data's marketing director Richard Wadman (who also 
wrote the manuals) told that this was due to that the US tv circuitry was 
easier to construct than for the UK, and so it could be done more quickly 
(shame they didn't mention that it was because the US standard is simple 
and crap), but apart from this the european and american machines would be 
identical. 

Tano's production of the Dragon began in Spetember and by October was upto 
capacity of the 48,000 square foot new plant where the lines were housed. 
Being a large coprate of 20 years with divisions in oil and gasoline (who 
design systems for flow measurement on oil lines, ala the Alaskan 
pipeline), reliability of their products needed to be high and the Dragon 
was no different - each machine being soak-tested to hunt out any defects. 
Not to be out done, their design team began working closely with Dragon 
Data on the new machines that had been previously planned. First to arrive 
would be the Dragon 128 in Novemeber (in the US). Featuring dual 6809 
processors, a numeric keypad, 128K ram and OS9 selectable on power-up it 
seemed as if both companies had got their act together and times looked 
rosy. 



3. The adoption pt2 - GEC take charge as Clarke is ousted. 

Dragon Data's earlier decisions began back-firing for them in the late 
summer of 83. The thought that sales would continue through spring and 
summer at the level as at Christmas had proved to be a major misjudgement 
and it came as no suprise to industry analysts when Managing Director Tony 
Clarke was asked to resign by the shareholders - of course it was reported 
to the public that he had "previously indicated to the board that he wished 
to resign for personnal resigns". 

With this position clear, the shareholders asked GEC (General Electric 
Company - the largest electrical company in the UK with its fingers in many 
pies including defence, satellites, home-entertainment, industrial 
computing, power generation and many more) to provide a senior executive to 
become the new chief executive of Dragon Data on "temporary secondment", 
and they duely obliged with Brian Moore appointed to the post on September 
12th, until a new business plan for the company had been worked out - 
though Brian could not put a time on this. It was no shock decision to 
appoint a GEC executive - Prutech who held 42% of Dragon shares were also 
the major investor in GEC - but he was suitable for the job, moving from a 
deputy managing directorship post at a GEC subsidiary speciallising in 
microprocessor controlled heating and ventilation systems, together with 
his experience in general electronic engineering, financial management and 
business applications for computers. 

Following on from this announcement came the news that a £2.5 million 
investment package for Dragon Data had been made. With it came the clame 
"It's business as usual" or more specifically "It's business as it was 
earlier this year and not as it was this summer". The shortfall between 
sales fact and forecast placed a greater "strain on the company's immediate 
cash and borrowing facilities", because at the time "it was gearing up 
production to meet pre-Christmas demand". The link between a bad summer and 
the need for more money coloured reactions to the investment so that it was 
more interpreted as a rescue package, but the package in the form of loans 
(or loan guarantees) would enable Dragon Data to continue work on the next 
generation of home and small business machines which were said to be in the 
late stages of development. A Dragon spokesman also countered the bad 
reactions by arguing that further investment was natural at the current 
stage of development, and that the company expected a profit for its first 
year of operation, on a turn-over of £18-20 million. It was also reported 
that although sales had dropped, Dragon's market share had stayed constant, 
proving that times were difficult for even the market leader. 

Although GEC had taken their time in entering the home-computer market, it 
was not unexpected. Earlier in the year the electronics giant were 
involoved in talks with Torch - another British microcomputer manufacturer. 
But when these came to nothing it was thought they would soon invest in 
another company; particularly when there rivals' were making progress in 
this area; and Dragon Data would seem the obvious choice with the Prutech 
connection. With hindsight, the problems at Dragon Data should have been 
expected. An increasingly competitive market saw many companies going to 
the wall, or to the brink of it - even Sinclair was struggling in the US 
and Acorn couldn't even break into any other markets. To this day their 
machines are still over-priced and only bought by educational 
establishments (for pupils upto the age of 18) and Acorn enthuisiasts. But 
remember, Dragon Data had an unorthodox start going independant from Mettoy 
after only 3 months of product launch and it transpires that they may have 
been under-capitalised from the beginning. At least with the investment and 
new management the shareholders made their postion clear, in that they were 
confident Dragon Data could turn it around with the product they had and 
the new machines in development. 

Previous to this the long awaited disc system appeared on the shelves of 
Boots and Dixons at a cost of £275 (or £475 for twin drives), for a 
single-sided 5.25" double density drive (180K formatted capacity) in a case 
with space for a second drive and built in PSU, together with a controller 
interface with software on ROM. The controller could control upto four 40 
or 80 track, single or double sided drives interfaced via a standard 
Shugart interface, by using a Western Digital 2797 controller IC. 

Although it had arrived late, it beat Cumana's system to the shelves, who 
were offering a Premier MicroSystems DeltaDos cartrige (which had been 
available for several months with a Cumana drive direct from Premier), 
together with a Cumana drive (of similar specs to Dragon's drive) inside a 
single drive case with inbuilt PSU. Their system was also more expensive 
than the official system at £300, but everyone agreed that DeltaDos was a 
better system than DragonDos, being bug-free (totally unlike DragonDos), 
easier to use and offerring more features; eg a second ROM socket in the 
DOS cartridge for addition of utility ROMs such as Premier's Encoder09 
assembler and Toolkit their Basic add-on. It's also widely accepeted that 
the Delta documentaion is in a different class to the Alan Mayer offering 
with the Dragon Data system. Although this was meant to be only a 
preliminary document it was never replaced. 

Eventually the Dragon 64 made its UK public appearance, but not until the 
PCW show on 29th September (till 2nd October); a month later than planned. 
Costing a reasonable £225 it was escenially a Dragon 32 with 32K of extra 
memory, a second Basic ROM for 64K operation (tape only - doesn't work with 
discs since the Basic maps into where the cartrdige port is), and an RS232C 
interface. The case also changed colour to a professional shade of grey 
(with blue hint), and on most machines a new keyobard was used with the 
lettering being smaller which looked smart - though many had the original 
32 keyboard which has the bigger and uglier lettering by comparison. It was 
unfortunate that Dragon Data decided not to rewrite the original 32 Basic 
manual (which was regarded as poor by many), but they supplied that manual 
(but debugged) with a seperate 64 specific supplement instead. Even though 
the latest Dragon was the only new machine on display at the show, not many 
heads were turned by it; an upgraded Dragon 32 was all it was, but then not 
many really knew the power the beast had. Although the Dragon had been a 
success, the Tandy CoCo had flopped in the UK (£400 for a 16K machine when 
a Dragon 32 was £169) and no other popular machine used the 6809 and its 
capabilities had yet to be unleashed. The highlight of the show must surely 
have been Dragon Data's public relations - they turned off an arcade game 
running on a display Dragon so that a Dragon employee could talk to a deaf 
and dumb user via the montior and keyboard. Dragon Data wanting to help and 
care for their customers in any way they could - free information was 
always available; just write and circuit-diagrams and info for machine code 
programmers was sent out free of charge. How many other major computer 
manufacturers have employed this policy? 

Eventually, the Dragon 64 hit the UK shops in November - 2 months later 
than in the US - but the promise of OS9 being available at the same time 
was not fullfilled. Dragon Data's enthusiasm for the product not matching 
its launch schedule. Richard Wadman, marketing director, was quoted as 
saying "The combination of the 64, OS-9 and drives gives the company the 
means to enter other markets". He was also sure that Dragon Data's move 
upwards would be as successful as its home-computing entry - if Dragon Data 
could keep to its launch times or not announce products till they were 
ready, maybe it would. 

Together with the UK arrival of the Dragon 64, Dragon Data (France) 
announced that they had sold 5,000 Dragon 32s and that by Christmas 20,000 
would have been shipped, and the US situation seemed even more rosey: 
Dragon/Tano held a booth at the three day Color Computer Exposition '83 in 
Pasedena, with the 64 together with disc drive being the main display item 
even out-doing Tandy/Radio Shack's launch of a 64K CoCo, and linked with 
good sales figures the future looked good. With the thoughts of that a 
British firm selling home-computers to the US was like 'carrying coals to 
Newcastle' seemingly dumb-founded, the return cargo for the UK would proove 
to be good news for UK users. Having the Dragon available in the US moved 
many more programmers writing CoCo games and utilities to convert them for 
the Dragon than what had already been, and so the range of software 
available grew. Unfortunately, not many UK Dragon programmers made the 
corresponding decision; if a good Dragon game or utility was converted to 
run on a Tandy and then sold to a US software house the rewards could be 
huge, but this never happened (or if it was, it was never publicised). 
Ironically, most of the software sold by Dragon/Tano in the US consisted of 
CoCo software orignally from the US, and converted in the UK by Dragon Data 
or Microdeal to the Dragon and then sold in the UK and shipped back to the 
US for sale there too. 

November also saw a sad day in the history of the Dragon. Toy-maker Mettoy, 
a shareholder in Dragon Data and the founder of Dragon computers called in 
the receivers - a year after selling Dragon Data to the current consortium 
of investors. Although the news was received with regret, Brian Moore; the 
new Dragon Data MD; emphasised that his company would not be affected. With 
Mettoy holding just a 15.5% stake, no significant difference in Dragon Data 
would effect. With these shares now being available for purchase, the 
receivers gave the Dragon Data shareholders first option, and it looked as 
if GEC missed a change to invest when Pru-tech increased their holding to 
49% by taking half of the Mettoy shares. 

Talking in an interview for Dragon User (December 1983), Brian Moore 
officially announced in the UK that a Dragon 128 was underdevelopment 
(though it was a working title), and that it would be compatible with the 
Dragon 64 through the use of OS9 - not Dragon Basic. Together with the new 
home-computer which was announced at the same time, the future for 32 
owners seemed bleak. But for Dragon users showing so much affection for 
their machines, he intended to support all users by offering upgrades to 
the 64 for 32 owners. Other avenues which the company were looking into 
included a WIMP driven computer, after Brian saw an Apple Lisa and viewed 
it as an "exciting system of the future"; this proved to be one vision by 
Dragon Data management which turned out as they had thought! Sales of the 
Dragon 64 were reported to be excellant, with "the order book full, and 
everything built being despatched" and that the company had already sold 
all the machines that it could produce for Christmas. The 64 had also been 
"very well received in the US". 



4. More Products hit the shops as GEC wind the screw. 

Come December Dragon Data had finally made a decision regarding the 
upgrading of a Dragon 32 to a 64. After the scrapping of both an add-on 
board or main-board swap, ex MD Tony Clarke made it public that a CPU board 
and bottom of the case swap would be the method of upgrading. But now with 
Brian Moore in charge the company had further second thoughts - preferring 
to exchange Dragon 32s for 64s rather than upgrade them. Logistically this 
would proove to be a simpler option without the need for service agents - 
dealers could do the swap. 

For the user this would be a painless operation - but not in the wallet. 
Simply by taking your Dragon 32 to a local dealer with £140 you could walk 
away with a 64. Part exchange was a new idea in this country, although 
Commodore had used the method in the US, reducing the price of its 64 to 
Vic20 owners who returned their machines. But with the move to the 64 
Commodore broke with Vic20 software compatibility, instead producing a more 
advanced machine. With the Dragon 64 this wasn't the case and many users 
were disgruntled about the cost - many users preferring an allowance of 
£100 rather than £85 (for a Dragon 32 used basically constantly for a year) 
and £140 for a seven month-old machine, leaving £85 to be paid. The main 
problem was users not realising that Dragon Data couldn't do much with the 
returned 32 - they cost £169 to buy, so how much did they sell to retailers 
for? £100? £80? And remember that Dragon Data did not have to offer an 
upgrade, but they cared about their customers and it was the self-same 
customers who were disgruntled that they cared. If they could raise more by 
selling their machine second hand then they could if they want, but Dragon 
Data offered them an easy path to upgrade. 

Several users wrote letters of complaint to Dragon User, saying that "it 
would be better to sell your 32 and buy a higher specification computer 
with improved display and sound" and to "sell your 32 and buy a machine 
from a manufacturer that will be thruthful to its supporters", but its 
difficult to think of the manufacturers they had in mind. 

And one letter to the editor of Dragon User had this to say: "One of the 
reasons we bought a Dragon in the first place was that Dragon Data looked 
like a company that wasn't out to rip off its customers. For example, it 
actually launched the Dragon by selling working computers in shops. You 
paid your money and carried one away. We wouldn't touch Commodore products 
with a barge pole precisely because of that company's attitude to its 
customers. Ditto Acorn." (commenting on that to buy a Commodre or Acorn you 
paid your money and waited a month for it to arrive, and then when it did, 
bits were usually missing from the box - eg manuals or a lead, or the 
computer was faulty.) 

The problem for Dragon Data was that many micro buyers either disagreed 
with that reader or owned something longer than a barge pole. No matter 
what, opinions from businessmen in the micro industry suggested that Dragon 
Data's intentions may be too honourable for their own good. 

February saw two major launches for Dragon Data with a technical book and 
after a long wait the OS9 operating system hitting the shelves. "Inside the 
Dragon" was written by Dragon Data's technical software manager Duncan 
Smeed and an ex-colleague of his; Ian Sommerville a computer science 
lecturer at Strathcylde University; and published by Addison-Wesley who 
described it as "No one who wants to do more with their Dragon than play 
games can afford to be without it". Duncan himself said that "the book 
contains virtually everything I know about the insides of the Dragon" - and 
that's from the design consultant of the Dragon 32 and 64 who was now 
working on the system software for the "128". Details on how to access and 
make use of the Basic ROM and all the hardware are covered, and together 
with data sheets for the Motorola chipset made it a book that has furthered 
Dragon users learning machine code like no other book did or could. It was 
testimony to that point, that all print runs of the book sold out. 

Eventually Dragon Data got OS-9 into the shops. The modular, multi-tasking, 
multi-user, real-time and Unix-like operating system was released for £40 
and with the single disc came the User manual. For £20 more a programmers 
manual could be purchased with application software extra; Stylograph (word 
processor) £80, Dynacalc (spreadsheet) £60 and RMS (Database) £55 with more 
to come such as 'Cash and VAT' and 'Stock Control'. Both of these appeared 
soon afterwards together with the programming langauges; Basic09, Pascal 
and the C compiler - ranging in price from £40 for Basic to £80 for C. 
Although the pricing may appear steep considering the usual cost of Dragon 
software, it must be born out that this was high-quality and usually 
expensive applications running on equally expensive business computers. 
Dragon Data's policy on recovering the huge licensing fee payable to the 
owners was the "pile it high and sell it cheap" method; their thinking that 
it was better to get lots of cheap sales than few expensive. The OS9 system 
was well received by the reviewer for Dragon User and by the buying public, 
and it proved to be a popular purchase for 64 owners with a disc drive - 
although it later transpired that Dragon Data never got around to paying 
Microware (OS9's author) any of the license fees owed. 

March 1984 saw GEC tightening their screw on the control of Dragon Data 
when it was announced that sales and marketing of all Dragon Data products 
would be handled by a GEC subsidiary - GEC McMichael (who had expertise in 
both defence and cosumer electronics. The latter including radio, 
television, video recorders, intelligent telephones, viewdata, teletext, 
laser-disc players and cable and satellite tv) - and over the next few 
months, double page spread adverts appeared in the national computing 
press, with Dragon Data products going under the GEC Dragon brandname. 
GEC's activities before this, being very diverse within the whole 
electronics area, but they were now widespread in the computing side alone 
ranging from specialised chip manufacture to viewdata systems. Although it 
wasn't clear what the GEC strategy was, they certainly had enough cash to 
support any move that they cared to make, and were willing to play a 
waiting game to get what they wanted - remember that they waited to invest 
after long talks with Torch broke down. 

For Dragon Data, GEC's marketing influence seemed likely to benefit their 
push into the business computer market, with the giant's power probably 
having little effect on the home-computer market; apart from suggesting 
that the partnership was a stable operation. Interactivity between the two 
companies would be the key to their future: Dragon Data would obviously 
concentrate on developing products that GEC would be keen to market. So in 
this way GEC would be controlling Dragon Data's future direction without 
having a major financial stake invested in them. 

Allowing Dragon Data to concentrate on developing computers was definitely 
GEC's plan when they announced that the McMichael subsidiary would 
introduce a range of printers, montiors and cassette decks for the Dragon, 
together with their sales and marketing tasks. A good Dragon compatible 
data-recorder had been on Dragon Data's drawing-board for a while, with one 
being expected to have been released during summer '83. But this failed to 
materialize and so GEC were set to fill in here, although the products 
would be marketed under the GEC McMichael banner due to their compatibility 
with other machines. 



5. Dragon Data announce the future - as they collapse one month later. 

May 1984 saw the official annoucement that a new micro was ready to be 
launched by Dragon Data. The transportable 64K machine was expected to 
include a built in modem and would come with either one or two integral 
Sony 3.5" disc drives at a cost of £700. Making its public debut at the 
Consumer Electronics Trade Exhibition at the end of May, production samples 
would be available to the public some time around August/September. 
Although Dragon Data were reluctant to release further information until 
launch (the reason being late product launches after announcements in the 
past), managing director Brian Moore explained that the package would be 
marketed as part of Dragon Data's belief that micros should be 
"communications based" - that is future machines must have communication 
hardware installed as standard. 

Speaking publicly for the first time about this machine - at the RETRA 
(Radio, Electrical and Television Retailers Association) annual conference 
in Torquay - GEC Dragon's (as Dragon Data was now called) Brian Moore spoke 
about what the market had in store and that this computer supplied it. 
About the computer market in general he commented that: "The home computer, 
together with all its support products, represents a retailing opportunity 
that cannot be ignored. The technology available, together with forecast 
explosive growth in home communications and information technology, will 
result in every retailer having to deal in computer-based products in order 
to survive." 

Strong words and probably true in that all major retailers sold computers 
and all survived, but on on the subject of the home computer business he 
said: "It's totally crazy, consisting of seventeen-year-old millionaires 
and big businesses failing to make a profit. Businesses producing 
peripherals, utilities, software and magazines are making money and the 
only people who aren't are the actual computer manufacturers." 

To be of value a computer manufacturer needed to offer a package, and 
Dragon Data did with their "Passport to Professional Software". Consisting 
of a Dragon 64, GEC McMichael TV, OS-9, Dragon disk drive, joysticks, three 
tape games (!) and several business programs, this was aimed at the small 
business market that GEC Dragon believed to be the key to the future - 
games were considered to be have an "uncertain" market position. Little did 
they realise what a huge market it was actually about to be. 

Perhaps the most apt quote of Brian's speech at RETRA was that "undoubtedly 
there will be a shake out of manufacturers over the next few years" - 
though doubtless excluding his company from within that trend. 

Late May saw the public display of the new machine along with the 
announcement of yet another new computer. Project-named Alpha, the new 
transportable machine that had already been announced would be launched as 
the GEC Dragon Professional. Basically an upgraded Dragon 64 it contained 
an integral Sony single-sided 3.5" disk drive (with room for another), 
built-in dos and disk interface, on-board three channel programmable 
sound-generator, internal BT-approved modem, RGB monitor socket and 
built-in power supply (as well as the other ports and features of the 
Dragon 64). Costing £700 for the single-drive version and £850 for two, 
Dragon Data's technical director Derek Williams described the micro as 
having "improved and expanded the 64 to the optimum, providing a neat 
package without wires trailing everywhere". Basically it looked like a 
Dragon 64 with a bit ontop where the two drives were fitted, facing the 
user. 

Basic on the new machine had also been re-worked so that a hi-res text 
screen of 51*24 or 40*24 could be utilised (ala Microdeal's Rainbow Writer 
and Compusense's Hi-Res and Edit+ programs) instead of the usual and 
mundane 32*16, and on power-up the user could choose to use Basic or load a 
disk-based operating system. With the on-board floppy controller to run 
upto two external 5.25" drives, the Professional remained highly compatible 
with existing Dragon 32, 64 and OS-9 software. 

Project Beta was something altogether different, and saw GEC Dragon really 
wanting to hit the big time. Expecting to retail at £2500-3000, the micro 
used twin 6809 processors, had 256K RAM (expandable to 768K) and offered 
two internal 3.5" floppy drives with an external hard disc available as an 
add-on. Together with an on-board power supply the machine also 
incorparated an 80-column display and an RGB monitor connection with the 
following display resolutions: 320*256*16 colours, 640*512*4, 640*256*4, 
320*256*4 and a teletext mode of 160*72 (teletext being 40*24 with each 
character a 4*3 block). 

The main CPU unit had a flat-top to support a monitor and the detached 
keyboard also featured a separate numeric pad. Together with a parallel 
Centronics, RS232, light-pen and mouse port, a mother-card was supplied 
providing expansion boards to be fitted. At the time of announcment only 
three had been fully developed: 1200/75 1200/1200 and 300/300 baud modem, 
quad serial port for OS-9 allowing multiple terminal access and a 
networking card allowing one machine to be used as a file-server to the 
others. 

With pre-production models already out both machines were due to go into 
full production in July, but in the same issue of Dragon User as these 
announcements took place (July '84), the editorial changed just before 
going to print to bring the devastating news that at the beginning of June 
the receivers had been called into Dragon Data. The comapany announced that 
"the continuing difficulties of establishing profitable trading in the UK 
and other parts of the world" was the reason for the decision. Although a 
huge blow to the future release of the new machines, the forever 
financially-troubled firm said that "it has confidence in its new products 
and the market opportunities they represent and will be using its best 
endeavours in helping the receivers to explore ways of continuing trading." 
And this was followed up by one executive commenting that "the home 
computer market was not as buoyant as people believed". 

Earlier in the year British Home Stores (a large department store chain) 
had decided to stop selling the Dragon 32, and cleared its shelves by 
offering the machine at a bargain basement price. Rival chain Boots; 
responsible for so many Dragon sales; was also expected to drop the 32 
within the coming months too, even before the news of Dragon Data came 
through, though they would still stock software. The decision of the 
dealers was aroused by the fact that in microcomputing terms, the 32 was 
now an old machine. Dragon Data's problems of the prolonged delay of the 
disk drive system hindered the 32s growth, and their attempt to move 
upmarket produced the 64 - little more than an upgraded 32. Then the gap 
between the arrival of the 64 and its "killer" applications in OS-9 
resulted in further damage. 

The wheel of fortune had turned full-circle, and unfortunately for Dragon 
Data it landed on the Brankrupt zone. Original developer Mettoy were faced 
with their own financial problems and sold the Dragon 32 to a consortium of 
backers. A year later they called in the receivers. Now the continuing 
problems of finance, mismanagement and market predications had caught up 
with Dragon Data, and the fate of Mettoy had befallen the new company too. 



6. Tandy take a look but the Armada rescues the sinking ship. 

With the news of Dragon Data's demise spreading, Dixons; the high-street 
electrical chain; responded by cutting the price of all Dragon Data 
products. A Dragon 32 with five pieces of software would cost £79.99, a 
Dragon 64 was £169.99 and disk drives went for under £100. If anything 
positive was to come from the demise of the computer manufacturer, alot 
more disk users was certainly one, with the systems selling out in most 
stores within days of Dixons announcement. With this in mind it came as a 
surprise that Boots did not alter their prices. 

Accountants Touche Ross with receiver Robert Ellis had received serveral 
offers for Dragon Data, and it was known that both Tandy and GEC had 
expressed a very strong interest in aquiring the company. GEC had infact 
paid for the GEC Dragon stand at the Earls Court Computer fair held just 
weeks before the news came through, and it was thought that they would 
concentrate on the Dragon Professional and an MSX type machine if they 
took-over. 

MSX is a concept that micros with broadly the same hardware will all run 
the same software, and although it was a success in its native Japan and 
Holland (the manufactures of the range of machines were Sony, Sanyo, 
Hitachi, Toshiba and Philips etc) it was not so else where, with only a 
small user-base after several years in the UK - even with such a large 
advertising campaign and large range of machines, but they were quite 
expensive at an average of £250. Earlier in the year GEC Dragon MD Brian 
Moore spoke at a major conference about the dangers of MSX to UK 
manufacturers, saying "that predications indicated the Japanese will take 
30-35 per cent of the home computer market - and that's for a product that 
hasn't even arrived in this country yet." The rumours that Dragon Data were 
thinking of producing an MSX computer were comfirmed by John Sayers, Tandy 
UK managing director, who revealed that GEC had acquired the rights from 
Microsoft to be the sole producer of MSX machines in Britain. If GEC came 
to market with an MSX micro, it was thought that they would include an 
option to make it compatible with Dragon software also. 

Tandy's interest in Dragon Data lied mainly with the 32, 64 and, 
importantly for users, service and support and to this they flew people 
over from the USA and Europe to have a look at the plant. Although 
unexpired warrenties are legally unenforceable against a company in 
receivership, if Tandy had bought Dragon Data they would have been expected 
to fulfill any outstanding to maintain goodwill. 

At this time it was known that another company was interested in buying the 
rights to the Dragon, and Philips was the name on most peoples' lips. But 
with only 52 staff remaining at the plant (after a further 100 had been 
made redundant), it was not known where manufacture of future micros would 
take place if the company were being taken over. 

By August Tandy had withdrawn from negotiations after its final bid was 
rejected by the receiver. Hoping to acquire the Dragon name and remaining 
stock to support end users, the receiver turned down the bid in hoping to 
find a buyer for the whole company. The bid the receivers wished for came 
through when Spanish firm Eurohard SA appeared with an agreeable 
settlement, making them the first micro manufacturer in Spain. 

Eurohard had many similar parallels to Dragon Data. With help in setting 
them up in business from government agencies they both set their 
manufacturing base in a regional development area - manufacture of the 
Dragon 32 and 64 in Spain would move to the new company's factory in Extre 
Madura, Caceres a development area 180 miles south west of Madrid, close to 
the the border with Portugal, with the company's public relations and 
marketing based in Madrid. Funding for the venture was from two Spanish 
public sector development agencies - Soviex and Ini - and also privately 
from a large financial group headed by Spanish Visa card chairman Eduardo 
Merigo, though Visa card itself had no connection with Eurohard. Soviex is 
a local development agency and help 40% of Eurohard, and Ini is the 
national development agency with a 10% stake (but they own half of Soviex 
too). 

Acquiring the assets of Dragon Data for a reported £1 million, Eurohard 
owned Dragon Data "lock stock and barrel" with rights to the Kenfig plant, 
machinery and intellectual property. It later transpired that prior to the 
receivers being called in, Eurohard had actually signed a licence with 
Dragon Data to manufacture Dragons in Spain for the spanish home market and 
spanish speaking countries, though this now meant nothing. 

The deal between Eurohard and the receivers Touche Ross was actually a 
tripartite arrangement with GEC continuing with the UK marketing and a new 
company, Touchmaster, providing after-sales support and distribution of 
Eurohard products to all territories other than Spain and Italy. 
Touchmaster was located in Dragon Data's old premises in Margam in Port 
Talbort, and made up of ex-Dragon Data employees, and headed by ex-managing 
director Brian Moore and former marketing director Richard Wadman. The main 
backer of this new firm once again was Pru-tech and the first project was 
to manufacture a touch-tablet (designed by Information Entry of Reading), 
that was first seen previewed at the CETEX show in May and from the 
September PCW show, interfaces for the Dragon, Commodore, MSX and BBC 
machines would be available. Dragon Data's existing stock of software and 
peripherals would also be sold by Touchamster - at discount prices, though 
it was still not certain whether they or Eurohard would take over Dragon 
Data's existing liabillities. 

Come September and the new deal was beginning to take full swing. Senor 
Alvarez of Eurohard (with four Touchmaster and ex-Dragon Data employees) 
began organising and overseeing the 6 week transfer of machinery and 
products from Dragon's UK plant to the new Spanish factory, with the hope 
that full production in Spain ; for world-wide distribution; could begin by 
the end of October. Although the company would start by producing Dragon 
Data spec 32s and 64s, they were "finishing perfecting" of the Professional 
design and hoped to have new machines including an MSX out in six months: 
Eurohard conceding that in their plans "Alpha (Dragon Professional) is not 
so important, we are more concerned with MSX and peripherals". As part of 
the Dragon Data package, Eurohard retained Dragon Data's share in the GEC 
Dragon MSX machines, though it was eventually leaked that GEC had not 
signed a licensing arrangement with Microsoft, but that Eurohard had. The 
confusion arising from that GEC had signed an agreement to distribute and 
manufacture Eurohard's products in the UK through GEC Radio and Television. 

October saw GEC tie up a deal with the receivers to buy the remainding 
Dragon Data stock after Eurohard had taken what it had wanted, and they 
were also in negotiations with Boots, Comet and Dixons to sell it through 
the high-street. Only Comet agreed to take the stock - Dixons and Boots 
preferring to clear their lines and leave them cleared - and they offered 
it at exceptional prices; Dragon 64s were available for £130. And Eurohard 
announced their major marketing plans: In association with the Spanish 
goverment they would begin a computer education based televsion programme, 
in a similar role to what Acorn took in the UK with the BBC computer show - 
the programme in Spain would use Dragons and Dragons would also be sold to 
schools with a goverment subsidy resulting in very low cost machines. The 
programme trying to attract buyers to choose the Dragon because it was what 
was on tv and their children used them in schools - so it would help their 
education if they had one at home too. 

In the UK there had been no news of the US scene since late 1983, and in 
the December '84 issue of Dragon User a letter was printed asking for 
companies to write to him with what they sold because the Tano Corporation 
was no longer supporting the Dragon. As a dealer this left him with little 
hardware and software available to sell to his frustrated customers. 
Realistically it was never thought that Dragon Data could truely break into 
the US market, and more bad news came with that issue with the news that 
GEC had sold all its stocks of Dragon products and had no immediate plans 
to promote the Dragon; it appeared that they were trying to cut loose of 
the home computer market that they had twice failed to get into 
successfully (Torch then Dragon). Although they were trying to establish a 
repair and warrenty service; in conjunction with Touchmaster; to serve 
their customers needs (of GEC Dragon). 

With sales of Dragon products falling for some following the demise of 
Dragon Data, Premier Microsystems, manufacturer of DeltaDos the first 
Dragon disk system, ceased trading in December '84. Fortunately for many 
firms this was not the case and at the first 6809 show (16-17th November at 
the Royal Horticultural Halls in London) for Dragon and Tandy owners, over 
7000 people turned up. With all major Dragon retailers there (except for 
new entrants Eurohard and Touchmaster), business was busy and many wondered 
if the closure of Dragon Data had any effect on the market what-so-ever. 

For others not quite so sure there was some good news. Dragon User January 
'85 featured an article with Eurohard chairman Eduardo Merigo. Dragon 
production in Spain started in November (due to "teething" problems), and 
so to solve their advance sales order of 25,000 units they purchased 13,000 
Dragon 32s, 64s and disk drives from GEC - all at marked down prices. With 
the Dragon 32 retailing at £200 in Spain and the 64 at £300 business was 
busy (the prices were slightly less than competitors products), and 
Eurohard were producing 500 units a day at their Caceres plant. 

Eduardo went on to talk about how this venture into the micro-computer 
world began, saying that "the initiative to actually start manufacturing 
Dragons in Spain came from a number of people working for ICS - the Spanish 
importer of the Dragon". A spark fired his imagination and Eurohard SA was 
formed in May 1984 with the intention of obtaining a licence to produce 
Dragons in Spain. Just before Dragon Data went into liquidation, an 
agreement with them was signed so that the company obtained the sole rights 
to manufacture Dragons in Spain for Spain and the Spanish speaking world at 
a cost of £7 per micro. But Dragon Data went into receivership and Eurohard 
bought them for £1 million. 

Their future plans included selling enhanced Dragon 32 and 64 models 
(called the 100 and 200), a new Dragon with 128K RAM, networking and a 
harddisk and also new Dragon peripherals; a 4-colour plotter, 2 printers, a 
slim-line 5.25" floppy drive and a 2.8" sequential floppy drive (operates 
like a tape) with a maximum loading time of 8 seconds for a 32K program. 
These announcements coincided with the news that Eurohard had now appointed 
long-time Dragon software house and developer Compusense as the UK 
distributer for the Dragon (though the MSX would still be pushed by GEC) - 
because of their competence and independant retailer status. Eurohard 
wanting to distribute the Dragon through specialist dealers and not large 
retails stores where there's little after-sales support. Dragon 64s would 
cost £195, single drives were £240 and the double drives £450. Compusense 
decided against importing the 32, wishing to push the 64 with drive as an 
entry-level business machine while lobbying Eurohard to develop new 
generations of Dragons and peripherals. 

With Eurohard's Dragon products being sold in Spain, France, Italy, Greece, 
Isreal and the Scandinavian countries, they intended to start producing 
add-on boards for the IBM PC and the MSX once their new board manufacturing 
plant began operation. And real big time looked their way when they 
announced that they had already signed a licence with two US manufacturers 
for Eurohard to produce their boards in Spain for the European market. 



7. Eurohard goes quiet as the beast dies a slow death. 

From April 1985, Dragon life was constantly good then bad. Compusense 
announced that the new machine would have 128K RAM and run OS9 Level II as 
an operating system and they as the UK distributers would not be importing 
the 2.8" tape drive. But that "Towards the end of the year, some fairly 
attractive systems should be produced, especailly if Eurohard put in the 
networking system". The UK firm also confirmed that Eurohard had sold 
20,000 machines in Spain before Christmas, and although January and 
February were obviously slow, they were going to try a new marketing tactic 
(in Spain) - door to door sales of the Dragon. My view is that this would 
seem to be a joke - though obviously not. 

The Dragon MSX made its entrance in May '85 and was manufactured by Radofin 
of Hong Kong for Eurohard - the same company which produced the Aquarius 
computer for Mattel. Being based around a Z80 processor it was totally 
incompatible with the Dragon - Eurohard deciding against making it 
compatible with the Dragon as well as the MSX standard. Worse news was to 
come that month though - one of the bigggest software distributors, 
Websters, stopped handling Dragon software. To users this would mean that 
Dragon software would be even harder to find in the high-street - although 
Boots stressed that they would still stock Dragon programs in their 150 top 
stores while there was a demand for it. 

Compusense took delivery of a 128K Dragon prototype in June, although this 
was to little fan-fare because it was simply bank-switched by the SAM chip 
already present in all Dragon models. Compusense took advantage of 
Eurohard's development when they released their Plus board later in the 
year. Also that month, Compusense appointed Race Electroincs (one time 
sub-contractor to Dragon Data - making Dragons for them when many machines 
had to be made) as the National Service Centre for all Dragon/Eurohard 
products. Race too had their own news with the release of an RS232 
interface, Sideways ROM cartrdige, EPROM programmer, four cartidge 
expansion (similar to Tandy Mulitpak), and floppy tape drive all for the 
Dragon. 

Competition for Race, with the floppy tape drive, arrived in July with the 
news that Radofin had launched the Triton Quick Disk (to be marketed in 
Europe by Eurohard). Files would load form the 2.8" double-sided disks in a 
minimum of 2 seconds and a maxiumum of 8. The price of the unit was a very 
reasonable £119.95, for which u got the drive, interface, cables and 
instructions. 

On a working August holdiay to London, Eurohard's cheif of development; 
Jordi Martinez; brought the news that 2 new machines were due to be 
launched and that another was in development. The first was a Spanish 
machine - the Dragon 200 - which was basically a revamped Dragon 64 with a 
Spanish keyboard, and the second was called the 200-E and would also 
contain a piggyback board with built-in 80 column card. In development was 
the 128K Dragon, though Eurohard had not decided whether it should use a 
6809 to remain compatible with older models, or a 68000 to make the machine 
more advanced and in line with new machines from Atari and Commodore (the 
ST and Amiga respectively). 

With another announcement that month, it appeared that Compusense had 
developed the 128K and 6809 Dragon for Eurohard, or at least an upgrade for 
older Dragons. The Dragon Plus was released at a cost of £100 and with a 
simple installation procedure ( take 2 chips out of the main board, plug 
them into the add-on and plug two cables from it into the main board, then 
wire up a simple socket for the monitor), your 64K Dragon would now have 
128K RAM and an 80-column display (text only). Soon they would also have a 
hard disc interface available (to plug into a connector on the Plus board), 
but this was never marketed because Compusense thought users wouldn't pay 
the then high costs for a hard disc - although the unit was much cheaper 
than comparable systems for the Acorn BBC machines. 

From August nothing was heard in the UK from Eurohard and the June '86 
issue of Dragon User brought devastating news, but not about the prolific 
Spanish company. Instead they announced that Dragon User would be going 
Subscription Only from the next issue. This was a crazy situation and more 
notice should have been given. What would happen to those who only bought 
the magazine occassionally? The next time they tried to buy a copy they 
were told it didn't exist - Newsagents weren't told it had gone 
subscription, just that it was off the shelves. Surely Sunshine 
Publications had known for a few months that sales had dropped, and so 
could have given readers a 2 or 3 issue warning - but they didn't. 
Fortunately this reader of the magazine bought every issue and got his 
mother to write him a cheque and send it off straight away - even though 
£12 was a lot to an eleven year old then! 

An even bigger shock was to come the next month, when in the first sub-only 
issue of Dragon User (now a black-and white on not too good paper affair, 
rather than the previous glossy colour magazine), ran a story where 
Compusense broke the news that Eurohard had "closed their Madrid premises 
and withdrawn to their factory. I've had a 1986 price list, but importing 
prices just aren't economic. I can't get through to anyone there". It now 
seemed that the end was nigh - like all before them, Eurohard's bubble had 
burst. 

Nothing was to be heard again, until the December 1987 issue which carried 
a readers letter by Josep Jane of Barcelona, Spain which was written on 
September the 21st. It transpired that Eurohard had not been as succesful 
as at frist thought, or reported. Between November 1984 and October '85 
they had sold only 17,000 Dragons, but had given away another 20,000 to 
institutes and schools. Although the Spanish governament paid the deficit 
from October, they would not invest further when Eurohard needed serious 
amounts of money for expansion and entrance into the South American market, 
and so Eurohard arose a huge deficit. 

President Eduardo Merigo resigned, with Eurohard owing money to Soviex, 
Planeta and TV3 - the TV company of Catalonia which broadcast the program 
on learning Basic on the Dragon computer. During October 85 to March 87, 
all the distributers sold their stocks of Dragons at ridicuously low 
prices, and at the end,the last Barcelona dealer was giving away his stock 
to Dragon users. The letter then went on to mention that Eurohard closed 
their Madrid base in November 1985, followed by the Barcelona facility in 
March 1986, and finally the Caceres factory in May 1987. 

1988 was probavly the worst year in the Dragon's chequered history since 
the disaster times of 1984. Microdeal; the software house who released 
about 200 Dragon games among a few utilities and peripherals (Tandy 
Speech/Sound cart and Electronic Book, plus their own Joysticks), and also 
a few products for other popular 8-bits but wuth not much success; 
announced that from January 1st 1988 they would be pulling out of the 
Dragon market. Commenting on that the lack of good new material was the 
reason for this, Microdeal owner John Symes said, "This time in 1987 we had 
50 reasonable tapes to look at. This year we only had 10. There just isn't 
the material about any more." 

Micordeal's stock of Dragon products were taken by mail order Dragon dealer 
Computape, and contained such titles as Telewriter, Rainbow Writer, 
Composer, ShockTrooper, Speed Racer, Tanglewood and Airball (both of which 
were later converted to the Atari ST and Commodore Amiga), among many more 
of both UK Dragon and American Tandy origin. John thanked all Dragon owners 
for their support and hoped that when they retired their beasts that they 
moved to the two machines they now supported - the ST and Amiga. Note that 
Microdeal were taken over by HiSoft in 1993, who are a UK company 
specialising in programming tools and utilities for the ST and Amiga. Their 
range includes assemblers, C, Pascal and Basic compilers together with 
video digitisers and sound samplers (provided by Microdeal). 

May saw Sunshine Publications give up on producing Dragon User - it not 
being economically viable for a magazine producer to produce anymore. 
Fortunately for users around the world, Bob Harris of Harris Micro Software 
(a Dragon software house offering business programs for the previous three 
years), took over control. This was entirely off his own back, and he was 
offered no cash to take it off Sunshine's hands - though editor Helen 
Armstrong decided to stay and edit the magazine, which had always been on a 
part-time basis anyway. 

Just 7 issues later, Dragon User died a quick death with the January 1989 
issue being the last one to make it off the press. At the time of the take 
over in May, there were 2400 subscribers but this had fallen to a paltry 
1450 by November. Take up rate of new subscriptions had also fallen from 
65% to just 20%. Bob Harris was rightfully angry at this situation, after 
having typed in the name and addresses of the 2400 subscribers and paid for 
part of the final issue out of his own pockets, so that no debt would be 
incurred with the printers by the windup. Greater love had no Dragon User. 

With this the only contact was with the user groups, and the National 
Dragon User Group benefited most (Bob Harris urged all who hadn't to join 
them). Membership skyed to a high of about 3000, though this has dropped at 
an alarming rate with only 300 members now in 1994; though this has 
stabalised with as user drops out, another re-discovers their machine (or 
buys one for £1 at a junk sale) and joins the group. 

Support wise there are still a few people selling software and hardware, 
though no new items have appeared for a while. Except for the NDUG 
Up-2-Date disc magazine (which alternates monthly with NDUGs Dragon Update 
newsletter) which costs £2 bi-monthly and is always full of interesting 
items. Having started in September 1991 its now in its fourth year and 
still going strong. 

The last Dragon show has probably taken place now too - held at the end of 
September 1994 in Liverpool, it was expected that if there wasn't enough 
support then it would be the last. This is even with it being at a cheap 
venue - held at a school on the same day as their autumn fayre. Previous 
shows were held in Ossett-Yorkshire (April 1993 was the last), London (last 
December 1987), and a few at other locations such as Cardiff Airport. 



Summary 

I will always have a place in my heart for the Dragon. It was the first 
computer I owned, having been bought a 64 for Christmas '84 when I was only 
ten years old - I persauded my late mother that I needed one to help with 
school, but I really just wanted it to play games on! Through finding 
another user in my area I heard of the North East Dragon User Club, though 
as they met in a public house I couldn't go in. But this didn't stop me 
from gaining their help, and through the club I purchased a printer, disc 
drive, monitor, Touchmaster pad and became interested in the more serious 
side of computing. 

Stupidly I sold my Dragon to another club member in March 1989 and bought 
an Atari ST. This was stupid of me as I just went back to games and sold 
this machine in July 1990 to buy a Sega Megadrive. This went a year later 
and I bought a Dragon 64 with disk drive in August 1991 having seen the 
error of my ways - I didn't want to burn in the fires of hell with the 
wrath of Paul Grade, NDUG chairman, founder and dogsbody! Now being sixteen 
years old I had some more knowledge and began learning 6809 assembler, 
which I honestly thought was simple after about 4 weeks, though the 
simplicity of the Dragon helps here - the 68020 in the Commodore Amiga 1200 
I have bought is also "simple" to program, but the OS is a complex-ass if 
there ever was one! 

I have now written many programs for the Dragon, including a Ramdisk which 
is sold by the NDUG to try to raise funds - I believe 30 copies have been 
sold which I'd regard as a success - and also a Dragon to Amiga picture 
transfer suite, which transfers PMode 4 pictures via the 64s RS232 port. I 
got 2 sales of this - one to Alfred Knotig in Germany, so I'm an 
international software house now I guess! 

I've never wanted to make a penny from programming; the £7 from the sale to 
Germany all went on insured posting, and I think its obscene the amount 
companies charge for software, but I will pay reasonable amounts for 
quality products; and this is why I chose to do an Electronics Engineering 
degree instead of Computing, preferring to keep that as a hobby. 
Electronics has always been a hobby of mine too - I'm about to start the 
second year of my course at York University next week (October 12th 1994) - 
and my new hobby of Amateur Radio of which I've been licenced for a year, 
encompasses both electronics, computing and my other "sad anorak wearing 
train-spotter" interest of short-wave listening. But hey, each to their 
own. 

You've probably realised that I'm no literary wizard, and my prose style is 
lacking to say the least, but then I'm only an engineer! And one from the 
North East of England too, and up here we aren't renouned for our english. 
Strong accents and our own "language" set us aside from the rest of the 
country! Though no doubt where you are from in the world, you'll have heard 
of Newcastle Brown Ale, Durham Cathedral, York Minster (which isn't as good 
as Durham - my opinion being a Geordie) and hopefully the enigmatic Kevin 
Keegan and Newcastle United - the football/soccer team who Kevin as manager 
has set alight. From the brink of extinction to the best side in Britain 
and one of the best in Europe. 

But as a finale, have fun with your computer whatever it is. If it isn't 
fun and its just a hobby then what are you using it for? I don't like 
knitting so I don't do it. Just enjoy yourself in whatever takes you 
pleasure and take care of yourself - you only have one chance so lets have 
some fun and enjoy it while it lasts. 

David Linsley 

I can be contacted at the following: 

e-mail: djl102@unix.york.ac.uk 

ax25 mail: g7raw@gb7msf.#18.gbr.eu 

mail: 4 Sanders Gardens Birtley Chester-le-Street Co. Durham DH3 1NA 
England ›7mHome Page ›0m My Dragon Data pages 

Acknowledgements: If you think I've blatenly used the news pages and 
articles in Dragon User for the information my text, then you are right! 
But there was no other source of such information, and I wish to thank all 
those that wrote for Dragon User and managed it during its five and a half 
years of life. 

I would also like to say a big thanks to all who supported the Dragon and 
all those who still do. Especially Paul Grade and Stephen Wood. Paul is the 
NDUG chairman, founder, printer, and dogs-body who is definitely 
over-worked. Even with the newsletter being bi-monthly and membership being 
much smaller than it was, he has alot to do. What must it have been like in 
the days after Dragon User when the newsletter was monthly and the 
membership sky high?! And he DIDN'T VOLUNTEER for the job - he asked if 
anyone wanted to set up a group (Mid 1984), and everyone presumed that he 
would do all the work, which he mostly has even 10 years on! Have a few 
Smirnoff's on me Paul. 

Stephen is in his second spell of Editorship of the newsletter and amongst 
pleading for members to send in articles, he likes to think he's Batman. I 
suppose I'll have to do him some more articles soon - its a while since 
I've done one and I promised I would. 

Same with this article! When I first joined the coco mailing list on the 
Internet, I promised many that I would write a history of the Dragon. That 
was the middle of January 1994. Then when I was checking my e-mail at York 
from Durham University (isn't TelNet wonderful! My friend goes to Durham 
University, and anyway our permanent homes are just 6 mile from it, so its 
a good Internet access point for us!), I noticed that I had a message from 
someone who had wanted a copy of the article when i wrote it. This was 
Monday September the 26th and so I thought I better get on and do it! I had 
honestly forgotten all about it, but now on Monday October the 3rd it is 
now finished and ready for the distribution. 

Please send any comments by any of the above methods of contacting me - 
e-mail is best though. If I take a long time to respond (more than a week), 
this will be because they'll have changed the usernames on the computer 
system at York, or I've changed the BBS I use on the Packet Radio network 
or I'm at home during none term-time. Anyway if there's a delay then 
contact me by another method. Mail to home will be read every 4-5 weeks 
when I go home for a weekend or end of term. 

Thanks for reading and all the best for the future - who knows, someone may 
use the Dragon Data name and bring out a machine that beats all others and 
becomes the best seller. Well you've got to have a dream! 

Regards, David Linsley  ›0m